News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: The Office  ( 310,254 )

TDubbs

  • TJG's 5th best writer
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,894
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The Office
« Reply #1245 on: February 12, 2009, 10:23:30 PM »
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Shut your facehole, fag.
THERE ARE TOO MANY MEN ON THE FIELD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: The Office
« Reply #1246 on: February 12, 2009, 10:40:34 PM »
Quote from: TDubbs on February 12, 2009, 10:23:30 PM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Shut your facehole, fag.

kd lang

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: The Office
« Reply #1247 on: February 13, 2009, 07:28:00 AM »
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

I thought her Forrest Gump impression was funny.  This one did have more of a 'very special' feel, though. 

Angela licking her cat wasn't as funny as it should have been. 

"I know.  I read it on the sign."
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.

RV

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,881
Re: The Office
« Reply #1248 on: February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM »
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: The Office
« Reply #1249 on: February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM »
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

TDubbs

  • TJG's 5th best writer
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,894
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The Office
« Reply #1250 on: February 13, 2009, 09:23:11 AM »
Quote from: Eli on February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

Horse hunting won't fit.
THERE ARE TOO MANY MEN ON THE FIELD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: The Office
« Reply #1251 on: February 13, 2009, 10:12:49 AM »
Quote from: Eli on February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

I assumed Jim had added touch football and charades.  Was that wrong?  Was I wrong in assuming that?
Hire Jim Essian!

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: The Office
« Reply #1252 on: February 13, 2009, 10:20:19 AM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 13, 2009, 10:12:49 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

I assumed Jim had added touch football and charades.  Was that wrong?  Was I wrong in assuming that?

No, I'm probably wrong.

butthead

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,877
    • aj_vassallo@hotmail.com
  • Location: Lincoln Square
Re: The Office
« Reply #1253 on: February 13, 2009, 12:19:58 PM »
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

It works better in half hour chunks. I didn't like last season when they stretched some episodes to an hour, and this two-parter was the same thing. Other than Jim and Dwight is was a pretty average show last night.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: The Office
« Reply #1254 on: February 13, 2009, 12:29:59 PM »
You're all Weebs now.

RV

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,881
Re: The Office
« Reply #1255 on: February 13, 2009, 12:32:23 PM »
Quote from: Slakee on February 13, 2009, 12:29:59 PM
You're all Weebs now.

YOU TAKE THAT BACK RIGHT NOW MISTER!

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: The Office
« Reply #1256 on: February 13, 2009, 02:27:49 PM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 13, 2009, 10:12:49 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

I assumed Jim had added touch football and charades.  Was that wrong?  Was I wrong in assuming that?

I don't think you're wrong.  But why think about it? 
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: The Office
« Reply #1257 on: February 13, 2009, 02:45:27 PM »
Quote from: JD on February 13, 2009, 02:27:49 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 13, 2009, 10:12:49 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 13, 2009, 09:00:12 AM
Quote from: RV on February 13, 2009, 08:47:09 AM
Quote from: Eli on February 12, 2009, 10:21:01 PM
They've had a pretty good run of episodes lately, but tonight's kind of stunk.  The less Pam, the better.

Yeah there were some funny moments but it was a bit of a dud. Not sure why they made this week and last week a two-parter, didn't seem like there was enough material for an hour.

Kelly being too excited to sleep was hilarious.

I think they really wanted to move the plot forward with the Michael and Holly thing.  But then he never actually saw Holly, so it seemed like a lot of fanfare for nothing.  The plot-driven episodes are still fine, but I think the show is funnier when they aren't pushing a storyline.

That said, Dwight adding touch football, mating and charades to the party ideas was great.

I assumed Jim had added touch football and charades.  Was that wrong?  Was I wrong in assuming that?

I don't think you're wrong.  But why think about it? 

I was juxtaposing what I thought Jim's idea of a fun party was with Dwight's, and that added to the humor.  At least in my brain.
Hire Jim Essian!

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: The Office
« Reply #1258 on: March 05, 2009, 11:08:16 PM »
I liked the new episode tonight.  Highlight was Creed stealing blood.

MAD

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,920
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The Office
« Reply #1259 on: March 06, 2009, 05:41:32 AM »
"Are you on e-mail?"
I think he's more of the appendix of Desipio.  Yeah, it's here and you're vaguely aware of it, but only if reminded.  The only time anyone notices it is when it ruptures (on Weebs in the video game thread).  Beyond that, though, it's basically useless and offers no redeeming value.
Eli G. (6-22-10)