Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: Saul Goodman on September 19, 2011, 07:46:35 PM

Title: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 19, 2011, 07:46:35 PM
Here's a thread to talk about the title and/or the game (optional).
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on September 19, 2011, 07:47:30 PM
Intrepid Reader: Apex:  *Brain explodes*
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Internet Apex on September 19, 2011, 08:22:34 PM
I give up.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: flannj on September 20, 2011, 09:52:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 19, 2011, 08:22:34 PM
I give up.

I'm guessing you don't.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - Lovie doesn't care about fat people.
Post by: Internet Apex on September 21, 2011, 09:13:19 AM
Quote from: flannj on September 20, 2011, 09:52:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 19, 2011, 08:22:34 PM
I give up.

I'm guessing you don't.

Nah, man. I'm throwing down my Romeo on when if you recall. Archer wins.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: BH on September 23, 2011, 10:49:12 AM
Omiyale is starting. So we'll probably get to see a lot of caleb hanie.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: CBStew on September 23, 2011, 02:09:42 PM
Quote from: BH on September 23, 2011, 10:49:12 AM
Omiyale is starting. So we'll probably get to see a lot of caleb hanie.

Or, as Harry would say,  Belac Einah.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Slaky on September 23, 2011, 02:11:09 PM
Merriweather and Jen Aniston in the defensive backfield, right? This is going to suck.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: BBM on September 23, 2011, 02:22:59 PM
Quote from: BH on September 23, 2011, 10:49:12 AM
Omiyale is starting. So we'll probably get to see a lot of caleb hanie.

might as well get the meatball outrage out early.

BENCH HANIE! PLAY DAT ENDERLE GUY!!!
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: CT III on September 25, 2011, 04:15:12 PM
DANE SANZENBACHER THE TOUCHDOWN MACHER!
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: SKO on September 25, 2011, 04:17:03 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 25, 2011, 04:15:12 PM
DANE SANZENBACHER THE TOUCHDOWN MACHER!
I have no idea how he's an actually productive NFL player.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: CT III on September 25, 2011, 05:09:09 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2011, 04:17:03 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 25, 2011, 04:15:12 PM
DANE SANZENBACHER THE TOUCHDOWN MACHER!
I have no idea how he's an actually productive NFL player.

Some expert you are.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: SKO on September 25, 2011, 06:21:43 PM
Every time I watch one of Rodger's receivers make a leaping, sure-handed grab on 3rd down or in the red zone I look at Johnny Knox and want to kill an orphan.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 25, 2011, 06:28:10 PM
CONSPIRACY!
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Tony on September 25, 2011, 06:59:16 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2011, 06:21:43 PM
Every time I watch one of Rodger's receivers make a leaping, sure-handed grab on 3rd down or in the red zone I look at Johnny Knox and want to kill an orphan.

It would be more productive to kill Knox. Or Angelo.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Slaky on September 25, 2011, 07:20:04 PM
I think there were positive in this game, believe it or not. Not many, but some. I don't think the Bears are finished by a long shot and I hope no one else does either. If they kept injury free today, they'll get healthier for Carolina and probably beat them up.

Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: SKO on September 25, 2011, 07:28:34 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2011, 07:20:04 PM
I think there were positive in this game, believe it or not. Not many, but some. I don't think the Bears are finished by a long shot and I hope no one else does either. If they kept injury free today, they'll get healthier for Carolina and probably beat them up.



To call them finished is insane, but I'd definitely say they need to win the next 2. If they can beat the Panthers and the Lions and get back to 3-2, their stretch run isn't all that frightening. They need to get healthy enough on the offensive line to run the goddamn ball, though. Guh.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Yeti on September 25, 2011, 07:41:11 PM
So, was it the scorned ghost of Tim Shaw who held on that punt return?
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Yeti on September 25, 2011, 08:02:21 PM
(http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/310697_552076419384_211300033_31610367_289502507_n.jpg)

I guess this can be the hold? At the 35, when the "penalty" happened at the 20.. and it took the flag a good 2 seconds to be thrown.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Yeti on September 25, 2011, 08:03:44 PM
Flag came out at 1:04
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Tony on September 25, 2011, 08:44:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2011, 07:28:34 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2011, 07:20:04 PM
I think there were positive in this game, believe it or not. Not many, but some. I don't think the Bears are finished by a long shot and I hope no one else does either. If they kept injury free today, they'll get healthier for Carolina and probably beat them up.



To call them finished is insane, but I'd definitely say they need to win the next 2. If they can beat the Panthers and the Lions and get back to 3-2, their stretch run isn't all that frightening. They need to get healthy enough on the offensive line to run the goddamn ball, though. Guh.

No they're not finished, but that might even be more frustrating. They could be pretty damn good with one decent receiver on the team. Rodgers has 4 or 5 guys he can throw to. Cutler's passes hit receivers in the face. In the damn face.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: fiveouts on September 25, 2011, 10:28:01 PM
The Bears were terrible today and didn't deserve to win the game.

What's amazing, though, is that they were two calls (the holding penalty and the blown Pass Interference call on Woodson) from winning that game.

