Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: Apexx on June 09, 2007, 07:07:52 PM

Title: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Apexx on June 09, 2007, 07:07:52 PM
Nice outing, dick.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Apexx on June 09, 2007, 07:13:33 PM
If JD's not on the board right now I know nobody else is going to step up and give Jock credit for taking out Hudson if I don't. Whether intentional or not, that was well-played. Umpires can't do shit to protect your bald headed ass from that, fucknuts. Ouch. Better get some ice on that, stat.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Al Yellon on June 09, 2007, 07:22:24 PM
I'm too drunk and tired to look for the ODC/OAC thread. Can someone dig it up please? Jesus H. Christ.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: EG on June 09, 2007, 07:40:55 PM
This home plate umpire has no idea what's going on. 
[/BC]
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Apexx on June 09, 2007, 07:43:53 PM
This Gallagher 2 guy isn't much fung to watch. I'll pass on him for my fantasy squad just yet.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on June 09, 2007, 07:47:12 PM
The Marquis d' Suck is back. 1 and 2/3 innings after getting a spotted a 4 run lead.

So much for Gallagher keeping the game close.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on June 09, 2007, 09:51:27 PM

Marquis is who we thought he was, and he got his ass crowned.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on June 09, 2007, 10:47:37 PM
The only good thing about tonight is the Tards lost again. And the Brewers were winning 3-0 going into the bottom of the ninth and

- F. Cordero relieved D. Turnbow
- F. Catalanotto struck out swinging
- I. Kinsler grounded out to pitcher
- B. Wilkerson singled to left
- B. Wilkerson to second on fielder's indifference
- R. Vazquez walked
- G. Laird singled to left center, B. Wilkerson scored, R. Vazquez to third
- K. Lofton singled to first, R. Vazquez scored, G. Laird to second
- M. Byrd singled to center, G. Laird scored, K. Lofton to second
- M. Young singled to right, K. Lofton scored, M. Byrd to second

4 runs, 5 hits, 0 errors
Milwaukee 3, Texas 4
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Slaky! on June 10, 2007, 02:12:26 AM
Fuck Milwaukee. The whole thing.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on June 10, 2007, 08:19:19 AM
The disappointing thing is Marquis struggled in his last start, but he went 5 and 1/3  only gave up 2 runs. Got a couple of double plays to get himself out of trouble. Last night he was just god awful.

I'm not saying the Cubs are a playoff team, but they have had a number of chances to not only be competitive this year, but be in first place considering the lack of any really good teams in the division. Just like the Tards were the best of the shitty last year.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RoyHobbs on June 10, 2007, 11:03:46 AM
Hey, the Tards may have lost, but I told you Marquis sucks donkey balls. You guys laughed it off and said Dave Duncan blah blah blah. Enjoy 2 and half more years of that douchetard.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: therick711 on June 10, 2007, 12:33:18 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 10, 2007, 11:03:46 AM
Hey, the Tards may have lost, but I told you Marquis sucks donkey balls. You guys laughed it off and said Dave Duncan blah blah blah. Enjoy 2 and half more years of that douchetard.

Umm, no one on this site did anything of the kind.  Perhaps you missed the hand wringing of his signing and the continued loathing of him and the moniker Marquis de Suc.  The bottom line is you can't have 5 number 1's but if you can get a guy like Marquis that will most of the time give you 5 or 6 innings at the end of the rotation, even if he does get shelled often, he can stilll serve a purpose.  The Cubs made the postseason with Shawn F@&%$in Estes at the back of the rotation.  That in mind I would put forth Marquis is an upgrade from that loser.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kermit on June 10, 2007, 04:05:16 PM
Quote from: therick711 on June 10, 2007, 12:33:18 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 10, 2007, 11:03:46 AM
Hey, the Tards may have lost, but I told you Marquis sucks donkey balls. You guys laughed it off and said Dave Duncan blah blah blah. Enjoy 2 and half more years of that douchetard.

Umm, no one on this site did anything of the kind.  Perhaps you missed the hand wringing of his signing and the continued loathing of him and the moniker Marquis de Suc.  The bottom line is you can't have 5 number 1's but if you can get a guy like Marquis that will most of the time give you 5 or 6 innings at the end of the rotation, even if he does get shelled often, he can stilll serve a purpose.  The Cubs made the postseason with Shawn F@&%$in Estes at the back of the rotation.  That in mind I would put forth Marquis is an upgrade from that loser.

Yeah, I don't remember anyone saying anything like that, either.  And Marquis has ALREADY given the Cubs 5 times as many good starts as I thought he would.  In three years.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: BananaHands on June 10, 2007, 04:39:08 PM
Wait, I thought Larry fixed him this offseason and that led to his ridiculous contract?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: EG on June 10, 2007, 04:53:53 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 10, 2007, 11:03:46 AM
Hey, the Tards may have lost, but I told you Marquis sucks donkey balls. You guys laughed it off and said Dave Duncan blah blah blah. Enjoy 2 and half more years of that douchetard.

Right.  Except his ERA is still a full run lower than any starter on the Cardinals.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RW on June 10, 2007, 05:38:56 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 10, 2007, 11:03:46 AM
Hey, the Tards may have lost, but I told you Marquis sucks donkey balls. You guys laughed it off and said Dave Duncan blah blah blah. Enjoy 2 and half more years of that douchetard.


You guys should really just focus on enjoying Todd Wellemeyer. IN YOUR STARTING ROTATION.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM
My apologies for that original post. I was still wasted from the night before and was just plain stupid. You guys pretty much said he sucked. I have no idea what went through my brain. Other than booze. Ugh. Apparently, I don't handle drinking whiskey until 4am like I used to.

And Marquis may have an ERA a full point lower than any starter on the Cards and we may have Wellemeyer in the starting rotation but somehow we aren't imploding. Man, if we don't have the shittiest starting rotation in any level of baseball, I'd be surprised. So I got no argument.   

Anyway, you guys said Marqius sucks and he does. My bad. But I still reserve the right to remind you how bad he sucks on occasion.   
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Apexx on June 11, 2007, 09:03:08 AM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM

somehow we aren't imploding.


You can't play the Reds, Pirates and Royals forever you toothless fuck. Soon, your Deadbirds and their 1-5 record vs. the NLE will take on the Phillies and Mets and we'll check back in with you and see how that whole not imploding thing is going.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on June 11, 2007, 09:06:55 AM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM
My apologies for that original post. I was still wasted from the night before and was just plain stupid. You guys pretty much said he sucked. I have no idea what went through my brain. Other than booze. Ugh. Apparently, I don't handle drinking whiskey until 4am like I used to.

And Marquis may have an ERA a full point lower than any starter on the Cards and we may have Wellemeyer in the starting rotation but somehow we aren't imploding. Man, if we don't have the shittiest starting rotation in any level of baseball, I'd be surprised. So I got no argument.   

Anyway, you guys said Marqius sucks and he does. My bad. But I still reserve the right to remind you how bad he sucks on occasion.    


I think Marquis can handle that all on his own.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 12:16:12 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on June 11, 2007, 09:03:08 AM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM

somehow we aren't imploding.


You can't play the Reds, Pirates and Royals forever you toothless f@#$. Soon, your Deadbirds and their 1-5 record vs. the NLE will take on the Phillies and Mets and we'll check back in with you and see how that whole not imploding thing is going.

Ok you guys haven't faced the Royals yet, but you are a whopping 4-5 against the Reds and Pirates.

And the Cubs record against the NL East is a spectacular 10-13.

At least you aren't a Yankees fan. Jesus H Christ, they are dreaming of pitchers making 2 consecutive starts. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on June 11, 2007, 12:58:14 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 12:16:12 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on June 11, 2007, 09:03:08 AM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM

somehow we aren't imploding.


You can't play the Reds, Pirates and Royals forever you toothless f@#$. Soon, your Deadbirds and their 1-5 record vs. the NLE will take on the Phillies and Mets and we'll check back in with you and see how that whole not imploding thing is going.

Ok you guys haven't faced the Royals yet, but you are a whopping 4-5 against the Reds and Pirates.

And the Cubs record against the NL East is a spectacular 10-13.

At least you aren't a Yankees fan. Jesus H Christ, they are dreaming of pitchers making 2 consecutive starts. flights.  

Lidled.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: therick711 on June 11, 2007, 05:57:01 PM
Quote from: Fork_The_Third on June 11, 2007, 12:58:14 PM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 12:16:12 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on June 11, 2007, 09:03:08 AM
Quote from: RoyHobbs on June 11, 2007, 07:28:06 AM

somehow we aren't imploding.


You can't play the Reds, Pirates and Royals forever you toothless f@#$. Soon, your Deadbirds and their 1-5 record vs. the NLE will take on the Phillies and Mets and we'll check back in with you and see how that whole not imploding thing is going.

Ok you guys haven't faced the Royals yet, but you are a whopping 4-5 against the Reds and Pirates.

And the Cubs record against the NL East is a spectacular 10-13.

At least you aren't a Yankees fan. Jesus H Christ, they are dreaming of pitchers making 2 consecutive starts. flights.  

Lidled.

Fantastic work there.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on July 06, 2007, 07:38:19 PM
It's reassuring to know that Marquis doesn't really start to suck until after the All Star Break. The batting practice he's been throwing to the Pirates tonight is a preview of what to expect from him in the second half of the season.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on July 15, 2007, 02:55:58 PM
Bump.

Quote from: Apexx on June 09, 2007, 07:07:52 PM
Nice outing, dick.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Augie-O on July 15, 2007, 03:07:10 PM
We should defenester people/things more often around here.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: cubbiebluestew on July 15, 2007, 04:03:31 PM
I have to say that I really like Jeff Garlin.  Why?  Because he is as die-hard as I am.  On the other hand, his father is an old-fart!
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Corn-fed on July 15, 2007, 04:37:48 PM
Quote from: Taylor on July 06, 2007, 07:38:19 PM
It's reassuring to know that Marquis doesn't really start to suck until after the All Star Break. The batting practice he's been throwing to the Pirates tonight is a preview of what to expect from him in the second half of the season.

