News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks  ( 36,679 )

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #195 on: June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM »
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #196 on: June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM »
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

BH

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,344
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #197 on: June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM »
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #198 on: June 19, 2013, 03:10:09 PM »
Quote from: BH on June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.

OH, sure. Trade the CLOSURE. HOW THE HELL ARE THEY GONNA CLIMB BACK TO 9-under-.500 without Greg?
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #199 on: June 19, 2013, 03:20:34 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 19, 2013, 03:10:09 PM
Quote from: BH on June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.

OH, sure. Trade the CLOSURE. HOW THE HELL ARE THEY GONNA CLIMB BACK TO 9-under-.500 without Greg?

6/16/13 NEVER FORGET

You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #200 on: June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM »
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #201 on: June 19, 2013, 05:31:28 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.

S'weenie's doing 90 'cause he's got nowhere to go.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #202 on: June 21, 2013, 01:46:37 PM »
I read on the Cubs' official site that Concepcion, the Cubs' 23 year old Cuban pitcher, has been sidelined with a sore back.  A 23 year old with a sore back?  That is obviously 23 years in Cuban time.
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #203 on: June 21, 2013, 02:51:47 PM »
Quote from: Fork on June 19, 2013, 05:31:28 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.

S'weenie's doing 90 'cause he's got nowhere to go.

Heh.  I'll give you that one, Fork.
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #204 on: June 28, 2013, 11:39:45 PM »
We might get another Al screed after some pretty poor outfield play tonight -- Sweeney and Schierholtz were too busy avoiding a stupid, unnecessary collision to actually catch the ball, and Bogusevic going for a very ill-advised falling/diving attempt that he whiffed on and of course the ball then rolled all the way to the wall and let the tying run score. Robbing the great Travis Wood of a deserved win. Basically, minor leaguers playing like the minor leaguers they are (except Schierholtz).

Good thing I'm rooting for a high draft pick or I might actually be upset.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #205 on: June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM »
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #206 on: June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM »
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #207 on: July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM »
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?

Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #208 on: July 01, 2013, 08:53:32 AM »
Quote from: Tonker on July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?

If I recall correctly, they've also played one of the tougher schedules in baseball. It'll probably make next year's March to .500 (subtitle: I'ts Gonna Hai) all the more surprising to a bunch of people who aren't really paying attention.

Brownie

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,279
Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
« Reply #209 on: July 01, 2013, 11:25:27 AM »
Quote from: Tonker on July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?



If Marmol hadn't blown that lead at Shiti Field, we'd be BUYERS!