Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: Saul Goodman on January 24, 2011, 07:30:37 AM

Title: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 24, 2011, 07:30:37 AM
Time to draft lots and lots of linemen.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on January 24, 2011, 07:35:03 AM
With the team exceeding expectations, should be easier than last year to get an offensive coordinator.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Waco Kid on January 24, 2011, 07:45:17 AM
Trade away that useless sack of shit Cutler and start the one and true Chicago Bear in heart and spirit, Caleb Hanie.

Also, fire everybody and hire Mike Singletary as head coach, GM, & VP of Fire and Passion.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on January 24, 2011, 08:06:43 AM
GIVE US MCNEILL!  HE IS LARGE AND PROTECTS QUARTERBACKS!

Ahh crap, I just read he signed a new contract.  So, scratch that idea. 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 24, 2011, 08:18:33 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on January 24, 2011, 07:45:17 AM
Trade away that useless sack of shit Cutler and start the one and true Chicago Bear in heart and spirit, Caleb Hanie.

Also, fire everybody and hire Mike Singletary as head coach, GM, & VP of Fire and Passion.

I swear my co-worker sitting behind said something to the affect of "Hanie moved the ball and if Cutler was int he game he wouldn't have been able to".  I muttered a few words about defense and The Packers being up 21-7.  He then said that Cutler wouldn't have been able to do that.  I turned around and he started yelling at me about my being right all the time and that no one could argue with me.

Yep, he's right about that.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on January 24, 2011, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on January 24, 2011, 07:45:17 AM
Trade away that useless sack of shit Cutler and start the one and true Chicago Bear in heart and spirit, Caleb Hanie.

Also, fire everybody and hire Mike Singletary as head coach, GM, & VP of Fire and Passion.

Sign Ortman to a lifetime contract.  Neckbeards don't get torn ACLs.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 24, 2011, 08:37:06 AM
Quote from: BBM on January 24, 2011, 08:32:39 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on January 24, 2011, 07:45:17 AM
Trade away that useless sack of shit Cutler and start the one and true Chicago Bear in heart and spirit, Caleb Hanie.

Also, fire everybody and hire Mike Singletary as head coach, GM, & VP of Fire and Passion.

Sign Ortman to a lifetime contract.  Neckbeards don't get torn ACLs.

Say this for Ortman though. He only got hurt during a humongous game once. And that was in college.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: fiveouts on January 24, 2011, 09:46:34 AM
Would it be too much to ask for a wide receiver who is taller than 5'2" and is actually strong enough to go up and battle for a ball? 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 24, 2011, 10:02:50 AM
Quote from: fiveouts on January 24, 2011, 09:46:34 AM
Would it be too much to ask for a wide receiver who is taller than 5'2" and is actually strong enough to go up and battle for a ball? 

Inasmuch as that would detract from the quest for a reasonable facsimile of an NFL offensive line, probably.

I've had enough of the Bears trying to build the team backwards.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on January 24, 2011, 10:19:55 AM
Quote from: fiveouts on January 24, 2011, 09:46:34 AM
Would it be too much to ask for a wide receiver who is taller than 5'2" and is actually strong enough to go up and battle for a ball?  

Devin Aromashodu perhaps? You didn't say anything about catching the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on January 24, 2011, 10:22:16 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 24, 2011, 10:02:50 AM
Quote from: fiveouts on January 24, 2011, 09:46:34 AM
Would it be too much to ask for a wide receiver who is taller than 5'2" and is actually strong enough to go up and battle for a ball? 

Inasmuch as that would detract from the quest for a reasonable facsimile of an NFL offensive line, probably.

I've had enough of the Bears trying to build the team backwards.

Thrill's retiring his bears shirt! HE'S HAD ENOUGH.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tony on January 24, 2011, 10:34:52 AM
Everyone knows they should be drafting offensive linemen, so the question is...how many defensive ends does Angelo draft? I say two, in the first and third rounds.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 24, 2011, 10:42:10 AM
Quote from: BBM on January 24, 2011, 10:19:55 AM
Quote from: fiveouts on January 24, 2011, 09:46:34 AM
Would it be too much to ask for a wide receiver who is taller than 5'2" and is actually strong enough to go up and battle for a ball?  

Devin Aromashodu perhaps? You didn't say anything about catching the ball.

Devin Aromoshadu is only 5'8. He just looks tall standing next to other Bear receivers. #Fact
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 24, 2011, 10:43:55 AM
Quote from: Tony on January 24, 2011, 10:34:52 AM
Everyone knows they should be drafting offensive linemen, so the question is...how many defensive ends does Angelo draft? I say two, in the first and third rounds.

Actually the OL will be fixed in a Cutler trade to protect new Bears backup QB Donovan McNabb as he throws to Chad Eightyfive after Hanie's injured making his fourth tackle on his fourth interception in the first Green Bay game. Veteran savvy!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 24, 2011, 12:25:49 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 24, 2011, 08:18:33 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on January 24, 2011, 07:45:17 AM
Trade away that useless sack of shit Cutler and start the one and true Chicago Bear in heart and spirit, Caleb Hanie.

Also, fire everybody and hire Mike Singletary as head coach, GM, & VP of Fire and Passion.

I swear my co-worker sitting behind said something to the affect of "Hanie moved the ball and if Cutler was int he game he wouldn't have been able to".  I muttered a few words about defense and The Packers being up 21-7.  He then said that Cutler wouldn't have been able to do that.  I turned around and he started yelling at me about my being right all the time and that no one could argue with me.

Yep, he's right about that.

When you got it, flaunt it.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 31, 2011, 06:07:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman (Fuck you) doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Que the so-called football "experts"'d
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on January 31, 2011, 09:21:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Please tell me Fro Dog coined this phrase.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tinker to Evers to Chance on January 31, 2011, 09:29:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on January 31, 2011, 09:21:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Please tell me Fro Dog coined this phrase.

No one around here is brilliant enough to come up with something like that. (http://firedustybaker2.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/moving-on/)

QuoteI want a safety who actually knows that if they are playing that crappy "Cover Who", that they wouldn't wander off letting a receiver go down the field for an easy touchdown (Danieal Manning).
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on January 31, 2011, 09:31:49 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on January 31, 2011, 09:29:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on January 31, 2011, 09:21:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Please tell me Fro Dog coined this phrase.

No one around here is brilliant enough to come up with something like that. (http://firedustybaker2.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/moving-on/)

QuoteI want a safety who actually knows that if they are playing that crappy "Cover Who", that they wouldn't wander off letting a receiver go down the field for an easy touchdown (Danieal Manning).

I prefer the "I-Pass defense" myself.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on February 01, 2011, 05:20:02 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 31, 2011, 09:31:49 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on January 31, 2011, 09:29:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on January 31, 2011, 09:21:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Please tell me Fro Dog coined this phrase.

No one around here is brilliant enough to come up with something like that. (http://firedustybaker2.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/moving-on/)

QuoteI want a safety who actually knows that if they are playing that crappy "Cover Who", that they wouldn't wander off letting a receiver go down the field for an easy touchdown (Danieal Manning).

I prefer the "I-Pass defense" myself.

You would
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on February 01, 2011, 08:27:32 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on February 01, 2011, 05:20:02 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 31, 2011, 09:31:49 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on January 31, 2011, 09:29:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on January 31, 2011, 09:21:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 31, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
Quote from: PenPho on January 31, 2011, 05:18:27 PM
Eagles request permission to interview Bears DB Coach for their DC position.  (http://www.yardbarker.com/blog/nflbuzz/source_eagles_request_to_interview_bears_assistant/4071429)

Why would they do that? Charles Tillman doesn't even know who to cover in an 11 on 11 situation. He just wanders off in the Cover Who and lets receivers do whatever they want.

Please tell me Fro Dog coined this phrase.

No one around here is brilliant enough to come up with something like that. (http://firedustybaker2.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/moving-on/)

QuoteI want a safety who actually knows that if they are playing that crappy "Cover Who", that they wouldn't wander off letting a receiver go down the field for an easy touchdown (Danieal Manning).

I prefer the "I-Pass defense" myself.

You would

Agreed.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 11, 2011, 11:49:03 AM
In the least surprising something something file we have Brad Biggs' positional breakdown on the Bears' Special Teams unit. While it was one of the league's best this year without question, Biggs still wonders what might have been...

Quote2010 overview: The Bears again finished as one of the best special teams units in the NFL and Toub again turned the trick while juggling personnel. The Bears made linebacker Tim Shaw one of their final cuts in September, a surprising move after he had set a franchise record with 30 tackles the year before. The Bears knew linebacker Hunter Hillenmeyer was dealing with post-concussion symptoms and they still chose to unload Shaw because he didn't fit into a backup role on defense. When Hillenmeyer was placed on injured reserve after Week 1, cutting Shaw looked even worse. But he didn't have any trouble finding work as the Tennessee Titans claimed him on waivers.

Without Shaw, the Bears proved to be OK. Would they have been better with him? No question. But new linebacker Brian Iwuh was a better fit on defense and he proved capable on special teams, finishing tied for second with 18 total tackles and third with 10 solos. While Shaw led the team in tackles in 2009, Graham was the point production leader that season and he topped the charts for Toub again this season.


Jesus Christ. This has cruised right on past strange and is rapping vociferously at creepy's back door.


http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2011/02/bears-positional-analysis-special-teams.html

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on February 11, 2011, 11:49:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 11, 2011, 11:49:03 AM
In the least surprising something something file we have Brad Biggs' positional breakdown on the Bears' Special Teams unit. While it was one of the league's best this year without question, Biggs still wonders what might have been...

Quote2010 overview: The Bears again finished as one of the best special teams units in the NFL and Toub again turned the trick while juggling personnel. The Bears made linebacker Tim Shaw one of their final cuts in September, a surprising move after he had set a franchise record with 30 tackles the year before. The Bears knew linebacker Hunter Hillenmeyer was dealing with post-concussion symptoms and they still chose to unload Shaw because he didn't fit into a backup role on defense. When Hillenmeyer was placed on injured reserve after Week 1, cutting Shaw looked even worse. But he didn't have any trouble finding work as the Tennessee Titans claimed him on waivers.

Without Shaw, the Bears proved to be OK. Would they have been better with him? No question. But new linebacker Brian Iwuh was a better fit on defense and he proved capable on special teams, finishing tied for second with 18 total tackles and third with 10 solos. While Shaw led the team in tackles in 2009, Graham was the point production leader that season and he topped the charts for Toub again this season.


Jesus Christ. This has cruised right on past strange and is rapping vociferously at creepy's back door.


http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2011/02/bears-positional-analysis-special-teams.html



Good old Shawsy - always stealing Biggsy's laptop and writing articles for him. He's a crafty, gentle lover.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 11, 2011, 12:06:53 PM
Quote from: Slaky on February 11, 2011, 11:49:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 11, 2011, 11:49:03 AM
In the least surprising something something file we have Brad Biggs' positional breakdown on the Bears' Special Teams unit. While it was one of the league's best this year without question, Biggs still wonders what might have been...

Quote2010 overview: The Bears again finished as one of the best special teams units in the NFL and Toub again turned the trick while juggling personnel. The Bears made linebacker Tim Shaw one of their final cuts in September, a surprising move after he had set a franchise record with 30 tackles the year before. The Bears knew linebacker Hunter Hillenmeyer was dealing with post-concussion symptoms and they still chose to unload Shaw because he didn't fit into a backup role on defense. When Hillenmeyer was placed on injured reserve after Week 1, cutting Shaw looked even worse. But he didn't have any trouble finding work as the Tennessee Titans claimed him on waivers.

Without Shaw, the Bears proved to be OK. Would they have been better with him? No question. But new linebacker Brian Iwuh was a better fit on defense and he proved capable on special teams, finishing tied for second with 18 total tackles and third with 10 solos. While Shaw led the team in tackles in 2009, Graham was the point production leader that season and he topped the charts for Toub again this season.


Jesus Christ. This has cruised right on past strange and is rapping vociferously at creepy's back door.


http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2011/02/bears-positional-analysis-special-teams.html



Good old Shawsy - always stealing Biggsy's laptop and writing articles for him. He's a crafty, gentle lover.

TIM SHAW WOULD HAVE BEEN DOMINANT PLAYING FOOTBALL FOR THE BEARS THIS YEAR!!  HE WOULD HAVE TACKLED HIS ENEMIES INTO SUBMISSION, FOR HE IS TIM SHAW, DESTROYER OF WORLDS!!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on February 11, 2011, 12:52:47 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 11, 2011, 11:49:03 AM
In the least surprising something something file we have Brad Biggs' positional breakdown on the Bears' Special Teams unit. While it was one of the league's best this year without question, Biggs still wonders what might have been...

Quote2010 overview: The Bears again finished as one of the best special teams units in the NFL and Toub again turned the trick while juggling personnel. The Bears made linebacker Tim Shaw one of their final cuts in September, a surprising move after he had set a franchise record with 30 tackles the year before. The Bears knew linebacker Hunter Hillenmeyer was dealing with post-concussion symptoms and they still chose to unload Shaw because he didn't fit into a backup role on defense. When Hillenmeyer was placed on injured reserve after Week 1, cutting Shaw looked even worse. But he didn't have any trouble finding work as the Tennessee Titans claimed him on waivers.

Without Shaw, the Bears proved to be OK. Would they have been better with him? No question. But new linebacker Brian Iwuh was a better fit on defense and he proved capable on special teams, finishing tied for second with 18 total tackles and third with 10 solos. While Shaw led the team in tackles in 2009, Graham was the point production leader that season and he topped the charts for Toub again this season.

Jesus Christ. This has cruised right on past strange and is rapping vociferously at creepy's back door.

http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2011/02/bears-positional-analysis-special-teams.html

Oh for fuck's sake Biggs. Just peel his skin off and wear it as undies already.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 14, 2011, 10:52:27 PM
Not even football can make the NLRB less boring. (http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=6121861)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: thehawk on February 15, 2011, 11:21:28 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 14, 2011, 10:52:27 PM
Not even football can make the NLRB less boring. (http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=6121861)

Not to mention anti-trust law.  But since I specialize in boring, assume that the owners do lock out  the players, and the NFLPA 'decertifies' (however that works), what then happens?  Is each player then essentially a free agent? Does basically any NFL labor related action (the draft a cap etc) become an automatic anti-trust violation?  Do dogs and cats start living together? Can I write another sentence without a quetion mark?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Timmy B on February 19, 2011, 06:11:20 PM
Basically, decertification is the players' nuclear option. When that happens, the union for the players would dissolve, becoming, ostensibly, a trade organization, and the NFL's antitrust exemption would go away (as long as they're negotiating with an elected union. they're given an anti-trust exemption). Based upon anti-trust law, if the NFL clubs, acting as 32 individual businesses, were to attempt to lock out the players, it would be a group boycott of the workers -- which is illegal. It would then open the NFL up to a class-action lawsuit by every individual player, and based on precedent, it would lose.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 06:44:08 PM
Quote from: thehawk on February 15, 2011, 11:21:28 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 14, 2011, 10:52:27 PM
Not even football can make the NLRB less boring. (http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=6121861)

Not to mention anti-trust law.  But since I specialize in boring, assume that the owners do lock out  the players, and the NFLPA 'decertifies' (however that works), what then happens?  Is each player then essentially a free agent? Does basically any NFL labor related action (the draft a cap etc) become an automatic anti-trust violation?  Do dogs and cats start living together? Can I write another sentence without a quetion mark?

From my boring specialist status to yours, here's what we've been told on the NFL front here at the Labor Board.  The players are probably going to see what happens with this charge first, that is, if the Washington Resident Office finds merit to the charge.  We've been told by the NFLPA to expect a charge against the owners in the next couple of weeks seeking to get the owners to turn over their financial statements.  That should be fun.

The memo I read said that the soon-to-expire CBA's provisions regarding the draft extend through this coming draft, so that would be protected.

Quote from: Timmy B on February 19, 2011, 06:11:20 PM
Basically, decertification is the players' nuclear option. When that happens, the union for the players would dissolve, becoming, ostensibly, a trade organization, and the NFL's antitrust exemption would go away (as long as they're negotiating with an elected union. they're given an anti-trust exemption). Based upon anti-trust law, if the NFL clubs, acting as 32 individual businesses, were to attempt to lock out the players, it would be a group boycott of the workers -- which is illegal. It would then open the NFL up to a class-action lawsuit by every individual player, and based on precedent, it would lose.

If I didn't know better, I'd say you were an attorney for the Labor Board too.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on February 19, 2011, 07:50:03 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 06:44:08 PM
If I didn't know better, I'd say you were an attorney for the Labor Board too.

That's a terrible thing to say about anyone.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 08:06:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on February 19, 2011, 07:50:03 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 06:44:08 PM
If I didn't know better, I'd say you were an attorney for the Labor Board too.

That's a terrible thing to say about anyone.

::sulks, walks away::
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on February 19, 2011, 08:35:40 PM
In other news - Holy shit it's Timmy B!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Timmy B on February 20, 2011, 07:50:36 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 06:44:08 PM
If I didn't know better, I'd say you were an attorney for the Labor Board too.

Worse -- I'm at a convention & visitors bureau.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: JD on February 20, 2011, 08:56:42 PM
Quote from: Timmy B on February 20, 2011, 07:50:36 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 19, 2011, 06:44:08 PM
If I didn't know better, I'd say you were an attorney for the Labor Board too.

Worse -- I'm at a convention & visitors bureauin Kermit's basement, humping a giant scorpion.  Afterwards?  I'm gonna piss on that rug of his.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:10:04 PM
Nothing on Lovie's 2 year extension?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on February 25, 2011, 01:10:34 PM
TIMMY B!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 25, 2011, 01:48:25 PM
Quote from: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:10:04 PM
Nothing on Lovie's 2 year extension?

I'm sure Frosenbloom has something on it. What word from Slezak though?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:50:47 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 25, 2011, 01:48:25 PM
Quote from: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:10:04 PM
Nothing on Lovie's 2 year extension?

I'm sure Frosenbloom has something on it. What word from Slezak though?

She doesn't get off work until around 5, so I'll check back in around 7.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: fiveouts on February 25, 2011, 01:51:51 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 25, 2011, 01:48:25 PM
Quote from: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:10:04 PM
Nothing on Lovie's 2 year extension?

I'm sure Frosenbloom has something on it. What word from Slezak though?

Whatever he writes, it will be rife with WONDERFUL, WONDERFUL PUNS! 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 25, 2011, 02:10:01 PM
Quote from: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:50:47 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 25, 2011, 01:48:25 PM
Quote from: BH on February 25, 2011, 01:10:04 PM
Nothing on Lovie's 2 year extension?

I'm sure Frosenbloom has something on it. What word from Slezak though?

She doesn't get off work until around 5, so I'll check back in around 7.

How's Target treating her so far?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tony on March 02, 2011, 05:24:34 PM
http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/ (http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on March 02, 2011, 09:19:18 PM
Quote from: Tony on March 02, 2011, 05:24:34 PM
http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/ (http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/)

Based on the URL, I assume this is about SKO.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on March 02, 2011, 09:24:51 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 02, 2011, 09:19:18 PM
Quote from: Tony on March 02, 2011, 05:24:34 PM
http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/ (http://www.kcchronicle.com/2011/03/01/police-battery-suspect-was-naked-shouting-about-bears-qb/awgr3gj/)

Based on the URL, I assume this is about SKO.

Your betrayal that night hurt me more than you can ever know, Eli.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on March 09, 2011, 09:31:58 AM
Our own R-V trolls one or all of Biggsy's seven chins on Twitter:

(http://web17.twitpic.com/img/255009791-b02c20f37f1b1c59f790ea2a59e36e75.4d779cf8-full.png)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Intrepid Reader: Biggsy

Wonder what Tim Shaw is up to right now... [dream sequence/lotion/old t-shirt/Doritos]
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on March 22, 2011, 12:18:14 PM
Quote from: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Intrepid Reader: Biggsy

Wonder what Tim Shaw is up to right now... [dream sequence/lotion/old t-shirt/Doritos]

Thanks for the reminder, I just laid some Shawbait for the big lug on my twitter machine.

QuoteKickoffs from the 35 = more touchbacks = less bone jarring tackles by the Tim Shaws of the world, right?

Will he bite this time?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on March 22, 2011, 12:22:34 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Maybe the competition committee can lend a hand to the NBA and eliminate the dunk and the 3-point shot, and then go to baseball and outlaw the slide, the curveball and the slurve.

PLAYER SAFETY ABOVE ALL!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 22, 2011, 12:18:14 PM
Quote from: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Intrepid Reader: Biggsy

Wonder what Tim Shaw is up to right now... [dream sequence/lotion/old t-shirt/Doritos]

Thanks for the reminder, I just laid some Shawbait for the big lug on my twitter machine.

QuoteKickoffs from the 35 = more touchbacks = less bone jarring tackles by the Tim Shaws of the world, right?

Will he bite this time?

Did you @ him?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on March 22, 2011, 12:37:06 PM
Quote from: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 22, 2011, 12:18:14 PM
Quote from: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Intrepid Reader: Biggsy

Wonder what Tim Shaw is up to right now... [dream sequence/lotion/old t-shirt/Doritos]

Thanks for the reminder, I just laid some Shawbait for the big lug on my twitter machine.

QuoteKickoffs from the 35 = more touchbacks = less bone jarring tackles by the Tim Shaws of the world, right?

Will he bite this time?

Did you @ him?

Oh yeah. I am aware of all internet customs.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 22, 2011, 12:43:49 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 22, 2011, 12:18:14 PM
Quote from: Slaky on March 22, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: Yeti on March 22, 2011, 12:01:25 PM
Enjoy the kickoffs from the 35 yard line next year. The score is reporting they received the press release saying the change is official.

Intrepid Reader: Biggsy

Wonder what Tim Shaw is up to right now... [dream sequence/lotion/old t-shirt/Doritos]

Thanks for the reminder, I just laid some Shawbait for the big lug on my twitter machine.

QuoteKickoffs from the 35 = more touchbacks = less bone jarring tackles by the Tim Shaws of the world, right?

Will he bite this time?

I'm sure he'll eat something.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 26, 2011, 10:54:26 PM
Nothing about Jay's engagement?

Yeah, I don't care either.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 12:30:02 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2011, 10:54:26 PM
Nothing about Jay's engagement?

Yeah, I don't care either.