Enough of the coming attractions, welcome to our feature presentation:

IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA
4.0 8 6 6 3 2 1 4.03
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on July 15, 2007, 06:30:22 PM
It's a good thing Wendy Rodríguez was a run suckier than the Marquis.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on July 16, 2007, 09:22:51 AM
So true. But if yesterday's game means that opponents can't call up every piece of shit AAAA lefty on the 40-man to shut down the Cubs' lineup for 6+ than color me a shade gheyer for this group of men than I was at at 2:20 ET yesterday.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Slaky! on July 16, 2007, 09:24:47 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on July 16, 2007, 09:22:51 AM
So true. But if yesterday's game means that opponents can't call up every piece of shit AAAA lefty on the 40-man to shut down the Cubs' lineup for 6+ than color me a shade gheyer for this group of men than I was at at 2:20 ET yesterday.

Even though Wendy did shut out the Mets his last time out, your point is noted. And gheyed.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 08:43:41 PM
Marquis needs to go away. Now.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Augie-O on July 26, 2007, 08:44:49 PM
He sucks.  I'm ready to bail on him for the rest of the year...is there anyone in the minors that we can call up to take some starts?  Can we "platoon" him with a pitcher who is strong in the second half of the season?  Can we trade him to Miluwakee to "replace" ben sheets?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 08:45:56 PM
Nice pants-shitting.  Walked Looper when he was giving up an out, walked Lassie after 1-2, hit Pujuols (so it wasn't ALL bad).  then a granny to Baby Huey (no relation, assholes).

When did Matt Clement come back?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: SD on July 26, 2007, 08:46:28 PM
F[size=0pt] [/size] UCK![/b]
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 08:48:23 PM
This is what you get with de Suck; one good outing, then one goddawful outing. I'm not ready to poke my eyes out just yet, he's a 50-50 guy just as-expected. Fine for a #5 pitcher.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 08:49:07 PM
BTW, the guy that needs to go is Serial Killer. Geezus, he has NOTHING in the tank. Wow.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: SD on July 26, 2007, 08:49:44 PM
DLEE!


(Marquis' June ERA was 5.02.  His July ERA was 5.79 but I would have to think thats on the up-and-up.)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on July 26, 2007, 08:53:49 PM

Marquis is the opposite of good.

On the bright side, the Reds VORPed the Brewers, so at least the Cubs don't lose any ground.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 09:02:29 PM
Too many here are getting all "4-letter" on us here. Since when is winning 2/3 in the New Urinal Cake a bad thing? Me satisfied.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 09:02:41 PM
I'm not watching the game, but doing crap in the kitchen where I'm listening to the new guy and Ronnie (Pat must be having the mother of all steamers...new guy sounds like he's doing the whole broadcast).  I noticed that Bengie Molina stole third.  According to Santo, Cedeno had NO IDEA what he was doing, as he came in for the SAC but didn't keep an eye on Molina so he could backtrack to the bag.

I could just picture it.  His dumbfounded look.  According to Santo, it seemed that he didn't even know what he did wrong, or that he did anything wrong at all.

Today's Dose...very timely.  I gotta imagine Lou's "Cedeno Countdown" is going 7...6...5...4...
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 09:03:31 PM
Petrick is doing a great Marquis impersonation.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: SD on July 26, 2007, 09:07:53 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 09:02:41 PM
"Cedeno Countdown" is going 7...6...5...4...

My Cedeno Countdown is ticking down too.  It goes like this:

.167, .100, .083, .059 ....
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: SD on July 26, 2007, 09:10:37 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 09:02:41 PM
(Pat must be having the mother of all steamers...new guy sounds like he's doing the whole broadcast).
Late Breaking News:
Pat Hughes' condition, as per Ron Santo:  "Must have ate something"

You think, Ron?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: BC on July 26, 2007, 09:12:15 PM
I went to a night game there last year when the Cardinals were playing the Royals... The gametime temperature was about 85 and the wind was out of the west at about 10 MPH, but the balls were FLYING out to right center. I think two homers went out that direction that night and there were a few flyballs that I thought would be moderate depth that ended up going warning depth distance. I think the reason for it is that there is a hole in the stadium from the first level up to the upper deck on the third base side and it probably tunnels the wind out in that direction when the wind is out of the west.

So, tonight, Soriano hits a ball very well (Sounded the best of any hit ball tonight anyway IMO) but it gets caught as it went to left center. While Pujols and Duncan can hit under their respective home run pitches and still get them out of the park because they hit the balls to right center. Lee also hit it that way, his was a little more of a line drive but it was probably wind-assisted as well.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
I can't get too upset about Marquis. He's just a guy. Not good. Not horrible. He's there because Z can't pitch everyday. You can't get too excited about Z or too upset with the 5th guy. The key is the three lefties. Everybody hates their 5th starter.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Corn-fed on July 26, 2007, 09:57:19 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 09:02:41 PM
According to Santo, Cedeno had NO IDEA what he was doing, as he came in for the SAC but didn't keep an eye on Molina so he could backtrack to the bag.

I could just picture it.  His dumbfounded look.  According to Santo, it seemed that he didn't even know what he did wrong, or that he did anything wrong at all.

You know there's a problem with your shortstop when he's out-awared by Ron Santo.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: BC on July 26, 2007, 10:28:46 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
I can't get too upset about Marquis. He's just a guy. Not good. Not horrible. He's there because Z can't pitch everyday. You can't get too excited about Z or too upset with the 5th guy. The key is the three lefties. Everybody hates their 5th starter.

I just hope it doesn't come down to the last few days and Marquis goes to the mound in a game that the Cubs absolutely must win. There's a reason Atlanta let him go and there's a reason the Cardinals didn't even have him on the postseason roster last year.

As far as the playoff race goes, looks like every team that is either near the Cubs or the Cubs are chasing lost today/tonight. I'm sure the Cubs could find many excruciating ways to not make the playoffs, but the one thing that would absolutely piss me off would be if the Cubs lost the Wild Card by one game to the Braves. Not only because I just hate the Braves (Other than the Cardinals, White Sox and Yankees I hate them the most) but that M-Fer of an umpire that ejected Lilly on the freaking third pitch of the game or whatever it was against the Braves would have essentially cost the Cubs a chance at the playoffs.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Old Style Man on July 26, 2007, 10:45:10 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 09:02:29 PM
Too many here are getting all "4-letter" on us here. Since when is winning 2/3 in the New Urinal Cake a bad thing? Me satisfied.


I agree. It was still a successful series. Anybody that thinks otherwise is over reacting. Marquis shit his pants. That isn't good, but it isn't the end of the world.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:49:49 PM
Recent Cubs winning teams, 5-hole comparisons--

(04): Jason Marquis or Glen-done? Rusch's career year, I take G-Unit.
(03): Jason Marquis or Shawn F. Estes? I'll take de Suck.
(01): Jason Marquis or Kevin Tapani? OK, I'll take Tap.
(98): Jason Marquis or Mark Clark/J(G)eremi Gonzalez? I'll take de Suck.
(93): Jason Marquis or Frank F. Castillo? Are you kidding? I'll take de Suck.
(89): Jason Marquis or Paul Kilgus? I'll take de Suck.
(84): Jason Marquis or Dick Ruthven? I'll take de Suck.

de Suck ranks 3/7 for the Cubs #5 starters. Livable situation.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.

I'm sorry, did you have to write that check? You did? Damn, sucks to be you.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: EG on July 26, 2007, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.

I'm sorry, did you have to write that check? You did? Damn, sucks to be you.


This is a stupid argument.  Of course I didn't write the check.  Of course it's not MY money.  Blah blah blah.  But when the Cubs give $7 million a year to a shitty pitcher, it ties up money the Cubs could spend on better players.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 10:18:16 AM
Quote from: Corn-fed on July 26, 2007, 09:57:19 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on July 26, 2007, 09:02:41 PM
According to Santo, Cedeno had NO IDEA what he was doing, as he came in for the SAC but didn't keep an eye on Molina so he could backtrack to the bag.

I could just picture it.  His dumbfounded look.  According to Santo, it seemed that he didn't even know what he did wrong, or that he did anything wrong at all.

You know there's a problem with your shortstop when he's out-awared by the broadcasting semi-senile, semi-legless, semi-blind (usually very amusing) version of Ron Santo.

Santo was an aware, and pretty darn good, hot corner man'd
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:19:29 AM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.

I'm sorry, did you have to write that check? You did? Damn, sucks to be you.


This is a stupid argument.  Of course I didn't write the check.  Of course it's not MY money.  Blah blah blah.  But when the Cubs give $7 million a year to a shitty pitcher, it ties up money the Cubs could spend on better players.

Who else was available? I really don't remember. It seems like they had a couple of options....spend 7 mill on a guy that throws baseballs instead of towels once every five days, or spend 7 mill on bus fare for the endless parade of stiffs from Iowa that took the place of the often injured simulated game all-stars.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on July 27, 2007, 10:21:22 AM
Quote from: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:19:29 AM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.

I'm sorry, did you have to write that check? You did? Damn, sucks to be you.


This is a stupid argument.  Of course I didn't write the check.  Of course it's not MY money.  Blah blah blah.  But when the Cubs give $7 million a year to a shitty pitcher, it ties up money the Cubs could spend on better players.

Who else was available? I really don't remember. It seems like they had a couple of options....spend 7 mill on a guy that throws baseballs instead of towels once every five days, or spend 7 mill on bus fare for the endless parade of stiffs from Iowa that took the place of the often injured simulated game all-stars.

Who else? Lots of guys. I'll tell you this - the Cubs waaaaaaay over-spent for a #5 starting pitcher that no other team was interested in. Much like last year, when they gave 3 years to a RF that no other team was even offering 2 to.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:35:34 AM
Quote from: Fourk on July 27, 2007, 10:21:22 AM
Quote from: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:19:29 AM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on July 26, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
Quote from: EG on July 26, 2007, 10:48:18 PM
Quote from: butthead on July 26, 2007, 09:55:49 PM
Everybody hates their 5th starter.

But not everybody gives them three-year, $21 million contracts.

I'm sorry, did you have to write that check? You did? Damn, sucks to be you.


This is a stupid argument.  Of course I didn't write the check.  Of course it's not MY money.  Blah blah blah.  But when the Cubs give $7 million a year to a shitty pitcher, it ties up money the Cubs could spend on better players.

Who else was available? I really don't remember. It seems like they had a couple of options....spend 7 mill on a guy that throws baseballs instead of towels once every five days, or spend 7 mill on bus fare for the endless parade of stiffs from Iowa that took the place of the often injured simulated game all-stars.

Who else? Lots of guys. I'll tell you this - the Cubs waaaaaaay over-spent for a #5 starting pitcher that no other team was interested in. Much like last year, when they gave 3 years to a RF that no other team was even offering 2 to.

