Open "FYC" Thread

[Shooter]

Check out Kaplan doing his best Dolan impersonation here:

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/david-kaplan-chicago-sports/

Is this what it's like to be berated by Dave Kaplan? Seems akin to getting slapped in the face with a sheet of looseleaf paper.

Not to miss the forest for the trees, but they really need a better editor over there.
Maybe one who keeps a stack of commas with him that he can dole out as needed.

I like how he's not impressed that the Cubs are playing the Arizona Diamondback (sic) and the Philadelphia Phillies (?).

Unreadable.

It makes a nice bookend with his usual unlistenable.

[Internet Apex]

Check out Kaplan doing his best Dolan impersonation here:

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/david-kaplan-chicago-sports/

Is this what it's like to be berated by Dave Kaplan? Seems akin to getting slapped in the face with a sheet of looseleaf paper.

Not to miss the forest for the trees, but they really need a better editor over there.
Maybe one who keeps a stack of commas with him that he can dole out as needed.

I like how he's not impressed that the Cubs are playing the Arizona Diamondback (sic) and the Philadelphia Phillies (?).

Unreadable.

It makes a nice bookend with his usual unlistenable.

Sandwitching his unwatchable?

THI

[Sterling Archer]

Solid Dave needs a solid thesaurus to aid in his solid writing about solid teams.

[The Big Cheese]

"C'mon Phil, I know that you are smarter than that. Reading this it sure doesn't show it though."



Wait, what?

[Yeti]

Chuck, Fuck yourself

[powen01]

Chuck, tu cara, chingalo.

[Sterling Archer]

That's a nice healthy FYC right there.

[Fork]

Got the following text from Chuck:

FYME

[Yeti]

If I were getting FYC'd more often, maybe this team would be, you know, good.

Fuck you for thinking Soriano and his .908 OPS is somehow not helping this team be good. And even though fielding stats aren't perfect, fagstats say he's been about average, just a little above it in the field. He's good this year. The team is inconsistent and shitty. Not his fault.

[Chuck to Chuck]

If I were getting FYC'd more often, maybe this team would be, you know, good.

Fuck you for thinking Soriano and his .908 OPS is somehow not helping this team be good. And even though fielding stats aren't perfect, fagstats say he's been about average, just a little above it in the field. He's good this year. The team is inconsistent and shitty. Not his fault.

He fits right in.

[Slaky]

If I were getting FYC'd more often, maybe this team would be, you know, good.

Fuck you for thinking Soriano and his .908 OPS is somehow not helping this team be good. And even though fielding stats aren't perfect, fagstats say he's been about average, just a little above it in the field. He's good this year. The team is inconsistent and shitty. Not his fault.

He fits right in.

No, see - he's been consistent and good. So he doesn't fit in at all.

[morpheus]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Confirmation bias (or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, independently of whether they are true.[1][2]  This results in people selectively collecting new evidence, interpreting evidence in a biased way, or selectively recalling information from memory.

[Bort]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Confirmation bias (or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, independently of whether they are true.[1][2]  This results in people selectively collecting new evidence, interpreting evidence in a biased way, or selectively recalling information from memory.

In case Chuck failed to read this the first time.

[MAD]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Confirmation bias (or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, independently of whether they are true.[1][2]  This results in people selectively collecting new evidence, interpreting evidence in a biased way, or selectively recalling information from memory.

[Gilgamesh]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Confirmation bias (or myside bias) is a tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, independently of whether they are true.[1][2]  This results in people selectively collecting new evidence, interpreting evidence in a biased way, or selectively recalling information from memory.

Couldn't enlarge that period, could you?