Start here:

http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7734.msg239987#msg239987
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 27, 2011, 06:19:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 12:30:02 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2011, 10:54:26 PM
Nothing about Jay's engagement?

Yeah, I don't care either.

Start here:

http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7734.msg239987#msg239987

I missed the trade of Jay Cutler from the Bears to the NFL.  /butthurt
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 06:25:46 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 27, 2011, 06:19:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 12:30:02 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2011, 10:54:26 PM
Nothing about Jay's engagement?

Yeah, I don't care either.

Start here:

http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7734.msg239987#msg239987

I missed the trade of Jay Cutler from the Bears to the NFL.  /butthurt

You'll have to forgive BH. He's new here.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on April 27, 2011, 06:28:43 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 06:25:46 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 27, 2011, 06:19:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 27, 2011, 12:30:02 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2011, 10:54:26 PM
Nothing about Jay's engagement?

Yeah, I don't care either.

Start here:

http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7734.msg239987#msg239987

I missed the trade of Jay Cutler from the Bears to the NFL.  /butthurt

You'll have to forgive BH. He's new here.

Intrepid Reader: BH

Maybe Fork could tell us about a time he was new and how long it took him to adapt.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 10:29:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?

Intrepid Readers: Matt Millen, Larry Himes and Isiah Thomas 

Hi.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 11:16:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 10:29:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?

Intrepid Readers: Matt Millen, Larry Himes and Isiah Thomas  

Hi.

Hi, guys.  For some reason I was thinking Chicago only.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 11:44:32 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 11:16:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 10:29:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?

Intrepid Readers: Matt Millen, Larry Himes and Isiah Thomas  

Hi.

Hi, guys.  For some reason I was thinking Chicago only.

Fixed.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on April 28, 2011, 02:15:28 PM
Some solid rage here.

http://deadspin.com/#!5796652/its-only-a-matter-of-time-before-an-nfl-teams-financials-are-leaked
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on May 23, 2011, 07:52:49 AM
"The Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times have confirmed that free agent running back Garrett Wolfe was arrested on early Sunday morning in Miami.
"He became aggressive while being ejected by bouncers, and two off-duty officers were summoned," police detective Juan Sanchez said. "They gave him the opportunity to settle his bill, and he refused. He attacked one of the officers." The four-year veteran is facing charges of retail theft, disorderly conduct, assault of a police officer and resisting arrest with violence. Those are fairly serious charges, and very bad news for a soon-to-be unrestricted free agent that earns his money on special teams."

from ROTOWORLD, bros.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on May 23, 2011, 08:59:58 AM
Quote from: BH on May 23, 2011, 07:52:49 AM
"The Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times have confirmed that free agent running back Garrett Wolfe was arrested on early Sunday morning in Miami.
"He became aggressive while being ejected by bouncers, and two off-duty officers were summoned," police detective Juan Sanchez said. "They gave him the opportunity to settle his bill, and he refused. He attacked one of the officers." The four-year veteran is facing charges of retail theft, disorderly conduct, assault of a police officer and resisting arrest with violence. Those are fairly serious charges, and very bad news for a soon-to-be unrestricted free agent that earns his money on special teams."

from ROTOWORLD, bros.


nice choice jerry
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on May 23, 2011, 12:33:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 11:16:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 10:29:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?

Intrepid Readers: Matt Millen, Larry Himes and Isiah Thomas  

Hi.

Hi, guys.  For some reason I was thinking Chicago only.

Larry Himes GMed somewhere other than chicago?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 23, 2011, 12:40:39 PM
Quote from: BBM on May 23, 2011, 12:33:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 11:16:06 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 10:29:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 28, 2011, 09:35:18 AM
Quote from: R-V on April 28, 2011, 09:27:28 AM
So who is the Worst GM in the History of Sportz going to pick? Surprisingly readable breakdown of the possibilities here:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0428-pompei-bears-chicago--20110427,0,1674956.column

Oh, fuck. Hendry is with the Bears now?

Intrepid Readers: Matt Millen, Larry Himes and Isiah Thomas  

Hi.

Hi, guys.  For some reason I was thinking Chicago only.

Larry Himes GMed somewhere other than chicago?

Yeah. He also GMed on the South Side.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 16, 2011, 07:02:28 PM
Nothing about Major Wright's parties with porn stars (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=8190498) or subsequent apology (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=8192887)?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 20, 2011, 01:38:12 PM
I found this  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Inside-Martzs-game-plan.html) fascinating. Matt Bowen knows his X's and O's.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: morpheus on June 22, 2011, 09:39:12 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

How was TIM SHAW omitted from the list of big name free agents?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on June 22, 2011, 09:50:05 AM
Quote from: morpheus on June 22, 2011, 09:39:12 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

How was TIM SHAW omitted from the list of big name free agents?

TIM SHAW is sitting under a viaduct holding a sign that says "Will tackle you for food".

IT'S THE ONLY LIFE HE KNOWS!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 09:52:54 AM
Quote from: CT III on June 22, 2011, 09:50:05 AM
Quote from: morpheus on June 22, 2011, 09:39:12 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

How was TIM SHAW omitted from the list of big name free agents?

TIM SHAW is sitting under a viaduct holding a sign that says "Will tackle you for food".

IT'S THE ONLY LIFE HE KNOWS!

I laughed my pimply-white ass off.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 09:58:23 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

I thought they'd bring back Maynard and maybe have him battle a kid like that McGee guy they've had hanging around the last couple camps, but I knew they weren't satisfied with his performance last year which was his worst year in Chicago. His average keeps going down and he's 37. Weatherford's a good replacement.

My free agency man crush is Braylon Edwards paired with whichever guard Atlanta doesn't re-sign, but I'd settle for a guy like Floyd or Sidney Rice or whomever and then someone like Davin Joseph. Provided they come out of this free agency period with at least one starting guard and a wide receiver that isn't a muppet (but also isn't over 30, natch) I'll be happy.

A lot of this stuff could be found on my blog, if I had one.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:03:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 09:58:23 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

I thought they'd bring back Maynard and maybe have him battle a kid like that McGee guy they've had hanging around the last couple camps, but I knew they weren't satisfied with his performance last year which was his worst year in Chicago. His average keeps going down and he's 37. Weatherford's a good replacement.

My free agency man crush is Braylon Edwards paired with whichever guard Atlanta doesn't re-sign, but I'd settle for a guy like Floyd or Sidney Rice or whomever and then someone like Davin Joseph. Provided they come out of this free agency period with at least one starting guard and a wide receiver that isn't a muppet (but also isn't over 30, natch) I'll be happy.

A lot of this stuff could be found on my blog, if I had one.

You have a crush on Braylon Edwards? Good news - chances are he'd fancy you, too.

(He likes penis)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:06:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:03:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 09:58:23 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

I thought they'd bring back Maynard and maybe have him battle a kid like that McGee guy they've had hanging around the last couple camps, but I knew they weren't satisfied with his performance last year which was his worst year in Chicago. His average keeps going down and he's 37. Weatherford's a good replacement.

My free agency man crush is Braylon Edwards paired with whichever guard Atlanta doesn't re-sign, but I'd settle for a guy like Floyd or Sidney Rice or whomever and then someone like Davin Joseph. Provided they come out of this free agency period with at least one starting guard and a wide receiver that isn't a muppet (but also isn't over 30, natch) I'll be happy.

A lot of this stuff could be found on my blog, if I had one.

You have a crush on Braylon Edwards? Good news - chances are he'd fancy you, too.

(He likes penis)

Is that insider information from the other Slaky? Either way, the guy might be fairly reasonably priced in a flooded market and has produced well despite catching passes from a parade of shitty quarterbacks. He cut down on the drops with the Jets as well. He can smoke all the pole he wants if he's a wide receiver that can do something in the end zone besides gesturing for a flag while the DB leaps over the top of him and intercepts the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:07:42 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:06:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:03:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 09:58:23 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

I thought they'd bring back Maynard and maybe have him battle a kid like that McGee guy they've had hanging around the last couple camps, but I knew they weren't satisfied with his performance last year which was his worst year in Chicago. His average keeps going down and he's 37. Weatherford's a good replacement.

My free agency man crush is Braylon Edwards paired with whichever guard Atlanta doesn't re-sign, but I'd settle for a guy like Floyd or Sidney Rice or whomever and then someone like Davin Joseph. Provided they come out of this free agency period with at least one starting guard and a wide receiver that isn't a muppet (but also isn't over 30, natch) I'll be happy.

A lot of this stuff could be found on my blog, if I had one.

You have a crush on Braylon Edwards? Good news - chances are he'd fancy you, too.

(He likes penis)

Is that insider information from the other Slaky? Either way, the guy might be fairly reasonably priced in a flooded market and has produced well despite catching passes from a parade of shitty quarterbacks. He cut down on the drops with the Jets as well. He can smoke all the pole he wants if he's a wide receiver that can do something in the end zone besides gesturing for a flag while the DB leaps over the top of him and intercepts the ball.

It is. I guess that's probably evidence that the NFL isn't ready for a full on ghey because according to Brad the locker room treated poor Braylon like shit.

Anyway, the Bears will never sign him because he's decent and costs money. So quit wasting your time.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:09:27 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:06:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:03:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 09:58:23 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 09:36:30 AM
Biggsy with an update (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-freeagency-rules-could-prove-costly-to-bears-20110622,0,7671627.story) on the tentative CBA. Whither Danieal Manning? Any chance that Malcom Floyd or Davin Joseph are SKO's new free agency mancrushes? And was I the only person who wasn't aware that Maynard is apparently done as a Bear?

QuoteIncluded in the report is the assertion that the rules for free agency will revert back to how they were in 2009 and before, meaning all players out of contract with four or more years of service will be unrestricted.

While that has been expectee, clubs still tendered qualifying offers to potential restricted free agents under the system that was used in 2010, when players needed six years of service to be unrestricted.

How will it affect the Chicago Bears? For cornerback Corey Graham, safety Danieal Manning and linebacker Nick Roach, it means good news. Although the Bears tendered a qualifying RFA offer to all three, under these guidelines they will be unrestricted, allowing them to enter the open market.

It's bad news for the team as it reduces the chances all three will return. In fact, Graham is a good bet to leave as a UFA. Roach is probably the best bet of the three to return as the Bears need a starter on the strong side, where he made six starts last season.

Manning, who has five years of service, was one of the players caught up last year by the change in rules. It's the influx of players in situations similar to his that is going to make free agency a bonanza when it opens, probably sometime next month.

The class of free agents will be nearly double its usual size, creating a massive pool of players for teams that will have to fill out rosters and spend to meet a salary-cap floor. If free agency starts in mid-July with training camps scheduled to open on time, it will be a mad dash of activity.

QuoteSome big names will head to free agency. The unofficial list includes wide receivers Steve Breaston, Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Malcolm Floyd and Sidney Rice, running backs Ahmad Bradshaw and DeAngelo Williams, defensive ends Ray Edwards and Jacob Ford, tight ends Kevin Boss and Zach Miller, offensive linemen Willie Colon, Doug Free and Davin Joseph and cornerbacks Antonio Cromartie and Johnathan Joseph.

QuoteStrong hints indicate the Bears will pursue veteran punter Steve Weatherford in free agency. That's just one of the positions the team needs to address.

I thought they'd bring back Maynard and maybe have him battle a kid like that McGee guy they've had hanging around the last couple camps, but I knew they weren't satisfied with his performance last year which was his worst year in Chicago. His average keeps going down and he's 37. Weatherford's a good replacement.

My free agency man crush is Braylon Edwards paired with whichever guard Atlanta doesn't re-sign, but I'd settle for a guy like Floyd or Sidney Rice or whomever and then someone like Davin Joseph. Provided they come out of this free agency period with at least one starting guard and a wide receiver that isn't a muppet (but also isn't over 30, natch) I'll be happy.

A lot of this stuff could be found on my blog, if I had one.

You have a crush on Braylon Edwards? Good news - chances are he'd fancy you, too.

(He likes penis)

Is that insider information from the other Slaky? Either way, the guy might be fairly reasonably priced in a flooded market and has produced well despite catching passes from a parade of shitty quarterbacks. He cut down on the drops with the Jets as well. He can smoke all the pole he wants if he's a wide receiver that can do something in the end zone besides gesturing for a flag while the DB leaps over the top of him and intercepts the ball.

DPD, but I could survive with just about any of the wide receivers out there except Plaxico, T.O., Ochocinco, or Randy Moss since I have no doubt those fossils would make Muhsin Muhammad look like a fucking steal so long as they get a starting guard. If they just re-sign Olin Kreutz and give us the whole "keeping Olin was like a free agent signing all to itself" horse plop and then talk about Chris Williams' potential I'll be pissed.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:31:30 AM
Quote from: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.

If you guys keep this up we're never going to realize the dream of an all-gay NFL.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:33:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:31:30 AM
Quote from: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.

If you guys keep this up we're never going to realize the dream of an all-gay NFL.

In the States, we call that soccer. And it's not gonna hai.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:34:17 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:31:30 AM
Quote from: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.

If you guys keep this up we're never going to realize the dream of an all-gay NFL.

I can't believe anyone on the '07 and '08 Browns would waste valuable time making fun of Blowin when there were uberdeutsches like Kellen Winslow and Brady Quinn just begging to be mocked viciously.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Bort on June 22, 2011, 10:34:30 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:31:30 AM
Quote from: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.

If you guys keep this up we're never going to realize the dream of an all-gay NFL.

[flounces out of the room angrily]
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:39:55 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:34:17 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:31:30 AM
Quote from: BH on June 22, 2011, 10:24:54 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 22, 2011, 10:21:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

They should call him Blowin Dudeswads.

Garblownzo Dudesbeanzs.

If you guys keep this up we're never going to realize the dream of an all-gay NFL.

I can't believe anyone on the '07 and '08 Browns would waste valuable time making fun of Blowin when there were uberdeutsches like Kellen Winslow and Brady Quinn just begging to be mocked viciously.

Because, and this was a real question that I actually asked, Kellen Winslow is widely believed to be able to shoot AIDS from his pores and no one would even dare go near him.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:51:09 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.

Yay!

Now, let's fix the secondary before it breaks.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:54:02 AM
I wonder if Lovie, Martz and Tice sit around talking about the Bears' o-line like we talk about Matt Murton, Todd Walker, Juan Pierre and Will Ohman. Like how the FUCK ... did... GOD DAMMIT!!!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:54:40 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:54:02 AM
I wonder if Lovie, Martz and Tice sit around talking about the Bears' o-line like we talk about Matt Murton, Todd Walker, Juan Pierre and Will Ohman. Like how the FUCK ... did... GOD DAMMIT!!!

Except they get paid for it. Man, that'd be fun.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:54:49 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:51:09 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.

Yay!

Now, let's fix the secondary before it breaks.

The only move they'll make in the secondary is bringing back Danieal Manning if they can afford him. I can't imagine them doing more than finding one mediocre guy to throw into the competition between Jennings and Zack Bowman, who'll get one more chance to prove he can do something with the talent he has.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 11:25:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:54:49 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:51:09 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.

Yay!

Now, let's fix the secondary before it breaks.

The only move they'll make in the secondary is bringing back Danieal Manning if they can afford him. I can't imagine them doing more than finding one mediocre guy to throw into the competition between Jennings and Zack Bowman, who'll get one more chance to prove he can do something with the talent he has.

I guess they drafted a Safety too. But BC said he was slow. So fuck that.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 22, 2011, 12:13:53 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 11:25:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:54:49 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:51:09 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.

Yay!

Now, let's fix the secondary before it breaks.

The only move they'll make in the secondary is bringing back Danieal Manning if they can afford him. I can't imagine them doing more than finding one mediocre guy to throw into the competition between Jennings and Zack Bowman, who'll get one more chance to prove he can do something with the talent he has.

I guess they drafted a Safety too. But BC said he was slow. So fuck that.

He's a converted corner, so too slow for a corner but good speed for a safety. Biggest problem is he's raw and new to the position, so in about 4-5 years he should have a quiet All-Pro caliber season and then leave in free agency like Danieal.

Also, the old Tampa Two strategy of "who needs corners if you have a pass rush?" worked pretty damn well last year, and I expect it to be even better with Stephen Paea drawing some of the attention away from Peppers and Izzy, so I'm not up in a cold sweat worrying about the secondary like I was the last three offseasons.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 12:37:07 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 12:13:53 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 11:25:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:54:49 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:51:09 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:31:00 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:27:53 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 22, 2011, 10:17:45 AM
I have faith that the Bears are sick of their offensive line worries and really want to fix it so that Cutler can become as great as they (to their credit) believe he is. Want to and know how are different things, I know. But I think there's a good chance they'll over- compensate there in FA and the receiving corps will remain highly suspect for another year. I'm more worried about the secondary than the receivers anyhow.

If they fix that offensive line than they'll survive with the wideouts they have, especially if they keep Hester in the slot like they did toward the end last year and keep the BBE on the outside opposite of Knox.

The problem with the line is that it sounds like Roberto Garza is just penciled in to start next year, which is bad news since he's nowhere near the player he was a few years ago. They need at least one starting guard in free agency and then you let Garza, Williams, Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, and Johan Asiata fight it out for the other spot while Gheyb locks down the blind side and Webb improves in year two over on the right. Either way, if they can find a way to drop the sack total down somewhere south of 35ish Erik Kramer's 1995 season will disappear from the record books. It's gonna hai.

All of THI.

I think they know they have to replace Garza. My worry is that they'll overpay for some hack who can't play and we're completely screwed.

There's enough quality, proven guys south of 30 in this class that they can probably find one that doesn't suck. If Davin Joseph (27), Justin Blalock (27), Carl Nicks (26), Harvey Dahl (30), Chris Chester (28), David Baas (29) and Deuce Lutui (28) are out there they have to get at least one reasonably young guy that can start and won't be a disaster. Angelo's record on free agent offensive linemen has been pretty mixed, but the last time the line was this bad he managed to add John Tait, Ruben Brown, and Fred Miller in two consecutive offseasons and those guys all gave 3-4 good years and they were all older than that group.

Yay!

Now, let's fix the secondary before it breaks.

The only move they'll make in the secondary is bringing back Danieal Manning if they can afford him. I can't imagine them doing more than finding one mediocre guy to throw into the competition between Jennings and Zack Bowman, who'll get one more chance to prove he can do something with the talent he has.

I guess they drafted a Safety too. But BC said he was slow. So fuck that.

He's a converted corner, so too slow for a corner but good speed for a safety. Biggest problem is he's raw and new to the position, so in about 4-5 years he should have a quiet All-Pro caliber season and then leave in free agency like Danieal.

Also, the old Tampa Two strategy of "who needs corners if you have a pass rush?" worked pretty damn well last year, and I expect it to be even better with Stephen Paea drawing some of the attention away from Peppers and Izzy, so I'm not up in a cold sweat worrying about the secondary like I was the last three offseasons.

I switched sides of the bed with TPex and now the AC hits me just right as well.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 22, 2011, 12:47:37 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 22, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 22, 2011, 10:12:15 AM
That was the worst DPD ever.

Sorry. I didn't mean to cover up the bombshell that is Braylon Edwards: Ghey Male Homosecksual.

At least now we know why he's not a tight end, amirite?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on June 23, 2011, 05:07:33 PM
"So we thought, who was behind the football?  Football?  Cops?  Football Cops. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-znHzHafMlQ)"
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 08, 2011, 04:23:31 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?
My best guess? They think Garza can handle center but they aren't sold that both Williams and Lance Louis will pan out at the guard positions, so if one of them struggles you move Garza back to guard and put Spencer in at center, but they obviously think they have better potential if fucking Williams ever amounts to anything and they want to keep Garza in the lineup.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 04:56:37 PM
Quote from: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.

$6 million for a back-up center seems like an awesome use of money for a team that has significant problems with the starting offensive line.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on August 08, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 04:56:37 PM
Quote from: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.

$6 million for a back-up center seems like an awesome use of money for a team that has significant problems with the starting offensive line.

I was under the impression that they intend to make Spencer the starting center once he learns the offense.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on August 08, 2011, 05:58:36 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 08, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 04:56:37 PM
Quote from: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.

$6 million for a back-up center seems like an awesome use of money for a team that has significant problems with the starting offensive line.

I was under the impression that they intend to make Spencer the starting center once he learns the offense.

I too was under that same impression.  It is a complex offense.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on August 08, 2011, 06:22:01 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on August 08, 2011, 05:58:36 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 08, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 04:56:37 PM
Quote from: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.

$6 million for a back-up center seems like an awesome use of money for a team that has significant problems with the starting offensive line.

I was under the impression that they intend to make Spencer the starting center once he learns the offense.

I too was under that same impression.  It is a complex offense.

I'd also be a retard to start frothing at the mouth over a proclamation made with four full weeks before the first meaningful game.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 09, 2011, 07:36:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 08, 2011, 06:22:01 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on August 08, 2011, 05:58:36 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 08, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 04:56:37 PM
Quote from: BH on August 08, 2011, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 08, 2011, 03:27:02 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 08, 2011, 09:29:40 AM
Well, Mike Tice says the starting five  (http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Bears-set-their-offensive-line.html) on the line are Webb, Williams, Garza, Louis, and Carimi L to R. I'll hold my judgement on that till the regular season, but for the most part WHAT THE FUCK? I suppose Garza at center may not be a terrible idea, since he's big and doesn't suck and knows the line calls and by the reports I've seen has gotten over a rough start and is playing pretty well at center now, but this plan includes starting Chris Williams and, I believe, leaves Frank Omiyale on the roster, so not good man, not good.

Then people are apparently pissed because Roy Williams is battling Johnny Knox for the starting X position, not Devin Hester over at Z. I don't think Johnny Knox sucks as much as Apex thinks he does, but I also don't think he's that much, if at all, better than Hester necessarily. Either way everyone's going to get a bunch of targets, but I don't think that muppets worth this much hand-wringing. It'll all be a moot point once Sanzebacher starts torching secondaries anyway.

Wait...why did they bother getting that guy from Seattke then?

I think the bears can change lineups later if they want.

$6 million for a back-up center seems like an awesome use of money for a team that has significant problems with the starting offensive line.

I was under the impression that they intend to make Spencer the starting center once he learns the offense.

I too was under that same impression.  It is a complex offense.

I'd also be a retard to start frothing at the mouth over a proclamation made with four full weeks before the first meaningful game.