You're right. They way over paid. I just can't get upset about a few million here or there when the team has the money to spend. This isn't like the NBA where a bad contract can hamper what a team is able to do. The only way the Marquis contract is a problem is if the new owner lets it be.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: EG on July 27, 2007, 10:53:48 AM
Quote from: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:35:34 AM
This isn't like the NBA where a bad contract can hamper what a team is able to do.

Sure it is.  Look at the Jacque contract.  We overpaid for him, and now we can't even get rid of him because no one else wants to pay that contract (no one even wants to pay half of that contract).  So we're stuck with him.  And that's just a minor example.  Bigger mistakes, like the Chan Ho park deal, have put teams in binds for years.

And if you want to see how a bad deal can hamper a team up close, wait until we're paying Soriano $18 million in 2014.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: JS on July 27, 2007, 10:56:48 AM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Well, the talk of getting Wood back is like making a big trade at the deadline has begun again. Gammons said it this morning and I have heard it a couple of other times this week.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:58:45 AM
Quote from: EG on July 27, 2007, 10:53:48 AM
Quote from: butthead on July 27, 2007, 10:35:34 AM
This isn't like the NBA where a bad contract can hamper what a team is able to do.

Sure it is.  Look at the Jacque contract.  We overpaid for him, and now we can't even get rid of him because no one else wants to pay that contract (no one even wants to pay half of that contract).  So we're stuck with him.  And that's just a minor example.  Bigger mistakes, like the Chan Ho park deal, have put teams in binds for years.

And if you want to see a bad deal can hamper a team up close, wait until we're paying Soriano $18 million in 2014.

But we could get rid of Jock if we wanted to eat all of his contract. That is an option. If someone like Cuban buys the team (which won't happen) it wouldn't be an issue.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Down In Front on July 27, 2007, 11:08:03 AM
Quote from: EG on July 27, 2007, 10:53:48 AM
And if you want to see how a bad deal can hamper a team up close, wait until we're paying Soriano $18 million in 2014.

If we have won it all by then, I'll be too busy farting in silk to care.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on July 27, 2007, 11:23:54 AM
Quote from: JS on July 27, 2007, 10:56:48 AM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Well, the talk of getting Wood back is like making a big trade at the deadline has begun again. Gammons said it this morning and I have heard it a couple of other times this week.



I've heard it every year when Wood/Prior comes back. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.

Do you mean Monk the fictional detective or Art Monk.  Cause one of those wouldn't make any sense.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:32:12 PM
Quote from: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.

Do you mean Monk the fictional detective or Art Monk.  Cause one of those wouldn't make any sense.

Monk the fictional TV detective.  Bauer is so two years ago, now that he let a nuke blow up LA (.. oh, and since the show has decided that the shark tank over there is just itching to be jumped.  I fully expect Henry Winkler to be the Chief of Staff this season). 

Meanwhile, Monk the detective is hanging with Snoop.  And, he always gets his man.

Art Monk played football pretty well, so he would be an apple amongst my oranges.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 02:36:05 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:32:12 PM
Quote from: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.

Do you mean Monk the fictional detective or Art Monk.  Cause one of those wouldn't make any sense.

Monk the fictional TV detective.  Bauer is so two years ago, now that he let a nuke blow up LA (.. oh, and since the show has decided that the shark tank over there is just itching to be jumped.  I fully expect Henry Winkler to be the Chief of Staff this season). 

Meanwhile, Monk the detective is hanging with Snoop.  And, he always gets his man.

Art Monk played football pretty well, so he would be an apple amongst my oranges.

They already did the Brady Bunch/Married...With Children shark-jumping that is the introduction of never-before-seen family members.  Bastards.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on July 27, 2007, 03:05:05 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:32:12 PM
Quote from: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.

Do you mean Monk the fictional detective or Art Monk.  Cause one of those wouldn't make any sense.

Monk the fictional TV detective.  Bauer is so two years ago, now that he let a nuke blow up LA (.. oh, and since the show has decided that the shark tank over there is just itching to be jumped.  I fully expect Henry Winkler to be the Chief of Staff this season). 

Meanwhile, Monk the detective is hanging with Snoop.  And, he always gets his man.

Art Monk played football pretty well, so he would be an apple amongst my oranges.

Thelonius Monk was pretty good too.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 03:20:40 PM
Quote from: Fourk on July 27, 2007, 03:05:05 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:32:12 PM
Quote from: bozos72 on July 27, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote from: helloWorld on July 27, 2007, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit on July 27, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Taylor on July 26, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I have to admit to having this hope delusion that not only will Kerry Wood come back healthy, but he'll be so strong when he comes back that by mid-August he replaces Marquis in the rotation.

You're with me, leather Taylor.  I've been having the same fantasy.  I feel like a four-letter guy, only my fantasy doesn't end with Adam Dunn and Kent Mercker going all bukkake on me.

Count me in on the chimeric Japanese splash fest where Wood joins the rotation.  Never had an avatar before, but I somehow feel the need to create a collage of Ronce, Monk, Frodo, and Leon Joe.  Hell Yeah!!!

Edited for being a douche that cannot spell.

Do you mean Monk the fictional detective or Art Monk.  Cause one of those wouldn't make any sense.

Monk the fictional TV detective.  Bauer is so two years ago, now that he let a nuke blow up LA (.. oh, and since the show has decided that the shark tank over there is just itching to be jumped.  I fully expect Henry Winkler to be the Chief of Staff this season). 

Meanwhile, Monk the detective is hanging with Snoop.  And, he always gets his man.

Art Monk played football pretty well, so he would be an apple amongst my oranges.

Thelonius Monk was pretty good too.

That so doesn't make any sense.  Hell Yeah!
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Indolent Reader on July 27, 2007, 03:59:58 PM
Sphere - awesome middle name.  Also, did you know that a scene from "Straight, No Chaser" is the basis for "flip ya for real" from The Usual Suspects?  Of course you did.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Fork_The_Third on July 27, 2007, 04:29:47 PM
Quote from: Indolent Reader on July 27, 2007, 03:59:58 PM
Sphere - awesome middle name. 

I know. It happens to be mine, also.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Mike Douche on May 18, 2008, 01:32:18 PM
Bump.

Adam LaRoche wins the "Who is less likely to be out of the bigs by 2010" contest by taking this peice of human excrement yard. 

To the opposite field.

With the wind howling in.

I'm starting to think I could hit this fuckmonkey.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Shooter on May 18, 2008, 01:36:08 PM
Quote from: Mike D on May 18, 2008, 01:32:18 PM
Bump.

Adam LaRoche wins the "Who is less likely to be out of the bigs by 2010" contest by taking this peice of human excrement yard. 

To the opposite field.

With the wind howling in.

I'm starting to think I could hit this fuckmonkey.


Bad news, good news. Bad news: he sucks ass and the Cubs are down 2-0 quickly. Good news: I figure this is his last start for a while. Lou has seen enough.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: bocaj on May 18, 2008, 02:12:55 PM
Can someone please tell Lilly that Marquis is playing around with his girl?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on May 18, 2008, 04:12:12 PM
Man, he just looks bad on the mound.  Who do they even have that can replace his spot in the rotation right now and be semi effective?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Weebs on May 18, 2008, 04:14:32 PM
Quote from: Poon on May 18, 2008, 04:12:12 PM
Man, he just looks bad on the mound.  Who do they even have that can replace his spot in the rotation right now and be semi effective?

Sean Marshall.  Rich Hill (once he stops shitting his pants).  Jon Lieber (maybe).  There are a number of guys I'd rather see every 5th day than Marquis.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on May 18, 2008, 04:36:46 PM
Quote from: Weebs on May 18, 2008, 04:14:32 PM
Quote from: Poon on May 18, 2008, 04:12:12 PM
Man, he just looks bad on the mound.  Who do they even have that can replace his spot in the rotation right now and be semi effective?

Sean Marshall.  Rich Hill (once he stops shitting his pants).  Jon Lieber (maybe).  There are a number of guys I'd rather see every 5th day than Marquis.

Well Lou doesn't seem to want Marshall, I'd guess Hill is still a bit away from coming back, and Lieber is better out of the pen.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on May 18, 2008, 08:50:58 PM

Marquis picked up the W, simply by virtue of the fact that he pitched against Mitch Hill.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:06:56 PM
So the Cubs went 7-1 on the homestand in games started by major league pitchers and 1-1 in games started by Jason Marquis. At least he won't get to pitch against Houston.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor2 on May 18, 2008, 09:33:02 PM
QuoteCubs starter Jason Marquis (2-3) won for the first time since April 19, allowing two earned runs on four hits in six innings.

One win every month. Too bad the Cubs don't play the Pirates again until August. It's the only team he can beat. But the Cubs maybe stuck with Marquis for a while as Dick Hill's trip to Iowa isn't going that well.

QuoteThe Cubs lefty, who was sent down to Iowa on May 3 to get his house in order, was pulled out of Friday night's game with back stiffness after allowing 3 walks and a 2-run single in the third inning.

"The extent of it I don't know yet," said Cubs pitching coach Larry Rothschild. "I don't think they do either until later (on). It's not anything. It just cropped up last night."

Has the back bothered Hill before?

"Don't know. He didn't have it last year, he didn't have it earlier in the year," manager Lou Piniella said. "I don't know what the problem is. Let's not make it too serious; it might not be serious at all."

Hill is 1-2 with a 3.38 ERA at Iowa. He has allowed a dozen hits in 13 innings, striking out 15 while walking eight.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:56:36 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Actually it means I'm tired of watching Marquis suck at a high rate of speed. I'd rather watch somebody else suck for awhile.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: therick711 on May 18, 2008, 10:03:48 PM
Marquiss won today because the wind was howling in.  It kept definitely a few balls out of the bleachers.  On a day where that doesn't happen, he gets shelled.  Just be thankful the Pirates took the Dusty approach and with the wind blowing in, swung from their asses and JJP'd (Jock Jones Pose, remember that).  The Pirates looked like Dusty's Cubs.  Sucks for them.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on May 18, 2008, 10:16:45 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:56:36 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Actually it means I'm tired of watching Marquis suck at a high rate of speed. I'd rather watch somebody else suck for awhile.

