Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 07:43:24 AM

Title: DDD
Post by: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 07:43:24 AM
I actually think this will be kind of cool. (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=4796555) I'm sure you will all hate it b/c it's on ESPN.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Powdered Toast Man on January 05, 2010, 07:49:44 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 07:43:24 AM
I actually think this will be kind of cool. (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=4796555) I'm sure you will all hate it b/c it's on ESPN.

I hate it because it sounds like it's mostly grass foot-hockee.  Nice idea, though.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Waco Kid on January 05, 2010, 07:55:04 AM
ESPN 3D it will be as if Chris Berman is in the room with you!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Powdered Toast Man on January 05, 2010, 08:00:36 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on January 05, 2010, 07:55:04 AM
ESPN 3D it will be as if Chris Berman is in the room with you!

Does that mean I'll finally get to hit him with a shovel?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 05, 2010, 09:06:14 AM

Can cable providers support the throughput?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Oleg on January 05, 2010, 09:19:24 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

That only happens to me after 6 Patron shots.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 10:03:34 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

Not even life?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 10:03:34 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

Not even life?

Nope. My whole world is flat.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 05, 2010, 10:24:00 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 10:03:34 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

Not even life?

Nope. My whole world is flat.

Stop looking at the Olsen Twins.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Powdered Toast Man on January 05, 2010, 10:37:43 AM
Quote from: Fork on January 05, 2010, 10:24:00 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 10:03:34 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

Not even life?

Nope. My whole world is flat.

Stop looking at the Olsen Twins.

Make me.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Oleg on January 05, 2010, 10:52:33 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 10:03:34 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 05, 2010, 08:52:06 AM
Meh. One of my eyes is significantly weaker than the other so I've never actually seen anything in 3D. I close one eye and see red, close the other and see blue. Meh.

Not even life?

Nope. My whole world is flat.

That explains the weird Britt Hume love.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: powen01 on January 05, 2010, 02:26:27 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

I was actually worried about clicking the link, but then remembered that getting unemployment would mean I could take that climbing trip out West that I have always wanted.  I was sorely disappointed and will cry myself to sleep knowing I still have medical insurance. 
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Pre on January 05, 2010, 03:12:54 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Exactly, the letters are about specific measurements, not total volume or something.

There's no best option, depends on the lady.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:19:09 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

When I said they'd look nice in DDs, it was one of those things where I actually meant the opposite of what I said. I forget what it's called.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:22:01 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:19:09 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

When I said they'd look nice in DDs, it was one of those things where I actually meant the opposite of what I said. I forget what it's called.

I'm facepalming myself.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 03:46:00 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:22:01 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:19:09 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

When I said they'd look nice in DDs, it was one of those things where I actually meant the opposite of what I said. I forget what it's called.

I'm facepalming myself.

At work?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:47:11 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 03:46:00 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:22:01 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:19:09 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

When I said they'd look nice in DDs, it was one of those things where I actually meant the opposite of what I said. I forget what it's called.

I'm facepalming myself.

At work?

Yes.  Does getting paid for it make me a prostitute?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Powdered Toast Man on January 05, 2010, 04:03:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:47:11 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 05, 2010, 03:46:00 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:22:01 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:19:09 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

When I said they'd look nice in DDs, it was one of those things where I actually meant the opposite of what I said. I forget what it's called.

I'm facepalming myself.

At work?

Yes.  Does getting paid for it make me a prostitute?

Olsen the White is piercing my soul with that undead zombie stare.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenFoe on January 05, 2010, 04:04:11 PM
Christ, enough already with the Olsen Twins.

Here are your DDDs

(http://www.iseekgirls.com/blog/wp-content/brandy_ddd_01.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: ChuckD on January 05, 2010, 06:35:43 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 05, 2010, 04:04:11 PM
Christ, enough already with the Olsen Twins.

Here are your DDDs

(http://www.iseekgirls.com/blog/wp-content/brandy_ddd_01.jpg)

(http://imgur.com/7pLXG.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Tony on January 05, 2010, 09:26:41 PM
A google image search for DDD is not as exciting as I had hoped.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Pre on January 05, 2010, 09:52:03 PM
Quote from: Tony on January 05, 2010, 09:26:41 PM
A google image search for DDD is not as exciting as I had hoped.

In the US it's more likely to be labeled as FF than DDD, but I'd suggest against a google
image search for FF unless you're Weebs.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 05, 2010, 11:47:57 PM
Quote from: Pre on January 05, 2010, 09:52:03 PM
Quote from: Tony on January 05, 2010, 09:26:41 PM
A google image search for DDD is not as exciting as I had hoped.

In the US it's more likely to be labeled as FF than DDD, but I'd suggest against a google
image search for FF unless you're Weebs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brassiere_measurement#Cup_size

F (or E in the UK)...

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Category:E_cup
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Category:DDD_cup
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Category:F_cup

Need I say "NSFW"?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 06, 2010, 07:47:10 AM
There's a Boobepedia? I think I might have found heaven on earth. (I have yet to view it out of fear it's very nsfw. I hope I don't leave disappointed)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on January 06, 2010, 08:15:05 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 06, 2010, 07:47:10 AM
There's a Boobepedia? I think I might have found heaven on earth. (I have yet to view it out of fear it's very nsfw. I hope I don't leave disappointed)

It's as awesome as you think it is.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: flannj on January 06, 2010, 08:28:05 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on January 06, 2010, 08:15:05 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 06, 2010, 07:47:10 AM
There's a Boobepedia? I think I might have found heaven on earth. (I have yet to view it out of fear it's very nsfw. I hope I don't leave disappointed)

It's as awesome as you think it is.
I may have to leave work early today.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 06, 2010, 08:29:28 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 08:28:05 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on January 06, 2010, 08:15:05 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 06, 2010, 07:47:10 AM
There's a Boobepedia? I think I might have found heaven on earth. (I have yet to view it out of fear it's very nsfw. I hope I don't leave disappointed)

It's as awesome as you think it is.
I may have to leave work early today.

It's among the greatest of the -pedias.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 06, 2010, 09:04:54 AM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 06, 2010, 08:29:28 AM
It's among the greatest of the -pedias.

(http://lastrow.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/pedialyte.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:14:59 AM
More on 3D TV (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/business/media/06tele.html?hp)




And now let's continue the boob discussion.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 06, 2010, 09:16:17 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:14:59 AM
More on 3D TV (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/business/media/06tele.html?hp)




And now let's continue the boob discussion.

How awesome will boobs be on 3D TV?

(rhetorical question. The only answer is "very".)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:21:59 AM
Quote from: Fork on January 06, 2010, 09:16:17 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:14:59 AM
More on 3D TV (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/business/media/06tele.html?hp)




And now let's continue the boob discussion.

How awesome will boobs be on 3D TV?

(rhetorical question. The only answer is "very".)
I'm guessing reaching toward the screen resulting in jammed fingers could become a common household injury.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 06, 2010, 09:28:09 AM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0141186/
http://www.amazon.com/Blonde-Emmanuelle-3-D-Leslie-Bovee/dp/B00008K799

"Presented in exciting Deepvision 3-D"
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Weebs on January 06, 2010, 09:32:05 AM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 06, 2010, 09:28:09 AM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0141186/
http://www.amazon.com/Blonde-Emmanuelle-3-D-Leslie-Bovee/dp/B00008K799

"Presented in exciting Deepvision 3-D"

Now we know where TDubbs gets his pickup lines.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 06, 2010, 09:38:23 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:21:59 AM
Quote from: Fork on January 06, 2010, 09:16:17 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:14:59 AM
More on 3D TV (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/business/media/06tele.html?hp)




And now let's continue the boob discussion.

How awesome will boobs be on 3D TV?

(rhetorical question. The only answer is "very".)
I'm guessing reaching toward the screen resulting in jammed fingers could become a common household injury.

You can ruin your eyes from trying to motorboat your TV.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on January 06, 2010, 09:41:04 AM
Quote from: Fork on January 06, 2010, 09:16:17 AM
Quote from: flannj on January 06, 2010, 09:14:59 AM
More on 3D TV (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/business/media/06tele.html?hp)




And now let's continue the boob discussion.

How awesome will boobs be on 3D TV?

(rhetorical question. The only answer is "very".)

Damnit.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Richard Chuggar on January 06, 2010, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: Weebs on January 06, 2010, 09:32:05 AM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 06, 2010, 09:28:09 AM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0141186/
http://www.amazon.com/Blonde-Emmanuelle-3-D-Leslie-Bovee/dp/B00008K799

"Presented in exciting Deepvision 3-D"

Now we know where TDubbs gets his pickup lines.

Where?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 18, 2010, 05:08:41 PM
The internet claims that (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Christina_Hendricks) Christina Hendricks of "Mad Men" fame sports a healthy pair of 38 DDD golden globes...

(http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7753/christinahendricks2010g.jpg)

(http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/8558/0983christinahendricks.jpg)

(http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/4025/hendricks.jpg)

(http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/626/christinahendricks1p.jpg)

(http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2808/christinahendricksbusty.jpg)

(http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/8100/christinahendricksesqui.jpg)

This whole 3-D TV thing can't come quickly enough.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 18, 2010, 07:14:28 PM

Thank you for not posting Mariah Carey...she's looking more like Stifler's Mom every time I see her.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Armchair_QB on January 19, 2010, 11:26:56 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:10:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on January 05, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 05, 2010, 02:19:25 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 05, 2010, 02:14:55 PM
Still no complaining that the thread title didn't lead to photos of DDD's?  Is...is Desipio growing up?

No. DDDs are a bit too big. Give me a C-D any day.