I also think any line that does not have Frank Omiyale as a starter is going to be better than an offensive line that had Frank Omiyale as a starter. That is a fact. I believe Tice that this is the five he would like to go into the season with, but they're obviously aware there's a good chance Spencer's going to have to go in once Chris Williams fucks up. One last chance for Jerry's blunder. Remember when everyone made a big deal about the Bears drafting him when they knew he had a back injury? Why didn't anyone make a bigger deal about the fact that he's not good at blocking people?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:21:18 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.

Freak out about a team I don't root for?

You know that SKO and I are different people, right?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:28:44 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:21:18 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.

Freak out about a team I don't root for?

You know that SKO and I are different people, right?

I figured since you were so butthurt over Spencer not starting, you'd have some tears about this news.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:29:13 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:28:44 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:21:18 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.

Freak out about a team I don't root for?

You know that SKO and I are different people, right?

I figured since you were so butthurt over Spencer not starting, you'd have some tears about this news.

You mean, since this is the exact opposite of that?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:36:23 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:29:13 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:28:44 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:21:18 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.

Freak out about a team I don't root for?

You know that SKO and I are different people, right?

I figured since you were so butthurt over Spencer not starting, you'd have some tears about this news.

You mean, since this is the exact opposite of that?

The opposite about caring who's in the starting lineup? Sure.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:37:19 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:36:23 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:29:13 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:28:44 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 10, 2011, 01:21:18 PM
Quote from: BH on August 10, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
Knox is a 2nd string WR behind Roy Williams. Behind Williams, Hester and Earl Bennett? Go ahead, freak out Pen.

Freak out about a team I don't root for?

You know that SKO and I are different people, right?

I figured since you were so butthurt over Spencer not starting, you'd have some tears about this news.

You mean, since this is the exact opposite of that?

The opposite about caring who's in the starting lineup? Sure.

Calmer than you are.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on August 11, 2011, 09:16:09 AM
Quote from: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).

I don't now what you're talking about right know.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:27:54 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 11, 2011, 09:16:09 AM
Quote from: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).

I don't now what you're talking about right know.

Apparently Knox is pissed that Roy Williams is currently working at X receiver and that Knox is now #4 on the depth chart because the team is still going to give Hester the opportunity to pan out as a wideout and Earl Bennett is pretty much locked in as the slot/3rd down guy. I think if the sonofabitch can't handle the challenge of beating out Roy Williams he's even softer than I thought. Knox is a talented guy and his speed is an awesome asset, but he had a catch rate of just 52% last year. The X receiver in the Martz offense just gets the most targets (98 for Johnny vs. 72 for Hester and 70 for Bennett), and he didn't cash in anywhere near as many of them as he should. I guarantee you Roy would eclipse Johnny's numbers from last year in the spot. If you want to blame Cutler for Knox's poor catch rate on his targets, okay, but he had by far the lowest rate out of the trio with  Bennett (65.7%) and Hester (55.6%). I certainly wouldn't trade him unless someone is willing to overpay, but the guy's kind of an overrated midget who hasn't done nearly as much as he thinks he has.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:31:06 AM
Then again: (http://i53.tinypic.com/2m7ekus.jpg) http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101660079568322561
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 11, 2011, 09:37:44 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:27:54 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 11, 2011, 09:16:09 AM
Quote from: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).

I don't now what you're talking about right know.

Apparently Knox is pissed that Roy Williams is currently working at X receiver and that Knox is now #4 on the depth chart because the team is still going to give Hester the opportunity to pan out as a wideout and Earl Bennett is pretty much locked in as the slot/3rd down guy. I think if the sonofabitch can't handle the challenge of beating out Roy Williams he's even softer than I thought. Knox is a talented guy and his speed is an awesome asset, but he had a catch rate of just 52% last year. The X receiver in the Martz offense just gets the most targets (98 for Johnny vs. 72 for Hester and 70 for Bennett), and he didn't cash in anywhere near as many of them as he should. I guarantee you Roy would eclipse Johnny's numbers from last year in the spot. If you want to blame Cutler for Knox's poor catch rate on his targets, okay, but he had by far the lowest rate out of the trio with  Bennett (65.7%) and Hester (55.6%). I certainly wouldn't trade him unless someone is willing to overpay, but the guy's kind of an overrated midget who hasn't done nearly as much as he thinks he has.

I postive the concept of Johnny Knox: 4th Receiver. The idea of Roy Williams as the No. 1, however excites me about as much as Johnny Knox: No. 1 Receiver.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on August 11, 2011, 09:39:47 AM
Quote from: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).

I think you have to have leverage to force a trade.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 11, 2011, 10:11:14 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 11, 2011, 09:37:44 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:27:54 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 11, 2011, 09:16:09 AM
Quote from: BH on August 11, 2011, 09:09:58 AM
And now Know might force a trade because he isn't starting (http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/44103946/ns/sports-player_news/).

I don't now what you're talking about right know.

Apparently Knox is pissed that Roy Williams is currently working at X receiver and that Knox is now #4 on the depth chart because the team is still going to give Hester the opportunity to pan out as a wideout and Earl Bennett is pretty much locked in as the slot/3rd down guy. I think if the sonofabitch can't handle the challenge of beating out Roy Williams he's even softer than I thought. Knox is a talented guy and his speed is an awesome asset, but he had a catch rate of just 52% last year. The X receiver in the Martz offense just gets the most targets (98 for Johnny vs. 72 for Hester and 70 for Bennett), and he didn't cash in anywhere near as many of them as he should. I guarantee you Roy would eclipse Johnny's numbers from last year in the spot. If you want to blame Cutler for Knox's poor catch rate on his targets, okay, but he had by far the lowest rate out of the trio with  Bennett (65.7%) and Hester (55.6%). I certainly wouldn't trade him unless someone is willing to overpay, but the guy's kind of an overrated midget who hasn't done nearly as much as he thinks he has.

I postive the concept of Johnny Knox: 4th Receiver. The idea of Roy Williams as the No. 1, however excites me about as much as Johnny Knox: No. 1 Receiver.

Ehh. Much as I loathe the bastard's personality, there's reason to believe this will work. He was plagued constantly by injuries in 08-09 which contributed to his declining numbers then, and last year he really wasn't bad. He had a pretty high catch rate and was a good downfield threat, but his targets dropped off considerably after Romo went down and Kitna preferred throwing underneath to Dez Bryant. Bryant got a whole lot of attention, but he really wasn't better than Roy since he had 561 yds and 6 TDs on 45 catches (12.5 avg) on 70 targets, while Roy had 37 catches for 530 yds (14.3 YPC) and 5 TDs on 64 targets. It's likely that, had Romo stayed healthy, Roy would have had a much better year, since he was on pace for about 980 yds before Romo's injury. I think if Roy stays healthy he'll get the 70 receptions and the 1000 some yards that Martz projects. I doubt he'll be a 1300 yd receiver like he was in 2006, but I think he'll be an upgrade over what Knox did last year. If Knox actually improves his route-running and doesn't get bumped off easily on every goddamn slant pass he ever runs he may overtake Hester for the Z.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 11, 2011, 10:31:37 AM
TPD...apparently our old friend Biggsy reported the Knox-trade thing and Johnny more or less told Biggsy to stick it up his ass http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101676119446659074 . Biggsy just wants them to trade him so he can continue to give us updates on the asshurt status of former Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on August 11, 2011, 10:49:55 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 10:31:37 AM
Biggsy just wants them to trade him so they can get back Tim Shaw he can continue to give us updates on the asshurt status of former Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on August 11, 2011, 11:16:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:31:06 AM
Then again: (http://i53.tinypic.com/2m7ekus.jpg) http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101660079568322561

Isn't it ironic that he's vowing to not "give up" when his reputation is that of a wideout who gives up all too easily for jump balls?

CT?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on August 11, 2011, 11:30:23 AM
Quote from: PANK! on August 11, 2011, 11:16:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:31:06 AM
Then again: (http://i53.tinypic.com/2m7ekus.jpg) http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101660079568322561

Isn't it ironic that he's vowing to not "give up" when his reputation is that of a wideout who gives up all too easily for jump balls?

CT?

Knox has had jump balls thrown to him?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 11, 2011, 11:34:26 AM
Quote from: R-V on August 11, 2011, 11:30:23 AM
Quote from: PANK! on August 11, 2011, 11:16:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:31:06 AM
Then again: (http://i53.tinypic.com/2m7ekus.jpg) http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101660079568322561

Isn't it ironic that he's vowing to not "give up" when his reputation is that of a wideout who gives up all too easily for jump balls?

CT?

Knox has had jump balls thrown to him?

We have to wait on CT to give us his thoughts... you jumped the gun a bit.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on August 11, 2011, 11:36:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 10:31:37 AM
TPD...apparently our old friend Biggsy reported the Knox-trade thing and Johnny more or less told Biggsy to stick it up his ass http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101676119446659074 . Biggsy just wants them to trade him so he can continue to give us updates on the asshurt status of former Bears.

Twice Posting Douche?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on August 11, 2011, 11:51:05 AM
Quote from: PANK! on August 11, 2011, 11:16:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 09:31:06 AM
Then again: (http://i53.tinypic.com/2m7ekus.jpg) http://twitter.com/#/Jknox13/status/101660079568322561

Isn't it ironic that he's vowing to not "give up" when his reputation is that of a wideout who gives up all too easily for jump balls?

CT?

I'm going to allow this.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Shooter on August 11, 2011, 01:34:15 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 11, 2011, 09:37:44 AM
I postive the concept of Johnny Knox: 4th Receiver. The idea of Roy Williams as the No. 1, however excites me about as much as Johnny Knox: No. 1 Receiver.

Can I interest you in Johnny Knoxville: No. 1 Receiver?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 11, 2011, 02:37:18 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.

Man, it really bothers you that nobody wants your opinion on anything, ever, doesn't it?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:56:00 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 02:37:18 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.

Man, it really bothers you that nobody wants your opinion on anything, ever, doesn't it?

Are you asking my opinion?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 11, 2011, 03:20:26 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.

No one except coaches can use real men's proper footbaw terminology. Tell me more about those runny catchy guys!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenPho on August 11, 2011, 05:19:20 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:56:00 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 02:37:18 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.

Man, it really bothers you that nobody wants your opinion on anything, ever, doesn't it?

Are you asking my opinion?

This was very funny.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on August 11, 2011, 05:40:37 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 11, 2011, 05:19:20 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:56:00 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 11, 2011, 02:37:18 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 11, 2011, 02:10:09 PM
I like when SKO talks about X, Z, and H receivers like he's a coach.

Man, it really bothers you that nobody wants your opinion on anything, ever, doesn't it?

Are you asking my opinion?

This was very funny.

Don't you just hate it when that happens?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 16, 2011, 01:10:36 PM
Pretty humorous interview with actual personality from Jay Cutler. (http://mfile3.akamai.com/52543/wma/bearsnfl.download.akamai.com/52567/081511_AllAccess.asx)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on August 18, 2011, 01:15:41 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.

You bet your sweet Ryan Harvey, mister!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on August 18, 2011, 02:23:32 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.

I love hearing it hear
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on August 18, 2011, 03:25:52 PM
Quote from: Alrish Yeltin on August 18, 2011, 02:23:32 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.

I love hearing it hear

When Yetti calls one out on a grammatical mistake, it's probably best to hang 'em up at that point.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on August 18, 2011, 07:04:36 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on August 18, 2011, 03:25:52 PM
Quote from: Alrish Yeltin on August 18, 2011, 02:23:32 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.

I love hearing it hear

When Yetti calls one out on a grammatical mistake, it's probably best to hang 'em up at that point.

Question.  When they approve of a comment that the speaker has made in the House of Commons are they saying "Here, here", or "Hear, hear",  or "Hear here"  or "Here, hear"? 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 22, 2011, 11:12:58 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 18, 2011, 07:04:36 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on August 18, 2011, 03:25:52 PM
Quote from: Alrish Yeltin on August 18, 2011, 02:23:32 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 18, 2011, 01:03:28 PM
Quote from: BH on August 18, 2011, 12:42:55 PM
Fire up (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Bears-Williams-not-in-shape?urn=nfl-387550) the hatewagon for Roy Williams.

He needs to get his "wind right", ie, he's still out of shape.


Man, the pickings really are slim this training camp. 

Roy Williams is going to have his bests season as a pro and the best season for a Bears wideout ever.  #FACT


He's going to catch over 100 balls for more than 1400 yards and catch more than 13 TDs. You heard it hear first.
Left-to-right.

I love hearing it hear

When Yetti calls one out on a grammatical mistake, it's probably best to hang 'em up at that point.

Question.  When they approve of a comment that the speaker has made in the House of Commons are they saying "Here, here", or "Hear, hear",  or "Hear here"  or "Here, hear"? 

Only Site You'll Ever Need

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hear,_hear
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on August 22, 2011, 12:42:39 PM
Biggsy takes a break from helping Tim Shaw pick out paint colors for his home theater to gather some interesting nuggets and tidbits from Football Outsiders (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-football-outsiders-bears-have-reason-for-optimism-20110822,0,3813808,full.story), including one comparison that I'm fairly certain will make SKO's bowlcut-topped head explode.

QuoteAs far as Cutler goes, the research shows what you see is what you get. Football Outsiders projects him to pass for 3,555 yards this season with 22 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

"Mechanically he has flaws that a player of his experience should have corrected by now and players who don't correct that by his age and his number of attempts don't correct them," Tanier said. "He's not going to stop throwing off of his back foot when he's rushed. He's not going to stop throwing into coverage in the middle of the field because those are mistakes you correct in your second year or third year."

Who does Cutler compare to according to Football Outsiders?

"Jim Everett, a player who had a lot of success, threw for a lot of yards, had some playoff success, but couldn't overcome the sacks and couldn't overcome the mistakes," Tanier said. "When you take a lot of hits early in your career, your numbers start to go down a little more quickly."

From the book: "The similarities between the two quarterbacks are obvious: big arm, big stats, tendency to throw off the back foot, checkered-at-best reputation as a clubhouse personality."
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 22, 2011, 02:37:30 PM
Quote from: R-V on August 22, 2011, 12:42:39 PM
Biggsy takes a break from helping Tim Shaw pick out paint colors for his home theater to gather some interesting nuggets and tidbits from Football Outsiders (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-football-outsiders-bears-have-reason-for-optimism-20110822,0,3813808,full.story), including one comparison that I'm fairly certain will make SKO's bowlcut-topped head explode.

QuoteAs far as Cutler goes, the research shows what you see is what you get. Football Outsiders projects him to pass for 3,555 yards this season with 22 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

"Mechanically he has flaws that a player of his experience should have corrected by now and players who don't correct that by his age and his number of attempts don't correct them," Tanier said. "He's not going to stop throwing off of his back foot when he's rushed. He's not going to stop throwing into coverage in the middle of the field because those are mistakes you correct in your second year or third year."

Who does Cutler compare to according to Football Outsiders?

"Jim Everett, a player who had a lot of success, threw for a lot of yards, had some playoff success, but couldn't overcome the sacks and couldn't overcome the mistakes," Tanier said. "When you take a lot of hits early in your career, your numbers start to go down a little more quickly."

From the book: "The similarities between the two quarterbacks are obvious: big arm, big stats, tendency to throw off the back foot, checkered-at-best reputation as a clubhouse personality."

Chris Cutler?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 23, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 22, 2011, 02:37:30 PM
Quote from: R-V on August 22, 2011, 12:42:39 PM
Biggsy takes a break from helping Tim Shaw pick out paint colors for his home theater to gather some interesting nuggets and tidbits from Football Outsiders (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-football-outsiders-bears-have-reason-for-optimism-20110822,0,3813808,full.story), including one comparison that I'm fairly certain will make SKO's bowlcut-topped head explode.

QuoteAs far as Cutler goes, the research shows what you see is what you get. Football Outsiders projects him to pass for 3,555 yards this season with 22 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

"Mechanically he has flaws that a player of his experience should have corrected by now and players who don't correct that by his age and his number of attempts don't correct them," Tanier said. "He's not going to stop throwing off of his back foot when he's rushed. He's not going to stop throwing into coverage in the middle of the field because those are mistakes you correct in your second year or third year."

Who does Cutler compare to according to Football Outsiders?

"Jim Everett, a player who had a lot of success, threw for a lot of yards, had some playoff success, but couldn't overcome the sacks and couldn't overcome the mistakes," Tanier said. "When you take a lot of hits early in your career, your numbers start to go down a little more quickly."

From the book: "The similarities between the two quarterbacks are obvious: big arm, big stats, tendency to throw off the back foot, checkered-at-best reputation as a clubhouse personality."

Chris Cutler?

We've discussed the Cutler-Everett comparison in the shoutbox before. They're actually pretty similar in that Everett, too, was shit on for most of his career after 1989. I mean he played for the mid-90s Saints and Rams. Those teams were absolute garbage. If Cutler gets protection we will see if he can't improve. I also don't necessarily by the "guys don't improve at this stage of their career" argument. Possibly true, but Favre from 92-94 had some serious issues before Holmgren finally settled him down. No one remembers because he won three Superbowls, but Tom Brady's highest passer rating in his first three years as a starter was 86.5 and his highest YPA in that time was 6.9. Guys can improve when you improve the talent around them.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on August 23, 2011, 11:48:33 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 23, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 22, 2011, 02:37:30 PM
Quote from: R-V on August 22, 2011, 12:42:39 PM
Biggsy takes a break from helping Tim Shaw pick out paint colors for his home theater to gather some interesting nuggets and tidbits from Football Outsiders (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-football-outsiders-bears-have-reason-for-optimism-20110822,0,3813808,full.story), including one comparison that I'm fairly certain will make SKO's bowlcut-topped head explode.

QuoteAs far as Cutler goes, the research shows what you see is what you get. Football Outsiders projects him to pass for 3,555 yards this season with 22 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

"Mechanically he has flaws that a player of his experience should have corrected by now and players who don't correct that by his age and his number of attempts don't correct them," Tanier said. "He's not going to stop throwing off of his back foot when he's rushed. He's not going to stop throwing into coverage in the middle of the field because those are mistakes you correct in your second year or third year."

Who does Cutler compare to according to Football Outsiders?

"Jim Everett, a player who had a lot of success, threw for a lot of yards, had some playoff success, but couldn't overcome the sacks and couldn't overcome the mistakes," Tanier said. "When you take a lot of hits early in your career, your numbers start to go down a little more quickly."

From the book: "The similarities between the two quarterbacks are obvious: big arm, big stats, tendency to throw off the back foot, checkered-at-best reputation as a clubhouse personality."

Chris Cutler?

We've discussed the Cutler-Everett comparison in the shoutbox before. They're actually pretty similar in that Everett, too, was shit on for most of his career after 1989. I mean he played for the mid-90s Saints and Rams. Those teams were absolute garbage. If Cutler gets protection we will see if he can't improve. I also don't necessarily by the "guys don't improve at this stage of their career" argument. Possibly true, but Favre from 92-94 had some serious issues before Holmgren finally settled him down. No one remembers because he won three Superbowls, but Tom Brady's highest passer rating in his first three years as a starter was 86.5 and his highest YPA in that time was 6.9. Guys can improve when you improve the talent around them.

So Cutler is just as good as Tom Brady and Eli Manning?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 23, 2011, 11:50:19 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 23, 2011, 11:48:33 AM
Quote from: SKO on August 23, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 22, 2011, 02:37:30 PM
Quote from: R-V on August 22, 2011, 12:42:39 PM
Biggsy takes a break from helping Tim Shaw pick out paint colors for his home theater to gather some interesting nuggets and tidbits from Football Outsiders (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-football-outsiders-bears-have-reason-for-optimism-20110822,0,3813808,full.story), including one comparison that I'm fairly certain will make SKO's bowlcut-topped head explode.

QuoteAs far as Cutler goes, the research shows what you see is what you get. Football Outsiders projects him to pass for 3,555 yards this season with 22 touchdowns and 18 interceptions.

"Mechanically he has flaws that a player of his experience should have corrected by now and players who don't correct that by his age and his number of attempts don't correct them," Tanier said. "He's not going to stop throwing off of his back foot when he's rushed. He's not going to stop throwing into coverage in the middle of the field because those are mistakes you correct in your second year or third year."

Who does Cutler compare to according to Football Outsiders?

"Jim Everett, a player who had a lot of success, threw for a lot of yards, had some playoff success, but couldn't overcome the sacks and couldn't overcome the mistakes," Tanier said. "When you take a lot of hits early in your career, your numbers start to go down a little more quickly."

From the book: "The similarities between the two quarterbacks are obvious: big arm, big stats, tendency to throw off the back foot, checkered-at-best reputation as a clubhouse personality."

Chris Cutler?

We've discussed the Cutler-Everett comparison in the shoutbox before. They're actually pretty similar in that Everett, too, was shit on for most of his career after 1989. I mean he played for the mid-90s Saints and Rams. Those teams were absolute garbage. If Cutler gets protection we will see if he can't improve. I also don't necessarily by the "guys don't improve at this stage of their career" argument. Possibly true, but Favre from 92-94 had some serious issues before Holmgren finally settled him down. No one remembers because he won three Superbowls, but Tom Brady's highest passer rating in his first three years as a starter was 86.5 and his highest YPA in that time was 6.9. Guys can improve when you improve the talent around them.

So Cutler is just as good as Tom Brady and Eli Manning?

Thanks for Eli Manning. Another notch against the "guys his age just don't improve" argument.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 24, 2011, 06:11:33 PM
It's stupid (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/7258765-417/bears-wr-roy-williams-in-danger-of-losing-starting-job.html) how close Roy Williams is to being a hall of famer.

"Asked where Williams is at, in preparation for the season opener, Drake said, "Not where he needs to be, and he knows that.

"He and I have talked about that. And the good thing about it is, you got Johnny Knox who is fighting and working hard. And believe you and me, [Williams] also understands that Johnny is there, and Johnny is hungry, and Johnny wants his spot back. And if things don't start changing, then Johnny is going to be in there. Heard it straight from the horse's mouth."

Williams said earlier Wednesday that he was being sarcastic about his comments from last week regarding his physical fitness. But Drake didn't debunk the notion that Williams still isn't in game shape.