Works for me too.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on May 19, 2008, 07:47:30 AM
Quote from: therick711 on May 18, 2008, 10:03:48 PM
Marquiss won today because the wind was howling in.  It kept definitely a few balls out of the bleachers.  On a day where that doesn't happen, he gets shelled.  Just be thankful the Pirates took the Dusty approach and with the wind blowing in, swung from their asses and JJP'd (Jock Jones Pose, remember that).  The Pirates looked like Dusty's Cubs.  Sucks for them.

If not, you'll get to view it firsthand when the Cubs take on the Marlins....  Or so the rumors go...
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on May 19, 2008, 10:28:35 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.

Easy...there's only so much blood of the non-believers to go around.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on May 19, 2008, 11:02:11 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.

Somehow both of those guys are exchanging pitching tips on the PCL bus routes while Chad Fox collects a big league paycheck. Yet the Cubs are in first place and I couldn't care less. It feels good.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 11:11:36 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 19, 2008, 11:02:11 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.

Somehow both of those guys are exchanging pitching tips on the PCL bus routes while Chad Fox collects a big league paycheck. Yet the Cubs are in first place and I couldn't care less. It feels good.

And Jason Marquis won a game!  Life is good, indeed.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on May 19, 2008, 11:53:14 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 11:11:36 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 19, 2008, 11:02:11 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.

Somehow both of those guys are exchanging pitching tips on the PCL bus routes while Chad Fox collects a big league paycheck. Yet the Cubs are in first place and I couldn't care less. It feels good.

And Jason Marquis won a game!  Life is good, indeed.

And Jason Marquis somehow didn't lose another game is a bit more accurate.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on May 19, 2008, 02:47:46 PM
Quote from: Poon on May 19, 2008, 11:53:14 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 11:11:36 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 19, 2008, 11:02:11 AM
Quote from: Kerm on May 19, 2008, 10:25:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on May 18, 2008, 09:50:32 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on May 18, 2008, 09:40:13 PM
Call Veal up from AA. He can't be any worse.

Did Marshall molest Lou's dog or something?

Is molesting dogs a euphemism for being five-inning pitcher without a reliable out pitch and a tendency to throw an assload of non-strikes? Because if it is, you might be on to something.

Yeah, Marshall should try to develop a cutter as good as Kevin Hart's.

Somehow both of those guys are exchanging pitching tips on the PCL bus routes while Chad Fox collects a big league paycheck. Yet the Cubs are in first place and I couldn't care less. It feels good.

And Jason Marquis won a game!  Life is good, indeed.

And Jason Marquis somehow didn't lose another game is a bit more accurate.

And Jason Marquis once again pitched against the Pirates is even more accurate.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Slaky+ on June 03, 2008, 10:39:17 PM
Bump.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: fiveouts on June 03, 2008, 10:43:52 PM
There's got to be some one-eyed midget working in the maintenance department at Wrigley Field that they could put on the mound every fifth day that would at least throw strikes. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on June 14, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Jason Marquis' sinker feasts on the blood of the children of Goyim.

Trade the perfidious Jew!

NEVER FORGET ST. SIMON OF TRENT! (http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/)

(http://i29.tinypic.com/2quokyd.jpg)

Too much?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on June 14, 2008, 04:41:54 PM
Quote from: Thrillho on June 14, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Jason Marquis' sinker feasts on the blood of the children of Goyim.

Trade the perfidious Jew!

NEVER FORGET ST. SIMON OF TRENT! (http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/)

(http://i29.tinypic.com/2quokyd.jpg)

Too much?
Just right.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on June 14, 2008, 04:48:35 PM
Quote from: Thrillho on June 14, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Jason Marquis' sinker feasts on the blood of the children of Goyim.

Trade the perfidious Jew!

NEVER FORGET ST. SIMON OF TRENT! (http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/)

(http://i29.tinypic.com/2quokyd.jpg)

Too much?

Now THIS is what I call a tangential and oblique post. Well done.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Wheezer on June 14, 2008, 07:45:00 PM
Quote from: Thrillho on June 14, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Jason Marquis' sinker feasts on the blood of the children of Goyim.

Trade the perfidious Jew!

Ronnie Po-chia Hsia is on the market?

(This does remind me that Meir Kahane was right up there with Gordon Liddy in terms of brisk prose.)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on June 15, 2008, 02:42:21 AM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on June 14, 2008, 04:48:35 PM
Now THIS is what I call a tangential and oblique post. Well done.

And now you see why Wheezer remains the king...

Quote from: Wheezer on June 14, 2008, 07:45:00 PM
Quote from: Thrillho on June 14, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
Jason Marquis' sinker feasts on the blood of the children of Goyim.

Trade the perfidious Jew!

Ronnie Po-chia Hsia is on the market?

(This does remind me that Meir Kahane was right up there with Gordon Liddy in terms of brisk prose.)


A simple invocation of an ancient blood libel finds him, among other things, pondering the literary stylings of a True American Patriot®.

(http://i27.tinypic.com/1zgbzoh.jpg)

That's a moustache right there that all but screams, "no homo (http://blackatmichigan.blogspot.com/2007/05/no-homo-black-male-intimacy.html)."
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on June 15, 2008, 03:56:28 AM

Oh yeah...G. Gordon Liddy is man enough.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: cubbiebluestew on June 15, 2008, 11:08:05 AM
Opus Dei is a Talmudic organization?  Did Da Vinci know that?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Eli on June 26, 2008, 02:36:04 PM
What a suck.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on July 27, 2008, 03:00:32 PM
Here's hoping that this is your last start of 2008 you worthless bag of homer-giving-up shit.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on July 27, 2008, 03:06:20 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on July 27, 2008, 03:00:32 PM
Here's hoping that this is your last start of 2008 you worthless bag of homer-giving-up shit.

They still need another bat but this no-talent assclown needs to be replaced right now.

The only two shitty outings by a starter since the break are both of his starts.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on July 27, 2008, 05:22:04 PM

Bounce his ass and see if you can get a servicable LH bat in return.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on July 28, 2008, 08:19:20 AM
That contract is the worst of Hendry's tenure. Marquis has less than no trade value. If he'd put together 3 or 4 decent starts going into the deadline he'd have maybe a little. But alas... 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: TJ on July 28, 2008, 08:28:22 AM
Yesterday would have been a 15-12 game if you had the 2000 Cubs staff. Marquis didn't have great stuff, but he lasted 6 innings. He's strung together some decent starts. He might have some value yet.  The next couple days could be, um, interesting.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: cubbiebluestew on July 28, 2008, 12:38:56 PM
Quote from: TJ on July 28, 2008, 08:28:22 AM
Yesterday would have been a 15-12 game if you had the 2000 Cubs staff. Marquis didn't have great stuff, but he lasted 6 innings. He's strung together some decent starts. He might have some value yet.  The next couple days could be, um, interesting.

Don't quote me, but the rumor here in the Bay Area is that the Giants are interested in Marquis for Lincecum, straight up.




(Can I be ex-communicated for this?)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on July 28, 2008, 01:31:29 PM
Quote from: TJ on July 28, 2008, 08:28:22 AM
Yesterday would have been a 15-12 game if you had the 2000 Cubs staff. Marquis didn't have great stuff, but he lasted 6 innings. He's strung together some decent starts. He might have some value yet.  The next couple days could be, um, interesting.

The thing that was frustrating about this whole series is that the pitching staff had Chlamydia er Hermida or whatever you'd want to call that rare form of STD the first few games...and then it was one hitter that did virtually all the damage to Marquis (with the help of BB's and a HBP).

Sure, hitters get in grooves, but it also seems to reflect a total lack of preparation/clue to get someone out when you're handling 7 guys to only get smoked by the 8th.  Repeatedly.

And with an erratic offense, any chance we can pin some of that on poor advance scouting?  Seems to me that might explain a lot, from both sides of the ball.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PTanner on July 29, 2008, 05:48:55 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on July 28, 2008, 01:31:29 PM
Quote from: TJ on July 28, 2008, 08:28:22 AM
Yesterday would have been a 15-12 game if you had the 2000 Cubs staff. Marquis didn't have great stuff, but he lasted 6 innings. He's strung together some decent starts. He might have some value yet.  The next couple days could be, um, interesting.

The thing that was frustrating about this whole series is that the pitching staff had Chlamydia er Hermida or whatever you'd want to call that rare form of STD the first few games...and then it was one hitter that did virtually all the damage to Marquis (with the help of BB's and a HBP).

Sure, hitters get in grooves, but it also seems to reflect a total lack of preparation/clue to get someone out when you're handling 7 guys to only get smoked by the 8th.  Repeatedly.

And with an erratic offense, any chance we can pin some of that on poor advance scouting?  Seems to me that might explain a lot, from both sides of the ball.

Who in the world would call a man Chlamydia? That's disgusting.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher. Problem of course is that once again, for the umpteenth time the last five years, an absolute nobody pitcher faces the Cubs and they can't hit squat off of him. Future Cy Young winner Jeff Karstens, um, yeah.

This got me laughing though, so true if you've ever been to the East Coast during summertime. Can't we just nuke these fucken people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw)

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on August 01, 2008, 03:48:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher. Problem of course is that once again, for the umpteenth time the last five years, an absolute nobody pitcher faces the Cubs and they can't hit squat off of him. Future Cy Young winner Jeff Karstens, um, yeah.

This got me laughing though, so true if you've ever been to the East Coast during summertime. Can't we just nuke these fucken people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw)



They just scored 31 runs in 4 games against their closest division rival.  They can't score 8 a game every game.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor2 on August 01, 2008, 03:52:28 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 01, 2008, 03:48:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher. Problem of course is that once again, for the umpteenth time the last five years, an absolute nobody pitcher faces the Cubs and they can't hit squat off of him. Future Cy Young winner Jeff Karstens, um, yeah.

This got me laughing though, so true if you've ever been to the East Coast during summertime. Can't we just nuke these fucken people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw)



They just scored 31 runs in 4 games against their closest division rival.  They can't score 8 a game every game.

I'd settle for 4 or 5 today.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: flannj on August 01, 2008, 04:03:37 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher. Problem of course is that once again, for the umpteenth time the last five years, an absolute nobody pitcher faces the Cubs and they can't hit squat off of him. Future Cy Young winner Jeff Karstens, um, yeah.

This got me laughing though, so true if you've ever been to the East Coast during summertime. Can't we just nuke these fucken people?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjLaJO8QEuw)


I'm married to an Italian girl from Jersey.
Christ will I get some mileage out of that clip.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 04:34:43 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher.