Really?  Because DDs are pretty awesome.

The C-D preference wasn't exclusive. Plus, it depends on the woman. I'm sure the Olsen twins would look great with DDs

Really?  Because the Olsen twins are undead zombie skanks.

Really?

Really.  Are they NOT gross now, or something?  This doesn't frighten you?

(http://kateblogsworth.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/ashley_olsen2.jpg)

Cocaine's a hell of a drug.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 11:39:47 AM
THE LYBIANS PIRANHAS!!!!!

http://www.movieweb.com/movie/FIo4Vsru8e4kro/VIlkEtmmV8TKpn

(http://i47.tinypic.com/20ubjhe.jpg)

More:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464154/
http://io9.com/5444921/gory-piranha-3d-trailer-is-blood-splattered-in-all-the-right-places
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:16:46 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


There is such a difference.  Wow.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


This may be DPD, but goddamn, are those amazing or what?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Armchair_QB on January 22, 2010, 02:49:16 PM
Who is that?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 22, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


This may be DPD, but goddamn, are those amazing or what?

Wonder if she's got one in the oven - they actually look more massive than usual.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on January 22, 2010, 02:58:54 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 22, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


This may be DPD, but goddamn, are those amazing or what?

Wonder if she's got one in the oven - they actually look more massive than usual.

Dressmakers can do wonderful things to breasts.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Weebs on January 22, 2010, 03:16:19 PM
Quote from: Slack-E on January 22, 2010, 02:58:54 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 22, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


This may be DPD, but goddamn, are those amazing or what?

Wonder if she's got one in the oven - they actually look more massive than usual.

Dressmakers can do wonderful things to breasts.

Too bad all of those wonderful things require covering them up.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 03:19:17 PM
Quote from: Slack-E on January 22, 2010, 02:58:54 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 22, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on January 22, 2010, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 12:22:26 PM
Fuck this goddamn gutless fucking LIBERAL MEDIA... (http://gothamist.com/2010/01/19/post_131.php)

QuoteNYT Distorts Image Of Christina Hendricks, Calls Her "Big"

(http://i47.tinypic.com/5fp821.jpg)
Left: the NY Times image; Right: the original image


This may be DPD, but goddamn, are those amazing or what?

Wonder if she's got one in the oven - they actually look more massive than usual.

Dressmakers can do wonderful things to breasts.

That.

Also: Ahem. (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7150.msg202635#msg202635)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenFoe on January 22, 2010, 03:20:54 PM
I'm not supporting her or admiring in the least...but these are DDDs. (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/2816590/After-ten-procedures-in-one-day-Heidi-Montag-still-wants-bigger-boobs.html)

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 04:03:09 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 22, 2010, 03:20:54 PM
I'm not supporting her or admiring in the least...but these are DDDs. (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/2816590/After-ten-procedures-in-one-day-Heidi-Montag-still-wants-bigger-boobs.html)

If I recall correctly (and, come on, you know I do), IAN once called Heidi Montag "hot," only to quickly claw back to something more akin to "I'd do her*... you know, if I was drunk" after getting called out on it.

I'm picking up on a pattern here.

*No doubt "in the butt"
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: MAD on January 23, 2010, 12:30:35 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 04:03:09 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 22, 2010, 03:20:54 PM
I'm not supporting her or admiring in the least...but these are DDDs. (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/2816590/After-ten-procedures-in-one-day-Heidi-Montag-still-wants-bigger-boobs.html)

If I recall correctly (and, come on, you know I do), IAN once called Heidi Montag "hot," only to quickly claw back to something more akin to "I'd do her*... you know, if I was drunk" after getting called out on it.

I'm picking up on a pattern here.

*No doubt "in the butt"

She's a fucking retard.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 23, 2010, 06:01:37 PM
QuoteAlso this month, best-selling American biographer Ian Halperin released a revelation- packed insight into the Jolie- Pitt relationship.

He said when the couple first met they had 20-HOUR sex sessions.

In his book Brangelina: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/697182/Golden-couple-Brad-Pitt-amp-Angelina-Jolie-see-top-divorce-lawyer.html), Ian writes: "Brad had never had such incredible sex.

"My sources say that they sometimes spent 18 to 20 hours a day in bed.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 23, 2010, 06:20:12 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 23, 2010, 06:01:37 PM
QuoteAlso this month, best-selling American biographer Ian Halperin released a revelation- packed insight into the Jolie- Pitt relationship.

He said when the couple first met they had 20-HOUR sex sessions.

In his book Brangelina: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/697182/Golden-couple-Brad-Pitt-amp-Angelina-Jolie-see-top-divorce-lawyer.html), Ian writes: "Brad had never had such incredible sex.

"My sources say that they sometimes spent 18 to 20 hours a day in bed.

36C?

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Angelina_Jolie

Lightweight.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 23, 2010, 07:04:22 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 23, 2010, 06:20:12 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on January 23, 2010, 06:01:37 PM
QuoteAlso this month, best-selling American biographer Ian Halperin released a revelation- packed insight into the Jolie- Pitt relationship.

He said when the couple first met they had 20-HOUR sex sessions.

In his book Brangelina: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/697182/Golden-couple-Brad-Pitt-amp-Angelina-Jolie-see-top-divorce-lawyer.html), Ian writes: "Brad had never had such incredible sex.

"My sources say that they sometimes spent 18 to 20 hours a day in bed.

36C?

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Angelina_Jolie

Lightweight.

Yeah, sorry.  Too lazy to dig for the Mr and Mrs Jones thread.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.


Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 24, 2010, 05:26:34 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.




I may not be experienced in the art of having intercourse with women, but something tells me you're doing them wrong.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on January 24, 2010, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?

There are other insulting gags lurking here but I can't think of them.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on January 25, 2010, 10:59:12 AM
Quote from: MAD on January 23, 2010, 12:30:35 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on January 22, 2010, 04:03:09 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 22, 2010, 03:20:54 PM
I'm not supporting her or admiring in the least...but these are DDDs. (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/2816590/After-ten-procedures-in-one-day-Heidi-Montag-still-wants-bigger-boobs.html)

If I recall correctly (and, come on, you know I do), IAN once called Heidi Montag "hot," only to quickly claw back to something more akin to "I'd do her*... you know, if I was drunk" after getting called out on it.

I'm picking up on a pattern here.

*No doubt "in the butt"

She's a fucking retard.

IAN is a girl?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: JD on January 25, 2010, 11:24:21 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 24, 2010, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?

There are other insulting gags lurking here but I can't think of them.

How many of those 20 hours were with your hands?

(that's still to Andy)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on January 25, 2010, 06:29:25 PM
Quote from: JD on January 25, 2010, 11:24:21 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 24, 2010, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?

There are other insulting gags lurking here but I can't think of them.

How many of those 20 hours were with your hands?

(that's still to Andy)

No.  I think that it had something to do with barnyard animals.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: JD on January 25, 2010, 06:37:24 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 25, 2010, 06:29:25 PM
Quote from: JD on January 25, 2010, 11:24:21 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 24, 2010, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?

There are other insulting gags lurking here but I can't think of them.

How many of those 20 hours were with your hands?

(that's still to Andy)

No.  I think that it had something to do with barnyard animals.

I try to keep it legal.

(YES, it's still against the law in Arkansas.  What do you think we are?  West Virginians?)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CT III on January 25, 2010, 07:07:49 PM
Quote from: JD on January 25, 2010, 06:37:24 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 25, 2010, 06:29:25 PM
Quote from: JD on January 25, 2010, 11:24:21 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 24, 2010, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: JD on January 24, 2010, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 24, 2010, 04:18:37 PM
Big deal, in the last 21 years I've had sex for 20 hours.

How many of those 20 hours were with women?

There are other insulting gags lurking here but I can't think of them.

How many of those 20 hours were with your hands?

(that's still to Andy)

No.  I think that it had something to do with barnyard animals.

I try to keep it legal.

(YES, it's still against the law in Arkansas.  What do you think we are?  West Virginians?)

Pretty much, yeah.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on February 01, 2010, 11:56:58 AM
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/01/28/australian-censor-bo.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 01, 2010, 12:58:48 PM
More of the lovely Christina Hendricks here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/30/christina-hendricks-dazzl_n_443358.html
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on February 01, 2010, 01:13:41 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 01, 2010, 12:58:48 PM
More of the lovely Christina Hendricks here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/30/christina-hendricks-dazzl_n_443358.html

That page led to links of "best/worst cleavage at the Grammys", which included Kathy Griffin and The Situation.

You fucker.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on February 01, 2010, 01:15:07 PM
Quote from: morpheus on February 01, 2010, 11:56:58 AM
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/01/28/australian-censor-bo.html ?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Nice link, nerd'd

Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 01, 2010, 12:58:48 PM
More of the lovely Christina Hendricks here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/30/christina-hendricks-dazzl_n_443358.html

Holy shit... She's married to the shroom-popping windowlicker from Super Troopers (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0034309/)?

(http://i48.tinypic.com/iqcy1f.jpg)

What the fuck?

Adding: I wonder how her snozzberries taste.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 16, 2010, 08:59:48 PM
More, because she's amazing.

(http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/141632/CHRISTINA-HENDRICKS.jpg)

(http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/141633/CHRISTINA-HENDRICKS.jpg)

(http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/141630/CHRISTINA-HENDRICKS.jpg)

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: flannj on February 16, 2010, 10:00:23 PM
Is it wrong that I am mesmerized by the camel toe rather than by the eyes red hair tits?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on February 16, 2010, 10:07:32 PM
Quote from: flannj on February 16, 2010, 10:00:23 PM
Is it wrong that I am mesmerized by the camel toe rather than by the eyes red hair tits?