"I understand that Roy's got some things to do, as far as getting in shape, but that's not my fault, and that's not my concern," Drake said. "My concern is making sure, when we play Atlanta, we got the best guys out there, that is going to give us the best chance to win. And if Johnny Knox is that guy, then he needs to be out there.""
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on August 27, 2011, 08:23:08 AM
RV STICKPOKE!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0827-bits-bears-chicago--20110827,0,3781327.story

QuoteSpecial stuff: The Bears' short-sighted release of special teams stalwart Tim Shaw at final cuts a year ago looks worse now.

Shaw was let go when the team trimmed to 53 and the Bears kept Hunter Hillenmeyer knowing the veteran with a history of concussions was coming off another head injury in preseason. Hillenmeyer lasted one game and the club was forced to bring in Rod Wilson, a player who knew the system but didn't match Shaw's capabilities on special teams a year after he set a franchise record with 30 tackles.

Now, the Bears aren't certain what kind of help they have for Dave Toub at linebacker and in the secondary and it won't be surprising if the club makes a waiver move at final cuts to bring in some help. Shaw, who the Titans scooped up on waivers last September, led them with 20 special teams tackles.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 27, 2011, 10:21:18 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 27, 2011, 08:23:08 AM
RV STICKPOKE!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0827-bits-bears-chicago--20110827,0,3781327.story

QuoteSpecial stuff: The Bears' short-sighted release of special teams stalwart Tim Shaw at final cuts a year ago looks worse now.

Shaw was let go when the team trimmed to 53 and the Bears kept Hunter Hillenmeyer knowing the veteran with a history of concussions was coming off another head injury in preseason. Hillenmeyer lasted one game and the club was forced to bring in Rod Wilson, a player who knew the system but didn't match Shaw's capabilities on special teams a year after he set a franchise record with 30 tackles.

Now, the Bears aren't certain what kind of help they have for Dave Toub at linebacker and in the secondary and it won't be surprising if the club makes a waiver move at final cuts to bring in some help. Shaw, who the Titans scooped up on waivers last September, led them with 20 special teams tackles.

RIGHT THAT WRONG!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on August 27, 2011, 10:24:25 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 27, 2011, 08:23:08 AM
RV STICKPOKE!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0827-bits-bears-chicago--20110827,0,3781327.story

QuoteSpecial stuff: The Bears' short-sighted release of special teams stalwart Tim Shaw at final cuts a year ago looks worse now.

Shaw was let go when the team trimmed to 53 and the Bears kept Hunter Hillenmeyer knowing the veteran with a history of concussions was coming off another head injury in preseason. Hillenmeyer lasted one game and the club was forced to bring in Rod Wilson, a player who knew the system but didn't match Shaw's capabilities on special teams a year after he set a franchise record with 30 tackles.

Now, the Bears aren't certain what kind of help they have for Dave Toub at linebacker and in the secondary and it won't be surprising if the club makes a waiver move at final cuts to bring in some help. Shaw, who the Titans scooped up on waivers last September, led them with 20 special teams tackles.

YOUVE GOTTA BE FUCKING KIDDING ME.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on August 27, 2011, 09:54:39 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 27, 2011, 10:24:25 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 27, 2011, 08:23:08 AM
RV STICKPOKE!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0827-bits-bears-chicago--20110827,0,3781327.story

QuoteSpecial stuff: The Bears' short-sighted release of special teams stalwart Tim Shaw at final cuts a year ago looks worse now.

Shaw was let go when the team trimmed to 53 and the Bears kept Hunter Hillenmeyer knowing the veteran with a history of concussions was coming off another head injury in preseason. Hillenmeyer lasted one game and the club was forced to bring in Rod Wilson, a player who knew the system but didn't match Shaw's capabilities on special teams a year after he set a franchise record with 30 tackles.

Now, the Bears aren't certain what kind of help they have for Dave Toub at linebacker and in the secondary and it won't be surprising if the club makes a waiver move at final cuts to bring in some help. Shaw, who the Titans scooped up on waivers last September, led them with 20 special teams tackles.

YOUVE GOTTA BE FUCKING KIDDING ME.

Biggsy has to change his pants after that TIMSHAW almost-interception in the dying seconds here.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on August 28, 2011, 06:49:10 AM
"I missed most of the Bears game Monday night and when I finally had a chance to tune in, the game was well out of reach. I did see the highlights and I will say that was awful to say the least. Then again, this is what we should expect from the Bears: Shitty defense in terms of the secondary and a horrendous offense led by the genius Mike Martz. I saw this shit last presason so it isn't anything new. When they play the Titans on Saturday, I think it's going to be just as ugly. Just imagine how bad it's going to be when the regular season starts. For the stat idiots out there, don't waste your time here about how the Bears almost went to the Super Bowl last year. They go 11-5 yet played like a an 8-8 team. I'd rather have a team go 8-8, barely get into the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl than the same team going 11-5 and showing how shitty they really are when it matters the most. Enough of that though."

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on August 28, 2011, 02:17:33 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 28, 2011, 06:49:10 AM
"I missed most of the Bears game Monday night and when I finally had a chance to tune in, the game was well out of reach. I did see the highlights and I will say that was awful to say the least. Then again, this is what we should expect from the Bears: Shitty defense in terms of the secondary and a horrendous offense led by the genius Mike Martz. I saw this shit last presason so it isn't anything new. When they play the Titans on Saturday, I think it's going to be just as ugly. Just imagine how bad it's going to be when the regular season starts. For the stat idiots out there, don't waste your time here about how the Bears almost went to the Super Bowl last year. They go 11-5 yet played like a an 8-8 team. I'd rather have a team go 8-8, barely get into the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl than the same team going 11-5 and showing how shitty they really are when it matters the most. Enough of that though."



Yeah, faggots. Fro would rather have a team that wins the Superbowl than a team that doesn't, unlike you and your stats.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 28, 2011, 03:01:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on August 28, 2011, 02:17:33 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 28, 2011, 06:49:10 AM
"I missed most of the Bears game Monday night and when I finally had a chance to tune in, the game was well out of reach. I did see the highlights and I will say that was awful to say the least. Then again, this is what we should expect from the Bears: Shitty defense in terms of the secondary and a horrendous offense led by the genius Mike Martz. I saw this shit last presason so it isn't anything new. When they play the Titans on Saturday, I think it's going to be just as ugly. Just imagine how bad it's going to be when the regular season starts. For the stat idiots out there, don't waste your time here about how the Bears almost went to the Super Bowl last year. They go 11-5 yet played like a an 8-8 team. I'd rather have a team go 8-8, barely get into the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl than the same team going 11-5 and showing how shitty they really are when it matters the most. Enough of that though."



Yeah, faggots. Fro would rather have a team that wins the Superbowl than a team that doesn't, unlike you and your stats.

My dream is for my Bears to go 1-15 and win the super bowl. Until that happens, I won't be satisfied.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on August 28, 2011, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.

DAT'S SANZENBASHNAGEL YA IDJIT!

I apologize.  After some contemplation, it's become clear to me that SANSABELTER is a completely awesome nickname.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on August 29, 2011, 08:19:17 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2011, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.

DAT'S SANZENBASHNAGEL YA IDJIT!

I apologize.  After some contemplation, it's become clear to me that SANSABELTER is a completely awesome nickname.

Jamal "Barbados Slim" Mayers agrees.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on August 29, 2011, 08:54:19 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 27, 2011, 10:24:25 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 27, 2011, 08:23:08 AM
RV STICKPOKE!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0827-bits-bears-chicago--20110827,0,3781327.story

QuoteSpecial stuff: The Bears' short-sighted release of special teams stalwart Tim Shaw at final cuts a year ago looks worse now.

Shaw was let go when the team trimmed to 53 and the Bears kept Hunter Hillenmeyer knowing the veteran with a history of concussions was coming off another head injury in preseason. Hillenmeyer lasted one game and the club was forced to bring in Rod Wilson, a player who knew the system but didn't match Shaw's capabilities on special teams a year after he set a franchise record with 30 tackles.

Now, the Bears aren't certain what kind of help they have for Dave Toub at linebacker and in the secondary and it won't be surprising if the club makes a waiver move at final cuts to bring in some help. Shaw, who the Titans scooped up on waivers last September, led them with 20 special teams tackles.

YOUVE GOTTA BE FUCKING KIDDING ME.

Oh for fuck's sake. I was unable to watch/follow the game on Saturday. Was Biggsy able to make it out of the press box what with being weighed down by his trousers full of sperm?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 29, 2011, 09:08:01 AM
Quote from: BBM on August 29, 2011, 08:19:17 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2011, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.

DAT'S SANZENBASHNAGEL YA IDJIT!

I apologize.  After some contemplation, it's become clear to me that SANSABELTER is a completely awesome nickname.

Jamal "Barbados Slim" Mayers agrees.

Get to work on Sean O'Donnell.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 29, 2011, 10:15:47 AM
Quote from: BBM on August 29, 2011, 08:19:17 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2011, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.

DAT'S SANZENBASHNAGEL YA IDJIT!

I apologize.  After some contemplation, it's become clear to me that SANSABELTER is a completely awesome nickname.

Jamal "Barbados Slim" Mayers agrees.

Does SANSABELTER wear no belt and constantly drop his drawers to reveal a 14-inch penis? I'm guessing yeah.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on August 30, 2011, 01:22:28 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 29, 2011, 10:15:47 AM
Quote from: BBM on August 29, 2011, 08:19:17 AM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2011, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: BBM on August 28, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 27, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
THE BEARS SPECIAL TEAMS ARE IN CRISIS DAMMIT SAM HURDS IN A WALKING BOOT DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

DAT GUY AIN'T NO MIKE H...DAVE SANSABELTER MY FRENT.

DAT'S SANZENBASHNAGEL YA IDJIT!

I apologize.  After some contemplation, it's become clear to me that SANSABELTER is a completely awesome nickname.

Jamal "Barbados Slim" Mayers agrees.

Does SANSABELTER wear no belt and constantly drop his drawers to reveal a 14-inch penis? I'm guessing yeah.

of course not.  Dude is honkified.  He's not a member of the Peter North Stars with Mackey Sasser or Sopel
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on August 30, 2011, 01:20:59 PM
Alex Brown is available (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-exbears-de-brown-tweet-hes-an-exsaint-20110830,0,5150523.story).
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on September 02, 2011, 11:57:01 AM
Bill Barnwell calls it like he sees it (http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/6918507/part-i). Our Bearz have NO CHANCE the Bears won't suck this year. 

"The Bears rode an awesome, unsustainable, life-affirming year of luck to the NFC Championship Game last season. Nobody can take that away from them. But let's pick away at that record to reveal why they will be terrible in 2011."

"Best-case scenario: They stay relatively healthy on defense, the offensive line percolates and produces a league-average attack, and they sneak into the playoffs as a 10-6 wild card.

Worst-case scenario: Oh, boy. Remember the 2010 Cowboys? Follow that blueprint to a T."
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 02, 2011, 12:58:46 PM
Quote from: BH on September 02, 2011, 11:57:01 AM
Bill Barnwell calls it like he sees it (http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/6918507/part-i). Our Bearz have NO CHANCE the Bears won't suck this year.  

"The Bears rode an awesome, unsustainable, life-affirming year of luck to the NFC Championship Game last season. Nobody can take that away from them. But let's pick away at that record to reveal why they will be terrible in 2011."

"Best-case scenario: They stay relatively healthy on defense, the offensive line percolates and produces a league-average attack, and they sneak into the playoffs as a 10-6 wild card.

Worst-case scenario: Oh, boy. Remember the 2010 Cowboys? Follow that blueprint to a T."

How can we be friends if you keep trying to whoeverthefuckthatisroll me? And what word from Slezak?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on September 06, 2011, 09:37:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

All I keep reading about is what a prick he is.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 09:37:36 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

I was waiting for you to tell me it was ok to be excited about it. Now I can let this thing breathe. BONAR WEATHER
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 10:18:15 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.

Which one?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on September 06, 2011, 10:26:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 06, 2011, 09:37:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

All I keep reading about is what a prick he is.

And that Belichick NEVER gets rid of someone who gets results, stupid chief.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on September 06, 2011, 12:24:51 PM
Quote from: R-V on September 06, 2011, 10:26:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 06, 2011, 09:37:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

All I keep reading about is what a prick he is.

And that Belichick NEVER gets rid of someone who gets results, stupid chief.

I don't care if he's a prick or not, and the Pats get rid of plenty of talented players. They usually don't suffer because they have depth behind them, but Belichick doesn't want to deal with anybody who he considers to be a problem. They got rid of Lawyer Milloy in 2002 and he's Still playing. Seymour's been productive with the Raiders. Deion Branch wasn't a terrible player, the Seahawks just blew while he was there. McGinest had some good years in Cleveland. Belichick lets go of good players, he just wins without them. Either way, at best Meriweather's a Pro Bowl safety who immediately strengthens the secondary. At worst he's one hell of an insurance plan if Major Wright doesn't pan out.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on September 06, 2011, 12:28:00 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 12:24:51 PM
Quote from: R-V on September 06, 2011, 10:26:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 06, 2011, 09:37:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

All I keep reading about is what a prick he is.

And that Belichick NEVER gets rid of someone who gets results, stupid chief.

I don't care if he's a prick or not, and the Pats get rid of plenty of talented players. They usually don't suffer because they have depth behind them, but Belichick doesn't want to deal with anybody who he considers to be a problem. They got rid of Lawyer Milloy in 2002 and he's Still playing. Seymour's been productive with the Raiders. Deion Branch wasn't a terrible player, the Seahawks just blew while he was there. McGinest had some good years in Cleveland. Belichick lets go of good players, he just wins without them. Either way, at best Meriweather's a Pro Bowl safety who immediately strengthens the secondary. At worst he's one hell of an insurance plan if Major Wright doesn't pan out.

Also, Asante Samuel. Ty Law (10 interceptions the year after he left the Pats). Have I made my point yet?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:07:04 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 10:18:15 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.

Which one?

In the opening scene when Mizz Scarlet is getting ready to eat Bah Be Cue with the Tarleton twins  (otherwise known as Clark Kent and his brother) I could have sworn that Brandon Mera-weatheh was mentioned.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:07:04 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 10:18:15 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.

Which one?

In the opening scene when Mizz Scarlet is getting ready to eat Bah Be Cue with the Tarleton twins  (otherwise known as Clark Kent and his brother) I could have sworn that Brandon Mera-weatheh was mentioned.

Did they say he was a prick?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:15:53 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:07:04 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 10:18:15 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.

Which one?

In the opening scene when Mizz Scarlet is getting ready to eat Bah Be Cue with the Tarleton twins  (otherwise known as Clark Kent and his brother) I could have sworn that Brandon Mera-weatheh was mentioned.

Did they say he was a prick?

Only in the Director's cut.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 01:18:27 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:15:53 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 01:07:47 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 01:07:04 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 06, 2011, 10:18:15 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 06, 2011, 09:20:36 AM
What? No one else is excited about Brandon Meriweather just falling into the Bears' lap? If he can stay out of trouble he's an awesome safety.

  Sounds like a character in Gone With the Wind.

Which one?

In the opening scene when Mizz Scarlet is getting ready to eat Bah Be Cue with the Tarleton twins  (otherwise known as Clark Kent and his brother) I could have sworn that Brandon Mera-weatheh was mentioned.

Did they say he was a prick?

Only in the Director's cut.

(||)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on November 12, 2011, 10:15:57 AM
PAY THE MAN.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/jensen/8756031-452/jensen-if-bears-arent-on-ball-earl-bennett-could-be-snapped-up-fast-in-free.html
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BBM on December 24, 2012, 03:36:00 PM
TADAY IST A SAAD DAY MY FRENTS.  DALE SANSABELTED WUZ FYYRED BY DA BEARSE.  EMSTINK IS TERRIBLE!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on December 30, 2012, 08:17:03 PM
DEY BETTER NOT DUMP URLACHER DAT GUY KNOWS WHAT BEIN A CHICAGO BEAR IS ALL ABOUT
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 08:38:47 AM
This is going to be hilarious assuming the Bears don't lag in making any changes to their staff.

I assume Lovie stays and Tice goes.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on December 31, 2012, 08:57:27 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 08:38:47 AM
This is going to be hilarious assuming the Bears don't lag in making any changes to their staff.

I assume Lovie stays and Tice goes.

Let the Jeremy Bates offensive era begin.

That'll be five coordinators in six years, I believe.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on December 31, 2012, 09:39:06 AM
Quote from: BBM on December 24, 2012, 03:36:00 PM
TADAY IST A SAAD DAY MY FRENTS.

6 goals and 8 assists in 25 games for Rockford. (http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=123396)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on December 31, 2012, 11:54:07 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I THINK WE GOTTA GET DAT BILL COWARD GUY OUTTA RETIRMENT MY FRENTS!!!  HE'S GOT A CHICAGO PEDIGREE BECAUSE HE ONCE BROKE JEFF FISHER'S LEG IN A GAME!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on December 31, 2012, 12:13:40 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

Why waste our time with such trifles when we could be getting to work hiring a new head coach?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on December 31, 2012, 02:24:43 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.

Yes this.  Although I am enjoying hearing meatballs call the Score upset and confused because some of the Bears' players spoke in Lovie's defense after he was fired. 

DON'T DEY UNNERSTAN DAT SHOWS A TOTAL DISRGART FOR DA FANS?!?

On another note, if we don't break Eli this week, we never will.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on December 31, 2012, 03:10:53 PM
Quote from: CT III on December 31, 2012, 02:24:43 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.

Yes this.  Although I am enjoying hearing meatballs call the Score upset and confused because some of the Bears' players spoke in Lovie's defense after he was fired. 

DON'T DEY UNNERSTAN DAT SHOWS A TOTAL DISRGART FOR DA FANS?!?

On another note, if we don't break Eli this week, we never will.

Agreed. I'm glad they hired a real GM and gave him GM duties and the power to carry them out. Amazing how fucking simple that is.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on December 31, 2012, 05:34:23 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCLaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.

Russ Grimm'd.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on January 01, 2013, 08:57:49 AM
Quote from: CT III on December 31, 2012, 02:24:43 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.

Yes this.  Although I am enjoying hearing meatballs call the Score upset and confused because some of the Bears' players spoke in Lovie's defense after he was fired. 

DON'T DEY UNNERSTAN DAT SHOWS A TOTAL DISRGART FOR DA FANS?!?

On another note, if we don't break Eli this week, we never will.

You're OK. I'm OK. Happy New Year.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on January 01, 2013, 10:03:46 AM
Quote from: Eli on January 01, 2013, 08:57:49 AM
Quote from: CT III on December 31, 2012, 02:24:43 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 31, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 02:14:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 31, 2012, 10:39:42 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 31, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 31, 2012, 09:56:34 AM
Lovie is gone. Let's fire up the meatball wagon.

Or let's hire a head coach who can stick around for a decade and do better than half as many playoff seasons as non-playoff seasons.

I don't think he's calling you a meatball for wanting Lovie fired at this point. You're a meatball for many other reasons. I think he's mostly just saying that those who salivated over his firing when he went 7-9 the year after a Superbowl trip will have their day, and it will be entertaining.

I didn't take it as a shot against me.  Just...why worry about the meatball take today?   I'm excited that the Bears at least have a decisive GM in place.

"You're a meatball for many other reasons" is the winning line of the day.

The mickball is correct though - it's great to see a Bears decision made quickly instead of having to wait for the next McCaskey family dinner so they could decide to hire a search firm to decide what decisions needed to be made so those decisions could then be discussed at the next family dinner.

Yes this.  Although I am enjoying hearing meatballs call the Score upset and confused because some of the Bears' players spoke in Lovie's defense after he was fired. 

DON'T DEY UNNERSTAN DAT SHOWS A TOTAL DISRGART FOR DA FANS?!?

On another note, if we don't break Eli this week, we never will.

You're OK. I'm OK. Happy New Year.

APPY NEW YERE, MY FRENT.

*slaps Eli on back a little too hard*
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 06, 2013, 02:34:32 PM
The AFStink is terrible.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on January 09, 2013, 11:11:32 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.

At least they replaced the old couch after the Russ Grimm Unpleasantness.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:33:23 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 09, 2013, 11:11:32 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.

At least they replaced the old couch after the Russ Grimm Unpleasantness.

I wonder how many Desipervs understand Thrill's reference.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on January 09, 2013, 11:50:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:33:23 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 09, 2013, 11:11:32 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.

At least they replaced the old couch after the Russ Grimm Unpleasantness.

I wonder how many Desipervs understand Thrill's reference.

I'm admitting nothing.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 11:58:27 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 09, 2013, 11:50:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:33:23 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 09, 2013, 11:11:32 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.

At least they replaced the old couch after the Russ Grimm Unpleasantness.

I wonder how many Desipervs understand Thrill's reference.

I'm admitting nothing.

Everyone but Kurt, I assume.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: flannj on January 09, 2013, 12:01:36 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 09, 2013, 11:50:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:33:23 AM
Quote from: CT III on January 09, 2013, 11:11:32 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 11:00:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

I sincerely hope they clean that couch after each filming.

At least they replaced the old couch after the Russ Grimm Unpleasantness.

I wonder how many Desipervs understand Thrill's reference.

I'm admitting nothing.

Raises hand.
I'm usually pretty clueless when it comes to this place but every once in a while I get one in my wheelhouse.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 09, 2013, 12:19:15 PM
I don't know what it is.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 12:20:04 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 09, 2013, 12:19:15 PM
I don't know what it is.

Liar.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 01:52:45 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Emery is just interviewing them to send the interviews to other GMs all around the world so the coach can make $1000-$5000 a day
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex

With really, really stupid women.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 05:31:03 PM
Obviously there is relevant context for this, but I'm choosing to ignore all of it because hilarious.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BANB2i_CcAAyrnq.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 06:58:56 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php

"Possibly"?

Next you'll tell me the Bang Bus guys weren't actually finding random sluts on the street who were down to DTF in the back of someone's van.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 09, 2013, 07:08:02 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 06:58:56 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php

"Possibly"?

Next you'll tell me the Bang Bus guys weren't actually finding random sluts on the street who were down to DTF in the back of someone's van.

Intrepid Reader Yetti: "Anyone in the market to buy a slightly used van?"
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php

Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 09, 2013, 09:12:00 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 06:58:56 PM
down to DTF

?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 09:12:00 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 06:58:56 PM
down to DTF

?