I was anticipating it getting uglier.  He actually got out of a few jams.  And he would turn in a performance good enough to win, when we don't score.  Asshole.

I'm still on board with axing this guy.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Weebs on August 01, 2008, 06:27:26 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 04:34:43 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 01, 2008, 03:39:16 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 01, 2008, 01:47:33 PM
Wow, Marquis can't even get the ubiquitous Jason Michaels and Andy LaRoche out...and another Marquis HBP scores.  And Jack Wilson ropes an RBI single too.

Seriously, Marquis' career as a Cub needs to be euthanized after this outing.

Again, not fair. Marquis may be a joke compared to the Cubs' other 4 starters, but he gives up 3 runs in 6 IP, there's nothing wrong with that for a #5 starting pitcher.

I was anticipating it getting uglier.  He actually got out of a few jams.  And he would turn in a performance good enough to win, when we don't score.  Asshole.

I'm still on board with axing this guy.

Well of course he did.  He always keeps us in games.  However, he never keeps a lead in games.  We could have scored 5 in the 5th, and Marquis would have proceeded to give up 3 more runs to blow the lead.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Grandmaster Wang on August 04, 2008, 06:47:44 AM
So how much longer before they DFA this assbag? Four straight losses, an ERA of 6 since the break, and a history of second half shitfests? They can't possibly be willing to give this douche 8-10 more starts, can they?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: theoneandonlyjim on August 06, 2008, 02:13:36 PM
Christ on a bike.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Al Czervik on August 06, 2008, 02:20:22 PM
I'm a reasonable man, but this should be the end of the reign of the Marquis de Suc.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on August 06, 2008, 02:27:02 PM
He started off very good, the sinker was working, no deep counts.  Then the jackass decides to not take the pitch calls he's getting from Soto and shake everything off so he can get back to the suck.  This all stinks of "LaRussa covert ops".
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: *In a Nutsack on August 06, 2008, 02:40:08 PM
Quote from: Poon on August 06, 2008, 02:27:02 PM
He started off very good, the sinker was working, no deep counts.  Then the jackass decides to not take the pitch calls he's getting from Soto and shake everything off so he can get back to the suck.  This all stinks of "LaRussa covert ops".

Marquis still sucks at life and baseball things.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 06, 2008, 03:16:04 PM
Okay, Marquis has qualified for what should be his last Cub win.  Get maybe one more inning out of him (or don't, off day tomorrow) and give him a goodbye that Stevie Ire wishes he could've had.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Oleg on August 06, 2008, 03:17:03 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 06, 2008, 03:16:04 PM
Okay, Marquis has qualified for what should be his last Cub win.  Get maybe one more inning out of him (or don't, off day tomorrow) and give him a goodbye that Stevie Ire wishes he could've had.

At an Old Country Buffet?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on August 06, 2008, 04:14:35 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 06, 2008, 03:16:04 PM
Okay, Marquis has qualified for what should be his last Cub win.  Get maybe one more inning out of him (or don't, off day tomorrow) and give him a goodbye that Stevie Ire wishes he could've had.
No running in spring training?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 06, 2008, 05:04:47 PM
I put it on a tee and you guys hit it out of the park.  Well done.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: StewiesBandwagon on August 22, 2008, 04:04:48 PM
Jason Marquis, I hate you with the fire of a thousand suns.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Weebs on August 22, 2008, 04:14:47 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 22, 2008, 04:04:48 PM
Jason Marquis, I hate you with the fire of a thousand suns winds of a thousand tornadoes.



JO'd.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Waco Kid on August 22, 2008, 04:38:06 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 22, 2008, 04:04:48 PM
Jason Marquis, Neal Cotts, & Bob Howry I hate you with the fire of a thousand suns.



Shitty relief pitcher'd
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Mike Douche on August 22, 2008, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: Waco Kid on August 22, 2008, 04:38:06 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 22, 2008, 04:04:48 PM
Jason Marquis, Neal Cotts, & Bob Howry I hate you with the fire of a thousand suns.



Shitty relief pitcher'd

Also 3 guys that we won't have to worry about come October.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Weebs on August 22, 2008, 05:43:54 PM
Quote from: Mike D on August 22, 2008, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: Waco Kid on August 22, 2008, 04:38:06 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 22, 2008, 04:04:48 PM
Jason Marquis, Neal Cotts, & Bob Howry I hate you with the fire of a thousand suns.



Shitty relief pitcher'd

Also 3 guys that we won't have to worry about come October.

I'm pretty sure Howry and Cotts will both be on the post-season roster.  Howry for sure.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: cubbiebluestew on August 22, 2008, 05:53:24 PM
Isn't it comforting to know that we have a great bullpen and we don't have to rely exclusively on Samardzia, Marmol and Wood?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: cubbiebluestew on August 22, 2008, 05:56:08 PM
I just just noticed that I am a member of the Fucakta fan club.  Can I resign?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2008, 02:47:07 AM
The best insurance we could get in September would be for Marquis to be caught in a bathroom stall with either Cotts or Howry.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2008, 10:01:53 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2008, 02:47:07 AM
The best insurance we could get in September would be for Marquis to be caught in a bathroom stall with either Cotts or Howry.

Doing what? Ghey stuff? You think that would make them pitch better? Or you'd propose launching them off the roster for their sexual orientation? How very unprogressive of you, Pie. And if they're going to be shooting each other with some performance enhancing substance, wouldn't you rather they weren't caught?

I don't understand this CubsFaninHydePark insurance policy at all.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2008, 10:05:27 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2008, 02:47:07 AM
The best insurance we could get in September would be for Marquis to be caught slip and fall in a bathroom shower stall with and land on either Cotts or Howry with each man suffering a broken arm.

Geico'd.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 27, 2008, 02:12:06 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



He can also hit, run, bunt and fields his position better than any other guy on the staff. He just isn't the balls and considering that the other four starters are capable of delivering a masterpiece any given start, the fact that we have to brace ourselves and hope he keeps the team in it when he starts is such a letdown that we may be harder on him than he deserves. The lousy son of a bitch.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:14:22 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 27, 2008, 02:12:06 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



He can also hit, run, bunt and fields his position better than any other guy on the staff. He just isn't the balls and considering that the other four starters are capable of delivering a masterpiece any given start, the fact that we have to brace ourselves and hope he keeps the team in it when he starts is such a letdown that we may be harder on him than he deserves. The lousy son of a bitch.

Not to quibble, but he doesn't hit his position best, that would be Carlos. And he doesn't bunt the best, that would be Dempster. But overall he's not such a total slug, I agree. He's just mediocre, and I can identify with that. True story.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on August 27, 2008, 02:54:23 PM
Marquis >>>>>>>>>>> Estes

So there's that.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: fiveouts on August 27, 2008, 03:01:00 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 27, 2008, 02:54:23 PM
Marquis >>>>>>>>>>> Estes

So there's that.

Dave Dravecky Post Amputation>>>>>Estes.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 27, 2008, 03:16:38 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:14:22 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 27, 2008, 02:12:06 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



He can also hit, run, bunt and fields his position better than any other guy on the staff. He just isn't the balls and considering that the other four starters are capable of delivering a masterpiece any given start, the fact that we have to brace ourselves and hope he keeps the team in it when he starts is such a letdown that we may be harder on him than he deserves. The lousy son of a bitch.

Not to quibble, but he doesn't hit his position best, that would be Carlos. And he doesn't bunt the best, that would be Dempster. But overall he's not such a total slug, I agree. He's just mediocre, and I can identify with that. True story.



That sentence is poorly written but I only meant that he fields the best and does the other stuff adequately for a pitcher.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RV on August 27, 2008, 03:17:18 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 27, 2008, 02:54:23 PM
Marquis >>>>>>>>>>> Estes

So there's that.

I was just thinking that Marquis' bizarre 7 innings of shutout ball today reminded me of this game (http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CIN/CIN200309240.shtml).

Obviously today's game wasn't as important, but both were surprisingly well-pitched games from a shitbird that the vast majority of us loathe(d).

Nice game today, shithead.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Al Czervik on August 27, 2008, 05:47:44 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



Probably right PPE.

We are a greedy lot.

A decade or so ago Marquis would've been our #2 behind Jose Guzman
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM
Quote from: Al Czervik on August 27, 2008, 05:47:44 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



Probably right PPE.

We are a greedy lot.

A decade or so ago Marquis would've been our #2 behind Jose Guzman

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.

Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT II on August 27, 2008, 08:25:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.



What?!?  Why the fuck didn't anyone tell me before this?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on August 27, 2008, 08:50:57 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that.
So, he's somewhere between the 121st and 125th best starter in MLB.  Yea?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Eli on August 27, 2008, 08:53:42 PM
The fact that Marquis shut down a team that sucked even before they traded 2 of their 3 best hitters doesn't impress me. 

He's still shitty.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on August 27, 2008, 11:08:26 PM
Who cares if he's shitty. He's going to start a few more games this year then do the same thing we all are going to do....watch the Cubs in the playoffs on TV.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 28, 2008, 05:51:13 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 27, 2008, 08:25:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.



What?!?  Why the fuck didn't anyone tell me before this?

When we were talking about it, you had your headphones on, knocking a foul ball away from Moises Alou. Then you went home to feed your goat and black cat.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT II on August 28, 2008, 08:13:50 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 28, 2008, 05:51:13 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 27, 2008, 08:25:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.



What?!?  Why the fuck didn't anyone tell me before this?

When we were talking about it, you had your headphones on, knocking a foul ball away from Moises Alou. Then you went home to feed your goat and black cat.

I didn't think anybody remembered that.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: TJ on August 28, 2008, 08:37:25 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 28, 2008, 08:13:50 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 28, 2008, 05:51:13 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 27, 2008, 08:25:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.



What?!?  Why the fuck didn't anyone tell me before this?

When we were talking about it, you had your headphones on, knocking a foul ball away from Moises Alou. Then you went home to feed your goat and black cat.

I didn't think anybody remembered that.

(http://blogs.chron.com/baseballblog/archives/mcgwire.jpg)

I'm not here to talk about the past. I'm here to be positive.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 28, 2008, 09:22:31 AM
Quote from: TJ on August 28, 2008, 08:37:25 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 28, 2008, 08:13:50 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 28, 2008, 05:51:13 AM
Quote from: CT II on August 27, 2008, 08:25:49 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 06:15:26 PM

There were times in the early 80s when he would have been the ace of the staff. Yes, the Cubs have been VERY bad in the past.