It is pretty intense.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on February 22, 2010, 09:59:37 AM
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/19/app_squashed/
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on February 25, 2010, 12:09:03 PM
Bump.  LIFESAVING D-cups.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/health/Doctor-Claims-Size-D-Implants-Saved-Womans-Life-85344552.html
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on February 25, 2010, 12:18:54 PM
Quote from: morpheus on February 25, 2010, 12:09:03 PM
Bump.  LIFESAVING D-cups.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/health/Doctor-Claims-Size-D-Implants-Saved-Womans-Life-85344552.html

Well this completely ruined the 5 page report I was preparing to give to my financee.

Quote"I don't want to say a boob job is the equivalent of a bulletproof vest," Scott Reitz told the Times. "So don't go getting breast enhancements as a means to deflect a possible incoming bullet."
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:20:46 PM
Bumps.

(http://i47.tinypic.com/2lua0eo.jpg)

Good thing she wore that makeup, right?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 02:48:36 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Is she dating McLovin?

She's married to the snozberries guy from Super Troopers.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 08, 2010, 08:53:40 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because she knows that this camera angle is going to capture her hogans perfectly.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think

Because he can play "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" on banjo with his tongue.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on March 09, 2010, 08:22:57 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think

Because he can play "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" on banjo with his tongue.


Because she has enormous, beautiful breasts.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: ChuckD on March 09, 2010, 08:37:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 09, 2010, 08:22:57 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)



Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think

Because he can play "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" on banjo with his tongue.

Because she has enormous, beautiful breasts.

Because she saw someone slip on a banana peel and fall down.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: thehawk on March 09, 2010, 08:48:44 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on March 09, 2010, 08:37:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 09, 2010, 08:22:57 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)




Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think

Because he can play "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" on banjo with his tongue.

Because she has enormous, beautiful breasts.

Because she saw someone slip on a banana peel and fall down.

Because I just wanted to post this picture one more time
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Jon on March 09, 2010, 09:11:17 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 09, 2010, 08:48:44 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on March 09, 2010, 08:37:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 09, 2010, 08:22:57 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
Sauce shelf and the luckiest nerd alive.

(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)




Is she dating McLovin?

I can understand his expression, but why is she smiling?

Because he has a much bigger cock than all of you think

Because he can play "Foggy Mountain Breakdown" on banjo with his tongue.

Because she has enormous, beautiful breasts.

Because she saw someone slip on a banana peel and fall down.

Because I just wanted to post this picture one more time


Because something something something.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on March 09, 2010, 10:12:22 AM
Quote from: Jon on March 09, 2010, 09:11:17 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 09, 2010, 08:48:44 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on March 09, 2010, 08:37:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 09, 2010, 08:22:57 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 09, 2010, 07:14:58 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 08, 2010, 08:55:04 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 08, 2010, 06:31:27 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on March 08, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on March 08, 2010, 12:24:50 PM
(http://i48.tinypic.com/20k53yx.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Ivy6 on March 12, 2010, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

I'm with him on the middle part.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: flannj on March 12, 2010, 10:22:22 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

That must be some neighborhood he's walking through.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on March 12, 2010, 10:42:09 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on March 12, 2010, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

I'm with him on the middle part.

I'm not going to argue. Everyone has different tastes and some people don't like redheads. That's fine.

His favorite actress, however, is Drew Barrymore.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CT III on March 12, 2010, 10:48:57 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 10:42:09 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on March 12, 2010, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

I'm with him on the middle part.

I'm not going to argue. Everyone has different tastes and some people don't like redheads. That's fine.

His favorite actress, however, is Drew Barrymore.

Why didn't you just tell he was gay at the beginning of the story?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on March 12, 2010, 10:51:11 AM
Quote from: CT III on March 12, 2010, 10:48:57 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 10:42:09 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on March 12, 2010, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

I'm with him on the middle part.

I'm not going to argue. Everyone has different tastes and some people don't like redheads. That's fine.

His favorite actress, however, is Drew Barrymore.

Why didn't you just tell he was gay at the beginning of the story?

That was the twist ending, CT. Haven't you watched that one M. Night Schylamanannan movie?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on March 12, 2010, 02:20:54 PM
Quote from: Bort on March 12, 2010, 10:51:11 AM
Quote from: CT III on March 12, 2010, 10:48:57 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 10:42:09 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on March 12, 2010, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 12, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
I've got a friend who doesn't think she's attractive at all. Just a pale redhead with big boobs. Said he could find tons of girls hotter than her just walking down the street.

I don't even...

I'm with him on the middle part.

I'm not going to argue. Everyone has different tastes and some people don't like redheads. That's fine.

His favorite actress, however, is Drew Barrymore.

Why didn't you just tell he was gay at the beginning of the story?

That was the twist ending, CT. Haven't you watched that one M. Night Schylamanannan movie?

I just blew your minds.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: BH on March 12, 2010, 02:26:35 PM
She's very hot.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Armchair_QB on March 12, 2010, 02:32:18 PM
motorboat
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on March 15, 2010, 12:39:31 PM

I had a nightmare that she was my mother and I was bottle fed.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 15, 2010, 12:47:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on March 15, 2010, 12:39:31 PM

I had a nightmare that she was my mother and I was bottle fed.

Yeah, but that still means you'd have to pass through her ... nevermind.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CT III on March 15, 2010, 12:48:50 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on March 15, 2010, 12:47:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on March 15, 2010, 12:39:31 PM

I had a nightmare that she was my mother and I was bottle fed.

Yeah, but that still means you'd have to pass through her ... nevermind.

C-section.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on March 15, 2010, 12:50:48 PM
Quote from: CT III on March 15, 2010, 12:48:50 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on March 15, 2010, 12:47:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on March 15, 2010, 12:39:31 PM

I had a nightmare that she was my mother and I was bottle fed.

Yeah, but that still means you'd have to pass through her ... nevermind.

C-section.

Talk about a disappointing childhood
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on March 24, 2010, 07:55:13 AM
Hockee in DDD (http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=522409)!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: SKO on March 24, 2010, 08:06:10 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 24, 2010, 07:55:13 AM
Hockee in DDD (http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=522409)!

Oh my god. You updated the tits thread with a post about Hockee games in 3D? You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on March 24, 2010, 08:31:04 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 24, 2010, 08:06:10 AM
Quote from: Fork on March 24, 2010, 07:55:13 AM
Hockee in DDD (http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=522409)!

Oh my god. You updated the tits thread with a post about Hockee games in 3D? You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?

(http://i39.tinypic.com/9jown9.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on April 19, 2010, 02:44:56 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on February 01, 2010, 01:15:07 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 01, 2010, 12:58:48 PM
More of the lovely Christina Hendricks here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/30/christina-hendricks-dazzl_n_443358.html

Holy shit... She's married to the shroom-popping windowlicker from Super Troopers (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0034309/)?

(http://i48.tinypic.com/iqcy1f.jpg)

What the fuck?

Adding: I wonder how her snozzberries taste.

Finally an explanation (link via SKO)...

http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2010/04/look-whos-back

QuoteWhen I first started dating my husband, I had this weird fascination with the circus and clowns and old carnival things and sideshow freaks and all that.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on May 05, 2010, 12:14:28 AM
Bump.  BEDBOUND BY BIG BOOBIES (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2957272/Bedbound-by-my-big-boobs.html)

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Andy on May 05, 2010, 02:49:28 PM
Wow, Padma's really let herself go.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on May 05, 2010, 08:25:26 PM
Quote from: Andy on May 05, 2010, 02:49:28 PM
Wow, Padma's really let herself go.

She's preggers. Leave her alone.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenPho on June 01, 2010, 05:12:05 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

I could see how that would be really hard for her, to stand there while there were additional cameras talking photos of her doing the exact same pose.

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on June 01, 2010, 05:45:28 PM
Quote from: PenPho on June 01, 2010, 05:12:05 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

I could see how that would be really hard for her, to stand there while there were additional cameras talking photos of her doing the exact same pose.



It's also quite hard for me.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on June 01, 2010, 06:20:17 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

It was an underwhelming photo. I preferred the other centerfold. It's that old Red/Blue 3D crap. That said, she's hot and I would bang her if I had to wear them. It was a valiant effort by playboy. I would show how it looks if I could find a way for the camera to do it right.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on June 01, 2010, 07:57:03 PM
Quote from: Yeti on June 01, 2010, 06:20:17 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

It was an underwhelming photo. I preferred the other centerfold. It's that old Red/Blue 3D crap. That said, she's hot and I would bang her if I had to wear them. It was a valiant effort by playboy. I would show how it looks if I could find a way for the camera to do it right.

I think she's super hot with a ridiculous body. Her choice in men is poor to quite poor. Maybe she likes getting punched in the face.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 05, 2010, 02:01:28 PM
"The Ghost Inside" by Broken Bells (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVxTsXRjNTw)






























...starring Christina Hendricks.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 05, 2010, 02:07:01 PM
DPD.  The producers of the previous video couldn't resist a little CH-related imagery, perhaps?

(http://i46.tinypic.com/10rjtvq.png)

She even joins in.

(http://i46.tinypic.com/5ff7zn.png)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on June 14, 2010, 12:48:17 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 01, 2010, 07:57:03 PM
Quote from: Yeti on June 01, 2010, 06:20:17 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

It was an underwhelming photo. I preferred the other centerfold. It's that old Red/Blue 3D crap. That said, she's hot and I would bang her if I had to wear them. It was a valiant effort by playboy. I would show how it looks if I could find a way for the camera to do it right.