If I look directly at her, I will pre my pants.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php

Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on January 10, 2013, 08:50:20 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.

submityourflicks is great if you want to find average looking people banging other average looking people.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 10, 2013, 09:01:42 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.

xhamster is the go-to for any clips of Desiree Cousteau, Seka, or any of the other Swedish Erotica greats.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 09:07:31 AM
Quote from: Fork on January 10, 2013, 09:01:42 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.

xhamster is the go-to for any clips of Desiree Cousteau, Seka, or any of the other Swedish Erotica greats.

Consider me learned.  This has the makings of the best Bears off-season ever.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: morpheus on January 10, 2013, 09:29:24 AM
Bears-related hilarity. (http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/8829166/new-york-jets-interview-jerry-angelo-former-chicago-bears-gm-thursday-sources)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 10, 2013, 09:33:08 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 09, 2013, 06:04:40 PM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 09, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: flannj on January 09, 2013, 01:41:50 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 09, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 09, 2013, 12:40:41 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 09, 2013, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 09, 2013, 10:39:12 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 08, 2013, 03:48:23 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 08, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 08, 2013, 03:24:12 PM
They've got to be kidding.

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. (AP) -- Minnesota assistants Mike Singletary and Mike Priefer will interview for the Chicago head coaching vacancy.

Vikings coach Leslie Frazier confirmed Tuesday that the Bears made the request. There are at least 10 other coaches reported to be under consideration to replace the fired Lovie Smith in Chicago.

After an unsuccessful stint as coach of the San Francisco 49ers, Singletary was hired by his former Bears teammate Frazier to be a linebackers coach and a special assistant. He's been with the Vikings for two years.

Priefer has completed two seasons as special teams coordinator, helping steer the organization's decision to cut veteran kicker Ryan Longwell and draft Blair Walsh, who made the Pro Bowl as a rookie this year.


Rooney Rule, dude.

More like Bears Organization Asking Emery To Do A Favor For An Old Great-Rule.

They satisfied the Rooney Rule with the Falcons special teams guy.

This apparently is the newly-formed "Emery Rule" where you have to interview at least one person born in every state in the country.

It all starts to make sense once you get a look at the office Emery is using for the interviews...

(http://i.imgur.com/gjyZc.jpg)

So there actually is no Bears head coaching job, then.

something something "head" coaching something

Emery is a hands on General Manager.
So he's going to go deep into the selection process.
He'll be drained at the conclusion.

Sex

With really, really stupid women.

Well, they likely are dumb, but possibly not duped: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/10/despite_what_you_may_have_hear.php

Now I know what this is. So, people thought this shit was real and had the audacity to claim that the actresses were stupid and gullible? Ok.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 10, 2013, 10:06:26 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 10, 2013, 08:50:20 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.

submityourflicks is great if you want to see videos of my ex-girlfriends find average looking people banging other average looking people.

Let's just be honest'd

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 10:12:11 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 10, 2013, 10:06:26 AM
Quote from: Yeti on January 10, 2013, 08:50:20 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 10, 2013, 08:37:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 10, 2013, 08:17:08 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 10, 2013, 08:06:44 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 09, 2013, 08:05:17 PM
Well, I just learned there's a site called pornhub. OK.

Seriously?

Yep.  Maybe I knew before and just repressed it or something.  Maybe youporn and redtube met my free, online porn needs.  I dunno...whatever.

So, no xhamster either?  Good God man, it's not like you're TDubbs, smashing in the back doors of anything that bends over long enough.  I mean, you probably have secks more often than me, but God knows that's not saying much.  What the fuck have you been doing?  Redtube?  I wouldn't wank over that if it was on fire.

submityourflicks is great if you want to see pictures of birds with gashes like badly-packed kebabs videos of my ex-girlfriends find average looking people banging other average looking people.

Let's just be honest'd



Even more honest'd
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Jim Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him.  
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 13, 2013, 12:15:37 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Video of it. (http://youtu.be/dhNiJCyCmoo?t=2m55s)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 13, 2013, 03:24:16 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?

I took it as a potshot at Singletary, but I'll defer to the source for an explanation.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on January 13, 2013, 06:47:43 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 13, 2013, 03:24:16 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?

I took it as a potshot at Singletary, but I'll defer to the source for an explanation.

The first one stands for BYOBB, the second one is a typo.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 07:16:26 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 13, 2013, 06:47:43 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 13, 2013, 03:24:16 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?

I took it as a potshot at Singletary, but I'll defer to the source for an explanation.

The first one stands for BYOBB, the second one is a typo.

You mean all pro football coaches aren't named "Mike"?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 13, 2013, 07:25:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 07:16:26 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 13, 2013, 06:47:43 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 13, 2013, 03:24:16 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?

I took it as a potshot at Singletary, but I'll defer to the source for an explanation.

The first one stands for BYOBB, the second one is a typo.

You mean all pro football coaches aren't named "Mike"?

Some are named Sam or Will.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 13, 2013, 07:29:59 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 13, 2013, 07:25:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 07:16:26 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 13, 2013, 06:47:43 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 13, 2013, 03:24:16 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 13, 2013, 01:22:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 13, 2013, 11:46:43 AM
While I certainly enjoyed the 49'ers dissection of the Packers, what got the biggest rise out of me was Mike Harbaugh.  With 1:07 left to play and his team up 45 to 24, the Niners have an interception taken away and are hit with a pass interference penalty.  He runs screaming onto the field and starts stomping his foot and jumping up and down in place as though his big brother took a toy away from him. 

Mike? Is this a nickname I don't know about?

I took it as a potshot at Singletary, but I'll defer to the source for an explanation.

The first one stands for BYOBB, the second one is a typo.

You mean all pro football coaches aren't named "Mike"?

Some are named Sam or Will.

Dammit, I misplaced my "validated linebacker joke" stamp.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 15, 2013, 11:25:51 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

How does it feel then? (||)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:29:33 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 15, 2013, 11:25:51 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

How does it feel then? (||)

Cautiously concerning.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:31:39 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is even better.

Not just a Jew, a lawyer.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is a Jewish man.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on January 15, 2013, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is a Jewish man.

So pen thought Toub would interview for the bears HC job, get turned down, then remain on the staff to work for the guy he was passed over for? That feels about right.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:55:33 AM
Quote from: BH on January 15, 2013, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is a Jewish man.

So pen thought Toub would interview for the bears HC job, get turned down, then remain on the staff to work for the guy he was passed over for? That feels about right.

I did?

I don't remember thinking that.

I just remember thinking it was generally bad to lose good people.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 15, 2013, 11:56:31 AM
Quote from: BH on January 15, 2013, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is a Jewish man.

So pen thought Toub would interview for the bears HC job, get turned down, then remain on the staff to work for the guy he was passed over for? That feels about right.

How would that have been worse than joining the Chiefs sans promotion?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on January 15, 2013, 11:57:29 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 15, 2013, 11:56:31 AM
Quote from: BH on January 15, 2013, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 15, 2013, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Slaky on January 15, 2013, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 15, 2013, 11:11:23 AM
Dave Toub leaving Bears to join Chiefs.

This doesn't feel like good news for Bears fans.  (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/01/15/report-dave-toub-leaving-bears/#.UPWLOFgjW6I.twitter)

Meh.

Bring on Trestman the Jew and let's do this.

Marv Levy?

Trestman is a Jewish man.

So pen thought Toub would interview for the bears HC job, get turned down, then remain on the staff to work for the guy he was passed over for? That feels about right.

How would that have been worse than joining the Chiefs sans promotion?

Toub and andy reid are buds bro.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery. 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:11:19 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.

Cutler's deal expires after 2014. If he doesn't play well enough to earn new paper this year, they'll move on. Trestman made an MVP out of Rich Gannon in Oakland so if he can't maximize Cutler's potential, then nobody can. But Trestman's offenses in SF, Oakland and even Detroit and Arizona were beyond anything the Bears have ever experienced. The plan is to build that here with Trestman. If Cutler isn't the guy, they'll find the next guy and hope Trestman will win with him. If that doesn't happen, then Emstink is going to be gone. That's how this NFL thing is done, according to the internets.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Armchair_QB on January 16, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
Trestman's offense also works better when it doesn't have five turnstyles on the offensive line. They've still got to address that issue.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:45:42 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on January 16, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
Trestman's offense also works better when it doesn't have five turnstyles on the offensive line. They've still got to address that issue.

And once they do that I can get to work on my Hester Projections for 2013.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 16, 2013, 10:54:54 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on January 16, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
Trestman's offense also works better when it doesn't have five turnstyles on the offensive line. They've still got to address that issue.

FWIW, that was also the first thing he addressed in Montreal.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: thehawk on January 16, 2013, 11:06:47 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:11:19 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.

Cutler's deal expires after 2014. If he doesn't play well enough to earn new paper this year, they'll move on. Trestman made an MVP out of Rich Gannon in Oakland so if he can't maximize Cutler's potential, then nobody can. But Trestman's offenses in SF, Oakland and even Detroit and Arizona were beyond anything the Bears have ever experienced. The plan is to build that here with Trestman. If Cutler isn't the guy, they'll find the next guy and hope Trestman will win with him. If that doesn't happen, then Emstink is going to be gone. That's how this NFL thing is done, according to the internets.

Trestman was also also Cutler's "consultant" between college and being drafted, so there is that.  This is a pretty gutsy pick for Emstink, because he has to know if Trestman fails he's certain to be lumped in with the Mustachioed Coach Who Must Not Be Named by the fan base.  On the other hand, this could be like picking a mustachioed guy from the CBA to take your NBA team from point B to Point C.   Guess I will wait a while and see how it plays out.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 11:09:25 AM
Quote from: thehawk on January 16, 2013, 11:06:47 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:11:19 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.

Cutler's deal expires after 2014. If he doesn't play well enough to earn new paper this year, they'll move on. Trestman made an MVP out of Rich Gannon in Oakland so if he can't maximize Cutler's potential, then nobody can. But Trestman's offenses in SF, Oakland and even Detroit and Arizona were beyond anything the Bears have ever experienced. The plan is to build that here with Trestman. If Cutler isn't the guy, they'll find the next guy and hope Trestman will win with him. If that doesn't happen, then Emstink is going to be gone. That's how this NFL thing is done, according to the internets.

Trestman was also also Cutler's "consultant" between college and being drafted, so there is that.  This is a pretty gutsy pick for Emstink, because he has to know if Trestman fails he's certain to be lumped in with the Mustachioed Coach Who Must Not Be Named by the fan base.  On the other hand, this could be like picking a mustachioed guy from the CBA to take your NBA team from point B to Point C.   Guess I will wait a while and see how it plays out.

This feels like an overstated connection. Those guys work with tons of aspiring QBs to help them along.

It's like hiring the guy who helped you with your resume 10 years ago to be your boss.  I'm just not sure how much loyalty that confers, especially when now that person is responsible for the team's success, not just yours.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 16, 2013, 11:24:48 AM
Quote from: thehawk on January 16, 2013, 11:06:47 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:11:19 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.

Cutler's deal expires after 2014. If he doesn't play well enough to earn new paper this year, they'll move on. Trestman made an MVP out of Rich Gannon in Oakland so if he can't maximize Cutler's potential, then nobody can. But Trestman's offenses in SF, Oakland and even Detroit and Arizona were beyond anything the Bears have ever experienced. The plan is to build that here with Trestman. If Cutler isn't the guy, they'll find the next guy and hope Trestman will win with him. If that doesn't happen, then Emstink is going to be gone. That's how this NFL thing is done, according to the internets.

Trestman was also also Cutler's "consultant" between college and being drafted, so there is that.  This is a pretty gutsy pick for Emstink, because he has to know if Trestman fails he's certain to be lumped in with the Mustachioed Coach Who Must Not Be Named by the fan base.  On the other hand, this could be like picking a mustachioed guy from the CBA to take your NBA team from point B to Point C.   Guess I will wait a while and see how it plays out.

Okay... But Trestman doesn't look like he even has a moustache.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on January 16, 2013, 11:48:36 AM
GUYZ WE GOT FROM MONTREAL DAT WORKED OUT:


(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0106/mlb_g_dawson_expos_400.jpg)

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31391wJA0uL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)

(http://ourhistory.canadiens.com/media/cd30f4317f47d234/small/Chelios_Chris_1.jpg)

(http://www.lessignets.com/signetsdiane/calendrier/images/nov/13/1/savard93.jpg)

(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100118203335/facialhair/images/6/6d/Bill_Wennington.jpg)

THOSE THAT DIDN'T

(http://images.art.com/images/products/large/10107000/10107644.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 16, 2013, 12:34:56 PM
All you 30 Rock fans, better book your trip for BEARBONNAIS right now.  Bring your posters! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWx_RgybOYE)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 16, 2013, 01:40:43 PM
Trestman was brought in to give the team a real, competitive offense. Phil Emery obviously thinks the quickest way to do that is by fixing Cutler. Emery's made several comments about the offensive line being the biggest issue and vowing to fix it, so if he fixes that and Trestman can get a good year out of Cutler, that's what they'll do.

If he doesn't, I don't think Emery or Trestman will bring back Cutler in 2014. They've simply decided that in 2013, Cutler is their guy, and they'll do the smartest thing by doing whatever they can to help him succeed. That doesn't mean they can't move on if it fails, or that Trestman will suck if he can't fix Cutler. He'll be given the chance to get his own guy right, then too.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 02:32:41 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 01:40:43 PM
Trestman was brought in to give the team a real, competitive offense. Phil Emery obviously thinks the quickest way to do that is by fixing Cutler. Emery's made several comments about the offensive line being the biggest issue and vowing to fix it, so if he fixes that and Trestman can get a good year out of Cutler, that's what they'll do.

If he doesn't, I don't think Emery or Trestman will bring back Cutler in 2014. They've simply decided that in 2013, Cutler is their guy, and they'll do the smartest thing by doing whatever they can to help him succeed. That doesn't mean they can't move on if it fails, or that Trestman will suck if he can't fix Cutler. He'll be given the chance to get his own guy right, then too.

So basically, "What Pen and Pex" said.

You can just copy/paste our posts onto your blog if you want.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 02:32:41 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 01:40:43 PM
Trestman was brought in to give the team a real, competitive offense. Phil Emery obviously thinks the quickest way to do that is by fixing Cutler. Emery's made several comments about the offensive line being the biggest issue and vowing to fix it, so if he fixes that and Trestman can get a good year out of Cutler, that's what they'll do.

If he doesn't, I don't think Emery or Trestman will bring back Cutler in 2014. They've simply decided that in 2013, Cutler is their guy, and they'll do the smartest thing by doing whatever they can to help him succeed. That doesn't mean they can't move on if it fails, or that Trestman will suck if he can't fix Cutler. He'll be given the chance to get his own guy right, then too.

So basically, "What Pen and Pex" said.

You can just copy/paste our posts onto your blog if you want.
Apex wrote for my blog once. He said Devin Hester would have ten touchdowns in one year and was never heard from again.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 02:32:41 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 01:40:43 PM
Trestman was brought in to give the team a real, competitive offense. Phil Emery obviously thinks the quickest way to do that is by fixing Cutler. Emery's made several comments about the offensive line being the biggest issue and vowing to fix it, so if he fixes that and Trestman can get a good year out of Cutler, that's what they'll do.

If he doesn't, I don't think Emery or Trestman will bring back Cutler in 2014. They've simply decided that in 2013, Cutler is their guy, and they'll do the smartest thing by doing whatever they can to help him succeed. That doesn't mean they can't move on if it fails, or that Trestman will suck if he can't fix Cutler. He'll be given the chance to get his own guy right, then too.

So basically, "What Pen and Pex" said.

You can just copy/paste our posts onto your blog if you want.
Apex wrote for my blog once. He said Devin Hester would have ten touchdowns in one year and was never heard from again.

I got the year wrong. Typos can't be tolerated so I self-banned myself.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:59:27 PM
I also dig that Phil Emery is clearly in charge of this franchise and has some serious balls. There's no way Jerry Angelo takes a chance on a guy like Trestman, knowing it could cost him his career if it fails. Whether he's right or wrong, his first priority is clearly the team and not his own job security. I admire that.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 16, 2013, 03:11:44 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 10:45:42 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on January 16, 2013, 10:36:52 AM
Trestman's offense also works better when it doesn't have five turnstyles on the offensive line. They've still got to address that issue.

And once they do that I can get to work on my Hester Projections for 2013.

Does the Unemployment Office keep stats like that?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 16, 2013, 03:13:19 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:59:27 PM
There's no way Jerry Angelo takes a chance on a guy like Trestman, knowing it could cost him his career if it fails.

So, he went with Lovie Smith.  Who cost him his career because it failed.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 16, 2013, 03:17:08 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 16, 2013, 03:13:19 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:59:27 PM
There's no way Jerry Angelo takes a chance on a guy like Trestman, knowing it could cost him his career if it fails.

So, he went with Lovie Smith.  Who cost him his career because it failed.

No, Chuck.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 16, 2013, 03:30:40 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 16, 2013, 03:13:19 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:59:27 PM
There's no way Jerry Angelo takes a chance on a guy like Trestman, knowing it could cost him his career if it fails.

So, he went with Lovie Smith.  Who cost him his career because it failed.

That makes absolutely zero fucking sense, even for you. If Jerry Angelo got fired because Lovie Smith failed, don't you think they'd have fired Lovie first? Jerry Angelo got fired because he couldn't draft to save his life. I'm not even sure why I'm taking the bait here.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 16, 2013, 03:33:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 03:30:40 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 16, 2013, 03:13:19 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 16, 2013, 02:59:27 PM
There's no way Jerry Angelo takes a chance on a guy like Trestman, knowing it could cost him his career if it fails.

So, he went with Lovie Smith.  Who cost him his career because it failed.

That makes absolutely zero fucking sense, even for you. If Jerry Angelo got fired because Lovie Smith failed, don't you think they'd have fired Lovie first? Jerry Angelo got fired because he couldn't draft to save his life. I'm not even sure why I'm taking the bait here.

DPD. And Lovie was a considerably safer pick, as the DC of a team that was one of the most successful in the NFL at the time, who had also served on the staff of the Buccaneers, the dominant defensive team of the previous decade. Angelo also had to hire Lovie after the McCaskey's top two choices, Ferentz and Saban, said no. Angelo was never inextricably tied to Lovie, obviously, since they fired them seperately.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on January 16, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
So Mante Te'o and his friend made up the whole girlfiend and her dying thing?  (http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: morpheus on January 16, 2013, 04:07:27 PM
Quote from: BH on January 16, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
So Mante Te'o and his friend made up the whole girlfiend and her dying thing?  (http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax)

MODS! (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=8174.135)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Armchair_QB on January 16, 2013, 10:41:30 PM
Quote from: Brownie on January 16, 2013, 11:48:36 AM
THOSE THAT DIDN'T

(http://images.art.com/images/products/large/10107000/10107644.jpg)

No Mitch Webster pics on the internet?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 16, 2013, 11:52:27 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o104/babesthatlovebaseball/Minnesota%20Twins/Rondell_White.jpg)

8=====D~~ ~~ ~
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 17, 2013, 08:43:26 AM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/17/rod-marinelli-could-be-leaving-chicago/

QuoteAccording to Mark Potash of the Chicago Sun-Times, Marinelli could opt for a "fresh start" out of loyalty to Smith (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/17620425-419/bears-defensive-coordinator-rod-marinelli-may-opt-for-fresh-start-elsewhere.html). Trestman is expected to meet with Marinelli and other members of Smith's staff on Thursday to decide who he wants to keep.

Per Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com, "signs point" to Marinelli leaving (https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/291760149276794882) the Bears.

It would be a big blow to a Bears defense that was among the league's best all season. Chicago finished the season as the fifth-ranked defense and led the league with 44 turnovers.

According to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune, Dallas Cowboys new defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin is hopeful to get (https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/291752203901882371) Marinelli to join his staff in Dallas.

So, with a year left on his contract, he's "likely" to leave a team that wants him to stay, for a demotion to LB coach, out of a sense of loyalty to a man who's probably taking 2013 off himself?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 17, 2013, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 17, 2013, 08:43:26 AM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/17/rod-marinelli-could-be-leaving-chicago/

QuoteAccording to Mark Potash of the Chicago Sun-Times, Marinelli could opt for a "fresh start" out of loyalty to Smith (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/17620425-419/bears-defensive-coordinator-rod-marinelli-may-opt-for-fresh-start-elsewhere.html). Trestman is expected to meet with Marinelli and other members of Smith's staff on Thursday to decide who he wants to keep.

Per Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com, "signs point" to Marinelli leaving (https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/291760149276794882) the Bears.

It would be a big blow to a Bears defense that was among the league's best all season. Chicago finished the season as the fifth-ranked defense and led the league with 44 turnovers.

According to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune, Dallas Cowboys new defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin is hopeful to get (https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/291752203901882371) Marinelli to join his staff in Dallas.

So, with a year left on his contract, he's "likely" to leave a team that wants him to stay, for a demotion to LB coach, out of a sense of loyalty to a man who's probably taking 2013 off himself?

Yeah, I don't see why the Bears can't just say "well, fuck that. You're under contract." What's he going to do, tell the defense to play bad?

Intrepid Reader Fro Dog: They don't need his help to do that!
Intrepid Reader BC: Especially Tillman!

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 17, 2013, 09:12:34 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 17, 2013, 08:43:26 AM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/17/rod-marinelli-could-be-leaving-chicago/

QuoteAccording to Mark Potash of the Chicago Sun-Times, Marinelli could opt for a "fresh start" out of loyalty to Smith (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/17620425-419/bears-defensive-coordinator-rod-marinelli-may-opt-for-fresh-start-elsewhere.html). Trestman is expected to meet with Marinelli and other members of Smith's staff on Thursday to decide who he wants to keep.

Per Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com, "signs point" to Marinelli leaving (https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/291760149276794882) the Bears.

It would be a big blow to a Bears defense that was among the league's best all season. Chicago finished the season as the fifth-ranked defense and led the league with 44 turnovers.

According to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune, Dallas Cowboys new defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin is hopeful to get (https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/291752203901882371) Marinelli to join his staff in Dallas.

So, with a year left on his contract, he's "likely" to leave a team that wants him to stay, for a demotion to LB coach, out of a sense of loyalty to a man who's probably taking 2013 off himself?

