Wow!  Now we'll only lose 6-1!In the world of Cub, not giving up Barry Bonds’ 714th home run is cause for mass celebration. Most teams are more worried about winning games than trivial stuff like that, but not the Cubs. No sir. This was as good as it’s likely to get the rest of the way. Juan Pierre reaching up over a seven foot fence to haul in a ball that was 7’1 high. It was terrific. 2,000 miles away, I yawned and checked to see if the Spurs had made a basket in the last ten minutes (they hadn’t.)

The Cubs, despite Juan’s heroic effort, lost 6-1 to the Giants, their eighth in a row. In their last 10 games, the Cubs have scored 12 runs. You wanted a record? You got one.

The Cubs are now 14-18. As Robert Wuhl and Trey Wilson might say, “How’d we ever win 14?” “It’s a miracle!”

That means, according to my math that there are 130 games left in the season. That seems like a lot. It seems like right now, whoever makes such decisions at the Tribune has a pretty big one to make.

You can:

a) Shove your head even further up your hiney and pretend that things can’t get worse, so you don’t make any moves and you pray that the team wins again before Father’s Day. (Mother’s Day, being Sunday and all, seems out of the question at this point.)

b) Fire your manager and his entire coaching staff and let the players know that the firings will continue until morale, and baserunning, improves.

See, here’s the interesting thing about the Cubs. How talented are they? Do you know? I don’t. I know they’re not exactly the ’84 Tigers, but with little more than a paid babysitting service in the dugout keeping an eye on them, I have no clue as to whether they’re underachieving, or if they’re actually overachieving and are actually the worst team of all time.

What I do know is that they have gotten worse, and worse, and worse since Dusty Baker took over in 2003. If you do a little math, you also see that they’ve gotten progressively worse under Jim Hendry’s watch, too.

I don’t blame Dusty alone. Jim’s just as culpable, maybe even more. It’s so nice that he got a big, fat extension, isn’t it? Not everybody can take a team from the brink of a World Series in his first year back to full-laughingstock status barely three seasons later. Now that is a talent that is just dying for a reward.

However, just because Hendry’s fallen down the stairs on the job does not absolve Dusty Baker and his coaching band of idiots.

In the past four years, firing a manager early on has spurred a couple of teams on to the playoffs. The Cubs should be keenly aware of this because the 2003 Marlins stole the pennant from them and the 2004 Astros stole a playoff spot from them. Had either general manager stood around with his thumb up his Hendry, Cubs history might be dramatically altered.

But you know what? Not every team just sits around when things go bad and accepts it.

Gasp!

I know, it’s strange, isn’t it? You mean, you can actually try to do something about it?

When the 2003 Marlins fired Jeff Torborg, they also fired pitching coach Brad Arnsberg. The Fish were 17-22 and nine games behind Atlanta.

They would finish the season 91-71, ten games behind Atlanta. But they also won the wild card and the pennant, and the World Series.

When the 2004 Astros fired Jimy Williams they were 44-44 and had just hosted the All-Star Game (the only reason Jimy made it as far as he did that year), and they also fired pitching coach Burt Hooten and hitting coach Harry Spilman. They were in fifth place, 11.5 games out of first. They would finish the season 92-70, 13 games behind the Cardinals, but they, too, won the wild card. A year later, in their first full season under new manager Phil Garner they won the wild card again, then the pennant.

Do you see any trend here?

First, it’s not enough to just fire the manager. You have to take some of his coaches, too. In the Cubs’ case, they should take all of them.

When the Bears fired Dick Jauron after the 2003 season, a lot of people lamented that he was a good coach, but he was too loyal to his assistants. He didn’t have it in him to replace them with better coaches. That’s part of the job, though, isn’t it? The GM hires you and gets you players, you manage those players and pick coaches to help them. If your coaches don’t do the job, you find new coaches.

Yet, the Cubs staff is largely in tact as it was when Dusty got the job in late 2002. The only changes have been Chris Speier in for the worst third base coach ever, Wendell Kim, and a superfluous change of Gary Matthews from hitting coach to first base coach and Gene Clines from first base coach to hitting coach. That’s it.

We’ve been watching lousy, fundamentally awful baseball for four seasons now and the same clowns are in charge of the circus. That has to change.

This brings us back to the original question. How good are the Cubs?

Considering their right fielder is awful, their center fielder is in obvious decline, they have a black hole at second base (though they currently have five–count ’em–five second basemen on the roster), their best second baseman is playing first and their multi-million dollar third baseman just started hitting four days ago…their offense is beyond terrible. They have four consistent offensive players. Two second-year players, Todd Walker and Michael Barrett. None of those four is going to scare the pants off anybody, except Jim Edmonds, who will drop trou for anybody.

