Desipio Message Board

General Category => The Dead Pool => Topic started by: PenPho on January 22, 2012, 09:36:38 AM

Title: NoPa
Post by: PenPho on January 22, 2012, 09:36:38 AM
Joe Paterno.

Wow, that was fast.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 22, 2012, 01:52:07 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 22, 2012, 09:36:38 AM
Joe Paterno.

Wow, that was fast.

Good riddance.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: flannj on January 22, 2012, 01:58:14 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 22, 2012, 01:52:07 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 22, 2012, 09:36:38 AM
Joe Paterno.

Wow, that was fast.

Good riddance.

Cue The Weeping, Wailing, Rending Of Garments, and Gnashing Of Teeth by the faithful.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Bonk on January 22, 2012, 02:32:32 PM
1. Zsa Zsa Gabor
2. Etta James
3. Stephen Hawking
4. Joe Paterno
5. John Madden
6. William Perry
7. Muhammad Ali
8. Roger Ebert
9. Ariel Sharon
10. Bob Huggins

And it's not even February yet...
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 22, 2012, 04:49:44 PM
Quote from: Bonk on January 22, 2012, 02:32:32 PM
1. Zsa Zsa Gabor
2. Etta James
3. Stephen Hawking
4. Joe Paterno
5. John Madden
6. William Perry
7. Muhammad Ali
8. Roger Ebert
9. Ariel Sharon
10. Bob Huggins

And it's not even February yet...

Have you considered putting that list in a spreadsheet or something?
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: BH on January 23, 2012, 02:46:18 PM
Jerry offers his condolences. (http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/yes-jerry-sandusky-had-guts-issue-statement-joe-204741319.html)

The comments, like always, really hit the nail on the head.

"Media killed Paterno. They were out to get him years ago before any asst. creep show. It's time PSU and USA wake up to media and take them on in the streets."
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 23, 2012, 03:35:57 PM
Quote from: BH on January 23, 2012, 02:46:18 PM
"Media killed Paterno. They were out to get him years ago before any asst. creep show..."

This whole "turning a blind eye to child rape" thing was just a convenient pretext.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: BH on January 23, 2012, 03:47:01 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 23, 2012, 03:35:57 PM
Quote from: BH on January 23, 2012, 02:46:18 PM
"Media killed Paterno. They were out to get him years ago before any asst. creep show..."

This whole "turning a blind eye to child rape" thing was just a convenient pretext.

But he didn't even know it was possible (http://espn.go.com/espnw/commentary/7476452/former-penn-state-coach-joe-paterno-na%C3%AFve-not-credible).

""I don't know that it would have done any good, because I never heard of, of, rape and a man," Paterno said."
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Bonk on January 23, 2012, 06:25:21 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 22, 2012, 04:49:44 PM
Quote from: Bonk on January 22, 2012, 02:32:32 PM
1. Zsa Zsa Gabor
2. Etta James
3. Stephen Hawking
4. Joe Paterno
5. John Madden
6. William Perry
7. Muhammad Ali
8. Roger Ebert
9. Ariel Sharon
10. Bob Huggins

And it's not even February yet...

Have you considered putting that list in a spreadsheet or something?

Something.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: CT III on January 23, 2012, 06:42:16 PM
Quote from: BH on January 23, 2012, 02:46:18 PM
Jerry offers his condolences. (http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/yes-jerry-sandusky-had-guts-issue-statement-joe-204741319.html)

The comments, like always, really hit the nail on the head.

"Media killed Paterno. They were out to get him years ago before any asst. creep show. It's time PSU and USA wake up to media and take them on in the streets."

True.  Paterno could have lived a long and fulfilling life if it weren't for that damn media.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Bort on January 24, 2012, 11:09:36 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

I smell a conspiracy of Ludlum-esque proportions. The Paterno Testimony.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

As we've said in the SBox, his grand jury testimony is out (it was out anyway, since there was no cross), but this makes McQueary the principal witness.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 24, 2012, 12:50:18 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

As we've said in the SBox, his grand jury testimony is out (it was out anyway, since there was no cross), but this makes McQueary the principal witness.

I'll hang up and wait to hear from a real lawyer.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: R-V on January 24, 2012, 12:59:10 PM
Quote from: Bort on January 24, 2012, 11:09:36 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

I smell a conspiracy of Ludlum-esque proportions. The Paterno Testimony.

This made me laugh, heartily, because it reminded me of the caller I heard on the Score the other morning who suggested that Paterno's death was indeed the result of a conspiracy to cover up that whole thing, or something.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: thehawk on January 24, 2012, 04:25:49 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 24, 2012, 12:50:18 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

As we've said in the SBox, his grand jury testimony is out (it was out anyway, since there was no cross), but this makes McQueary the principal witness.

I'll hang up and wait to hear from a real lawyer.

You should keep waiting, but I think that JoPa's testimony could be use to impeach a parties testimony.  So it cant be used as evidence that he told the President or AD in and of itself, but it could be brought in if either the President or AD claimed that JoPa never told them.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 05:21:55 PM
Quote from: thehawk on January 24, 2012, 04:25:49 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 24, 2012, 12:50:18 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

As we've said in the SBox, his grand jury testimony is out (it was out anyway, since there was no cross), but this makes McQueary the principal witness.

I'll hang up and wait to hear from a real lawyer.

You should keep waiting, but I think that JoPa's testimony could be use to impeach a parties testimony.  So it cant be used as evidence that he told the President or AD in and of itself, but it could be brought in if either the President or AD claimed that JoPa never told them.

The more I read and think about rule 804, I'm sure the State could make an argument to the judge that Paterno's testimony was against his interest and therefore, should be admissible.  Plus, the catchall of rule 807 could save the State, provided they have no other means to prove the facts against the AD and President.

Edit: PA doesn't have the residual exception.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Bort on January 24, 2012, 08:58:02 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 05:21:55 PM
Quote from: thehawk on January 24, 2012, 04:25:49 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 24, 2012, 12:50:18 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 24, 2012, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: BH on January 24, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
With Joe dying, does this mean his previous testimony is thrown out? If so, would imagine the previous AD, president and police would just say that Joe never told them anything and walk?

As we've said in the SBox, his grand jury testimony is out (it was out anyway, since there was no cross), but this makes McQueary the principal witness.

I'll hang up and wait to hear from a real lawyer.

You should keep waiting, but I think that JoPa's testimony could be use to impeach a parties testimony.  So it cant be used as evidence that he told the President or AD in and of itself, but it could be brought in if either the President or AD claimed that JoPa never told them.

The more I read and think about rule 804, I'm sure the State could make an argument to the judge that Paterno's testimony was against his interest and therefore, should be admissible.  Plus, the catchall of rule 807 could save the State, provided they have no other means to prove the facts against the AD and President.

Edit: PA doesn't have the residual exception.

Quiet Gil. The lawyers are talking.
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: BH on January 26, 2012, 02:06:32 PM
http://www.theonion.com/articles/jerry-sandusky-ill-never-forget-all-the-things-joe,27169/
Title: Re: NoPa
Post by: Tonker on January 26, 2012, 02:17:36 PM
Quote from: BH on January 26, 2012, 02:06:32 PM
http://www.theonion.com/articles/jerry-sandusky-ill-never-forget-all-the-things-joe,27169/

That is absolutely outfuckingstanding.