It would be a convenient alibi in case Trestman decides not to keep him. They could mutually part ways and who cares what Marinelli says about the reason behind it. Marinelli has to know that they would keep him for one "transition" year, running essentially Smith and Marinelli's system while Emstink and Trestman decide what defense they will ultimately run - meanwhile letting go as many players drafted for the old system as possible to make room for new dudes. So this isn't as clear as choosing a coordinator position over an opportunity elsewhere. Marinelli is one of the most respected defensive position coaches in the game from all I've heard. His stock is higher now than it was after Lovie picked him up off the Detroit scrap heap. He should go where he's wanted unless he really likes coaching these players and being treated like a pariah by the new regime.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 17, 2013, 09:25:38 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 17, 2013, 09:12:34 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 17, 2013, 08:43:26 AM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/17/rod-marinelli-could-be-leaving-chicago/

QuoteAccording to Mark Potash of the Chicago Sun-Times, Marinelli could opt for a "fresh start" out of loyalty to Smith (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/17620425-419/bears-defensive-coordinator-rod-marinelli-may-opt-for-fresh-start-elsewhere.html). Trestman is expected to meet with Marinelli and other members of Smith's staff on Thursday to decide who he wants to keep.

Per Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com, "signs point" to Marinelli leaving (https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/291760149276794882) the Bears.

It would be a big blow to a Bears defense that was among the league's best all season. Chicago finished the season as the fifth-ranked defense and led the league with 44 turnovers.

According to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune, Dallas Cowboys new defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin is hopeful to get (https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/291752203901882371) Marinelli to join his staff in Dallas.

So, with a year left on his contract, he's "likely" to leave a team that wants him to stay, for a demotion to LB coach, out of a sense of loyalty to a man who's probably taking 2013 off himself?

It would be a convenient alibi in case Trestman decides not to keep him. They could mutually part ways and who cares what Marinelli says about the reason behind it. Marinelli has to know that they would keep him for one "transition" year, running essentially Smith and Marinelli's system while Emstink and Trestman decide what defense they will ultimately run - meanwhile letting go as many players drafted for the old system as possible to make room for new dudes. So this isn't as clear as choosing a coordinator position over an opportunity elsewhere. Marinelli is one of the most respected defensive position coaches in the game from all I've heard. His stock is higher now than it was after Lovie picked him up off the Detroit scrap heap. He should go where he's wanted unless he really likes coaching these players and being treated like a pariah by the new regime.

Except Emery supposedly asked every candidate if they were open to keeping Marinelli before he hired them because he also respects Marinelli and wants to keep him and never had a problem with Lovie's schemes or his defense and has been part of organizations that run 4-3 defenses every year except for a brief stint in Kansas City. I don't think he has even the slightest intention of dumping players to build a new scheme.

If you consider that Henry Melton is a rising star, Wootton, McClellin, Paea, and Collins made up one of the youngest and deepest D-Lines in football, Major Wright, terrible hands aside, was one of the best run-supporting safeties in the NFL, Tim Jennings had an All-Pro year, there's absolutely no reason to think this defense is supposedly in need of the complete rebuild people've been predicting for years. They already decreased their dependency on Urlacher, Peppers played the fewest snaps of his Bears career this year...this a Cover 2 team all over and I don't think Emery's changing that. He's not stupid.

So if Marinelli's leaving it's a total butthurt move over Lovie, and that's it. There's a reason Trestman had his offensive and ST guys hired before he even officially had the job and there's been not even a hint of discussion over defensive candidates. They plan on Marinelli as their guy.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 17, 2013, 09:30:01 AM
DPD, but there'd have been no reason for Emery to extend Lance Briggs last year if he had any hint of possibly changing schemes in the future, because there's a player who'd be functionally useless in a 3-4. Unless people are still overreacting to Shea McClellin (and Emery himself said he still saw him as a defensive end after he fired Lovie), there's zero evidence that Emery's ever thought for a second of switching defensive schemes.

I also think it's absurd that Marinelli stayed in Tampa with Kiffin when they brought in Gruden after dumping Dungy and yet he'd consider leaving Chicago because they fired Lovie.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 17, 2013, 10:10:51 AM
Quote from: SKO on January 17, 2013, 09:30:01 AM
DPD, but there'd have been no reason for Emery to extend Lance Briggs last year if he had any hint of possibly changing schemes in the future, because there's a player who'd be functionally useless in a 3-4. Unless people are still overreacting to Shea McClellin (and Emery himself said he still saw him as a defensive end after he fired Lovie), there's zero evidence that Emery's ever thought for a second of switching defensive schemes.

I also think it's absurd that Marinelli stayed in Tampa with Kiffin when they brought in Gruden after dumping Dungy and yet he'd consider leaving Chicago because they fired Lovie.

I'm not suggesting that they'll move to a 3-4 if they change the system. I'm suggesting that they have a few ideas about what they might run. One option is keeping Lovie's system and keeping Marinelli in place for one year while they squeeze what they can out of who they have. That's a good option if they want to try to win next year.

And if it fails then Lovie and Marinelli get the blame. 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on January 17, 2013, 10:26:15 AM
Per the Score, it's official that Marinelli is leaving.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 17, 2013, 10:34:29 AM
Well, balls.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 17, 2013, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: BH on January 16, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
So Mante Te'o and his friend made up the whole girlfiend and her dying thing?  (http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax)

With the 9th pick, the New York Jets select...
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on January 17, 2013, 02:15:19 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



TOO OLD!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 17, 2013, 04:02:28 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 17, 2013, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: BH on January 16, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
So Mante Te'o and his friend made up the whole girlfiend and her dying thing?  (http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax)

With the 9th pick, the New York Jets select...

Are you in syndication now? (http://nymag.com/daily/sports/2013/01/questions-that-manti-teo-needs-to-answer-today.html)

(http://i47.tinypic.com/dghxqu.png)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 17, 2013, 04:08:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 17, 2013, 04:02:28 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 17, 2013, 10:46:04 AM
Quote from: BH on January 16, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
So Mante Te'o and his friend made up the whole girlfiend and her dying thing?  (http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax)

With the 9th pick, the New York Jets select...

Are you in syndication now? (http://nymag.com/daily/sports/2013/01/questions-that-manti-teo-needs-to-answer-today.html)

(http://i47.tinypic.com/dghxqu.png)

In Hackensack, I'm even bigger than Danzig.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 18, 2013, 05:55:50 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on January 17, 2013, 10:26:15 AM
Per the Score, it's official that Marinelli is leaving.

So, the Bears hire Mel Tucker (https://twitter.com/danpompei/status/292409842725961730) (recently left Jacksonville after failing to win the HC job there) and Marinelli ends up with a demotion, going to Dallas to be the D-Line coach. (https://twitter.com/toddarcher/status/292414762699071489)

The carousel is ridiculous.

Oh, and for shits and giggles, Marty Mohningweg ends up as the Jets OC, despite the fact that he hasn't actually called the plays on offense since 2007.  
Which is probably not a huge problem when you coach for an offensive-minded HC who does call the plays (Andy Reid) but could certainly pose a problem when you're the lead offensive guy on Rex Ryan's staff.  Plus, Andy taking Doug Pederson (former Eagles QB Coach) to KC to be the OC over Marty probably says something as well (not sure about whom.) Long story short, we can probably continue to laugh at the Jets for this one.  And for also just hiring a GM without scouting experience.  (Second verse, same as the first verse.)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 18, 2013, 09:14:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



They look like solid 8s, but the promise of free Bears tickets pushes them over 9.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 18, 2013, 09:47:12 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 18, 2013, 09:14:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



They look like solid 8s, but the promise of free Bears tickets pushes them over 9.

Which is surprising, since Marc looks a little like James Carville with thicker eyebrows and some more hair.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on January 18, 2013, 10:10:03 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 18, 2013, 09:47:12 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 18, 2013, 09:14:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



They look like solid 8s, but the promise of free Bears tickets pushes them over 9.

Which is surprising, since Marc looks a little like James Carville with thicker eyebrows and some more hair.

Is there anyone Trestman doesn't look like?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Bort on January 18, 2013, 10:33:58 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 18, 2013, 10:10:03 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 18, 2013, 09:47:12 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 18, 2013, 09:14:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



They look like solid 8s, but the promise of free Bears tickets pushes them over 9.

Which is surprising, since Marc looks a little like James Carville with thicker eyebrows and some more hair.

Is there anyone Trestman doesn't look like?

He doesn't look very much like the guy from Big Bang Theory.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on January 19, 2013, 07:52:47 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 16, 2013, 10:03:43 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on January 16, 2013, 06:04:52 AM
Trestman huh?  Is this the canadian guy?  Great hire Emery.  

I've got no idea if this is a good hire, it's certainly a curious hire, considering he's been out of the NFL so long and most of us probably had never heard of him prior to 2-3 weeks ago.

That said...holy shit.  (http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike-freeman/21563377/the-bears-hire-of-marc-trestman-puzzling-at-best)

Quote
The Bears hired Trestman thinking he can fix Jay Cutler when Cutler is unfixable. Cutler always will be up and down, great one minute -- throwing multiple picks the next. Nothing is going to change that. Cutler never will be an elite thrower because his head isn't screwed on right. Unless Trestman is a therapist or hypnotist Cutler will be Cutler.

Cutler is a coach killer and Trestman is next up on the chopping block.

Honestly, are the Bears so firmly committed to Cutler (now under both a GM and a coach with no real loyalties to him) that they wouldn't move on from him if both of them thought he wasn't the answer?  I just don't understand why Trestman is automatically going to be unsuccessful if Cutler proves not to be the guy.

If anybody here had never heard the name before 2-3 weeks ago, they're either not into football or they're 15 years old &  would've been too young to remember when his name kept coming up for coaching  jobs 10 years ago.

Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 20, 2013, 07:30:08 PM
Quote from: Yeti on January 18, 2013, 10:10:03 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on January 18, 2013, 09:47:12 PM
Quote from: Fork on January 18, 2013, 09:14:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Fine, if no one else is going to do it.

Trestman's slightly too old for Yeti-bait daughters.  (http://www.chicagonow.com/mayor-daily/2013/01/trestman-daughters-hot-123/)

19 and 21.



They look like solid 8s, but the promise of free Bears tickets pushes them over 9.

Which is surprising, since Marc looks a little like James Carville with thicker eyebrows and some more hair.

Is there anyone Trestman doesn't look like?

Lovie Smith.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on January 20, 2013, 09:22:10 PM
I for one welcome our Harbaugh overlords.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 21, 2013, 12:32:34 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on January 20, 2013, 09:22:10 PM
I for one welcome our Harbaugh overlords.

That was a really bad call on the Falcons' pass reception with two minutes to go.  But I was so pleased that it was made so that I could watch JIM Harbaugh jump up and down, throwing one of his patented tantrums.  I now realize that the reason I watch 49er games is to see how mishugah this guy is.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 21, 2013, 01:31:20 PM
I'm already sick of Harbaughs and will avoid this Super Bowl for as long as I possibly can - which is until somebody lines up a shit load of fattening food in close proximity to a television showing it.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on January 21, 2013, 01:34:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 21, 2013, 01:31:20 PM
I'm already sick of Harbaughs and will avoid this Super Bowl for as long as I possibly can - which is until somebody lines up a shit load of fattening food in close proximity to a television showing it.

Harbaughs or not I just don't care about either team. One of them will win and it won't mean dick to me.

Congrats to one of them.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on January 21, 2013, 01:56:09 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 21, 2013, 12:32:34 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on January 20, 2013, 09:22:10 PM
I for one welcome our Harbaugh overlords.

That was a really bad call on the Falcons' pass reception with two minutes to go.  But I was so pleased that it was made so that I could watch JIM Harbaugh jump up and down, throwing one of his patented tantrums.  I now realize that the reason I watch 49er games is to see how mishugah this guy is.

http://twitpic.com/bwxwby
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 21, 2013, 02:50:50 PM
But seriously, fuck the Ravens sideways.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 21, 2013, 03:47:13 PM
Jim Harbaugh can yell and scream and act like a fucking maniac all he wants. I wish he was the head coach of the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on January 21, 2013, 04:03:29 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 03:47:13 PM
Jim Harbaugh can yell and scream and act like a fucking maniac all he wants. I wish he was the head coach of the Bears.

If you root for any team other than the Patriots, this should probably be your opinion.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:20:10 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 21, 2013, 04:03:29 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 03:47:13 PM
Jim Harbaugh can yell and scream and act like a fucking maniac all he wants. I wish he was the head coach of the Bears.

If you root for any team other than the Patriots, this should probably be your opinion.

I mean, it certainly helps that he inherited a ludicrously talented, underperforming defense and Trent Baalke seems to be a fine GM after the Anthony Davis/Iupati/Aldon Smith picks, but what he's done with Alex Smith, and then Kaepernick after what he did at Stanford...the man might strangle kittens in his basement each night for all I know or care, but he can coach a football team.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on January 21, 2013, 04:23:34 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:20:10 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 21, 2013, 04:03:29 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 03:47:13 PM
Jim Harbaugh can yell and scream and act like a fucking maniac all he wants. I wish he was the head coach of the Bears.

If you root for any team other than the Patriots, this should probably be your opinion.

I mean, it certainly helps that he inherited a ludicrously talented, underperforming defense and Trent Baalke seems to be a fine GM after the Anthony Davis/Iupati/Aldon Smith picks, but what he's done with Alex Smith, and then Kaepernick after what he did at Stanford...the man might strangle kittens in his basement each night for all I know or care, but he can coach a football team.

But if he's not going to coach the Bears, might as well launch him and his brother into the sun.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:26:57 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 21, 2013, 04:23:34 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:20:10 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 21, 2013, 04:03:29 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 03:47:13 PM
Jim Harbaugh can yell and scream and act like a fucking maniac all he wants. I wish he was the head coach of the Bears.

If you root for any team other than the Patriots, this should probably be your opinion.

I mean, it certainly helps that he inherited a ludicrously talented, underperforming defense and Trent Baalke seems to be a fine GM after the Anthony Davis/Iupati/Aldon Smith picks, but what he's done with Alex Smith, and then Kaepernick after what he did at Stanford...the man might strangle kittens in his basement each night for all I know or care, but he can coach a football team.

But if he's not going to coach the Bears, might as well launch him and his brother into the sun.

No, because it'll make his inevitable defeats at the hands of Marc Trestman in seven consecutive NFC title games all that much sweeter, because he'll rage and rage while Trestman just pats his combover and talks about guys who really love football being the key or whatever it is that he does.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 21, 2013, 04:54:59 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:26:57 PM
... because he'll rage and rage while Trestman just pats his combover...

I don't think "comb-over" does that 'do justice. It's more of a comb-back or something. With plugs.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on January 24, 2013, 12:54:11 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 21, 2013, 04:54:59 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:26:57 PM
... because he'll rage and rage while Trestman just pats his combover...

I don't think "comb-over" does that 'do justice. It's more of a comb-back or something. With plugs.

Has a Stan Sitwell comparison been made yet on this werbsite?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on January 24, 2013, 01:23:28 PM
Quote from: R-V on January 24, 2013, 12:54:11 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 21, 2013, 04:54:59 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 21, 2013, 04:26:57 PM
... because he'll rage and rage while Trestman just pats his combover...

I don't think "comb-over" does that 'do justice. It's more of a comb-back or something. With plugs.

Has a Stan Sitwell comparison been made yet on this werbsite?

Nothing has been made on this website since the Clinton administration.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on February 10, 2013, 11:43:53 AM
The Steelers are apparently poised to let OT Max Starks walk.  He started every game for them last year and was their best lineman.

The Bears could do...and have been doing...a lot worse at the position.  This could be a FA signing that would make a lot of fucking sense in terms of protecting Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on February 11, 2013, 12:47:00 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on February 10, 2013, 11:43:53 AM
The Steelers are apparently poised to let OT Max Starks walk.  He started every game for them last year and was their best lineman.

The Bears could do...and have been doing...a lot worse at the position.  This could be a FA signing that would make a lot of fucking sense in terms of protecting Cutler.

He's 31, injury prone, and this year was well out of line with his normal career performance. If he's cheap, fine, they could do worse, but there are a number of tackles at either position who are likely to be available this year that are younger and have been more consistent performers.

Branden Albert or Vollmer would make more sense as guys young enough that you could lock down the tackle position for the next 4-5 years and aren't coming off a potential aberration of a season.

They also don't need to get a LT, necessarily. Webb, with a -0.7 grade from PFF, was a league average tackle. If they got a stalwart RT that would free up a tight end or RB to help Webb from time to time, that would also be an acceptable upgrade, and in might leave more cap room to get an upgrade at guard or center.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 11, 2013, 01:23:16 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2013, 12:47:00 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on February 10, 2013, 11:43:53 AM
The Steelers are apparently poised to let OT Max Starks walk.  He started every game for them last year and was their best lineman.

The Bears could do...and have been doing...a lot worse at the position.  This could be a FA signing that would make a lot of fucking sense in terms of protecting Cutler.

He's 31, injury prone, and this year was well out of line with his normal career performance. If he's cheap, fine, they could do worse, but there are a number of tackles at either position who are likely to be available this year that are younger and have been more consistent performers.

Branden Albert or Vollmer would make more sense as guys young enough that you could lock down the tackle position for the next 4-5 years and aren't coming off a potential aberration of a season.

They also don't need to get a LT, necessarily. Webb, with a -0.7 grade from PFF, was a league average tackle. If they got a stalwart RT that would free up a tight end or RB to help Webb from time to time, that would also be an acceptable upgrade, and in might leave more cap room to get an upgrade at guard or center.

Whoever they get, had better have some sort of Pittsburgh connection, though. Otherwise...
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: ChuckD on February 11, 2013, 06:55:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 11, 2013, 01:23:16 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2013, 12:47:00 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on February 10, 2013, 11:43:53 AM
The Steelers are apparently poised to let OT Max Starks walk.  He started every game for them last year and was their best lineman.

The Bears could do...and have been doing...a lot worse at the position.  This could be a FA signing that would make a lot of fucking sense in terms of protecting Cutler.

He's 31, injury prone, and this year was well out of line with his normal career performance. If he's cheap, fine, they could do worse, but there are a number of tackles at either position who are likely to be available this year that are younger and have been more consistent performers.

Branden Albert or Vollmer would make more sense as guys young enough that you could lock down the tackle position for the next 4-5 years and aren't coming off a potential aberration of a season.

They also don't need to get a LT, necessarily. Webb, with a -0.7 grade from PFF, was a league average tackle. If they got a stalwart RT that would free up a tight end or RB to help Webb from time to time, that would also be an acceptable upgrade, and in might leave more cap room to get an upgrade at guard or center.

Whoever they get, had better have some sort of Pittsburgh connection, though. Otherwise...

(http://torontosportsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/waiting.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on February 12, 2013, 10:24:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

WRONG THREAD!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on February 12, 2013, 10:26:35 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 12, 2013, 10:24:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

WRONG THREAD!!!!

NO, CHUCK
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Bort on February 12, 2013, 10:46:20 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2013, 10:26:35 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 12, 2013, 10:24:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

WRONG THREAD!!!!

NO, CHUCK

No, Chuck
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on February 12, 2013, 11:12:40 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

Well if he hadn't have fumbled, he'd still be upright.  HE BROUGHT THIS ON HIMSELF.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on February 12, 2013, 11:32:07 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

What about spine damage
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 11:35:02 AM
Quote from: Slaky on February 12, 2013, 11:32:07 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

What about spine damage

Meh.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on February 12, 2013, 12:03:00 PM
Quote from: Slaky on February 12, 2013, 11:32:07 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

What about spine damage

Nothing Krieger can't fix.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on February 12, 2013, 12:20:01 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Intrepid Reader: Deion Sanders

Tackling is overrated.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on February 12, 2013, 12:46:11 PM
Quote from: Fork on February 12, 2013, 12:20:01 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Intrepid Reader: Deion Sanders

Tackling is overrated.

From TJ's link:

QuoteWhile scientists in recent years have found evidence of lasting neurological damage in some people who suffered football-related concussions, skeptics say the links have yet to be proved definitively.

Great reporting there, Tribune. Mayhaps you could tell us who these unnamed skeptics are and the basis for their skepticism?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on February 12, 2013, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: R-V on February 12, 2013, 12:46:11 PM
Quote from: Fork on February 12, 2013, 12:20:01 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Intrepid Reader: Deion Sanders

Tackling is overrated.

From TJ's link:

QuoteWhile scientists in recent years have found evidence of lasting neurological damage in some people who suffered football-related concussions, skeptics say the links have yet to be proved definitively.

Great reporting there, Tribune. Mayhaps you could tell us who these unnamed skeptics are and the basis for their skepticism?

They wanted to remain anonymous so that they would not be distracted from their Global Warming denial research.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on February 12, 2013, 01:50:38 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

This country used to be free.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Honestly, if potential football players (or their parents) at all levels are appraised of the potential neurological effects of tackle football at pretty much every stage, and they still go ahead and play, I really don't care.

I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on February 12, 2013, 02:41:41 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Honestly, if potential football players (or their parents) at all levels are appraised of the potential neurological effects of tackle football at pretty much every stage, and they still go ahead and play, I really don't care.

I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?

How hard does she think players tackle teammates in practice anyway?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on February 12, 2013, 02:55:22 PM
Quote from: Fork on February 12, 2013, 02:41:41 PM
How hard does she think players tackle teammates in practice anyway?

From the damn article itself...

QuoteBut one Purdue University study last year cast a spotlight on practice.

Researchers at the Purdue Neurotrauma Group attached sensors to the helmets of high school players and found that some athletes absorbed dozens of blows to the head per week.

Eric Nauman, a mechanical engineering professor who is part of the group, said players who took the most hits performed the worst on cognitive tests. It remains unclear if those effects could pose larger problems later in life, but he said eliminating some contact is a good idea.

"It would be huge," he said. "Most of the hits kids take are in practice."

To the Google machine...

http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/research/2012/120202NaumanFootball.html

QuoteWEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - A two-year study of high school football players suggests that concussions are likely caused by many hits over time and not from a single blow to the head, as commonly believed.

Purdue University researchers have studied football players for two seasons at Jefferson High School in Lafayette, Ind., where 21 players completed the study the first season and 24 the second season, including 16 repeating players.

Helmet-sensor impact data from each player were compared with brain-imaging scans and cognitive tests performed before, during and after each season.

"The most important implication of the new findings is the suggestion that a concussion is not just the result of a single blow, but it's really the totality of blows that took place over the season," said Eric Nauman, an associate professor of mechanical engineering and an expert in central nervous system and musculoskeletal trauma. "The one hit that brought on the concussion is arguably the straw that broke the camel's back."

