News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon  ( 37,369 )

Andy

  • Head Moran
  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,521
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #30 on: June 03, 2009, 08:45:25 AM »
Brenly tried to explain just how terrible Gregg's 1-2 pitch to Francoeur was and he got halfway through and just stopped.  Basically...

"You've got a guy who will swing at anything, and you're ahead in the count and you...it's...a fastball...right...down...blurrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhh."

Which was opposed to Santo's commentary on it which was, "WHY ME?  WHY ME?"


Andy

  • Head Moran
  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,521
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #31 on: June 03, 2009, 08:46:35 AM »
Quote from: Oleg on June 03, 2009, 08:44:45 AM
On the bright side, Hawks training camp is less than 3 months away.

Shit Oleg, it's hockey.  Training camp is probably three days away.

Don't they just pause two-a-days for four hours one Saturday to draft a bunch of new Swedes and then get right back to it?

MAD

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,920
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #32 on: June 03, 2009, 08:52:43 AM »
Quote from: Andy on June 03, 2009, 08:45:25 AM
Brenly tried to explain just how terrible Gregg's 1-2 pitch to Francoeur was and he got halfway through and just stopped.  Basically...

"You've got a guy who will swing at anything, and you're ahead in the count and you...it's...a fastball...right...down...blurrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhh."

Which was opposed to Santo's commentary on it which was, "WHY ME?  WHY ME?"



Actually, the radio call was quite priceless.

Santo began moaning like a wounded ewe immediately after DLee dropped the first out in the 8th inning.  After several "GOSH"es, "Ahhhh"'s and "What is going ON?"'s through the next 1 2/3 innings, Santo finally said something to the effect of "I've got to calm down here.  I need to take some pills".  Literally seconds after that was when Francouer homered.  If I wasn't so disgusted I would have laughed.  Point is, that blubbering idiot was actually silent on the home run.  Funny, because that's the time when a homer color analyst would be justified in losing his shit.

If anybody can somehow dig up the radio call of Frenchy's homerun, I promise you the timing of Santo's sudden and unexpected self-realization may actually make you snort a little.
I think he's more of the appendix of Desipio.  Yeah, it's here and you're vaguely aware of it, but only if reminded.  The only time anyone notices it is when it ruptures (on Weebs in the video game thread).  Beyond that, though, it's basically useless and offers no redeeming value.
Eli G. (6-22-10)

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #33 on: June 03, 2009, 08:56:13 AM »
Quote from: Andy on June 03, 2009, 08:46:35 AM
Quote from: Oleg on June 03, 2009, 08:44:45 AM
On the bright side, Hawks training camp is less than 3 months away.

Shit Oleg, it's hockey.  Training camp is probably three days away.

Don't they just pause two-a-days for four hours one Saturday to draft a bunch of new Swedes and then get right back to it?

Yay?  Yay!

Philberto

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,884
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #34 on: June 03, 2009, 10:04:19 AM »
Quote from: Fork on June 03, 2009, 07:56:58 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on June 02, 2009, 11:19:58 PM
This team should be really happy that Randy Wells is not Ted Lilly.  If he were the Bull Moose, there might not be a team left tomorrow morning.

And with good reason.

I'm not endorsing wholesale slaughter, but I'm not necessarily against it either.

So what you're really saying is that you don't have a full opinion on it?

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #35 on: June 03, 2009, 10:09:51 AM »
Quote from: IrishYeti on June 03, 2009, 10:04:19 AM
Quote from: Fork on June 03, 2009, 07:56:58 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on June 02, 2009, 11:19:58 PM
This team should be really happy that Randy Wells is not Ted Lilly.  If he were the Bull Moose, there might not be a team left tomorrow morning.

And with good reason.

I'm not endorsing wholesale slaughter, but I'm not necessarily against it either.

So what you're really saying is that you don't have a full opinion on it?

Worse things have hai'ed.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #36 on: June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM »
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB
Hire Jim Essian!

RV

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,881
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #37 on: June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #38 on: June 03, 2009, 11:26:53 AM »
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Because Lou would rather put in the gas cans than leave a guy in who's been dominant. Lou has been a shell of himself this year.

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #39 on: June 03, 2009, 11:55:55 AM »
Quote from: Slakee on June 03, 2009, 11:26:53 AM
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Because Lou would rather put in the gas cans than leave a guy in who's been dominant. Lou has been a shell of himself this year.

Rookie pitcher, making his 5th start, going through the order for a 3rd and 4th time.  His two best relievers were well-rested.

