Hey Andy, you just made the list, pal!There’s an interesting dynamic going on over at the new Chicago Now blogs.  It’s almost as if the guys who are running the place, and blogging there, have never actually written or even seen a blog before.

Every media group who decides to do “one of those blog things on the Interwebs” but doesn’t mean they “get” the concept.

The ones who don’t understand the concept fall into one of two categories.  Either they ignore the comments of the readers or don’t bother to publish them (Phil Rogers) or they go the other way.  Dave Kaplan is so far “the other way” he’s disappeared over the horizon.

When his blog first appeared it was a laughable.  It was Larry King esque, he just fired off a bunch of hackneyed notions about Chicago sports.  Kermit and I actually raced to see who could rip it apart first.  He won.  So he got to write the column, while I was stuck just replying to the one Kap had.  (Damn you, Kermit!)

It all seemed like it was going to be good natured fun.  He’d write dumb things, I’d write about how dumb they were, rinse, repeat.

I know that Gordon Wittenmyer is still mad at me, but even he had the good sense not to fire off a pissy “don’t pick on me” e-mail to me.  He just tells people he’d like to punch me.  Now that’s the mature way to handle it.

(By the way, I did get an e-mail from a Chicago media member who billed a Wittenmyer appearance on SportsCentral as “douche on douche crime.”)

The first step in this process was for Jimmy Greenfield (you’ve seen his work draped over homeless people on chilly Chicago evenings) the “Chicago Now content manager” to try to get me to knock it off, mainly by calling me “Desip.”

Am I supposed to start calling him Greenf?  Greenfi?  I have no idea.

Jimmy’s going to have his hands full later this summer when the prodigal columnist moves over to the Tribune side and he gets to wrangle those commenters.  He’s going to pray for one as polite as me when that happens.

Yesterday, I e-mailed Jimmy to see if he had any comment on the open secret that Mariotti’s coming to the Tribune, and I got this for a response.

Fr: jgreenfield@tribune.com
To: andy@desipio.com
Re: Mariotti’s Chicago Now blog

I really like the Tribune-approved logo on your blog, Desip. It’s nice
to know the Trib’s endorsement means so much to you.

Cheers,
Jimmy

I do enjoy the fact that Paul Sullivan likes Desipio.  So, I guess the answer is, “Thanks?”

But I’m pretty sure it means Mariotti’s start date is July 1.

Here’s where things get interesting.  Yesterday, Kaplan wrote a piece about how panicked Cubs fans would be if Mark DeRosa was traded from the Indians to the Cardinals.  The DeRosa debate has been waged, it’s been bludgeoned to death and run over by Cubs blogs the world around.

Mark DeRosa is a nice player who had his two best (or at least two of his three best–he had that one big one in Texas) seasons as a Cub.  The reasons he was traded have been kicked to death.  The Cubs wanted to free up money to add a lefty bat, they worried that Kosuke was going to suck again and decided to add a lefty hitting right fielder and have Fontenot play second on the cheap.  We get it.

DeRosa hasn’t exactly set the world on fire in Cleveland.  He’s hitting .260 he made an AL leading six errors at third and in the newly shuffled Indians infield he’s back to playing second. Kap said the thought would send shivers up the spines of Cubs fans, and he said that Hendry can’t add payroll but later on that he was still trying to trade to help out the team.

Anyway, I wrote this:

I know that sent shivers up my spine.

You just linked to a blog, not exactly the Cleveland Indians Web site.

Or you could have linked to this: http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/06/indians-not-in-selling-mode.html

But even if the Indians do eventually trade DeRosa to the Cardinals, you’re talking about a guy hitting .262 who leads the AL with seven errors and his OPS had dropped nearly 100 points since last year.

But my favorite part is when you write “don’t expect that deal to happen because the Cubs have zero room to add salary until their ownership situation is resolved.”

This after at least two posts last week where you breathlessly “reported” that sources had told you that Hendry was looking all over to add a bat.

Oh, then not to be outdone, ONE PARAGRAPH later you write, “Here’s hoping that Jim Hendry is given the greenlight to make a few moves to upgrade the club over the next 4-6 weeks which should coincide with Ramirez’s return and give the Cubs a real shot in the arm as they head into the second half of the season.”

So which is it?

And, I get an e-mail from Kaplan.

Fr: dlkaplan@tribune.com
To: andy@desipio.com
RE: [Kap’s Corner] New Comment added to “Uh Oh…Could Mark DeRosa Be Headed to the Cardinals?

You know what, if you want to be a jerk go do it somewhere else. They did add a player in Freel who is now also hurt. Hendry is indeed calling around looking for a bat but he would move salary back in the same deal so the payroll would basically stay the same. That is a concept which you obviously don’t understand.

In addition, what don’t you understand about hoping to get the green light to make some moves once the ownership situation is cleared up? You obviously don’t like me and that’s fine. Just don’t write to me and we’ll go our separate ways. You are nothing but a jerk to me and that’s your right. Just stay away from me.

Kap

I love the fact that apparently I’m picking on him, and not only that, he thinks that when someone posts on a blog that they must have to get in the little wire from the computer to the wall and run to that person’s computer to post it, so that I’d have to “stay away” from him.

But then he e-mails me to ask for my phone number so he can call me.

I figure I’ll let him calm down a little.  He seems a little high strung.

He e-mails again and says he wants to have a “civil conversation.”

I’m not really that excited about the idea of giving him my cell phone number, and it’s not that I’m afraid of talking to him, what’s he going to do crawl through the handset?  It just seems, what was Kermit’s word?  Oh, “Creepy.”  Yes, indeed.

Then today, it gets stranger.  You didn’t think that was possible, did you?