Schedule definitely gets easier from here on out.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Yeti on September 25, 2011, 11:12:40 PM
Quote from: fiveouts on September 25, 2011, 10:28:01 PM
The Bears were terrible today and didn't deserve to win the game.

What's amazing, though, is that they were two calls (the holding penalty and the blown Pass Interference call on Woodson) from winning that game.

Schedule definitely gets easier from here on out.

eh, you can't really claim that, because if the PI didn't happen, then maybe there's a TD there, but if it gets called the Bears just have the ball at around the 50, right? What happens there is unknown. Then, if that PI gets called, the situation causing the punt return may have never happened. They were two calls I'm still pissed about, but if reveresed, the entire landscape of the game would have changed. Hell, the Bears could have gotten blown out after it.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 26, 2011, 01:43:48 AM
I cannot believe the season is over after just three games. The Packers did exactly what I thought they were going to do. Cutler was carried off by stretcher at halftime, the pass defense did nothing as usual; Aaron Rodgers brought his I-Pass to Chicago and went 30/34 for 406 yards and three touchdowns. Tim Jennings has learned tremendously from Charles Tillman (Worthless) on how to be a shitty cornerback who does not know how to defend a wide receiver. FIND A RECEIVER AND STAY ON HIM YOU SON OF A BITCH. Cam Newton can't wait to go against this defense.

How stupid of me to get excited about this season.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 26, 2011, 02:07:51 AM
But seriously...

I'm not gonna argue that the whole outcome turned on that holding call. Spot the Bears those 7 points and it's still long odds that they even tie the game, let alone come back to win it.

But, fuck me. That punt return was one hell of a fucking football play. And it's a shame to have something like that wiped from the boxscore on either a bullshit call by the refs or an utterly unnecessary jersey grab by Graham. Or both.

And how much are we gonna miss Dave Toub whenever he goes wherever he goes?
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Internet Apex on September 26, 2011, 09:23:48 AM
I thought the game was over the moment Martz trotted out the game plan that called for 4 yards rushing by the time I got up and left in a huff. The Bears should beat bad teams and lose to good teams all year long. Because they are mediocre as dick. What we don't know is who the good and bad teams are on the schedule because of that any given Sunday thing (also, Philly? Pffft.). So, I've resolved to just wait ans see how this all plays out.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on September 26, 2011, 09:31:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 26, 2011, 09:23:48 AM
I thought the game was over the moment Martz trotted out the game plan that called for 4 yards rushing by the time I got up and left in a huff. The Bears should beat bad teams and lose to good teams all year long. Because they are mediocre as dick. What we don't know is who the good and bad teams are on the schedule because of that any given Sunday thing (also, Philly? Pffft.). So, I've resolved to just wait ans see how this all plays out.

Atlanta's not looking like the team we thought they were either.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou?
Post by: Internet Apex on September 26, 2011, 10:45:43 AM
Also Craig Steltz (fuck you) and Johnny Knox are worse at football than I am at not getting dumped by Asian broads.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Quote from: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.

Sorry, BH...SKO says they're going 11-2 the rest of the way.

Quote from: SKO
That was a fucking awesome game. The offensive line was better than the sacks made them look. Webb had some issues and so did Carimi but I wouldn't say they looked bad most of the game. Cutler had time to throw and he had at least 6 seconds on 2 of those sacks in which to throw the ball away. The Cover 2 worked to perfection today. They dared Matt Ryan to try and beat them downfield and he was too scared. That was the weakest 300 yard passing game I've ever seen from an opposing QB. The run game looked good until they took out Forte to keep him from getting hurt in a blowout during his contract year. The defensive line was the strongest unit on the field as I had hoped. As for my prediction for this season I had them at 12-4. So we'll see. I think if they beat either the Saints or Packers in the next two weeks they make the playoffs no problem. If they win both they win the division.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: SKO on September 26, 2011, 04:38:10 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Quote from: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.

Sorry, BH...SKO says they're going 11-2 the rest of the way.

Quote from: SKO
That was a fucking awesome game. The offensive line was better than the sacks made them look. Webb had some issues and so did Carimi but I wouldn't say they looked bad most of the game. Cutler had time to throw and he had at least 6 seconds on 2 of those sacks in which to throw the ball away. The Cover 2 worked to perfection today. They dared Matt Ryan to try and beat them downfield and he was too scared. That was the weakest 300 yard passing game I've ever seen from an opposing QB. The run game looked good until they took out Forte to keep him from getting hurt in a blowout during his contract year. The defensive line was the strongest unit on the field as I had hoped. As for my prediction for this season I had them at 12-4. So we'll see. I think if they beat either the Saints or Packers in the next two weeks they make the playoffs no problem. If they win both they win the division.

BH was quoting from one of Fro Dog's commenters. I definitely thought before the season and after the Atlanta game that they'd be 2-1 instead of 1-2, so we'll see. Right now they're inconsistent and injured, but there's a whole lot of football left and a slate of games against an AFC West that looks underwhelming, the Seahawks, and two against the Vikings.  They're not as bad as they played the last two weeks and they're possibly not as good as they looked against Atlanta, but they're sure as hell not done.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 05:13:33 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 26, 2011, 04:38:10 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Quote from: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.