...

Findings, detailed in a paper to appear online in the Journal of Biomechanics, are contrary to conventional thinking.

"Most clinicians would say that if you don't have any concussion symptoms you have no problems," said Larry Leverenz, an expert in athletic training and a clinical professor of health and kinesiology. "However, we are finding that there is actually a lot of change, even when you don't have symptoms."

...

The research may help to determine how many blows it takes to cause impairment, which could lead to safety guidelines on limiting the number of hits a player receives per week.

"Any change in fMRI data is a concern, but we don't yet know what these changes mean, what they translate to, in terms of cognitive impairment," Breedlove said.

A common assumption in sports medicine is that certain people are innately more susceptible to head injury. However, the new findings suggest the number of hits received during the course of a season is the most important factor, Talavage said.

"Over the two seasons we had six concussed players, but 17 of the players showed brain changes even though they did not have concussions," Talavage said. "There is good correlation with the number of hits players received, but we need more subjects."

...

Players in the study received from 200 to nearly 1,900 hits to the head in a single season, with two players exceeding 1,800 hits. Helmet-sensor data indicated impact forces to the head ranged from 20 Gs to more than 100 Gs.

"The worst hit we've seen was almost 300 Gs," Nauman said.

A soccer player "heading" a ball experiences an impact of about 20 Gs.

...
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on February 12, 2013, 03:15:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on February 12, 2013, 02:41:41 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 12:11:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 11:13:18 AM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on February 12, 2013, 10:21:25 AM
First Campana and now Johnny Knox (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/article-1/Bears-terminate-contract-of-Johnny-Knox/d52ce519-89f5-43bb-bb3c-5a6c81271f56). Sad, sad week for the meatbreathers.

Feel sad for Johnny Knox and the way his career ended. Terrible, terrible injury.

It may have ended his career, but given what we now know about CTE and brain injuries, it may have extended his life.

Not to worry. The only thing we all belong to is on the case, and will help eliminate the scourge that is tackle football. (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-11/news/ct-met-football-concussions-20130212_1_high-school-football-practice-state-lawmaker-chad-hetlet)

Honestly, if potential football players (or their parents) at all levels are appraised of the potential neurological effects of tackle football at pretty much every stage, and they still go ahead and play, I really don't care.

I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?

How hard does she think players tackle teammates in practice anyway?

I'm just a knuckle dragging Peorian, but some pretty hard hitting went on in our practices.

(I'm mostly just trolling for more high school anecdotes from Yeti)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: flannj on February 12, 2013, 03:27:06 PM
QuoteA soccer player "heading" a ball experiences an impact of about 20 Gs.

Intrepid Reader: Fork

"Soccer is for fags"


Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on February 12, 2013, 04:13:01 PM

I dunno...every skill player we had wore a yellow "non contact" pullover. We'd just wrap and the coach would blow a whistle. Of course, it was hard to tackle back when we played with onions on our belts.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on February 12, 2013, 05:38:54 PM
Since they started requiring college players who lose their helmets to sit out a play I became aware of how common an occurrence it is.  Or did they recently start to design the helmets differently?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 05:47:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on February 12, 2013, 05:38:54 PM
Since they started requiring college players who lose their helmets to sit out a play I became aware of how common an occurrence it is.  Or did they recently start to design the helmets differently?

They do have a new design from Riddel, but remember Mark Kelso from the Bills?  He had that huge helmet.

Here it is, in fact:(http://mschuettblahblahblah.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/mark-kelsos-head-was-used-for-helmet-storage.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 05:56:49 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?

That's all I'm saying. Are a bunch of moran state legislators of whom the vast majority supported Rod Blagojevich twice and who have yet to do anything to address the state's shit economy and albatross pension obligations really needed to tell a bunch of professional educators and parents how to do their jobs?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 06:10:37 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 05:56:49 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?

That's all I'm saying. Are a bunch of moran state legislators of whom the vast majority supported Rod Blagojevich twice and who have yet to do anything to address the state's shit economy and albatross pension obligations really needed to tell a bunch of professional educators and parents how to do their jobs?

Totally solid point.  That being said, I'm sure most of them (or some) are smart enough to multitask on legislation, but...you know, this pension shit is hard and concussions are in the news lately, so DISTRACT THE PUBLIC!!!

In all seriousness, I question whether football will look anything like what we see today in the next 15 or 20 years.  As the issue of long-term brain injuries come into focus (and not just the singular "concussion issue"), how many parents are going to be willing to allow their kids to play football?  If kids lose interest at the younger ages that cuts off the feeder high schools, which in turn cuts off college football, and then the NFL. 

Or will the various levels of football just have to come out and say this is a dangerous sport, this is what can happen to you (that science knows so far), and you need to sign this, this, and that before you can play?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Oleg on February 12, 2013, 07:09:15 PM
Rolling Stone had a great article about high school players who suffered concussions and one (they mention a couple more) who died when he was 17 from a hit.  The article is not available online but I can lend you my magazine if you want to stop by and pick it up.  Caveat: Needless to say, it's been in the bathroom with me.

Basically, the issue isn't just the blows to the head but also the underdeveloped brain, brain stem, and spine (the nervous system as a whole) of the dudes who are not yet adults.

There is just simply no good reason to allow kids to play tackle football.  It's really scary shit.  When I think about headaches I'd sometimes get after tackling drills...scares the piss out of me. /Forkstory
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on February 12, 2013, 10:29:23 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 05:47:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on February 12, 2013, 05:38:54 PM
Since they started requiring college players who lose their helmets to sit out a play I became aware of how common an occurrence it is.  Or did they recently start to design the helmets differently?

They do have a new design from Riddel, but remember Mark Kelso from the Bills?  He had that huge helmet.

Here it is, in fact:(http://mschuettblahblahblah.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/mark-kelsos-head-was-used-for-helmet-storage.jpg)

Quick, someone post a picture of Rick Moranis from the Mel Brooks comedy movie Spaceballs.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on February 18, 2013, 10:08:41 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 06:10:37 PM
Quote from: Brownie on February 12, 2013, 05:56:49 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 02:33:16 PM
I wouldn't propose limiting practices, as this bill does, but informing players seems to be appropriate, no?

That's all I'm saying. Are a bunch of moran state legislators of whom the vast majority supported Rod Blagojevich twice and who have yet to do anything to address the state's shit economy and albatross pension obligations really needed to tell a bunch of professional educators and parents how to do their jobs?

Totally solid point.  That being said, I'm sure most of them (or some) are smart enough to multitask on legislation, but...you know, this pension shit is hard and concussions are in the news lately, so DISTRACT THE PUBLIC!!!

In all seriousness, I question whether football will look anything like what we see today in the next 15 or 20 years.  As the issue of long-term brain injuries come into focus (and not just the singular "concussion issue"), how many parents are going to be willing to allow their kids to play football?  If kids lose interest at the younger ages that cuts off the feeder high schools, which in turn cuts off college football, and then the NFL. 

Or will the various levels of football just have to come out and say this is a dangerous sport, this is what can happen to you (that science knows so far), and you need to sign this, this, and that before you can play?

This is one instance where I favor the nanny state - kids obviously can't give informed consent, and the long-term health implications make this the sort of thing that should never be allowed to be waived on their behalf.  This isn't the permission slip to go on a field trip, this is way bigger.

And all it takes is going to watch the meathead parents at a pee-wee game to know that none of them will be smart enough to make the right decision for their kids.

I couldn't be happier that I won the battle against my parents on playing football when I was younger.  The risk wasn't worth it, let alone to play for a perpetually 3-6 HS football team.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on February 19, 2013, 02:33:25 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2013, 10:29:23 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on February 12, 2013, 05:47:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on February 12, 2013, 05:38:54 PM
Since they started requiring college players who lose their helmets to sit out a play I became aware of how common an occurrence it is.  Or did they recently start to design the helmets differently?

They do have a new design from Riddel, but remember Mark Kelso from the Bills?  He had that huge helmet.

Here it is, in fact:(http://mschuettblahblahblah.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/mark-kelsos-head-was-used-for-helmet-storage.jpg)

Quick, someone post a picture of Rick Moranis from the Mel Brooks comedy movie Spaceballs.

Okay:

(http://i.imgur.com/S7zIsv2.gif) (http://imgur.com/S7zIsv2)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 10, 2013, 01:28:41 AM
I enjoyed this video. (http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2013/04/jay-cutler-doesnt-deny-the-dddoooonnntttt-caaarrreee-story.html)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 25, 2013, 09:33:11 PM
DPD.  Bears stayed at #20 and selected OG Kyle Long, Oregon, 6'6 313 lb.  NFL GM Hub Arkush says Emstink "blew that pick."  Why won't the Bears just hire Hub already?  He's so much smarter than everyone.  "This is the second year in a row, not just according to me but people I really respect, they just didn't get value for the pick."
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on April 25, 2013, 09:55:05 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 25, 2013, 09:33:11 PM
DPD.  Bears stayed at #20 and selected OG Kyle Long, Oregon, 6'6 313 lb.  NFL GM Hub Arkush says Emstink "blew that pick."  Why won't the Bears just hire Hub already?  He's so much smarter than everyone.  "This is the second year in a row, not just according to me but people I really respect, they just didn't get value for the pick."

For the record, these people all went to Michigan, and they assure Hub that David Terrell is going to be gangbusters.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on April 26, 2013, 12:13:15 AM
Things I learned tonight:

1)Kyle Long will suck because how did the last two first round linemen the Bears drafted work out? Even though Emery didn't, you know, draft them.
2)Bears fans have every right to blame Emery for the Bears having shitty drafts for the last fucking decade because DA MCCASKEYS STILL RUN DA SHOW.
3)Even though the Colts at 24 and Cowboys at 31 supposedly wanted him, every fan on twitter has inside information that the guy would have been available for the Bears in the second round, or something.
4)Sharriff Floyd is a better pick even though they have a Pro Bowl DT and an above average young NT in Stephen Paea, because he went really high in mock drafts and fell hard, so he must be awesome.
5)Despite bitching for five years that the Bears haven't done enough in the draft to fix their o-line, the one time they do so it was a bad fucking idea.

In short, I hate all Bears fans, and you people, and probably myself.

TEC's good, though.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 26, 2013, 01:13:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 12:13:15 AM
Things I learned tonight:

1)Kyle Long will suck because how did the last two first round linemen the Bears drafted work out? Even though Emery didn't, you know, draft them.
2)Bears fans have every right to blame Emery for the Bears having shitty drafts for the last fucking decade because DA MCCASKEYS STILL RUN DA SHOW.
3)Even though the Colts at 24 and Cowboys at 31 supposedly wanted him, every fan on twitter has inside information that the guy would have been available for the Bears in the second round, or something.
4)Sharriff Floyd is a better pick even though they have a Pro Bowl DT and an above average young NT in Stephen Paea, because he went really high in mock drafts and fell hard, so he must be awesome.
5)Despite bitching for five years that the Bears haven't done enough in the draft to fix their o-line, the one time they do so it was a bad fucking idea.

In short, I hate all Bears fans, and you people, and probably myself.

TEC's good, though.

That's exactly where I'm at. How many years have Bears fans and the likes of Hub tore their garments in two because the Bears didn't take O-linemen throughout the draft? Now they finally do it and the world is on fire.  Out of curiosity, SKO, given who was available, who would you have taken? I'd never heard of Long but what do I know. (Pex will back me up on that last part.)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on April 26, 2013, 08:11:25 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2013, 01:13:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 12:13:15 AM
Things I learned tonight:

1)Kyle Long will suck because how did the last two first round linemen the Bears drafted work out? Even though Emery didn't, you know, draft them.
2)Bears fans have every right to blame Emery for the Bears having shitty drafts for the last fucking decade because DA MCCASKEYS STILL RUN DA SHOW.
3)Even though the Colts at 24 and Cowboys at 31 supposedly wanted him, every fan on twitter has inside information that the guy would have been available for the Bears in the second round, or something.
4)Sharriff Floyd is a better pick even though they have a Pro Bowl DT and an above average young NT in Stephen Paea, because he went really high in mock drafts and fell hard, so he must be awesome.
5)Despite bitching for five years that the Bears haven't done enough in the draft to fix their o-line, the one time they do so it was a bad fucking idea.

In short, I hate all Bears fans, and you people, and probably myself.

TEC's good, though.

That's exactly where I'm at. How many years have Bears fans and the likes of Hub tore their garments in two because the Bears didn't take O-linemen throughout the draft? Now they finally do it and the world is on fire.  Out of curiosity, SKO, given who was available, who would you have taken? I'd never heard of Long but what do I know. (Pex will back me up on that last part.)

I honestly don't know, Sterling. A lot of people wanted Sharrif Floyd because he was the best player available supposedly (because he was supposed to go at #2 and didn't go till #23...which gives absolutely no one any pause that maybe he wasn't actually the best playe available?). Otherwise Ogletree would probably have been my pick, but Arthur Brown is still on the board (and gasp, Te'O, who really wouldn't piss me off that much as a second round pick) so I'm not really upset about it. The consensus from Mayock and the like is that Long is potentially the most physically gifted lineman in the draft and could play any spot on the line but center. How this is a bad thing, I don't know. I mean, he could be a bust, naturally, but other than the inexperience factor (which would seem less important on OL than anywhere else) I don't see why he's caused so many red flags, other than that he got drunk an flunked out of FSU five years ago.

I just, Jesus...the 20th overall pick in the rookie wage scale makes roughly 2 million a year. The franchise is zero % fucked if Long bombs, and the NFL sent a clear message with the fewest skill position players in a first round in recent memory that the crop is generally considered to be weak. Phil decided to err on the side of caution in terms of drafting someone with a ton of potential at what is, free agent additions considered, still the weakest group on the team. I have zero problems with this. I'm not buying a Kyle Long shirsey, but Phil Emery's made enough moves for the franchise that I'm more than willing to wait and at least see how this plays out.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on April 26, 2013, 08:40:32 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 08:11:25 AM
I don't see why he's caused so many red flags, other than that he got drunk an flunked out of FSU five years ago.

He told Kenny Williams to fuck off. So, he's clearly not totally stupid.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: morpheus on April 26, 2013, 10:36:32 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 08:11:25 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2013, 01:13:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 12:13:15 AM
Things I learned tonight:

1)Kyle Long will suck because how did the last two first round linemen the Bears drafted work out? Even though Emery didn't, you know, draft them.
2)Bears fans have every right to blame Emery for the Bears having shitty drafts for the last fucking decade because DA MCCASKEYS STILL RUN DA SHOW.
3)Even though the Colts at 24 and Cowboys at 31 supposedly wanted him, every fan on twitter has inside information that the guy would have been available for the Bears in the second round, or something.
4)Sharriff Floyd is a better pick even though they have a Pro Bowl DT and an above average young NT in Stephen Paea, because he went really high in mock drafts and fell hard, so he must be awesome.
5)Despite bitching for five years that the Bears haven't done enough in the draft to fix their o-line, the one time they do so it was a bad fucking idea.

In short, I hate all Bears fans, and you people, and probably myself.

TEC's good, though.

That's exactly where I'm at. How many years have Bears fans and the likes of Hub tore their garments in two because the Bears didn't take O-linemen throughout the draft? Now they finally do it and the world is on fire.  Out of curiosity, SKO, given who was available, who would you have taken? I'd never heard of Long but what do I know. (Pex will back me up on that last part.)

I honestly don't know, Sterling. A lot of people wanted Sharrif Floyd because he was the best player available supposedly (because he was supposed to go at #2 and didn't go till #23...which gives absolutely no one any pause that maybe he wasn't actually the best playe available?). Otherwise Ogletree would probably have been my pick, but Arthur Brown is still on the board (and gasp, Te'O, who really wouldn't piss me off that much as a second round pick) so I'm not really upset about it. The consensus from Mayock and the like is that Long is potentially the most physically gifted lineman in the draft and could play any spot on the line but center. How this is a bad thing, I don't know. I mean, he could be a bust, naturally, but other than the inexperience factor (which would seem less important on OL than anywhere else) I don't see why he's caused so many red flags, other than that he got drunk an flunked out of FSU five years ago.

I just, Jesus...the 20th overall pick in the rookie wage scale makes roughly 2 million a year. The franchise is zero % fucked if Long bombs, and the NFL sent a clear message with the fewest skill position players in a first round in recent memory that the crop is generally considered to be weak. Phil decided to err on the side of caution in terms of drafting someone with a ton of potential at what is, free agent additions considered, still the weakest group on the team. I have zero problems with this. I'm not buying a Kyle Long shirsey, but Phil Emery's made enough moves for the franchise that I'm more than willing to wait and at least see how this plays out.

DAT ARTHUR BROWN WOODA BROUGHT THE FIRE!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Bort on April 26, 2013, 10:45:21 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 26, 2013, 10:36:32 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 08:11:25 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 26, 2013, 01:13:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 12:13:15 AM
Things I learned tonight:

1)Kyle Long will suck because how did the last two first round linemen the Bears drafted work out? Even though Emery didn't, you know, draft them.
2)Bears fans have every right to blame Emery for the Bears having shitty drafts for the last fucking decade because DA MCCASKEYS STILL RUN DA SHOW.
3)Even though the Colts at 24 and Cowboys at 31 supposedly wanted him, every fan on twitter has inside information that the guy would have been available for the Bears in the second round, or something.
4)Sharriff Floyd is a better pick even though they have a Pro Bowl DT and an above average young NT in Stephen Paea, because he went really high in mock drafts and fell hard, so he must be awesome.
5)Despite bitching for five years that the Bears haven't done enough in the draft to fix their o-line, the one time they do so it was a bad fucking idea.

In short, I hate all Bears fans, and you people, and probably myself.

TEC's good, though.

That's exactly where I'm at. How many years have Bears fans and the likes of Hub tore their garments in two because the Bears didn't take O-linemen throughout the draft? Now they finally do it and the world is on fire.  Out of curiosity, SKO, given who was available, who would you have taken? I'd never heard of Long but what do I know. (Pex will back me up on that last part.)

I honestly don't know, Sterling. A lot of people wanted Sharrif Floyd because he was the best player available supposedly (because he was supposed to go at #2 and didn't go till #23...which gives absolutely no one any pause that maybe he wasn't actually the best playe available?). Otherwise Ogletree would probably have been my pick, but Arthur Brown is still on the board (and gasp, Te'O, who really wouldn't piss me off that much as a second round pick) so I'm not really upset about it. The consensus from Mayock and the like is that Long is potentially the most physically gifted lineman in the draft and could play any spot on the line but center. How this is a bad thing, I don't know. I mean, he could be a bust, naturally, but other than the inexperience factor (which would seem less important on OL than anywhere else) I don't see why he's caused so many red flags, other than that he got drunk an flunked out of FSU five years ago.

I just, Jesus...the 20th overall pick in the rookie wage scale makes roughly 2 million a year. The franchise is zero % fucked if Long bombs, and the NFL sent a clear message with the fewest skill position players in a first round in recent memory that the crop is generally considered to be weak. Phil decided to err on the side of caution in terms of drafting someone with a ton of potential at what is, free agent additions considered, still the weakest group on the team. I have zero problems with this. I'm not buying a Kyle Long shirsey, but Phil Emery's made enough moves for the franchise that I'm more than willing to wait and at least see how this plays out.

DAT ARTHUR BROWN WOODA BROUGHT THE FIRE!

Validated.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 26, 2013, 01:52:50 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.

He's got enough size and mobility to make up for lack of technique, for now. I think he's got the potential to be a Jumbo Elliot-type.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on April 26, 2013, 02:14:38 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.

I don't think they drafted a 29 year old dude with the thought of putting him on the bench. They think he's ready to rape corpses now.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on April 26, 2013, 03:18:31 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 26, 2013, 02:14:38 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.

I don't think they drafted a 29 year old dude with the thought of putting him on the bench. They think he's ready to rape corpses now.

Wait, Pittsburgh drafted him? That changes everything.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on April 26, 2013, 03:32:42 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 26, 2013, 02:14:38 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.

I don't think they drafted a 29 year old dude with the thought of putting him on the bench. They think he's ready to rape corpses now.

Yeah, he's going to start, only question is which spot exactly. I think the rawness is overstated. He's gotten professional coaching, he played a couple years in JuCo..with his combination of strength, size, and athleticism he'll be alright despite his inexperience. Certainly good enough to beat out his competition on the interior of the line where he's less exposed. I mean  he has more OL experience than Lance Louis had, considering he was a TE in college.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on April 26, 2013, 04:49:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on April 26, 2013, 03:32:42 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 26, 2013, 02:14:38 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 26, 2013, 01:44:12 PM
Quote from: Brownie on April 26, 2013, 11:31:48 AM
Every one of you ripping Hub, where did you play your college ball?

Oh, nevermind. Huey Long would have improved the Bears guard corps and he's been dead since George Halas was mocking the New York Giants for wearing sneakers on the icy Polo Grounds turf. The fact that Kyle Long actually played guard for a few games in college and is a living, breathing human, and the words "Stan" and "Thomas" do not appear on his Social Security card, these are all good things.

This is my only issue with the pick - given the age of the defense and the fact that this could be Cutler's last stand, they seem to be a team in win-now mode. And given Long's rawness it could be a year or two before he's ready to truly maul some sons of bitches in the trenches.

I don't think they drafted a 29 year old dude with the thought of putting him on the bench. They think he's ready to rape corpses now.

Yeah, he's going to start, only question is which spot exactly. I think the rawness is overstated. He's gotten professional coaching, he played a couple years in JuCo..with his combination of strength, size, and athleticism he'll be alright despite his inexperience. Certainly good enough to beat out his competition on the interior of the line where he's less exposed. I mean  he has more OL experience than Lance Louis had, considering he was a TE in college.

DPD, but worth noting that Carl Nicks was 5th RD pick who spent two years at New Mexico State and a JuCo (and TEC will tell you NM State is worse) and was a top ten guard as a rookie and has been an All-Pro guard since. Jahri Evans was a 4th Rd pick who was a projected 7th Rd pick that the Saints drafted out of a Division II school, and he also started from day one of his rookie year and is a four time All-Pro guard. Jermon Bushrod was a 4th RD pick from FCS school Towson and he developed into a good starting LT on one of the most pass-happy offenses in the NFL. Zach Strief is a very solid starter at RT and he's a 7th rd pick from Northwestern.