What?!?  Why the fuck didn't anyone tell me before this?

When we were talking about it, you had your headphones on, knocking a foul ball away from Moises Alou. Then you went home to feed your goat and black cat.

I didn't think anybody remembered that.

(http://blogs.chron.com/baseballblog/archives/mcgwire.jpg)

I'm not here to talk about the past. I'm here to be test positive.

pee bottled.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Three times a JD on August 28, 2008, 12:34:40 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

Yep.  It's the role of "pitcher that definitely won't be in the playoff rotation."  I think it's the role for which he's best suited.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 28, 2008, 12:52:04 PM
Quote from: Three times a JD on August 28, 2008, 12:34:40 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

Yep.  It's the role of "pitcher that definitely won't be in the playoff rotation."  I think it's the role for which he's best suited.

He is very good at setting up the postgame buffets in October.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Bonk on August 28, 2008, 12:59:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 27, 2008, 02:12:06 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 27, 2008, 02:05:47 PM
Marquis is overpaid for what he brings, but maybe he should be viewed in context. The guy is a 500 pitcher, 190 IP, high 4's ERA, double digit wins year in and year out. For a #5 pitcher, that's pretty damn acceptable. I don't like his smirky attitude, and sure, I'd rather have a Johan Santana as my 5th starter than a Marquis de Suck. But objectively, he's probably one of the top 5 #5 pitchers in baseball. Nothing wrong with that. And he will never start a post-season game barring injuries, so he can't hurt the team when it counts in October.

He kind of looks like Mark Cuban a bit, too, just noticed that.



He can also hit, run, bunt and fields his position better than any other guy on the staff. He just isn't the balls and considering that the other four starters are capable of delivering a masterpiece any given start, the fact that we have to brace ourselves and hope he keeps the team in it when he starts is such a letdown that we may be harder on him than he deserves. The lousy son of a bitch.

Yes to what you two said. Having four studs in the rotation spoils us.

9-7-4.52 from the five spot is still pretty damned good.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 28, 2008, 01:47:23 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

That's an odd way of saying that the rotation is quite a bit better with Harden than with Gallagher.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 28, 2008, 01:47:23 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

That's an odd way of saying that the rotation is quite a bit better with Harden than with Gallagher.

I've found that finding ways to creatively restate the obvious can confuse people into thinking that you know something.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 28, 2008, 10:36:31 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 28, 2008, 01:47:23 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

That's an odd way of saying that the rotation is quite a bit better with Harden than with Gallagher.

I've found that finding ways to creatively restate the obvious can confuse people into thinking that you know something.

Which is an odd way of saying you are in law school.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Gil Gunderson on August 29, 2008, 12:04:42 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 28, 2008, 10:36:31 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 28, 2008, 01:47:23 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 28, 2008, 12:23:33 PM
I was thinking about this on the trip home last night...  The Harden trade has increased Marquis' value - it basically sent away our old #5 starter for a starter that was so ridiculously better than Marquis that it bumped Jason down to the clear #5 starter.

As a #4 starter...it's probably not as clear.  While we're overpaying, the Harden deal gave Marquis a role where he might actually be very good.

That's an odd way of saying that the rotation is quite a bit better with Harden than with Gallagher.

I've found that finding ways to creatively restate the obvious can confuse people into thinking that you know something.

Which is an odd way of saying you are in law school.

It's actually the best way of saying it.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: DPappy on September 06, 2008, 08:22:05 PM
Jason Marquis: Stopper?  I'll take it.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Gil Gunderson on September 06, 2008, 08:36:07 PM
Quote from: DPappy on September 06, 2008, 08:22:05 PM
Jason Marquis: Stopper?  I'll take it.

I'll take it, but I don't have to like it.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on September 07, 2008, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on September 06, 2008, 08:36:07 PM
Quote from: DPappy on September 06, 2008, 08:22:05 PM
Jason Marquis: Stopper?  I'll take it.

I'll take it, but I don't have to like it.

I'm sure that attitude helps a lot of people get through prison.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT II on September 07, 2008, 10:44:56 AM
Quote from: Jon on September 07, 2008, 10:10:27 AM
Quote from: Gil Gunderson on September 06, 2008, 08:36:07 PM
Quote from: DPappy on September 06, 2008, 08:22:05 PM
Jason Marquis: Stopper?  I'll take it.

I'll take it, but I don't have to like it.

I'm sure that attitude helps a lot of people get through prison.

Not to mention the Theater ciriculum.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 07, 2008, 10:49:12 AM

All we need now is for Runge to completely fuck up a ball/strike count every time Marquis pitches...if he does it with the leadoff hitter, we'll see a no-hitter.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Hawkeye's clutchness on September 17, 2008, 07:25:38 PM
Only a 3 run first. Not bad.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on September 17, 2008, 07:31:39 PM
At least he's not waiting til the last day of the season to pitch himself out of the postseason rotation roster.

Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: DwightKurtz on September 17, 2008, 07:38:41 PM
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on September 17, 2008, 07:31:39 PM
At least he's not waiting til the last day of the season to pitch himself out of the postseason rotation.

There was ever a chance that he was going to make the post season rotation?  Or, for that matter, the post season roster at all?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on September 17, 2008, 07:53:07 PM
Either Sheets is hurt or Mark DiFelice forgot to throw his bullpen session before the game.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 18, 2008, 06:12:01 AM
Quote from: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.

You're just mad that they didn't win 162 in a row, aren't you?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 08:09:03 AM
Quote from: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.

It's far from impossible to disagree with this.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Hawkeye's clutchness on September 18, 2008, 08:42:19 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 08:09:03 AM
Quote from: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.

It's far from impossible to disagree with this.

Actually, I'm not one of the "others". I posted immediately after the 1st inning. A feeble attempt at sarcasm, I guess.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
Quote from: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.

It's not that he gave up 3 runs. He walked five. In his previous outing, he walked five.  Milwaukee is pretty much demoralized, and Marquis spent the night issuing walks to a team that can't get out of his own way.

On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on September 18, 2008, 09:00:11 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
Quote from: joesoxfan on September 18, 2008, 02:01:36 AM
This piece of shit. I'm sure he or others would defend him by saying he 'only' gave up 3, and that the team didn't hit, but there's a reason he never wins a lot of games, and it's that it's deflating to his teammates to see this retard out there on the mound. Cubs win 5 in a row, Brewers lose 5 in a row, Sheets has all the pressure in the world on him (and would eventually cave in, in his way), Cubs need only to win the last two games to clinch, so naturally Marquis goes out and gives up 3 runs before getting an out. Then he 'settles down'. What a faggot this guy is. Playoffs can't come soon enough, get this asshole off the field.

It's not that he gave up 3 runs. He walked five. In his previous outing, he walked five.  Milwaukee is pretty much demoralized, and Marquis spent the night issuing walks to a team that can't get out of his own way.

On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

Weren't a bulk of the relievers call ups that they never saw before?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Mike Douche on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on September 18, 2008, 09:06:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

If something is important enough, you make time for it.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:07:06 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

No angst, it's just a game the Cubs should have won and they didn't.  It's hard to get worked up when they have an EIGHT GAME LEAD with 11 to play.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Eli on September 18, 2008, 09:22:05 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:07:06 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

No angst, it's just a game the Cubs should have won and they didn't.  It's hard to get worked up when they have an EIGHT GAME LEAD with 11 to play.

Just you watch.  Pussies.

[/LoneStar]
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT II on September 18, 2008, 09:39:15 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

Slak, you could always derail an El train.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:44:02 AM
Quote from: CT II on September 18, 2008, 09:39:15 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

Slak, you could always derail an El train.

If you're going to cause damage to public transportation, please consider a few buses. Don't destroy them, just put them in need of major work.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on September 18, 2008, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:44:02 AM
Quote from: CT II on September 18, 2008, 09:39:15 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

Slak, you could always derail an El train.

If you're going to cause damage to public transportation, please consider a few buses. Don't destroy them, just put them in need of major work.

Not so much that they have to replace the whole bus... Just parts of the bus.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Oleg on September 18, 2008, 10:24:29 AM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 18, 2008, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:44:02 AM
Quote from: CT II on September 18, 2008, 09:39:15 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  D

o we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

Slak, you could always derail an El train.

If you're going to cause damage to public transportation, please consider a few buses. Don't destroy them, just put them in need of major work.

Not so much that they have to replace the whole bus... Just parts of the bus.

And, make it look like an accident.  What are we talking about?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: LoneStarCubFan on September 18, 2008, 11:15:26 AM
Quote from: Eli on September 18, 2008, 09:22:05 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 09:07:06 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

No angst, it's just a game the Cubs should have won and they didn't.  It's hard to get worked up when they have an EIGHT GAME LEAD with 11 to play.

Just you watch.  Pussies.

[/LoneStar]


Relax. It's just a game.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 11:22:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?

Pretty tough. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:25:02 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?

I would think weight would be a more prohibiting factor than toughness.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: flannj on September 18, 2008, 12:06:14 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 11:22:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?

Pretty tough. 
A lot tougher than you think Fork.
(Godamnit Powen I wasn't going to reply to this because it just encourages him)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 12:10:14 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 18, 2008, 12:06:14 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 11:22:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?

Pretty tough. 
A lot tougher than you think Fork.
(Godamnit Powen I wasn't going to reply to this because it just encourages him)

It reminds me of one guy I know who always said soccer players are pussies.  Then I found out that he blew out his ACL...   When?  The one time in his life that he played soccer. 

I also don't want to have to start posting more grotesque photos of soccer players breaking other people's legs again.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: morpheus on September 18, 2008, 12:12:11 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 12:10:14 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 18, 2008, 12:06:14 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 11:22:01 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 11:15:04 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 18, 2008, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:54:00 AM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: 5laky on September 18, 2008, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Mike D on September 18, 2008, 09:02:29 AM
Quote from: TJ on September 18, 2008, 08:55:18 AM
On another note, how do the Cubs only manage four hits and one run in seven innings against the Brewers' bullpen?

I know.  Gutless fucking assholes, right?

1 game folks.  Do we need to analyze to death every loss? 

Move on.  Christ.

Besides, if they clinch while I'm at work how the fuck am I supposed to flip a car?

Your place of work isn't near a parking lot?

I work in the big scary city. The homeless have burned all the cars. To a crisp.