I really don't have an issue with this.  If Marmol and Gregg pitch well (and despite what the reactionary crowd thinks, that's not a far-fetched notion), this isn't even up for discussion.

Hindsight being 20/20 and all.

Tank

  • Folklorist/Library Cop
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,874
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #40 on: June 03, 2009, 12:29:52 PM »
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

And if anyone knows "really hairy"...
"So, this old man comes over to us and starts ragging on us to get down from there and really not being mean. Well, being a drunk gnome, I started yelling at teh guy... like really loudly."

Excerpt from The Astonishing Tales of Wooderson the Lesser

Philberto

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,884
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #41 on: June 03, 2009, 12:33:04 PM »
Quote from: Tank on June 03, 2009, 12:29:52 PM
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

And if anyone knows "really hairy"...

Someone say hairy?

LoneStarCubFan

  • Guest
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #42 on: June 03, 2009, 01:03:25 PM »
Quote from: Oleg on June 03, 2009, 11:55:55 AM
Quote from: Slakee on June 03, 2009, 11:26:53 AM
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Because Lou would rather put in the gas cans than leave a guy in who's been dominant. Lou has been a shell of himself this year.

Rookie pitcher, making his 5th start, going through the order for a 3rd and 4th time.  His two best relievers were well-rested.

I really don't have an issue with this.  If Marmol and Gregg pitch well (and despite what the reactionary crowd thinks, that's not a far-fetched notion), this isn't even up for discussion.

Hindsight being 20/20 and all.

Problem with that thinking is that the Cubs don't have two "best" relievers. They have Marmol, who is good more often than not, and a steaming pile of suck after that.

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #43 on: June 03, 2009, 01:35:37 PM »
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on June 03, 2009, 01:03:25 PM
Quote from: Oleg on June 03, 2009, 11:55:55 AM
Quote from: Slakee on June 03, 2009, 11:26:53 AM
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Because Lou would rather put in the gas cans than leave a guy in who's been dominant. Lou has been a shell of himself this year.

Rookie pitcher, making his 5th start, going through the order for a 3rd and 4th time.  His two best relievers were well-rested.

I really don't have an issue with this.  If Marmol and Gregg pitch well (and despite what the reactionary crowd thinks, that's not a far-fetched notion), this isn't even up for discussion.

Hindsight being 20/20 and all.

Problem with that thinking is that the Cubs don't have two "best" relievers. They have Marmol, who is good more often than not, and a steaming pile of suck after that.

Guzman has been good, Ascanio has been decent, Waddell can't be worse than Cotts, and Marshall will be in the bullpen soon.

Drink a beer, dude.
Hire Jim Essian!

MAD

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,920
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon
« Reply #44 on: June 03, 2009, 01:52:54 PM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 01:35:37 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on June 03, 2009, 01:03:25 PM
Quote from: Oleg on June 03, 2009, 11:55:55 AM
Quote from: Slakee on June 03, 2009, 11:26:53 AM
Quote from: RV on June 03, 2009, 11:22:27 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on June 03, 2009, 10:58:43 AM
On the bright side, Randy Wells has been really, really, REALLY fucking awesome so far.  I know it's only five starts, but day-um.

1.69 ERA
0.969 WHIP
0.3 HR/9
2.0 BB/9
7.6 SO/9
3.86 SO/BB

He was really, really good last night. I missed the beginning of the Braves' 8th last night - was there a particular reason why Lou gave him the hook after 83 pitches and what should have been the first out of the inning? The way he was pitching I assumed he'd go the distance unless things got really hairy.

Because Lou would rather put in the gas cans than leave a guy in who's been dominant. Lou has been a shell of himself this year.

Rookie pitcher, making his 5th start, going through the order for a 3rd and 4th time.  His two best relievers were well-rested.

I really don't have an issue with this.  If Marmol and Gregg pitch well (and despite what the reactionary crowd thinks, that's not a far-fetched notion), this isn't even up for discussion.

Hindsight being 20/20 and all.

Problem with that thinking is that the Cubs don't have two "best" relievers. They have Marmol, who is good more often than not, and a steaming pile of suck after that.

Guzman has been good, Ascanio has been decent, Waddell can't be worse than Cotts, and Marshall will be in the bullpen soon.

Drink a beer Get laid, dude.

Anxiety release'd.
I think he's more of the appendix of Desipio.  Yeah, it's here and you're vaguely aware of it, but only if reminded.  The only time anyone notices it is when it ruptures (on Weebs in the video game thread).  Beyond that, though, it's basically useless and offers no redeeming value.
Eli G. (6-22-10)