All this adds up to Aaron Kromer having a pretty solid track record of developing raw, project offensive linemen into good starters, and in the case of the two guards both played, and played well, right away. Long is the most inexperienced of the group but also the most physically gifted, and playing in 11 games and starting half a season without even being part of spring practices for a top five program has to count for as much as being a multi-year starter at a Division II or FCS school.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: morpheus on April 29, 2013, 09:04:05 AM
Now the Bears can pick up a backup QB (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2013/04/29/tim-tebow-released-by-jets/) on the cheap.

(http://i.imgur.com/NG0FR.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 29, 2013, 09:56:17 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 29, 2013, 09:04:05 AM
Now the Bears can pick up a backup QB (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2013/04/29/tim-tebow-released-by-jets/) on the cheap.

(http://i.imgur.com/NG0FR.jpg)

If he got Raptured, would he come off the salary cap?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CBStew on April 29, 2013, 11:41:47 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2013, 09:56:17 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 29, 2013, 09:04:05 AM
Now the Bears can pick up a backup QB (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2013/04/29/tim-tebow-released-by-jets/) on the cheap.

(http://i.imgur.com/NG0FR.jpg)

If he got Raptured, would he come off the salary cap?

Couldn't the Jets have done that last week when the Bears were in the market for a linebacker?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on May 22, 2013, 10:06:44 AM
Urlacher retired (https://twitter.com/BUrlacher54/status/337222072075952128)
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: Yeti on May 22, 2013, 10:06:44 AM
Urlacher retired (https://twitter.com/BUrlacher54/status/337222072075952128)

Smart choice.  Actually, if no one gives you a job, can you call it retiring?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on May 22, 2013, 10:19:51 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: Yeti on May 22, 2013, 10:06:44 AM
Urlacher retired (https://twitter.com/BUrlacher54/status/337222072075952128)

Smart choice.  Actually, if no one gives you a job, can you call it retiring?

Yes, Chuck.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on May 22, 2013, 10:24:59 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: Yeti on May 22, 2013, 10:06:44 AM
Urlacher retired (https://twitter.com/BUrlacher54/status/337222072075952128)

Smart choice.  Actually, if no one gives you a job, can you call it retiring?

Yes.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BC on May 23, 2013, 03:25:54 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: Yeti on May 22, 2013, 10:06:44 AM
Urlacher retired (https://twitter.com/BUrlacher54/status/337222072075952128)

Smart choice.  Actually, if no one gives you a job, can you call it retiring?

I call it "my life".....
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 24, 2013, 10:46:02 AM

Seems like as good as place as any for this (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/chuck-norris/2013/05/21/chuck-norris-column-why-tim-tebow-ultimate-clutch-player).
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Bort on May 24, 2013, 03:49:07 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 24, 2013, 10:46:02 AM

Seems like as good as place as any for this (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/chuck-norris/2013/05/21/chuck-norris-column-why-tim-tebow-ultimate-clutch-player).

I hope that link just leads to a website that says nothing but "TIME TO POST" in huge block letters.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: CT III on May 24, 2013, 06:55:35 PM
Quote from: Bort on May 24, 2013, 03:49:07 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 24, 2013, 10:46:02 AM

Seems like as good as place as any for this (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/chuck-norris/2013/05/21/chuck-norris-column-why-tim-tebow-ultimate-clutch-player).

I hope that link just leads to a website that says nothing but "TIME TO POST" in huge block letters.

Why would he link back here?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 05, 2013, 04:26:58 PM
"What's encouraging for both Cutler and for Bears fans is that this year — with Trestman, with Marshall, with Forte, and with this line — is the first year he actually has a chance."

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/64475/92-day-nfl-warning-the-chicago-bears-finally-get-offensive
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on June 05, 2013, 04:37:11 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 05, 2013, 04:26:58 PM
"What's encouraging for both Cutler and for Bears fans is that this year — with Trestman, with Marshall, with Forte, and with this line — is the first year he actually has a chance."

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/64475/92-day-nfl-warning-the-chicago-bears-finally-get-offensive

Reading that put me at half-mast.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Richard Chuggar on June 10, 2013, 04:11:36 PM
Tebowner to Patriots.  Stupid Emstink missed the boat again.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 10, 2013, 04:32:44 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on June 10, 2013, 04:11:36 PM
Tebowner to Patriots.  Stupid Emstink missed the boat again.

He's going to line up at TE. There is no way this won't be amazing.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 10, 2013, 04:41:45 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 10, 2013, 04:32:44 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on June 10, 2013, 04:11:36 PM
Tebowner to Patriots.  Stupid Emstink missed the boat again.

He's going to line up at TE. There is no way this won't be amazing.

I hope he finds a way to humiliate the Jets when the two teams play each other.  Can't wait.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Eli on June 10, 2013, 05:25:05 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 10, 2013, 04:32:44 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on June 10, 2013, 04:11:36 PM
Tebowner to Patriots.  Stupid Emstink missed the boat again.

He's going to line up at TE. There is no way this won't be amazing.

Nope. Third-string QB.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 02:53:47 AM
Okay, perhaps somebody (*cough*SKO*cough*) can explain this to me in terms that a Eurosimpleton can understand.

Tim Tebow was, by any measure, one of the greatest college quarterbacks ever.  I've heard criticism of his throwing mechanics, but they seemed to work just fine for the Gators.  How the fuck does this not translate to the NFL, and - more to the point - why not?  I know he's by no means the first star QB to fail miserably in the big leagues.  Are colleges so concerned with their own success that they're prepared to let the careers of their kids suffer by not teaching them properly?  Is that a rhetorical question?  Why don't colleges just play NFL-style football?  I can only assume it's because a college team playing NFL ball would get its arse handed to it by a college team playing college ball, but why?  And if that's the case, then why don't they play college-style ball in the NFL?  What's the difference?  What changes when these kids graduate?

You can understand my confusion, I think.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 11, 2013, 04:28:23 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 02:53:47 AM
Okay, perhaps somebody (*cough*SKO*cough*) can explain this to me in terms that a Eurosimpleton can understand.

Tim Tebow was, by any measure, one of the greatest college quarterbacks ever.  I've heard criticism of his throwing mechanics, but they seemed to work just fine for the Gators.  How the fuck does this not translate to the NFL, and - more to the point - why not?  I know he's by no means the first star QB to fail miserably in the big leagues.  Are colleges so concerned with their own success that they're prepared to let the careers of their kids suffer by not teaching them properly?  Is that a rhetorical question?  Why don't colleges just play NFL-style football?  I can only assume it's because a college team playing NFL ball would get its arse handed to it by a college team playing college ball, but why?  And if that's the case, then why don't they play college-style ball in the NFL?  What's the difference?  What changes when these kids graduate?

You can understand my confusion, I think.

Could be wrong here, but I think it has something to do with the availability of opposing talent. Only the elite players reach the NFL. Tebow looks pretty great against the massive range of talent distribution in college but when you take the chumps out and force him to face elite athletes he's not so great without a heavily modified playbook like the one Denver installed for him. And then it's a matter of time until the league catches up to that. A slow decision maker with a slow throwing motion, as Tebow is alleged to be, can have college success but those are fatal flaws for an NFL QB. Asking why colleges don't play NFL football seems a little like asking why Double A teams don't play Major League Baseball.

Compare Tebow's flawed game to a hitter in Double A with a hole in his swing but Double A pitchers just aren't good enough to exploit it and are hopelessly overmatched against his raw talent and skill.  They just can't get him out. Then the hitter goes up to Triple A ball and there are pitchers and defenses who give him fits but he still does pretty well overall. But he hits his ceiling in MLB when almost every pitcher above replacement level can use that flaw to get him out at will. That's like Tebow going from high school, to college, to the pros. Peter Principle, and all that. Which is all just a long-winded way of saying I don't know what I'm talking about (TIME TO POST!) and now it's time for the smart people to blow everyone's nips off with their big brains.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 04:51:51 AM
Okay, I get some of that.  But:

Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 11, 2013, 04:28:23 AM
A slow decision maker with a slow throwing motion, as Tebow is alleged to be, can have college success but those are fatal flaws for an NFL QB.

If that's the case, then surely there would be fast decision-makers with fast throwing motions who would have been more successful than Tebow both in the NFL and (and here's the rub) in college ball, too.  But there weren't: in college, he was the absolute top of the tree.  The issue can't just be down to the relative level of his talents.  In college ball he had to be have been doing something far, far better than anybody else - and that something, whatever it was, obviously doesn't count for much in the NFL.  There must be some fundamental difference in the kind of football being played.  I think it might have something to do with rushing vs. playing out of the pocket/shotgun, but I'm really, really scraping the bottom of my football knowledge-barrel here.

Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 11, 2013, 04:28:23 AM
Asking why colleges don't play NFL football seems a little like asking why Double A teams don't play Major League Baseball.

I see what you're getting at, but this is kind of my point, too.  Double A teams do play major league baseball, just at a less talented level.  The fundamentals are exactly the same.  Indeed, Theo put a book together precisely to make sure that the entire Cubs organisation is playing exactly the same game, from top to bottom.  A player at double A who is a superstar on the Tebow level - say Mike Trout, or Bryce Harper - can reasonably be expected, with perhaps a year or two of seasoning, to become a superstar at the Major League level.  Tebow never will, and it's not because he flamed out, it's because he never had the right stuff in the first place.  See what I mean?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 11, 2013, 04:55:36 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 04:51:51 AM
Okay, I get some of that.  But:

Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 11, 2013, 04:28:23 AM
A slow decision maker with a slow throwing motion, as Tebow is alleged to be, can have college success but those are fatal flaws for an NFL QB.

If that's the case, then surely there would be fast decision-makers with fast throwing motions who would have been more successful than Tebow both in the NFL and (and here's the rub) in college ball, too.  But there weren't: in college, he was the absolute top of the tree.  The issue can't just be down to the relative level of his talents.  In college ball he had to be have been doing something far, far better than anybody else - and that something, whatever it was, obviously doesn't count for much in the NFL.  There must be some fundamental difference in the kind of football being played.  I think it might have something to do with rushing vs. playing out of the pocket/shotgun, but I'm really, really scraping the bottom of my football knowledge-barrel here.

Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 11, 2013, 04:28:23 AM
Asking why colleges don't play NFL football seems a little like asking why Double A teams don't play Major League Baseball.

I see what you're getting at, but this is kind of my point, too.  Double A teams do play major league baseball, just at a less talented level.  The fundamentals are exactly the same.  Indeed, Theo put a book together precisely to make sure that the entire Cubs organisation is playing exactly the same game, from top to bottom.  A player at double A who is a superstar on the Tebow level - say Mike Trout, or Bryce Harper - can reasonably be expected, with perhaps a year or two of seasoning, to become a superstar at the Major League level.  Tebow never will, and it's not because he flamed out, it's because he never had the right stuff in the first place.  See what I mean?

Obviously it's TWTW. I'm interested to see how others answer this. That Cubs Way manual is more of a manual on how to play baseball though, not how to play MLB. Double A just isn't MLB. Not even Triple A is. It's a very different level of competition that's partly influenced by the venues and coaches and other peripheries but primarily by the caliber of players on the field. Trout and Harper RAKED at double A just like Tebow was probably unstoppable in HS. Maybe Tebow was unstoppable in college too, but for some reason I'm remembering there were colleges that knew how to handle him. Maybe I'm remembering wrong. I don't quite know how to address the converse of the slow/slow QB, maybe someone with a better football memory can refute or confirm, but there are other ways to fail as an NFL QB too.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 08:47:58 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 02:53:47 AM
Okay, perhaps somebody (*cough*SKO*cough*) can explain this to me in terms that a Eurosimpleton can understand.

Tim Tebow was, by any measure, one of the greatest college quarterbacks ever.

Whoah, whoah, whoah, whoah.....

Whoah. There are plenty of measures that evaluate quarterback play. Everybody except for Josh McDaniels had access to them before the draft.

And while SKO is cleaning up his exploded brain so he can post, I'll say in layman's terms, that Tebow had success running the football in college. The speed, power and agility of NFL defenses simply won't abide that unless a player can keep them honest with his throwing arm. It's as simple as all that really. Tebow was not winning games with his arm at Florida. They had the top defense in the country's best conference and Tebow scored just enough to become a mouthbreather icon.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 11, 2013, 08:54:14 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 10, 2013, 04:41:45 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 10, 2013, 04:32:44 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on June 10, 2013, 04:11:36 PM
Tebowner to Patriots.  Stupid Emstink missed the boat again.

He's going to line up at TE. There is no way this won't be amazing.

I hope he finds a way to humiliate the Jets when the two teams play each other.  Can't wait.

There is no way the Jets can be humiliated any worse than they already are by seeing Jets uniforms in their lockers.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 09:31:32 AM
Oh man. There's a lot here.

Couple of things- Tebow was fucking amazing in college, Apex's natural pexhurt aside. They struggled a bit in conference his last year when Steve Addazio took over as OC when Dan Mullen left, but the 2007-2008 Gators had the best offenses I've ever seen in college football, period.

The problem, Tonk, is that Tebow's throwing motion is abysmal, and he holds the ball really low and then brings it all of the way up before releasing. It gives defenses time to figure out where he is throwing the ball and to key on it. In college this was less of a big deal for various reasons: defenders are slower, he was playing in a spread offense that mostly left him throwing to wide open receivers, teams were so busy keying on his threat as a runner that they Let him have open guys to throw to, because it seemed the lesser evil. 

If he tries to rush his throwing motion to fix this issue, the result is the hilarious airmailed throws that we've laughed at for years. He's not an accurate NFL passer because of this, and I know people keep saying shit like "let him learn," but I have my doubts that it's really fixable. He's thrown this way since he was a kid, and his muscle memory is built on it. Completely changing his throwing motion, if possible, isn't necessarily going to improve his accuracy so much as it might make him just completely unable to throw a ball. Bruce Arians compared it to coaching a golfer...you can fix accuracy issues that start with footwork and the lower body and tighten up their mechanics, but you can't just change the way a guy moves his arm.

Add into all of this that I think he's fairly stupid and can't read advanced NFL coverages, and he's a curiosity and nothing more. As for why don't college coaches run the NFL offense? It's because the NFL basically runs two or three schemes, period, all of which are similar. They require lots of practice time, tons of film study, hundreds of reps, they're basically offenses designed for football players who can be at the practice facility every day, all day. Which you can't do in college, so they try to use more exotic and yet simpler offenses that can get more out of players with less time to practice. 

All of this is a gross over-simplification, but I hope I helped.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 09:40:33 AM
It should also be noted that Tebow played on an offense at Florida with, I believe, three different linemen who are currently NFL starters, Aaron Hernandez at tight end, Percy Harvin at WR, and three different runningbacks who ran 4.3 40s. The disparity in talent betwee Florida and even other SEC teams at the time was tremendous, and it made him look like a much better player than he was, but the jig was up once Saban had recruited enough talent at Bama that their defensive schemes against Tebow were no longer foiled by Tim simply plowing over some hapless Shula recruit at linebacker.

And the Double A-MLB comparison is not applicable. College football offenses and defenses are often very, very different schematically. Usually the only teams in college that run schemes that are very close to what NFL teams run are those teams that are typically so talented they don't need to outscheme or confuse people. USC during the golden days of Pete Caroll basically ran a pretty vanilla NFL offense, and Bama's defense is pretty much the same as Bill Parcell's. Neither of them needed to try and deceive people because they're players were so much better than everyone elses that they just need to be fundamentally sound to kick your ass. 
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 10:23:33 AM
Furthermore: http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/tim-tebows-last-chance, http://startkyleorton.blogspot.com/2013/04/can-tim-tebow-be-fixed-what-about-jay.html.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 10:28:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 10:23:33 AM
Furthermore: http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/tim-tebows-last-chance, http://startkyleorton.blogspot.com/2013/04/can-tim-tebow-be-fixed-what-about-jay.html.

In all sincerity, that wasn't a terrible blog post.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 10:37:12 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 10:28:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 10:23:33 AM
Furthermore: http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/tim-tebows-last-chance, http://startkyleorton.blogspot.com/2013/04/can-tim-tebow-be-fixed-what-about-jay.html.

In all sincerity, that wasn't a terrible blog post.

Appreciated. In all honesty, I find Tebow an interesting player and would root for him in earnest if the bullshit storm around him wasn't so awful, because those raw skills are undeniable.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Yeti on June 11, 2013, 10:51:09 AM
Long. Winded.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 11:09:31 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 11, 2013, 10:51:09 AM
Long. Winded.

A football question was asked in the middle of June. Tonk knew what he was getting into.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Tonker on June 11, 2013, 11:53:21 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 11:09:31 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 11, 2013, 10:51:09 AM
Long. Winded.

A football question was asked in the middle of June. Tonk knew what he was getting into.

Yeah.  TL;DR

Seriously, though, thanks.  It's about what I expected to hear, I think.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 11, 2013, 01:02:10 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

Yeah, like I'd reference anybody from the last 20 years.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 01:20:48 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

It was Bobby Douglass. Bobby, like Tim, was also a lefty. I think I've made a Tebow-Douglass mention before, actually.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 11, 2013, 02:56:35 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw

Wishbone.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:58:36 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw

At a November 2003 Bears game I saw a sign that said, "Dear Pittsburgh: Thanks for Ramirez, Lofton & Simon. Take Stewart back."

I still think about that sign and laugh. And then I drink heavily and wait to die.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 03:31:00 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:58:36 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw

At a November 2003 Bears game I saw a sign that said, "Dear Pittsburgh: Thanks for Ramirez, Lofton & Simon. Take Stewart back."

I still think about that sign and laugh. And then I drink heavily and wait to die.

Yeah but every time I dust off the PS2 I pop in Madden 2004 and run a HB pass from A-Train to Slash up on the sideline and it rules.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 03:37:26 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:58:36 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw

At a November 2003 Bears game I saw a sign that said, "Dear Pittsburgh: Thanks for Ramirez, Lofton & Simon. Take Stewart back."

I still think about that sign and laugh. And then I drink heavily and wait to die.

Considering the baseball guys were via trade and Kordell was a free agent, that is a stupid sign.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Slaky on June 11, 2013, 03:45:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Did I ever tell you guys about the time my friends got in a fight with him and his fuckheaded son at Cubby Bear North because we were openly rooting against Kansas in the Final Four?

Of course I did.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on June 11, 2013, 03:50:45 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 11, 2013, 03:45:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Did I ever tell you guys about the time my friends got in a fight with him and his fuckheaded son at Cubby Bear North because we were openly rooting against Kansas in the Final Four?

Of course I did.

I recall this.  For some reason, I thought it was a Bob Avellini encounter, though.  Awesome no matter who the fuckbucket it was.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 03:56:39 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 03:37:26 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:58:36 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 11, 2013, 02:45:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 11, 2013, 02:24:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 11, 2013, 12:24:01 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Without clicking, I just assumed this was Kordell Stewart and I got a healthy case of preemptive butthurt.

His Bears tenure permanently Costanza'd my KordellBoner but there was a time I cut diamonds with it after seeing him poop in Michigan and Indy's cereal bowls in consecutive seasons. Slash was my guy. Now, he's a guy. Who probably likes guys.
Play action quarterback draw

At a November 2003 Bears game I saw a sign that said, "Dear Pittsburgh: Thanks for Ramirez, Lofton & Simon. Take Stewart back."

I still think about that sign and laugh. And then I drink heavily and wait to die.

Considering the baseball guys were via trade and Kordell was a free agent, that is a stupid sign.

Yeah, what an awful, awful sign. I boo my memory of it! BOOOOO! Fuck you, memory. Go the fuck back to Pittsburgh.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: SKO on June 11, 2013, 04:19:58 PM
Quote from: PANK! on June 11, 2013, 03:50:45 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 11, 2013, 03:45:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Did I ever tell you guys about the time my friends got in a fight with him and his fuckheaded son at Cubby Bear North because we were openly rooting against Kansas in the Final Four?

Of course I did.

I recall this.  For some reason, I thought it was a Bob Avellini encounter, though.  Awesome no matter who the fuckbucket it was.

I'd like to hear this story. It must have been Douglass, since he went to Kansas.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Shooter on June 11, 2013, 07:26:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 11, 2013, 03:45:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 11, 2013, 11:52:43 AM
So a QB with rocks in his head who is a shitty passer, but can run like a motherfucker?

Where have we seen that (http://www.terribleviolence.com/cards/bearook/2010/douglass.jpg) before?


Did I ever tell you guys about the time my friends got in a fight with him and his fuckheaded son at Cubby Bear North because we were openly rooting against Kansas in the Final Four?

Of course I did.

Did he tell you about the time he drove the wrong way down one of the busiest streets in Madison just prior to being stopped for DUI?
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 26, 2013, 02:23:03 PM
Aaron Hernandez is now a free agent. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-aaron-hernandez-arrested-20130626,0,6057065.story)  Go get 'im, Phil!
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: BH on June 26, 2013, 02:30:24 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 26, 2013, 02:23:03 PM
Aaron Hernandez is now a free agent. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-aaron-hernandez-arrested-20130626,0,6057065.story)  Go get 'im, Phil!

I thought Hernandez destroyed all the surveillance info at his house? Apparently he isn't very smart on how to do it.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: PenFoe on June 26, 2013, 02:31:24 PM
Quote from: BH on June 26, 2013, 02:30:24 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 26, 2013, 02:23:03 PM
Aaron Hernandez is now a free agent. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-aaron-hernandez-arrested-20130626,0,6057065.story)  Go get 'im, Phil!

I thought Hernandez destroyed all the surveillance info at his house? Apparently he isn't very smart on how to do it.

Right after the part where he walked in with a gun in his hand and went to turn it off.
Title: Re: 2011 - 20?? Bears Offseason(s) Thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 26, 2013, 03:04:50 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 26, 2013, 02:31:24 PM
Quote from: BH on June 26, 2013, 02:30:24 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 26, 2013, 02:23:03 PM
Aaron Hernandez is now a free agent. (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-aaron-hernandez-arrested-20130626,0,6057065.story)  Go get 'im, Phil!

I thought Hernandez destroyed all the surveillance info at his house? Apparently he isn't very smart on how to do it.

Right after the part where he walked in with a gun in his hand and went to turn it off.

This image made me laugh, but then I saw this on the Deadspins:

QuoteWhen the three—minus Lloyd—returned to Hernandez's house, surveillance cameras showed someone carrying a gun into his house, down to the basement, and that's when cameras were shut off.