He writes a column about what’s wrong with the Cubs, and spends a great deal of time bemoaning the fact that the team traded Jason Marquis.  Seriously.  Because Jason’s 7-3.  Ugh.  Why is it that the people with the simplest grasp of things are the hardest to explain things to?  You’d think they’d be the easiest.

And I should have known it was going to get weird, when he mentioned me by name in the column, and he linked to my profile on Chicago Now.  Why?  Because it’s driving him crazy that under: Least favorite thing about Chicago: I put Dave Kaplan.  Which, was a joke.  Had I known that the Mariotti Express was heading into town this summer, it would have said Jay Mariotti.  Because seriously, Kaplan’s in like a 14 way tie right now with Sox fans, Mike Murphy, toll plazas, etc.

So I posted this in response to his column (and if you look at the comments you’ll see that Kermit was happy to chime in, too.

Hey Kap old pal. Thanks for the mention.

So the solution to all of the Cubs problems this year would have been to have kept Jason Marquis? That’s genius. Why Jim Hendry doesn’t have you on his payroll is astounding.

Have you ever noticed (and why would you, it’s not like it’s your job) that Marquis’ first half numbers are always much better than his second half ones?

In his career he is 20 games over .500 (56-36) in the first half of seasons, with an ERA of 4.22; in the second half of seasons in his career he’s 30-37 with an ERA of 4.93. What half of the season is this?

Harden’s 4-2. Marquis is 7-3. Trying to make a case that the Cubs would have won three more games with Marquis than with Harden is something even someone as deluded as you shouldn’t attempt.

But why exactly are you spending this much time on Marquis when you were supposedly examining what’s wrong with the Cubs? Their starting pitching is not what’s wrong with them. Unless your argument is that if they’d kept Marquis that they’d have Marshall and Wells in their bullpen right now. But you can’t make that argument because you claim you wanted Marquis in the rotation and Harden pitching somewhere else.

Your Zambrano argument is just getting tired. In that epic post of yours you were trying to make the case that he can’t handle pressure. What that had to do with anything else you were trying to write is debatable, and it still has nothing to do with any of this. Besides, there’s nothing to make that argument stand up.

I’ll sit back and wait for you to send me another e-mail where you call me a jerk. I can’t get enough of those.

Did I get that e-mail?  Are you kidding?

But first, he proved how cool he was by commenting that he wanted to call me, but I wouldn’t give him my number.  I’m now in league with about 14,000 Chicago-area women.

His comment:

By the way, I have offered to talk with Andy Dolan of Desipio.com and asked him for a phone number to reach him at but in typical cowardly fashion he refused. Why Andy? Can’t have a civil conversation? It seems like you only want to hide behind your keyboard.

So I asked what was wrong with him?  I meant it.  I’m now officially worried, not about me, about him.  The reason I thought the “jerk” e-mail was so funny was because it just showed somebody who’s insulated from criticism lashing out in a moment of anger, and the fact that he hadn’t said anything all that bad (no expletives, no epithets, nothing that was going to get him in trouble with his bosses) made it that much better.  But now?  Now, I’m just concerned.

Maybe this was his tactic?  Just act a little nutty, and they’ll leave you alone.  I always figured it was how Martha Stewart got through prison.  The first day she threatened to make paper mache out of her cellmate’s skin and the rest of the inmates left her alone.

Fr: dlkaplan@tribune.com
To: andy@desipio.com

I keep looking but I can’t seem to find where I said that Jason Marquis was the solution to all of their problems. I simply am pointing out the numbers as they sit on June 3rd. Because they don’t support your argument that Carlos Zambrano is the best pitcher in the history of the sport you decide to twist my words. Yes, I know Marquis is always better in the first half but if you READ what I wrote I said here are his numbers as of today. Again, they don’t support your guy Carlos and his underachieving performances. He does lead the league in missed flights and suspensions by a starting pitcher though. That’s worth 90 million dollars.

Clearly, my argument was that Carlos is the best pitcher in the history of the sport, but I’m the one doing the word twisting.

A few moments later, right after I replied to his blog comment where he called me a sissy for not giving him my number he sends this:

Fr: dlkaplan@tribune.com
To: andy@desipio.com

Thin skinned? What makes you think I am thin skinned. You seem like a die hard Cubs fan as am I. Why can’t we have a conversation about the team? You can blast me all you want. I could care less. I just thought we could talk baseball. I guess I was wrong.

Now I’m getting confused.  Because Kerm is posting replies and Kap has started e-mailing him directly and Kermit is IM’ing me with Kap’s e-mailed comments and I don’t even know where to look, plus I’m trying to write this thing. All it was going to be was the e-mail where he called me a “jerk.”

So, I e-mailed back:

I don’t really believe that you don’t care, Dave.

I’m going to step away slowly and hope that your head doesn’t explode while I’m in the vicinity.

Try breathing through your mouth in short bursts.  Might calm you down a little.

Oh, and it’s “Couldn’t care less.”  If you “could care less” than you really don’t care that much.  Right now, all you are doing is caring.

The worst thing about this?   In my witty retort, I wrote “than” instead of “then.”  I just took a big dump on my joke.  Not that he noticed.

OK, now he’s told Kermit to butt out and then, I swear to baby Jebus, he sends me this:

Fr: dlkaplan@tribune.com
To: andy@desipio.com

Interesting article on Mariotti. Do you really think he is headed to the Tribune? BTW, I am enjoying our give and take via e-mail.

Thank you!  Good night!  You’ve been a great audience.

I’m so confused.  Is it an act?  Is he really just stirring things up?  If so, it’s genius.  But I just don’t think that’s it.

All I know is that if Chicago Now is this nutty when nobody’s actually reading it, what’s it going to be like when people actually are?

Oh, wait, that’s probably not going to happen, is it?

Well, time to go see if I can get this kind of reaction out of Bruce Miles…