The Fukkake Bukkake thread

[Eli]

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season? 

Tim Lincecum.

[Powdered Toast Man]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

[Internet Apex]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

[Oleg]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

So, just so I have it right...only trade Colvin is it makes the team better.

[Eli]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

So, just so I have it right...only trade Colvin is it makes the team better.

Well, that depends ...

[Tony]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

So, just so I have it right...only trade Colvin is it makes the team better.

Well, that depends ...

Better now or better later?

[Internet Apex]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

So, just so I have it right...only trade Colvin is it makes the team better.

Well, that depends ...

Better now or better later?

And how much better? Are we talking Playoffs?

[Bort]

Anyway, to go back to BH's post, I would trade Colvin in a heartbeat if he was going to bring back a good major league player in return.

Maybe Hendry can package Colvin and Soto together to snare another bullpen arm that can complement John Grabow and REALLY anchor the pen once and for all.  Chad Qualls, perhaps?

Because that's totally what I said.  I apologize, Colvin's awesome.  We should never trade him, ever.  I'm sure his value will only increase.

I was commenting on Hendry's propensity for overvaluing relievers, not your trade idea.  I completely agree Colvin could be a good trade chip right now.

What quality major league ready player will Colvin net in return that can do anything for the Cubs this season?  I don't understand this idea at all.  But, I guess that's the least suprising of things and something else.

Oh good lord, before you people all end up arguing the same thing let's just fill out the questionnaire:

1. Do you think Tyler Colvin is a trade chip?
2. If yes, for what would you trade him? (please be specific about position and age of player)
3. Would that person be a pick up for a playoff run this year, or a person who can help the team next year?

Playoffs?

My point exactly. I think IAN here is confused in thinking people are willing to trade Colvin out of a deluded sense that this team is only a trade deadline acquisition away from contending. I think everyone here knows they're out of it, but would be willing to trade Colvin to get a player that has value for the next couple years. I just don't know who that player would be or what position he would be at. Unless we're packaging him to get Adrian Gonzalez to replace the deceased Derrek Lee.

That's what I was thinking everyone else was thinking and it was making my head hurt.  If trading him makes the team better for the next couple of years, I'm all for it.  I just don't know if it's all that feasable that he plus anybody else's corpse on this team gets the Cubs there.

I agree with everybody.

So, just so I have it right...only trade Colvin is it makes the team better.

Well, that depends ...

Better now or better later?

And how much better? Are we talking Playoffs?

Is that significant in your opinion? What would be a really high number?

[Kermit IV]

Fuck this thread.

[MAD]

Fuck this thread.

THI

[Tinker to Evers to Chance]

Fuck this thread.

THI

Screw you guys.  This thread is great every April.

[Brownie]

Time for Theo to right Hendry's trade-deadline wrong!