Sorry, BH...SKO says they're going 11-2 the rest of the way.

Quote from: SKO
That was a fucking awesome game. The offensive line was better than the sacks made them look. Webb had some issues and so did Carimi but I wouldn't say they looked bad most of the game. Cutler had time to throw and he had at least 6 seconds on 2 of those sacks in which to throw the ball away. The Cover 2 worked to perfection today. They dared Matt Ryan to try and beat them downfield and he was too scared. That was the weakest 300 yard passing game I've ever seen from an opposing QB. The run game looked good until they took out Forte to keep him from getting hurt in a blowout during his contract year. The defensive line was the strongest unit on the field as I had hoped. As for my prediction for this season I had them at 12-4. So we'll see. I think if they beat either the Saints or Packers in the next two weeks they make the playoffs no problem. If they win both they win the division.

BH was quoting from one of Fro Dog's commenters. I definitely thought before the season and after the Atlanta game that they'd be 2-1 instead of 1-2, so we'll see. Right now they're inconsistent and injured, but there's a whole lot of football left and a slate of games against an AFC West that looks underwhelming, the Seahawks, and two against the Vikings.  They're not as bad as they played the last two weeks and they're possibly not as good as they looked against Atlanta, but they're sure as hell not done.

Similar to how we use green for sarcasm, can we use "invisible" for Fro Dog and his commenters?
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: Eli on September 26, 2011, 09:19:59 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 05:13:33 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 26, 2011, 04:38:10 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Quote from: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.

Sorry, BH...SKO says they're going 11-2 the rest of the way.

Quote from: SKO
That was a fucking awesome game. The offensive line was better than the sacks made them look. Webb had some issues and so did Carimi but I wouldn't say they looked bad most of the game. Cutler had time to throw and he had at least 6 seconds on 2 of those sacks in which to throw the ball away. The Cover 2 worked to perfection today. They dared Matt Ryan to try and beat them downfield and he was too scared. That was the weakest 300 yard passing game I've ever seen from an opposing QB. The run game looked good until they took out Forte to keep him from getting hurt in a blowout during his contract year. The defensive line was the strongest unit on the field as I had hoped. As for my prediction for this season I had them at 12-4. So we'll see. I think if they beat either the Saints or Packers in the next two weeks they make the playoffs no problem. If they win both they win the division.

BH was quoting from one of Fro Dog's commenters. I definitely thought before the season and after the Atlanta game that they'd be 2-1 instead of 1-2, so we'll see. Right now they're inconsistent and injured, but there's a whole lot of football left and a slate of games against an AFC West that looks underwhelming, the Seahawks, and two against the Vikings.  They're not as bad as they played the last two weeks and they're possibly not as good as they looked against Atlanta, but they're sure as hell not done.

Similar to how we use green for sarcasm, can we use "invisible" for Fro Dog and his commenters?

Yeah, but then this board would be empty.
Title: Re: Week 3: Packers at Bears - O Line, Where Art Thou? (L 17-27)
Post by: Internet Apex on September 27, 2011, 08:34:43 AM
Quote from: Eli on September 26, 2011, 09:19:59 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 05:13:33 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 26, 2011, 04:38:10 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 26, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Quote from: BH on September 26, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
So, according to my thinking, stupid as I am, the Bears will at best be 6-10. And conceivably, they could go 3-13. Don't let the game with Atlanta fool you. This team sucks. This coaching staff sucks. And the owners suck. If the Bears are to improve at all, that old bitch Virginia McCaskey has to die. As long as she's around, this will remain the trainwreck it is now.

Sorry, BH...SKO says they're going 11-2 the rest of the way.

Quote from: SKO
That was a fucking awesome game. The offensive line was better than the sacks made them look. Webb had some issues and so did Carimi but I wouldn't say they looked bad most of the game. Cutler had time to throw and he had at least 6 seconds on 2 of those sacks in which to throw the ball away. The Cover 2 worked to perfection today. They dared Matt Ryan to try and beat them downfield and he was too scared. That was the weakest 300 yard passing game I've ever seen from an opposing QB. The run game looked good until they took out Forte to keep him from getting hurt in a blowout during his contract year. The defensive line was the strongest unit on the field as I had hoped. As for my prediction for this season I had them at 12-4. So we'll see. I think if they beat either the Saints or Packers in the next two weeks they make the playoffs no problem. If they win both they win the division.

BH was quoting from one of Fro Dog's commenters. I definitely thought before the season and after the Atlanta game that they'd be 2-1 instead of 1-2, so we'll see. Right now they're inconsistent and injured, but there's a whole lot of football left and a slate of games against an AFC West that looks underwhelming, the Seahawks, and two against the Vikings.  They're not as bad as they played the last two weeks and they're possibly not as good as they looked against Atlanta, but they're sure as hell not done.

Similar to how we use green for sarcasm, can we use "invisible" for Fro Dog and his commenters?

Yeah, but then this board would be empty.

Save for Archer's hijinx, natch.