I work in the suburbs.  You know how hard it's going to be to flip over an SUV filled with AYSO players?

how tough do you think soccer players are?

Pretty tough. 
A lot tougher than you think Fork.
(Godamnit Powen I wasn't going to reply to this because it just encourages him)

It reminds me of one guy I know who always said soccer players are pussies.  Then I found out that he blew out his ACL...   When?  The one time in his life that he played soccer. 

I also don't want to have to start posting more grotesque photos of soccer players breaking other people's legs again.

SOCCER PLAYERS ARE PUSSIES!!!!*

I just want to see the grotesque photos.  Did I do that right?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 01:14:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

No way, man.  When I was watching the World Cup in France a few years ago, I saw numerous soccer players go down with what looked to be bone-crushing knee injuries.  They'd roll on the ground, screaming in agony.  But then, rather than be carried away on a stretcher, they'd hobble over to the sideline, receive a magical cure from some kind of healing spray, and be back on the pitch running and diving er, kicking all over again. 

To recover so quickly from such agonizing injuries is a clear indication of how tough those guys are.  Either that or they need to get that magical spray into baseball ASAP, for all those nagging elbow and shoulder injuries.  Just think, Mary Prior might be pitching this year if he'd been exposed to that spray!
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:14:55 PM
Sigh.  I retired from playing soccer after my 2nd ACL reconstruction, but anytime you wanna go for a spin Fork, you're on.  

It gets good right about the 1:20 mark:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TThOST09haY

Music is NSFW.  
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 18, 2008, 01:16:30 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:14:55 PM
Sigh.  I retired from playing soccer after my 2nd ACL reconstruction, but anytime you wanna go for a spin Fork, you're on.  

It gets good right about the 1:20 mark:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TThOST09haY

Music is NSFW.  

Torn labrum after a dip. (FULL DISCLOSURE: after softball-related dislocation the year before).

I'll watch the video when I get home.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:18:46 PM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 01:14:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

No way, man.  When I was watching the World Cup in France a few years ago, I saw numerous soccer players go down with what looked to be bone-crushing knee injuries.  They'd roll on the ground, screaming in agony.  But then, rather than be carried away on a stretcher, they'd hobble over to the sideline, receive a magical cure from some kind of healing spray, and be back on the pitch running and diving er, kicking all over again. 

To recover so quickly from such agonizing injuries is a clear indication of how tough those guys are.  Either that or they need to get that magical spray into baseball ASAP, for all those nagging elbow and shoulder injuries.  Just think, Mary Prior might be pitching this year if he'd been exposed to that spray!

All the diving and play acting really turned me off from the game the last few years.  Biggest culprits:  Portugal and Italy.  Those guys ARE pussies, and I love watching them actually get the shit knocked out of them. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 18, 2008, 01:20:54 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:18:46 PM
Quote from: DwightKurtz on September 18, 2008, 01:14:19 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

No way, man.  When I was watching the World Cup in France a few years ago, I saw numerous soccer players go down with what looked to be bone-crushing knee injuries.  They'd roll on the ground, screaming in agony.  But then, rather than be carried away on a stretcher, they'd hobble over to the sideline, receive a magical cure from some kind of healing spray, and be back on the pitch running and diving er, kicking all over again. 

To recover so quickly from such agonizing injuries is a clear indication of how tough those guys are.  Either that or they need to get that magical spray into baseball ASAP, for all those nagging elbow and shoulder injuries.  Just think, Mary Prior might be pitching this year if he'd been exposed to that spray!

All the diving and play acting really turned me off from the game the last few years.  Biggest culprits:  Portugal and Italy.  The Pittsburgh Penguins. Those guys ARE pussies, and I love watching them actually get the shit knocked out of them. 

NHL'ed.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on September 18, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)

Is that STAGE right?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:37:47 PM
Quote from: Jon on September 18, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)

Is that STAGE right?

I would like to have sexual intercourse with the female dancer on the LEFT side of the picture.

Better?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Eli on September 18, 2008, 01:51:44 PM
Quote from: Jon on September 18, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)

Is that STAGE right?

It's always about theater with you, isn't it?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on September 18, 2008, 02:17:58 PM
Quote from: Eli on September 18, 2008, 01:51:44 PM
Quote from: Jon on September 18, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)

Is that STAGE right?

It's always about theater with you, isn't it?

Nah. I'm just playing this role on Desipio. In real life I'm far more interested in beer and Futurama than theatre.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 02:20:39 PM
Quote from: Jon on September 18, 2008, 02:17:58 PM
Quote from: Eli on September 18, 2008, 01:51:44 PM
Quote from: Jon on September 18, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Taylor2 on September 18, 2008, 01:22:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 18, 2008, 01:04:50 PM

Soccer players are pussies.

Worse than ballroom dancers.

So when the Cubs clinch the division we should flip over ballroom dancers and not soccer players?

Yes.

You take the one on the right.  I'll work on the one on the left. 

(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/4961/anyassdk5.jpg)

Is that STAGE right?

It's always about theater with you, isn't it?

Nah. I'm just playing this role on Desipio. In real life I'm far more interested in beer and Futurama than theatre.

You prankster you!
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Poon on September 19, 2008, 12:09:54 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


In Russia, soccer fucks you.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Wheezer on September 19, 2008, 12:31:47 AM
And in honor of International Talk Like a Pirate Day,

"Don't bend down ... when Wenger's around ...
'cause you might get a willy up your Arse"
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on September 19, 2008, 09:15:00 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

This2
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 19, 2008, 09:22:21 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

You should get some legal SPEED for that.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Jon on September 19, 2008, 09:24:22 AM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 19, 2008, 09:22:21 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

You should get some legal SPEED for that.

This3
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on September 19, 2008, 11:25:42 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

I hate when pro-soccer people assume I don't like soccer because there isn't enough scoring. That's not the problem with the game as a spectator sport. Apex is right....it too much effort just to get to a decent scoring chance. I don't care if the ball goes in the goal, but I want to see a shot every so often.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Someone needs to tell this lass that even a hydraulic winch isn't gonna make her A's look like C's.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: DPappy on September 19, 2008, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Someone needs to tell this lass that even a hydraulic winch isn't gonna make her A's look like C's.

All I know is that I support the usage of models as a distraction from the original intent of this thread.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: butthead on September 19, 2008, 11:48:45 AM
Quote from: DPappy on September 19, 2008, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Someone needs to tell this lass that even a hydraulic winch isn't gonna make her A's look like C's.

All I know is that I support the usage of models as a distraction from the original intent of this thread.

Keeley sez her D's look just fine with or without hydraulics.

(http://i5.tinypic.com/122yamg.jpg)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:59:24 AM
Quote from: butthead on September 19, 2008, 11:48:45 AM
Quote from: DPappy on September 19, 2008, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Someone needs to tell this lass that even a hydraulic winch isn't gonna make her A's look like C's.

All I know is that I support the usage of models as a distraction from the original intent of this thread.

Keeley sez her D's look just fine with or without hydraulics.

(http://i5.tinypic.com/122yamg.jpg)

Now this is foot hockey I might actually watch.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on September 19, 2008, 12:02:30 PM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:59:24 AM
Quote from: butthead on September 19, 2008, 11:48:45 AM
Quote from: DPappy on September 19, 2008, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: Thrillho on September 19, 2008, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Someone needs to tell this lass that even a hydraulic winch isn't gonna make her A's look like C's.

All I know is that I support the usage of models as a distraction from the original intent of this thread.

Keeley sez her D's look just fine with or without hydraulics.

(http://i5.tinypic.com/122yamg.jpg)

Now this is foot hockey I might actually watch.

Or this.

(http://image.mycolours.com.au/large/5800331.jpg)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 19, 2008, 01:00:51 PM

I'll have plenty of time to watch this while I'm collecting unemployment.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on September 20, 2008, 08:43:32 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

That has been my problem with the game the last few years.  Too much play acting, not enough offense, too much boring, slow defense.  Guys were playing to not lose, and not to win.  There are some games that put me to sleep after 15 minutes.  Hell, World Cup finals have put me to sleep (Argentina versus Germany 1990 - Not even a coked out Maradona could keep me awake). 

I reserve most of my fanaticism for the US National Team.  I'll go catch a game sometimes, used to play a lot, but otherwise, I don't flip cars over it.

Some people say the same thing about baseball though; it's too slow and boring.  Once you understand the intricacies and the strategy behind baseball; you can appreciate it.  Same with soccer.  Then again, some teams in soccer are like Steve Trachsel.  Slow and booooooooooooooooooring. 

But hey:  Beeeeewwwwwbs. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on September 20, 2008, 09:46:17 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 20, 2008, 08:43:32 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

That has been my problem with the game the last few years.  Too much play acting, not enough offense, too much boring, slow defense.  Guys were playing to not lose, and not to win.  There are some games that put me to sleep after 15 minutes.  Hell, World Cup finals have put me to sleep (Argentina versus Germany 1990 - Not even a coked out Maradona could keep me awake). 

I reserve most of my fanaticism for the US National Team.  I'll go catch a game sometimes, used to play a lot, but otherwise, I don't flip cars over it.

Some people say the same thing about baseball though; it's too slow and boring.  Once you understand the intricacies and the strategy behind baseball; you can appreciate it.  Same with soccer.  Then again, some teams in soccer are like Steve Trachsel.  Slow and booooooooooooooooooring. 

But hey:  Beeeeewwwwwbs. 

This times a million.

Seam, also.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 20, 2008, 10:04:33 AM

Nothing can't be made better with the addition of bewbs.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: flannj on September 20, 2008, 02:10:25 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 20, 2008, 08:43:32 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

That has been my problem with the game the last few years.  Too much play acting, not enough offense, too much boring, slow defense.  Guys were playing to not lose, and not to win.  There are some games that put me to sleep after 15 minutes.  Hell, World Cup finals have put me to sleep (Argentina versus Germany 1990 - Not even a coked out Maradona could keep me awake). 

I reserve most of my fanaticism for the US National Team.  I'll go catch a game sometimes, used to play a lot, but otherwise, I don't flip cars over it.

Some people say the same thing about baseball though; it's too slow and boring.  Once you understand the intricacies and the strategy behind baseball; you can appreciate it.  Same with soccer.  Then again, some teams in soccer are like Steve Trachsel.  Slow and booooooooooooooooooring. 

But hey:  Beeeeewwwwwbs. 
The Italians.