I think she's super hot with a ridiculous body. Her choice in men is poor to quite poor. Maybe she likes getting punched in the face.

NSFW....

http://i.imgur.com/hB3ut.jpg
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on June 14, 2010, 06:08:09 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on June 14, 2010, 12:48:17 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 01, 2010, 07:57:03 PM
Quote from: Yeti on June 01, 2010, 06:20:17 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on June 01, 2010, 05:09:30 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119942120100511

QuotePlayboy magazine, a pioneer in featuring photographs of naked women on its pages, said on Tuesday its June issue's 3-D centerfold will be an eye-popping collectible.

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/2010/05/playboys-june-centerfold-calls-3d-issue-really-cool.html

QuoteOn The Red Carpet asked Dworaczyk how different her 3D shoot was than her first appearance in the magazine.

"There were different cameras in different spots in the room. And they all went off simultaneously. It's just kinda freaky cause there's different cameras at different angles you're not used to. So that's kind of hard," she said.

It was an underwhelming photo. I preferred the other centerfold. It's that old Red/Blue 3D crap. That said, she's hot and I would bang her if I had to wear them. It was a valiant effort by playboy. I would show how it looks if I could find a way for the camera to do it right.

I think she's super hot with a ridiculous body. Her choice in men is poor to quite poor. Maybe she likes getting punched in the face.

NSFW....

http://i.imgur.com/hB3ut.jpg

Definitely looks better through the glasses on the computer over the magazine.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenPho on July 13, 2010, 06:28:28 PM
Since I'm pretty sure this became the thread for hot chicks, Marisa Miller was back in baseball attire (http://www.hotcelebshome.com/2010/07/12/marisa-miller-mlb-all-star-game-celebrity-softball-game/), though in the generic National League unis, rather than just the Cubs.

Still, hot damn.

(http://images.hotcelebshome.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Marisa_Miller_MLB_All_Star_Celebrity_Softball_Game.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on July 13, 2010, 06:34:54 PM
Quote from: PenPho on July 13, 2010, 06:28:28 PM
Since I'm pretty sure this became the thread for hot chicks, Marisa Miller was back in baseball attire (http://www.hotcelebshome.com/2010/07/12/marisa-miller-mlb-all-star-game-celebrity-softball-game/), though in the generic National League unis, rather than just the Cubs.

Still, hot damn.

(http://images.hotcelebshome.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Marisa_Miller_MLB_All_Star_Celebrity_Softball_Game.jpg)

I didn't get to watch obviously, but last year they had Ashanti with her big sweet ass in baseball pants. Was she back this year?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: air2300 on July 13, 2010, 10:10:26 PM
Quote from: Slaky on July 13, 2010, 06:34:54 PM
Quote from: PenPho on July 13, 2010, 06:28:28 PM
Since I'm pretty sure this became the thread for hot chicks, Marisa Miller was back in baseball attire (http://www.hotcelebshome.com/2010/07/12/marisa-miller-mlb-all-star-game-celebrity-softball-game/), though in the generic National League unis, rather than just the Cubs.

Still, hot damn.

(http://images.hotcelebshome.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Marisa_Miller_MLB_All_Star_Celebrity_Softball_Game.jpg)

I didn't get to watch obviously, but last year they had Ashanti with her big sweet ass in baseball pants. Was she back this year?
No.  Just Marisa Miller and Maria Manunos. 
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on July 16, 2010, 04:30:37 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Jesus H. Christ that is a 10.17(ddd)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 17, 2010, 09:18:45 AM
Quote from: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.

You mean there are actual people who think things like this?

It's not just advanced experiments in Artificial Wrongtelligence like Internet Chuck?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on July 17, 2010, 10:59:22 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 17, 2010, 09:18:45 AM
Quote from: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.

You mean there are actual people who think things like this?

It's not just advanced experiments in Artificial Wrongtelligence like Internet Chuck?

Two of the three sentences are hyperbole - but the first part, yes. People I know actually think that. And they are probably super gay.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on July 17, 2010, 05:40:15 PM
Quote from: Slaky on July 17, 2010, 10:59:22 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 17, 2010, 09:18:45 AM
Quote from: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.

You mean there are actual people who think things like this?

It's not just advanced experiments in Artificial Wrongtelligence like Internet Chuck?

Two of the three sentences are hyperbole - but the first part, yes. People I know actually think that. And they are probably super gay.
Yeah. I've met a few of those wrongtards over the last year or so. Sad, really.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on July 17, 2010, 10:02:08 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 17, 2010, 05:40:15 PM
Quote from: Slaky on July 17, 2010, 10:59:22 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 17, 2010, 09:18:45 AM
Quote from: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.

You mean there are actual people who think things like this?

It's not just advanced experiments in Artificial Wrongtelligence like Internet Chuck?

Two of the three sentences are hyperbole - but the first part, yes. People I know actually think that. And they are probably super gay.
Yeah. I've met a few of those wrongtards over the last year or so. Sad, really.

I think even straight men in younger generations are growing up queer as hell.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: SKO on July 23, 2010, 03:23:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 17, 2010, 10:02:08 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 17, 2010, 05:40:15 PM
Quote from: Slaky on July 17, 2010, 10:59:22 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 17, 2010, 09:18:45 AM
Quote from: Slaky on July 16, 2010, 06:07:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Intrepid Reader: Other Men I Actually Know That Consider Themselves Straight

I don't get what's so great about her. You know, I just don't get any joy out of a woman with a womanly figure. Ass and tits just aren't for me, sorry.

You mean there are actual people who think things like this?

It's not just advanced experiments in Artificial Wrongtelligence like Internet Chuck?

Two of the three sentences are hyperbole - but the first part, yes. People I know actually think that. And they are probably super gay.
Yeah. I've met a few of those wrongtards over the last year or so. Sad, really.

I think even straight men in younger generations are growing up queer as hell.

This is true. I know a few guys my age who find her fat. I set them all on fire. I would do things to that woman that would sicken and disturb Gil's efficient German sex slaves.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on July 23, 2010, 03:27:23 PM
That type of men's wrongness is surpassed in magnitude only slightly by the amount of tranny porn in their interweb cache.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on July 23, 2010, 07:44:40 PM
Don't say I never gave you nothing.



http://www.m2film.dk/fleggaard/trailer2.swf

Oh, Right   NSFW
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenPho on July 23, 2010, 10:59:38 PM
Quote from: CBStew on July 23, 2010, 07:44:40 PM
Don't say I never gave you nothing.



http://www.m2film.dk/fleggaard/trailer2.swf

Oh, Right   NSFW

Well, every commercial shoot I've ever been a part of now looks a little worse.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 24, 2010, 10:13:32 AM
Quote from: PenPho on July 23, 2010, 10:59:38 PM
Quote from: CBStew on July 23, 2010, 07:44:40 PM
Don't say I never gave you nothing.



http://www.m2film.dk/fleggaard/trailer2.swf

Oh, Right   NSFW

Well, every commercial shoot I've ever been a part now looks a little worse.

This one may be more Desipio's speed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwtoQjNRHg4
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on July 29, 2010, 06:33:49 PM
Our girl is at it again...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/christina-hendricks-appea_n_663851.html
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on August 02, 2010, 09:42:16 PM
All you Mad Men lovers, there's something special in Playboy for you this month...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Ivy6 on August 02, 2010, 09:49:00 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 02, 2010, 09:42:16 PM
All you Mad Men lovers, there's something special in Playboy for you this month...

SPOILER: she's not a teenager.

Also, not the fat redhead.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 02, 2010, 10:09:35 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 02, 2010, 09:42:16 PM
All you Mad Men lovers, there's something special in Playboy for you this month...

An exclusive interview with series creator Matthew Weiner?  Can't wait!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on August 03, 2010, 12:52:27 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on August 02, 2010, 09:49:00 PM
Also, not the fat redhead.

Chuck? (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7150.msg220143#msg220143)

Quote from: Chuck on July 16, 2010, 04:23:00 PMI think Christina Hendricks has amazing hogans but a jinourmous ass that detracts from her possible hotness
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on August 09, 2010, 08:21:01 AM
This seems like the right place to mention this (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1642252/).

Be sure to read the user reviews.
QuoteI wouldn't really consider myself a big fan of the big tits genre, having only seen about 50 titles to date (mostly theatrical films). I have enjoyed a majority of the ones I've seen (especially the Studio Ghibli line), but most of them haven't blown me away. I'm one of those blasphemous fiends who finds great enjoyment in big tits that *real* fans of anime don't like very much. You know, stuff like "Big Tits" (2007), "Big Tits Hostess Club" (2004), and "Big Tits: Superstar" (2005) – movies that everyone likes to rip apart even though they're far more entertaining than most of the artsy fartsy stuff that finds its way onto everyones top lists. I've also disliked and even hated a number of highly acclaimed titles. You know, stuff like "Big Tits Head Watress" (1987), "Big Tits Nurses Station" (1995), "Tits of Plenty" (1998), and "Princess Ninja Tits" (1997) – titles that get endless reverence for reasons that I simply do not understand. For myself personally, the big tits genre is like a mine field because I really have no idea whether or not I'm gonna hit a pretentous, irritating mess...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on August 09, 2010, 11:50:11 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 09, 2010, 08:21:01 AM
This seems like the right place to mention this (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1642252/).