Their pitching staff is a mess, they have three rookies, a 40-year old and a crazy Venezuelan. Their bullpen is better than it had been, but that’s like saying Chernobyl hasn’t smelled this good since the meltdown.

But here’s what we do know. Under the current regime, this team can not and will not win. Sure, they won’t lose every game, but they’ll lose the vast majority of them.

So what is there to lose by firing the coaches? Just send them all away. Find six new guys and turn them loose. Surely, somewhere, there’s a bright man who hasn’t been given a chance to run a baseball team yet, but he’s got a lot of ideas and he’s not going to blame it all on guys trying too hard or not having a lefthanded batting practice pitcher (somebody in the comments the other day reminded us the Cubs do have one…Glendon Rusch).

It’s time for a change.

Some will complain that it’s all the Cubs know how to do. They go through managers like Murphy Brown went through secretaries and Mark Grace went through bar skanks. Well, you know what? They’ve also lost a lot. An epic amount. An amount so incalculable that if it takes firing a manager every fifteen minutes, they should try it.

Once a new coaching staff is in place, it’s time to take a serious look at what value the players have. The Cubs should have only one untradeable player, and he’s only untradeable because they gave him a no-trade clause right before he broke his wrist.

Honestly, is there anybody else good enough or mentally stable enough that you shouldn’t see what you can get for them?

I’m not even necessarily talking about a fire sale, either. Why not a good old challenge trade or two? Trade somebody good for somebody good and see who ends up being better? That hardly ever happens anymore in baseball. Now every trade is about how much salary goes one way and that determines whether you get good prospects or mediocre ones.

What never gets old, though, is the Cubs continuing inability to deal with adversity.  It’s not just a five year trend or something that pops up from time to time.  It happens every year.  It has happened every year since 1909.  When given a chance to go in the toilet, they dive in head first.  As Michael Wilbon said on Pardon the Interruption on Monday, “Nobody collapses like the Cubs.”

They’re doing it right now.  This is a team that in both 1999 and 2000 managed to go through fifty game stretches when they lost 40.  Think about that.  Think about playing .200 baseball for a third of your season.  Who does that?  Who does it twice in two years?

This is a team built on fallacy.  They fall in love with hard-throwing strikeout pitchers, presumably because their park is too easy to hit home runs in and this is the only defense.  They fall in love with immobile, strikeout prone home run hitters, presumably because their park is so easy to hit home runs in.  They never stop to consider that the best pitchers they’ve had in the past 50 years were control pitchers who only go to 3,000 strikeouts because they each pitched for 20 years.  They never stop to consider that Wrigley Field isn’t a home run paradise.  It plays neutral, which is a good thing.  It means you have options as to how to build your team.  Yet, they never explore those options.

So here we are again.  At the end of another failed regime.  Or, at least, what should be the end of another failed regime.  Dusty Baker is sure to pay for this with his job (though probably not for a while), but Jim Hendry will still be around and so will Andy MacPhail.

It is beyond comprehension that a multi-billion dollar parent company can look at the salaries they pay to MacPhail and to Hendry and feel that they are getting their money’s worth.  At a time when they are cutting costs all across the many arms of the Tribune Company, how do these two frauds continue to get theirs on the first and the fifteenth?

We had high hopes for Dandy Andy when he came over from the Twins, but those evaporated quickly.  Likewise with Hendry who seemed ready to seize the opportunity when finally promoted to GM.  But over time he’s been worn down just like everybody else.  He throws good money after bad, finds excuses not to make trades and, in the most troubling Cubs’ consistency of them all, gets handsomely rewarded for it all.

We’ve seen it all before, and yet, we keep watching.  Or we used to.

I probably saw or listened to (conservative estimate) 90 percent of the Cubs’ innings played between 2001 and this season.  That’s a lot of horrible baseball.  Since April 22 (the one win in St. Louis), I’ll bet I’ve watched maybe (unconservative estimate) thirty of the roughly 135 innings.

That doesn’t mean I don’t want them to win.  Doesn’t mean I don’t want it to turn around.

But there was a time when I scheduled my life around these games.  Not because I had to, or felt compelled to, just because I wanted to.  I wanted to see them.

Now?

Not so much.

I’m not alone, either.

I’m not a lost cause yet.  If the Cubs would show some signs of actually wanting to win, of actually wanting to find a new way, I’m ready to watch, listen and pay to attend.

But until then?

I’m done wasting my time.  I’m done caring more about them than they do.