2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers

[Sterling Archer]

Because no one cares about the last game of preseason.

[Eli]

Just because there's now an opportunity to link this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqxnm6t3QMw

Also, go Bears.

[Gil Gunderson]

Da Beearz.

[SKO]

Green Bay Sucks.

[Dave B]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

[Sterling Archer]

Just because there's now an opportunity to link this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqxnm6t3QMw

Also, go Bears.

This isn't really intended for humans.  I guess it's more for the Fox robot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoi1MSGu64

[SKO]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Honestly I wouldn't mind setting up the schedule like 2006 every year. Open with Green Bay and close with Green Bay. To bookend the season with a sweep of the cheeseheads would be beautiful.

[Weebs]

Just because there's now an opportunity to link this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqxnm6t3QMw

Also, go Bears.

This isn't really intended for humans.  I guess it's more for the Fox robot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoi1MSGu64

I hope Erin Andrews is back for some football.

[CubFaninHydePark]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

[MAD]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

[Fork]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

Not unless they penetrate, they won't. The Stillers' passing will be too much if Roethlisberger gets his usual time.

[PenFoe]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

Not unless they penetrate, they won't. The Stillers' passing will be too much if Roethlisberger gets his usual time.

I assume by "usual time" you mean not very much time at all?
The Steelers passing game isn't predicated on Ben having a lot of time in the pocket, it's successful when he's out of the pocket making plays.

[Fork]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

Not unless they penetrate, they won't. The Stillers' passing will be too much if Roethlisberger gets his usual time.

I assume by "usual time" you mean not very much time at all?
The Steelers passing game isn't predicated on Ben having a lot of time in the pocket, it's successful when he's out of the pocket making plays.

There's still a good 4 seconds between snap and release. That could be an eternity with the Bears' DBs.

[PenFoe]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

Not unless they penetrate, they won't. The Stillers' passing will be too much if Roethlisberger gets his usual time.

I assume by "usual time" you mean not very much time at all?
The Steelers passing game isn't predicated on Ben having a lot of time in the pocket, it's successful when he's out of the pocket making plays.

There's still a good 4 seconds between snap and release. That could be an eternity with the Bears' DBs.

The 17th ranked Steelers passing attack allowed the 4th most sacks in the NFL last year and have made no improvements to the Offensive Line.
When the Steelers beat the Bears, it's not going to be because of the protection.

[Kermit, B.]

Green Bay Sucks.

You hate to put too much emphasis on the first game of the season, but beating those pud-whacks at home would make for a damn good start.

Well, seeing as the defending Super Bowl champs are the second game of the season, and there's that annoying graphic that always gets shown for 0-2 teams (the Giants were the only team ever to start 0-2 and win the Super Bowl, right?), I'd say week 1 is a bit more important than usual.

But Andy says we'll win both, and I'm good with that.

They'll beat Pittsburgh.

Up yours, PenFoe.

Not unless they penetrate, they won't. The Stillers' passing will be too much if Roethlisberger gets his usual time.

I assume by "usual time" you mean not very much time at all?
The Steelers passing game isn't predicated on Ben having a lot of time in the pocket, it's successful when he's out of the pocket making plays.

There's still a good 4 seconds between snap and release. That could be an eternity with the Bears' DBs.

The 17th ranked Steelers passing attack allowed the 4th most sacks in the NFL last year and have made no improvements to the Offensive Line.
When the Steelers beat the Bears, it's not going to be because of the protection.

TAKE YOUR STATISTICS AND LOGIC TO THE BASEBALL THREADS, PLEASE.