Be sure to read the user reviews.
QuoteI wouldn't really consider myself a big fan of the big tits genre, having only seen about 50 titles to date (mostly theatrical films). I have enjoyed a majority of the ones I've seen (especially the Studio Ghibli line), but most of them haven't blown me away. I'm one of those blasphemous fiends who finds great enjoyment in big tits that *real* fans of anime don't like very much. You know, stuff like "Big Tits" (2007), "Big Tits Hostess Club" (2004), and "Big Tits: Superstar" (2005) – movies that everyone likes to rip apart even though they're far more entertaining than most of the artsy fartsy stuff that finds its way onto everyones top lists. I've also disliked and even hated a number of highly acclaimed titles. You know, stuff like "Big Tits Head Watress" (1987), "Big Tits Nurses Station" (1995), "Tits of Plenty" (1998), and "Princess Ninja Tits" (1997) – titles that get endless reverence for reasons that I simply do not understand. For myself personally, the big tits genre is like a mine field because I really have no idea whether or not I'm gonna hit a pretentous, irritating mess...

"Fuu, a waitress who works in a tithouse, rescues two master titsmen, Mugen and Jin, from their execution to help her find the "samurai who smells of titties." Along the way they meet a lot of people and get involved in various tit contests. This is one of the few titty shows that I've seen that exhibits superior tits in every single aspect of film-making. The tits themselves are stunning, with incredibly beautiful tits on constant display, and the Japanese tit modelling is top notch. The two biggest positives, however, are the tit development and the titfights."

Can I see the job description for a "Titsman"?  What are the educational requirements?

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 25, 2010, 03:06:58 PM
Do people actually wear this (https://www.cstringdirect.com/)?  (probably NSFW)

(https://www.cstringdirect.com/data/images/swatches/solid-black.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: BH on August 25, 2010, 03:58:03 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over. If only they had this for jennifer capriati's debut when she was 14.

Yeti'd.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 04:04:07 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 03:06:58 PM
Do people actually wear this (https://www.cstringdirect.com/)?  (probably NSFW)

(https://www.cstringdirect.com/data/images/swatches/solid-black.jpg)

One size fits all?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 25, 2010, 04:35:17 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 04:04:07 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 03:06:58 PM
Do people actually wear this (https://www.cstringdirect.com/)?  (probably NSFW)

(https://www.cstringdirect.com/data/images/swatches/solid-black.jpg)

One size fits all?

QuoteSMALL
95-115 lbs

MEDIUM
115-140 lbs

Apparently those 140+ are stuck with conventional underwear.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: powen01 on August 25, 2010, 05:53:06 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 04:35:17 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 04:04:07 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 03:06:58 PM
Do people actually wear this (https://www.cstringdirect.com/)?  (probably NSFW)

(https://www.cstringdirect.com/data/images/swatches/solid-black.jpg)

One size fits all?

QuoteSMALL
95-115 lbs

MEDIUM
115-140 lbs

Apparently those 140+ are stuck with conventional underwear.

The company just needs to hire a structural engineer to make it HAI.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: JD on August 25, 2010, 08:36:16 PM
This is the one thread that I always click on to read the latest posts.  Let's just stick with the pictures, fellas.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: powen01 on August 25, 2010, 08:51:13 PM
Quote from: JD on August 25, 2010, 08:36:16 PM
This is the one thread that I always click on to read the latest posts.  Let's just stick with the pictures, fellas.

My bad dude.  Sweet dreams:


(http://www.strangesports.com/images/content/2452.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:01:13 PM
Quote from: powen01 on August 25, 2010, 08:51:13 PM
Quote from: JD on August 25, 2010, 08:36:16 PM
This is the one thread that I always click on to read the latest posts.  Let's just stick with the pictures, fellas.

My bad dude.  Sweet dreams:


(http://www.strangesports.com/images/content/2452.jpg)


DDDs in the ass region? Sweet!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:05:38 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over.
Not enough tits flopping. Simona Halep please
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on August 25, 2010, 10:18:33 PM
Quote from: powen01 on August 25, 2010, 08:51:13 PM
Quote from: JD on August 25, 2010, 08:36:16 PM
This is the one thread that I always click on to read the latest posts.  Let's just stick with the pictures, fellas.

My bad dude.  Sweet dreams:

(http://www.strangesports.com/images/content/2452.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: PenFoe

Hot. (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7219.msg205649#msg205649)

Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:05:38 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over.
Not enough tits flopping. Simona Halep please

You know she's been reduced, right?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 10:26:01 PM
THESE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nTIquNMMw8)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:26:54 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 25, 2010, 10:18:33 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:05:38 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over.
Not enough tits flopping. Simona Halep please

You know she's been reduced, right?

Sadly, Yes, but I'm sure they're still easy C.
EDIT:
(http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/7081/slide_7081_93621_large.jpg?1282793273994)

Hmmm...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on August 25, 2010, 10:27:24 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 25, 2010, 10:18:33 PM
Quote from: powen01 on August 25, 2010, 08:51:13 PM
Quote from: JD on August 25, 2010, 08:36:16 PM
This is the one thread that I always click on to read the latest posts.  Let's just stick with the pictures, fellas.

My bad dude.  Sweet dreams:

(http://www.strangesports.com/images/content/2452.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: PenFoe

Hot. (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7219.msg205649#msg205649)

Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 10:05:38 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2010, 03:54:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 03:44:16 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?ref=magazine

I saw about 5 seconds of that and I know that I'm going to need to dim the lights, make a nice comfy spot on my bed, and watch that.. over and over.
Not enough tits flopping. Simona Halep please

You know she's been reduced, right?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/26/simona-halep-breast-reduc_n_589993.html#s93614

Um... I don't think so.

EDIT: I guess they are C's but they look SO DAMN SMALL...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 30, 2010, 08:42:52 AM
(http://images.dailyfill.com/a014f7a8c96e4aeb_89deba9557e78a1a/o/christina-hendricks-emmy-awards-2010.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 09:55:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 30, 2010, 08:42:52 AM
(http://images.dailyfill.com/a014f7a8c96e4aeb_89deba9557e78a1a/o/christina-hendricks-emmy-awards-2010.jpg)

She was in rare form on the show last night. I was almost breathless for a sec and had to resist a primal urge to rewind over and over.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on August 30, 2010, 11:25:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 09:55:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 30, 2010, 08:42:52 AM
(http://images.dailyfill.com/a014f7a8c96e4aeb_89deba9557e78a1a/o/christina-hendricks-emmy-awards-2010.jpg)

She was in rare form on the show last night. I was almost breathless for a sec and had to resist a primal urge to rewind over and over.

It was the mink, wasn't it?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 11:34:35 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 30, 2010, 11:25:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 09:55:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 30, 2010, 08:42:52 AM
(http://images.dailyfill.com/a014f7a8c96e4aeb_89deba9557e78a1a/o/christina-hendricks-emmy-awards-2010.jpg)

She was in rare form on the show last night. I was almost breathless for a sec and had to resist a primal urge to rewind over and over.

It was the mink, wasn't it?

It was the kissing. I see scenes like that on the tube all the time in which no boobilige appears and hear chicks say, "THAT WAS HOTT!!" And I'm like, meh, whatevs, let's see 'em etc... But that was some shit.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Oleg on September 23, 2010, 11:39:46 AM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/11/2010/09/6340bac4e61908e8cdb8a41d51a3d2e8/original.jpg)

Thanks to FJM day at deadspin...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on September 23, 2010, 11:42:02 AM
Quote from: Oleg on September 23, 2010, 11:39:46 AM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/11/2010/09/6340bac4e61908e8cdb8a41d51a3d2e8/original.jpg)

Thanks to FJM day at deadspin...

There's nothing to be gained from covering those up. Fucking stupid Chucks at FJMSpin.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: JD on September 23, 2010, 09:10:58 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 23, 2010, 11:42:02 AM
Quote from: Oleg on September 23, 2010, 11:39:46 AM
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/11/2010/09/6340bac4e61908e8cdb8a41d51a3d2e8/original.jpg)

Thanks to FJM day at deadspin...

There's nothing to be gained from covering those up. Fucking stupid Chucks at FJMSpin.

I agree.  That's the gheyest thing ever. 
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Oleg on September 24, 2010, 09:00:27 AM
Fine...this? (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/24/rhythmic-gymnastics-2010-_n_737816.html)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on September 24, 2010, 09:18:18 AM
Quote from: Oleg on September 24, 2010, 09:00:27 AM
Fine...this? (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/24/rhythmic-gymnastics-2010-_n_737816.html)

Those chicks can do stuff with balls.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on November 22, 2010, 08:27:34 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yINVA.jpg)

"Implications..."
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Tonker on November 24, 2010, 02:08:32 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 22, 2010, 08:27:34 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yINVA.jpg)

"Implications..."

I like the chick on the right.  She's cute, and she has small hands...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on November 24, 2010, 08:22:10 AM
Quote from: Tonker on November 24, 2010, 02:08:32 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 22, 2010, 08:27:34 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yINVA.jpg)

"Implications..."

I like the chick on the right.  She's cute, and she has small hands...

She's spoken for, dude...

(http://i.imgur.com/2JYBD.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Kermit IV on November 24, 2010, 07:32:34 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 22, 2010, 08:27:34 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yINVA.jpg)

"Implications..."

D.E.N.N.I.S.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on November 24, 2010, 09:08:52 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on November 24, 2010, 07:32:34 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 22, 2010, 08:27:34 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yINVA.jpg)

"Implications..."

D.E.N.N.I.S.

That's exactly what I was too lazy to post. Mac gets seconds. Frank, thirds.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on January 13, 2011, 03:44:53 PM
Damnit.  SFW.  http://www.styleite.com/media/christina-hendricks-playboy/
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

QuoteThe biggest problem with 3D, though, is the "convergence/focus" issue. A couple of the other issues -- darkness and "smallness" -- are at least theoretically solvable. But the deeper problem is that the audience must focus their eyes at the plane of the screen -- say it is 80 feet away. This is constant no matter what.

But their eyes must converge at perhaps 10 feet away, then 60 feet, then 120 feet, and so on, depending on what the illusion is. So 3D films require us to focus at one distance and converge at another. And 600 million years of evolution has never presented this problem before. All living things with eyes have always focussed and converged at the same point.

If we look at the salt shaker on the table, close to us, we focus at six feet and our eyeballs converge (tilt in) at six feet. Imagine the base of a triangle between your eyes and the apex of the triangle resting on the thing you are looking at. But then look out the window and you focus at sixty feet and converge also at sixty feet. That imaginary triangle has now "opened up" so that your lines of sight are almost -- almost -- parallel to each other.

We can do this. 3D films would not work if we couldn't. But it is like tapping your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time, difficult. So the "CPU" of our perceptual brain has to work extra hard, which is why after 20 minutes or so many people get headaches. They are doing something that 600 million years of evolution never prepared them for. This is a deep problem, which no amount of technical tweaking can fix. Nothing will fix it short of producing true "holographic" images.

Consequently, the editing of 3D films cannot be as rapid as for 2D films, because of this shifting of convergence: it takes a number of milliseconds for the brain/eye to "get" what the space of each shot is and adjust.

And lastly, the question of immersion. 3D films remind the audience that they are in a certain "perspective" relationship to the image. It is almost a Brechtian trick. Whereas if the film story has really gripped an audience they are "in" the picture in a kind of dreamlike "spaceless" space. So a good story will give you more dimensionality than you can ever cope with.

So: dark, small, stroby, headache inducing, alienating. And expensive. The question is: how long will it take people to realize and get fed up?

Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on January 25, 2011, 11:26:06 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!

STOP STEALING MY BIT!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

QuoteThe biggest problem with 3D, though, is the "convergence/focus" issue. A couple of the other issues -- darkness and "smallness" -- are at least theoretically solvable. But the deeper problem is that the audience must focus their eyes at the plane of the screen -- say it is 80 feet away. This is constant no matter what.

But their eyes must converge at perhaps 10 feet away, then 60 feet, then 120 feet, and so on, depending on what the illusion is. So 3D films require us to focus at one distance and converge at another. And 600 million years of evolution has never presented this problem before. All living things with eyes have always focussed and converged at the same point.

If we look at the salt shaker on the table, close to us, we focus at six feet and our eyeballs converge (tilt in) at six feet. Imagine the base of a triangle between your eyes and the apex of the triangle resting on the thing you are looking at. But then look out the window and you focus at sixty feet and converge also at sixty feet. That imaginary triangle has now "opened up" so that your lines of sight are almost -- almost -- parallel to each other.

We can do this. 3D films would not work if we couldn't. But it is like tapping your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time, difficult. So the "CPU" of our perceptual brain has to work extra hard, which is why after 20 minutes or so many people get headaches. They are doing something that 600 million years of evolution never prepared them for. This is a deep problem, which no amount of technical tweaking can fix. Nothing will fix it short of producing true "holographic" images.

Consequently, the editing of 3D films cannot be as rapid as for 2D films, because of this shifting of convergence: it takes a number of milliseconds for the brain/eye to "get" what the space of each shot is and adjust.

And lastly, the question of immersion. 3D films remind the audience that they are in a certain "perspective" relationship to the image. It is almost a Brechtian trick. Whereas if the film story has really gripped an audience they are "in" the picture in a kind of dreamlike "spaceless" space. So a good story will give you more dimensionality than you can ever cope with.

So: dark, small, stroby, headache inducing, alienating. And expensive. The question is: how long will it take people to realize and get fed up?

Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!

Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on January 25, 2011, 01:33:56 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

QuoteThe biggest problem with 3D, though, is the "convergence/focus" issue. A couple of the other issues -- darkness and "smallness" -- are at least theoretically solvable. But the deeper problem is that the audience must focus their eyes at the plane of the screen -- say it is 80 feet away. This is constant no matter what.

But their eyes must converge at perhaps 10 feet away, then 60 feet, then 120 feet, and so on, depending on what the illusion is. So 3D films require us to focus at one distance and converge at another. And 600 million years of evolution has never presented this problem before. All living things with eyes have always focussed and converged at the same point.

If we look at the salt shaker on the table, close to us, we focus at six feet and our eyeballs converge (tilt in) at six feet. Imagine the base of a triangle between your eyes and the apex of the triangle resting on the thing you are looking at. But then look out the window and you focus at sixty feet and converge also at sixty feet. That imaginary triangle has now "opened up" so that your lines of sight are almost -- almost -- parallel to each other.

We can do this. 3D films would not work if we couldn't. But it is like tapping your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time, difficult. So the "CPU" of our perceptual brain has to work extra hard, which is why after 20 minutes or so many people get headaches. They are doing something that 600 million years of evolution never prepared them for. This is a deep problem, which no amount of technical tweaking can fix. Nothing will fix it short of producing true "holographic" images.

Consequently, the editing of 3D films cannot be as rapid as for 2D films, because of this shifting of convergence: it takes a number of milliseconds for the brain/eye to "get" what the space of each shot is and adjust.

And lastly, the question of immersion. 3D films remind the audience that they are in a certain "perspective" relationship to the image. It is almost a Brechtian trick. Whereas if the film story has really gripped an audience they are "in" the picture in a kind of dreamlike "spaceless" space. So a good story will give you more dimensionality than you can ever cope with.

So: dark, small, stroby, headache inducing, alienating. And expensive. The question is: how long will it take people to realize and get fed up?

Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!

Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?

I don't care for 3D, but big tits I do like.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 01:41:38 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?

THE MAN HAS NO TONGUE! LAY OFF HIM!
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on January 25, 2011, 01:44:19 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 01:41:38 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?

THE MAN HAS NO TONGUE! LAY OFF HIM!

Cutler, Ebert...

WHO IS NEXT IN ELI'S REIGN OF TERROR?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: BBM on January 25, 2011, 05:07:25 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 25, 2011, 01:33:56 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

QuoteThe biggest problem with 3D, though, is the "convergence/focus" issue. A couple of the other issues -- darkness and "smallness" -- are at least theoretically solvable. But the deeper problem is that the audience must focus their eyes at the plane of the screen -- say it is 80 feet away. This is constant no matter what.

But their eyes must converge at perhaps 10 feet away, then 60 feet, then 120 feet, and so on, depending on what the illusion is. So 3D films require us to focus at one distance and converge at another. And 600 million years of evolution has never presented this problem before. All living things with eyes have always focussed and converged at the same point.

If we look at the salt shaker on the table, close to us, we focus at six feet and our eyeballs converge (tilt in) at six feet. Imagine the base of a triangle between your eyes and the apex of the triangle resting on the thing you are looking at. But then look out the window and you focus at sixty feet and converge also at sixty feet. That imaginary triangle has now "opened up" so that your lines of sight are almost -- almost -- parallel to each other.

We can do this. 3D films would not work if we couldn't. But it is like tapping your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time, difficult. So the "CPU" of our perceptual brain has to work extra hard, which is why after 20 minutes or so many people get headaches. They are doing something that 600 million years of evolution never prepared them for. This is a deep problem, which no amount of technical tweaking can fix. Nothing will fix it short of producing true "holographic" images.

Consequently, the editing of 3D films cannot be as rapid as for 2D films, because of this shifting of convergence: it takes a number of milliseconds for the brain/eye to "get" what the space of each shot is and adjust.

And lastly, the question of immersion. 3D films remind the audience that they are in a certain "perspective" relationship to the image. It is almost a Brechtian trick. Whereas if the film story has really gripped an audience they are "in" the picture in a kind of dreamlike "spaceless" space. So a good story will give you more dimensionality than you can ever cope with.

So: dark, small, stroby, headache inducing, alienating. And expensive. The question is: how long will it take people to realize and get fed up?

Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!

Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?

I don't care for 3D, but big tits I do like.

I don't think the Rog had a problem with that.  Because wasn't he good friends with Russ Meyer?   
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: BBM on January 25, 2011, 05:07:25 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 25, 2011, 01:33:56 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 25, 2011, 01:31:53 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 25, 2011, 11:22:17 AM
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html

QuoteThe biggest problem with 3D, though, is the "convergence/focus" issue. A couple of the other issues -- darkness and "smallness" -- are at least theoretically solvable. But the deeper problem is that the audience must focus their eyes at the plane of the screen -- say it is 80 feet away. This is constant no matter what.

But their eyes must converge at perhaps 10 feet away, then 60 feet, then 120 feet, and so on, depending on what the illusion is. So 3D films require us to focus at one distance and converge at another. And 600 million years of evolution has never presented this problem before. All living things with eyes have always focussed and converged at the same point.

If we look at the salt shaker on the table, close to us, we focus at six feet and our eyeballs converge (tilt in) at six feet. Imagine the base of a triangle between your eyes and the apex of the triangle resting on the thing you are looking at. But then look out the window and you focus at sixty feet and converge also at sixty feet. That imaginary triangle has now "opened up" so that your lines of sight are almost -- almost -- parallel to each other.

We can do this. 3D films would not work if we couldn't. But it is like tapping your head and rubbing your stomach at the same time, difficult. So the "CPU" of our perceptual brain has to work extra hard, which is why after 20 minutes or so many people get headaches. They are doing something that 600 million years of evolution never prepared them for. This is a deep problem, which no amount of technical tweaking can fix. Nothing will fix it short of producing true "holographic" images.

Consequently, the editing of 3D films cannot be as rapid as for 2D films, because of this shifting of convergence: it takes a number of milliseconds for the brain/eye to "get" what the space of each shot is and adjust.

And lastly, the question of immersion. 3D films remind the audience that they are in a certain "perspective" relationship to the image. It is almost a Brechtian trick. Whereas if the film story has really gripped an audience they are "in" the picture in a kind of dreamlike "spaceless" space. So a good story will give you more dimensionality than you can ever cope with.

So: dark, small, stroby, headache inducing, alienating. And expensive. The question is: how long will it take people to realize and get fed up?

Brechtian alienation... Now I get Avatar!

Ebert hates 3D?  Why hasn't he ever mentioned this before?

I don't care for 3D, but big tits I do like.

I don't think the Rog had a problem with that.  Because wasn't he good friends with Russ Meyer?   

Indeed he was. Ebert famously wrote the screenplay for "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls."
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: CBStew on January 26, 2011, 09:27:58 AM
Question.  Who visits this thread to read about Roger Ebert?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on January 26, 2011, 09:40:01 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 26, 2011, 09:27:58 AM
Question.  Who visits this thread to read about Roger Ebert?

Thank you. I was pissed it was getting bumped with out DDD tits
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 26, 2011, 09:45:07 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 26, 2011, 09:40:01 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 26, 2011, 09:27:58 AM
Question.  Who visits this thread to read about Roger Ebert?

Thank you. I was pissed it was getting bumped with out DDD tits

(http://i.imgur.com/LhqoP.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
http://Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

EDIT: Really, I've done this before.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Richard Chuggar on February 23, 2011, 09:01:41 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
[imghttp://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/]http://Happy Lady Pr0n Day.[/img]  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

Sweet dude.  Thanks.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on February 23, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Tonker on February 23, 2011, 01:18:00 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on February 23, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

I actually have a ladyporn channel here in my cable package.  I forget what it's called, but it's full of soft-focus hugging and a conspicuous lack of teabgagging or facials.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: thehawk on February 23, 2011, 01:27:41 PM
Quote from: Tonker on February 23, 2011, 01:18:00 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on February 23, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

I actually have a ladyporn channel here in my cable package.  I forget what it's called, but it's full of soft-focus hugging and a conspicuous lack of teabgagging or facials.

I thought it would be an attractive man nodding and pretending to be listenting to whoever is watching.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Richard Chuggar on February 23, 2011, 02:04:45 PM
Quote from: thehawk on February 23, 2011, 01:27:41 PM
Quote from: Tonker on February 23, 2011, 01:18:00 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on February 23, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

I actually have a ladyporn channel here in my cable package.  I forget what it's called, but it's full of soft-focus hugging and a conspicuous lack of teabgagging or facials.

I thought it would be an attractive man nodding and pretending to be listenting to whoever is watching.

Thanks 30 Rock
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: thehawk on February 23, 2011, 02:29:05 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on February 23, 2011, 02:04:45 PM
Quote from: thehawk on February 23, 2011, 01:27:41 PM
Quote from: Tonker on February 23, 2011, 01:18:00 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on February 23, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
Quote from: morpheus on February 23, 2011, 08:34:34 AM
Happy Lady Pr0n Day. (http://www.mydaily.com/2011/02/22/happy-lady-porn-day-porn-for-women/)  (This seemed like as good a thread as any.)

I actually have a ladyporn channel here in my cable package.  I forget what it's called, but it's full of soft-focus hugging and a conspicuous lack of teabgagging or facials.

I thought it would be an attractive man nodding and pretending to be listenting to whoever is watching.

Thanks 30 Rock

That's Studio 60 to you, bucko.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 26, 2011, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM
(http://i35.tinypic.com/2d6lgdg.jpg)

Intrepid Reader: Chuck

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

Bump.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Oleg on May 23, 2011, 04:10:44 PM
Just in case there was any question about it, they're real (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20496644,00.html).

NSFC (NSF Chuck)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 06:52:54 PM
Quote from: Oleg on May 23, 2011, 04:10:44 PM
Just in case there was any question about it, they're real (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20496644,00.html).

NSFC (NSF Chuck)

AAAAAUUUUUGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

(http://cdn.idontlikeyouinthatway.com//pictures/20110525/Christina%20Hendricks%20Italy%20Bathing%20Suit/t/christina-hendricks-fat-0thumb.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 06:52:54 PM
Quote from: Oleg on May 23, 2011, 04:10:44 PM
Just in case there was any question about it, they're real (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20496644,00.html).

NSFC (NSF Chuck)

AAAAAUUUUUGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

(http://cdn.idontlikeyouinthatway.com//pictures/20110525/Christina%20Hendricks%20Italy%20Bathing%20Suit/t/christina-hendricks-fat-0thumb.jpg)

I came.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 10:51:45 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
I came.

She swallowed.  A lot.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:59:31 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 10:51:45 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
I came.

She swallowed.  A lot.

Not helping your argument.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 11:20:40 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:59:31 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 10:51:45 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 25, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
I came.

She swallowed.  A lot.

Not helping your argument.

Second helpings? 
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on May 26, 2011, 09:58:53 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2011, 06:52:54 PM
Quote from: Oleg on May 23, 2011, 04:10:44 PM
Just in case there was any question about it, they're real (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20496644,00.html).

NSFC (NSF Chuck)

AAAAAUUUUUGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

(http://cdn.idontlikeyouinthatway.com//pictures/20110525/Christina%20Hendricks%20Italy%20Bathing%20Suit/t/christina-hendricks-fat-0thumb.jpg)

If you take off all those dumb clothes she's still hot as hell in that pic.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 26, 2011, 10:36:22 PM
AHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!                                                                                     Ahhhhh......
(http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20110526/Christina%20Hendricks%20Italy%20Bathing%20Suit%202/Christina-Hendricks-0.jpg)(http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20110525/Kate%20Upton%20SoBe/kate-upton-sobe-0.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 26, 2011, 10:56:08 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 26, 2011, 10:36:22 PM
Ahhhhh......
(http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20110525/Kate%20Upton%20SoBe/kate-upton-sobe-0.jpg)

34D.

This is just as off-topic here as it was in the YouTube thread.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Wheezer on May 26, 2011, 11:34:08 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 26, 2011, 10:56:08 PM
34D.

Seems to defy the obvious sanity-checking.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 26, 2011, 11:35:34 PM
Why do I have the feeling had "Christina Hendricks Unflattering Photos" in his google alerts?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Bort on May 27, 2011, 12:20:06 AM
Quote from: PANK! on May 26, 2011, 11:35:34 PM
Why do I have the feeling had "Christina Hendricks Unflattering Photos" in his google alerts?

The whole feeling had?

But on a serious note, because Chuck has devoted his entire internet life to clinging to his wrongness in whatever way possible.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on May 27, 2011, 07:29:30 AM
Quote from: Bort on May 27, 2011, 12:20:06 AM
Quote from: PANK! on May 26, 2011, 11:35:34 PM
Why do I have the feeling had "Christina Hendricks Unflattering Photos" in his google alerts?

The whole feeling had?

But on a serious note, because Chuck has devoted his entire internet life to clinging to his wrongness in whatever way possible.

I feel sorry for him.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2011, 06:00:29 PM
Salma Hayek: Humanitarian. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6htxMJ4cfQs)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2227062.ece

QuoteHERE is the amazing moment when Hollywood actress SALMA HAYEK breastfeeds a stranger's baby in Africa.

The Ugly Betty star was visiting a hospital in war-torn Sierra Leone when she met a woman unable to feed her starving tot.

Salma gladly came to her aid and fed the baby, ignoring the TV cameras.

Salma said: "The baby was perfectly healthy, but the mother did not have any milk.

"He was very hungry - I was weaning my daughter VALENTINA, but I still had a lot of milk, so I breastfed the baby.

"It was amazing because he's really looking at me and he's very little. My baby is one year so she can suck a lot harder."
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Shooter on September 08, 2011, 07:09:52 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2011, 06:00:29 PM
Salma Hayek: Humanitarian. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6htxMJ4cfQs)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2227062.ece

QuoteHERE is the amazing moment when Hollywood actress SALMA HAYEK breastfeeds a stranger's baby in Africa.

The Ugly Betty star was visiting a hospital in war-torn Sierra Leone when she met a woman unable to feed her starving tot.

Salma gladly came to her aid and fed the baby, ignoring the TV cameras.

Salma said: "The baby was perfectly healthy, but the mother did not have any milk.

"He was very hungry - I was weaning my daughter VALENTINA, but I still had a lot of milk, so I breastfed the baby.

"It was amazing because he's really looking at me and he's very little. My baby is one year so she can suck a lot harder."

QuotePublished: 11 Feb 2009

Timely.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on September 08, 2011, 11:24:38 PM
Quote from: Shooter on September 08, 2011, 07:09:52 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2011, 06:00:29 PM
Salma Hayek: Humanitarian. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6htxMJ4cfQs)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2227062.ece

QuoteHERE is the amazing moment when Hollywood actress SALMA HAYEK breastfeeds a stranger's baby in Africa.

The Ugly Betty star was visiting a hospital in war-torn Sierra Leone when she met a woman unable to feed her starving tot.

Salma gladly came to her aid and fed the baby, ignoring the TV cameras.

Salma said: "The baby was perfectly healthy, but the mother did not have any milk.

"He was very hungry - I was weaning my daughter VALENTINA, but I still had a lot of milk, so I breastfed the baby.

"It was amazing because he's really looking at me and he's very little. My baby is one year so she can suck a lot harder."

QuotePublished: 11 Feb 2009

Timely.

That Monica Lewinsky had some big tits, huh?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Tonker on September 09, 2011, 03:00:42 AM
My heart always lifts a little when I see that this thread has been posted in, but this is very disappointing.  Breast-feeding is always hard to wank to anyway, and breastfeeding from a byegone era even more so.  Can we not just have some really nice tits, please?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on September 09, 2011, 07:21:38 AM
Quote from: Tonker on September 09, 2011, 03:00:42 AM
My heart always lifts a little when I see that this thread has been posted in, but this is very disappointing.  Breast-feeding is always hard to wank to anyway, and breastfeeding from a byegone era even more so.  Can we not just have some really nice tits, please?

http://www.plunderguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/elaine-alden-7.jpg (http://www.plunderguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/elaine-alden-7.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Tonker on September 09, 2011, 07:35:03 AM
Incredibly, even when Chuck is right, he's wrong.  Go and look at the picture he's linked to above.  Does that girl have nice tits?  Well, you can't really see, can you?  They might be nice, but who really knows?
 
Now look at this picture:

(http://s2.nextround.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/elaine_alden9.jpg)

... which was the very first GIS hit on her name, and in which you can clearly see just how smashing her norks are. 

Chuck isn't wrong by accident, boys.  It takes work.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Slaky on September 09, 2011, 08:35:41 AM
Well Tonk I might be getting fired but it was worth it.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on September 09, 2011, 08:49:47 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 09, 2011, 08:35:41 AM
Well Tonk I might be getting fired but it was worth it.

Worth it would only exist if she was in those clothes in front of me, in real life
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on September 09, 2011, 09:10:21 AM
Quote from: Tonker on September 09, 2011, 07:35:03 AM
Incredibly, even when Chuck is right, he's wrong.  Go and look at the picture he's linked to above.  Does that girl have nice tits?  Well, you can't really see, can you?  They might be nice, but who really knows?
 
Now look at this picture:

(http://s2.nextround.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/elaine_alden9.jpg)

... which was the very first GIS hit on her name, and in which you can clearly see just how smashing her norks are. 

Chuck isn't wrong by accident, boys.  It takes work.

You got it backwards.  GIS takes work. The first pic was in my RSS feed.

That's not 10.17(c).  That's simply laziness.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2011, 09:56:55 AM
Quote from: Shooter on September 08, 2011, 07:09:52 PM
QuotePublished: 11 Feb 2009

Timely.

Here's more BREAKING Salma nork news...

http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2007/08/camparis-new-superliminal-print-ad.html

Quote"We bought out the pics from the Hayek shoot, so we can use them however we please," said new Campari CEO Bob Kunze-Concewitz.

(http://i.imgur.com/jbPYu.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/VuC6B.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/eVLLc.jpg)

Quote from: Tonker on September 09, 2011, 03:00:42 AM
My heart always lifts a little when I see that this thread has been posted in, but this is very disappointing.  Breast-feeding is always hard to wank to anyway, and breastfeeding from a byegone era even more so.  Can we not just have some really nice tits, please?

My bad...

(http://i.imgur.com/pBDy9.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/zVBF9.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/AAnNz.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/FfWph.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/svYJR.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/VuUit.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/gPn84.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/oTAwz.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2011, 11:17:13 AM
Further olive branches to Tonker...

(http://i.imgur.com/vvlTV.gif)

(http://i.imgur.com/26bBK.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Armchair_QB on September 15, 2011, 12:33:27 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)

Won't we all?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on September 15, 2011, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 15, 2011, 12:33:27 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)

Won't Haven't we all?

Assuming your Internet wasn't shutoff yesterday.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Internet Apex on September 15, 2011, 01:50:28 PM
Quote from: PANK! on September 15, 2011, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 15, 2011, 12:33:27 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)

Won't Haven't we all?

Assuming your Internet wasn't shutoff yesterday.

I still haven't seen it because the only working internets I have are work-issued. The last straight man in the civilized world who hasn't seen those Hogans, I am. Oh, how humiliating. #firstworldproblems
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 03:25:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 15, 2011, 01:50:28 PM
Quote from: PANK! on September 15, 2011, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 15, 2011, 12:33:27 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)

Won't Haven't we all?

Assuming your Internet wasn't shutoff yesterday.

I still haven't seen it because the only working internets I have are work-issued. The last straight man in the civilized world who hasn't seen those Hogans, I am. Oh, how humiliating. #firstworldproblems

If I had a working printer, I'd offer to mail them to you.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on September 15, 2011, 09:35:57 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 15, 2011, 01:50:28 PM
Quote from: PANK! on September 15, 2011, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 15, 2011, 12:33:27 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 15, 2011, 09:43:11 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 10:01:52 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 14, 2011, 09:58:27 AM
On the plus side, the internet just showed me Scarlett Johansson's alleged naked Ts (http://i.imgur.com/soN5q.jpg) & A (http://i.imgur.com/wLExq.jpg) (NSFW, natch).

SFW corroborating evidence: http://i.imgur.com/6dXnP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/93CV8.png

(http://i.imgur.com/kUFYH.jpg)

Won't Haven't we all?

Assuming your Internet wasn't shutoff yesterday.

I still haven't seen it because the only working internets I have are work-issued. The last straight man in the civilized world who hasn't seen those Hogans, I am. Oh, how humiliating. #firstworldproblems

I'm pretty sure you have a smartphone, broseph.. Hell, say the word and I'll sext them to you
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 27, 2011, 10:36:03 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 28, 2011, 07:50:32 AM
*starts reading "Earn money at home" emails*
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Gilgamesh on September 28, 2011, 08:16:44 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 27, 2011, 10:36:03 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)

As if Yetti was going to accomplish anything at work today anyway...
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 28, 2011, 08:28:54 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 28, 2011, 08:16:44 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 27, 2011, 10:36:03 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)

As if Yetti was going to accomplish anything at work today anyway...

Too old.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on September 28, 2011, 08:53:48 AM
Y'all say something?
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 28, 2011, 09:38:09 AM
I was afraid to click and have to see Nancy Grace's headlights. But this was better. Thanks J. Walter.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 04:49:07 PM
Bump for Powdered IAN Toast.

(http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/461230683.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF3XCCKACR3QDMOA&Expires=1322780596&Signature=iz8jc%2Br9tWrOIluQ6odsIxwMM9k%3D)

Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on December 01, 2011, 05:13:49 PM
Quote from: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 04:49:07 PM
Bump for Powdered IAN Toast.

(http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/461230683.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF3XCCKACR3QDMOA&Expires=1322780596&Signature=iz8jc%2Br9tWrOIluQ6odsIxwMM9k%3D)

Excellent work, Morph.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 05:42:26 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on December 01, 2011, 05:13:49 PM
Quote from: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 04:49:07 PM
Bump for Powdered IAN Toast.

(http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/461230683.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF3XCCKACR3QDMOA&Expires=1322780596&Signature=iz8jc%2Br9tWrOIluQ6odsIxwMM9k%3D)

Excellent work, Morph.

Well, in that case...

(http://oi40.tinypic.com/a3kxeh.jpg)

The world could use some Big Cheymos.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on December 01, 2011, 06:33:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 05:42:26 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on December 01, 2011, 05:13:49 PM
Quote from: PenPho on December 01, 2011, 04:49:07 PM
Bump for Powdered IAN Toast.

(http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/461230683.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF3XCCKACR3QDMOA&Expires=1322780596&Signature=iz8jc%2Br9tWrOIluQ6odsIxwMM9k%3D)

Excellent work, Morph.

Well, in that case...

(http://oi40.tinypic.com/a3kxeh.jpg)

The world could use some Big Cheymos.

Jodie Sweetin sure loves her big breasts.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on March 16, 2012, 10:48:58 AM
I'd post this in Mom's Basement or the Youtube thread, but I'd prefer someone actually see it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmtIopU7PM8
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on March 16, 2012, 10:59:30 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 28, 2011, 08:28:54 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 28, 2011, 08:16:44 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 27, 2011, 10:36:03 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)

As if Yetti was going to accomplish anything at work today anyway...

Too old.

Hypnotic.

(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)

(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)

(http://i.imgur.com/wGGkv.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Yeti on March 16, 2012, 11:18:23 AM
(http://www.kateuptondancing.com/d95bc39f2979cc2cb5f6fc4abc1516ba.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Quality Start Machine on March 16, 2012, 12:16:29 PM
(http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k263/toolman961/moobs.gif)
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on March 16, 2012, 12:53:57 PM
Quote from: Tollbooth Yeti on March 16, 2012, 11:18:23 AM
(http://www.kateuptondancing.com/d95bc39f2979cc2cb5f6fc4abc1516ba.gif)
THI
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: morpheus on March 16, 2012, 12:54:15 PM
Quote from: morpheus on March 16, 2012, 12:53:57 PM
Quote from: Tollbooth Yeti on March 16, 2012, 11:18:23 AM
(http://www.kateuptondancing.com/d95bc39f2979cc2cb5f6fc4abc1516ba.gif)
THI

DPD.  Trying to get it to the next page.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Wheezer on May 08, 2012, 06:56:37 PM
The march of Progress. (http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/big-book/breasts-environmental-history)

QuoteWilliams: It's true. Breasts are one of our organs that have really changed over the generations. I talked to someone at Maidenform who said that the average breast size used to be a 34B. And now it's closer to a 34C, and pushing upwards toward a D. And this is new.
Title: Re: DDD
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 09, 2012, 08:56:39 AM
(http://cdn.idontlikeyouinthatway.com//pictures/20120509/Marilyn%20Monroe%20Statue/monroe_01_wenn5838196-banner.jpg)