So yes, Bewbs.
Italian Bewbs.
(http://www.wallpapergate.com/data/media/738/Maria_Grazia_Cucinotta_002.jpg)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Thrillho on September 20, 2008, 02:22:42 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 20, 2008, 02:10:25 PM
Quote from: powen01 on September 20, 2008, 08:43:32 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 19, 2008, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 19, 2008, 05:37:21 AM
Quote from: Kerm on September 19, 2008, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on September 18, 2008, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on September 18, 2008, 10:34:18 PM
Fuck soccer.


Get in line.

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_2oq2bSN-S9o/R_uHFJzgXgI/AAAAAAAABLM/snPGxhaDbTA/s400/sexy+soccer+wives.jpg)

Don't you understand?  Soccer players don't get hot girls, even if they have hot girls hanging all over them.  It's science.

Moreover, in high school, I'm absolutely positive that I could have beat the shit out of more than 75% of our football team.

Not our fault your high school had a shitty football team.

I don't really have anything against soccer players or soccer fans or soccer moms or soccer balls or any of that shit. It's just the sport itself. I have ADD. The game's too slow for me. Sorry. All that effort just to almost score. At least in ice soccer they get across the rink fast as hell and smash into each other, occasionally dropping the gloves for fisticuffs. International tournaments with the pride of one's country on the line? That's interesting to watch, I'll grant you. For about 15 minutes. Then I'm flipping over to some boobilige. Or a Frazier re-run. Fuck. ANYTHING.

That has been my problem with the game the last few years.  Too much play acting, not enough offense, too much boring, slow defense.  Guys were playing to not lose, and not to win.  There are some games that put me to sleep after 15 minutes.  Hell, World Cup finals have put me to sleep (Argentina versus Germany 1990 - Not even a coked out Maradona could keep me awake). 

I reserve most of my fanaticism for the US National Team.  I'll go catch a game sometimes, used to play a lot, but otherwise, I don't flip cars over it.

Some people say the same thing about baseball though; it's too slow and boring.  Once you understand the intricacies and the strategy behind baseball; you can appreciate it.  Same with soccer.  Then again, some teams in soccer are like Steve Trachsel.  Slow and booooooooooooooooooring. 

But hey:  Beeeeewwwwwbs. 

The Italians.

GIS tells me Signora Alena Seredova's* hogans look far more fetching unclad.

*Originally Czech.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Brownie on December 30, 2008, 06:02:51 PM
My brother called me and said this trade just went down: Marquis to the Rox for Luis Vizcaino. (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081230&content_id=3730354&vkey=hotstove2008&fext=.jsp) This opens the door for a big salary, no?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on December 30, 2008, 06:08:52 PM
Quote from: Brownie on December 30, 2008, 06:02:51 PM
My brother called me and said this trade just went down: Marquis to the Rox for Luis Vizcaino. (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081230&content_id=3730354&vkey=hotstove2008&fext=.jsp) This opens the door for a big salary, no?

Quote
Marquis, 30, has been a consisted winner

That is all.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: RV on December 30, 2008, 06:50:20 PM
Cubs are saving about $5 million in this deal. Hopefully Vizcaino can pull one of those randomly good reliever seasons out of his drunk ass.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/rockies/2008/12/30/rox-agree-to-ship-vizcaino-to-cubs-for-marquis/ (http://blogs.denverpost.com/rockies/2008/12/30/rox-agree-to-ship-vizcaino-to-cubs-for-marquis/)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Andy on December 30, 2008, 06:50:28 PM
The Cubs needed a way to get more homers.  Luis Vizcaino can help them with that.  From the mound.

But hey, he's no Jason Marquis.  So he's got that going for him.  Which is nice.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kermit, B. on December 30, 2008, 09:16:15 PM
Quote from: RV on December 30, 2008, 06:50:20 PM
Cubs are saving about $5 million in this deal. Hopefully Vizcaino can pull one of those randomly good reliever seasons out of his drunk ass.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/rockies/2008/12/30/rox-agree-to-ship-vizcaino-to-cubs-for-marquis/ (http://blogs.denverpost.com/rockies/2008/12/30/rox-agree-to-ship-vizcaino-to-cubs-for-marquis/)

I doubt he even makes the team.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:49:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?


Bruce Levine says DeRosa is all but gone for a couple prospects who would then be swung into a Peavy deal. Also, he said the 5 million will go toward Uncle Miltie.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT II on December 30, 2008, 09:57:18 PM
Quote from: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:49:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?


Bruce Levine says DeRosa is all but gone for a couple prospects who would then be swung into a Peavy deal. Also, he said the 5 million will go toward Uncle Miltie.

Levine?  Shit that guy is still reporting that the 2004 Cubs are about to sign Pudge Rodriguez.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:58:45 PM
Quote from: CT II on December 30, 2008, 09:57:18 PM
Quote from: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:49:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?


Bruce Levine says DeRosa is all but gone for a couple prospects who would then be swung into a Peavy deal. Also, he said the 5 million will go toward Uncle Miltie.

Levine?  Shit that guy is still reporting that the 2004 Cubs are about to sign Pudge Rodriguez.

While I realize he's probably just thinking out loud, it's still worth posting. Especially because we can make Bruce Levine jokes.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Mike Douche on December 30, 2008, 10:55:34 PM
Quote from: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:58:45 PM
Quote from: CT II on December 30, 2008, 09:57:18 PM
Quote from: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:49:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?


Bruce Levine says DeRosa is all but gone for a couple prospects who would then be swung into a Peavy deal. Also, he said the 5 million will go toward Uncle Miltie.

Levine?  Shit that guy is still reporting that the 2004 Cubs are about to sign Pudge Rodriguez.

While I realize he's probably just thinking out loud, it's still worth posting. Especially because we can make Bruce Levine jokes.

Like the fact that he was risking his life reporting on DeRosa possibly being dealt instead of giving his mother a foot rub?

(http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd13/halloweenmart/psycho7.gif)
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Philberto on December 31, 2008, 12:10:53 AM
Quote from: CT II on December 30, 2008, 09:57:18 PM
Quote from: 5laky on December 30, 2008, 09:49:37 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2008, 09:43:40 PM

Does this bring Peavy back into play?


Bruce Levine says DeRosa is all but gone for a couple prospects who would then be swung into a Peavy deal. Also, he said the 5 million will go toward Uncle Miltie.

Levine?  Shit that guy is still reporting that the 2004 Cubs are about to sign Pudge Rodriguez.

They aren't?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: *In a Nutsack on December 31, 2008, 07:28:46 AM
I don't even know who Luis Vizcaino is.  I don't even care.  He probably won't even make the major league roster.  This means no more Marquis.  This might be a good year, after all.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on December 31, 2008, 07:43:57 AM
I'm happy that this thread is about to be over and done with until the Cubs/Rox series when Marquis throws a 2-hit shutout at the Cubs at Coors.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Tank on December 31, 2008, 08:32:36 AM
Quote from: *In a Nutsack on December 31, 2008, 07:28:46 AM
I don't even know who Luis Vizcaino is.

José's couseen, mang.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on June 08, 2009, 04:57:51 PM
BUMP for current National League leader in wins.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: MAD on June 08, 2009, 05:08:35 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 08, 2009, 04:57:51 PM
BUMP for current National League leader in wins.

Gosh, if we only had Marquis, DeRosa and Edmonds, our KUBBIEZ would be kicking ASS!!!  Fucking Hendry.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 08, 2009, 07:35:02 PM
Quote from: MAD on June 08, 2009, 05:08:35 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 08, 2009, 04:57:51 PM
BUMP for current National League leader in wins.

Gosh, if we only had Marquis, DeRosa and Edmonds, our KUBBIEZ would be kicking ASS!!!  Fucking Hendry.

TRADE EVERYONE
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: powen01 on August 02, 2009, 04:11:53 PM
BUMP.

Looks like he is having a pretty good second half (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AooBuFFzktJjLNRZRye8jPQ5nYcB?slug=ap-reds-rolenhurt&prov=ap&type=lgns). 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 02, 2009, 04:50:29 PM
Quote from: powen01 on August 02, 2009, 04:11:53 PM
BUMP.

Looks like he is having a pretty good second half (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AooBuFFzktJjLNRZRye8jPQ5nYcB?slug=ap-reds-rolenhurt&prov=ap&type=lgns). 

nice
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 03, 2009, 08:54:21 AM

I suppose the salient point here is...

Why would the Reds bother getting Scott Rolen?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Ivy6 on August 03, 2009, 11:02:32 AM
Intrepid Reader: Steve Stone

classy words from marquis.  hendry had to trade him bc gave to much $ to zambrano.  marquis=12 winz z=7.  nice choice. 
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 11:10:24 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 03, 2009, 08:54:21 AM

I suppose the salient point here is...

Why would the Reds bother getting Scott Rolen?

This trade literally made no sense.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Eli on August 03, 2009, 11:31:11 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 11:10:24 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 03, 2009, 08:54:21 AM

I suppose the salient point here is...

Why would the Reds bother getting Scott Rolen?

This trade literally made no sense.

Sure it does. Rolen will be 35 next year. Roger Craig taught Dusty that most players peak between 35-39 years old, so they're just waiting to cash in on his prime years.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Dave B on August 03, 2009, 12:45:45 PM
Looks like a Marquis-Dempster match-up in Coors Saturday.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Kermit, B. on August 03, 2009, 02:12:46 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 03, 2009, 12:45:45 PM
Looks like a Marquis-Dempster match-up in Coors Saturday.

Nice choice, Lou.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 02:15:45 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 03, 2009, 12:45:45 PM
Looks like a Marquis-Dempster match-up in Coors Saturday.

Sounds like a really Marquee Matchup.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: MAD on August 03, 2009, 02:17:09 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 02:15:45 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 03, 2009, 12:45:45 PM
Looks like a Marquis-Dempster match-up in Coors Saturday.

Sounds like a really Marquee Matchup.

Real funny, PenFork.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
Stoney loves him some Jason Marquis. (http://twitter.com/BaseballStone/status/3108200287)
I assume it's an MOT thing.

Quote
The cubs are catching the reds at the right time. Jason marquis continues to pay dividends for the cubs. He hit scott rolen in the head ...

Thank God the Cubs won't have to face Scott Rolen tonight.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT III on August 03, 2009, 04:30:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
Stoney loves him some Jason Marquis. (http://twitter.com/BaseballStone/status/3108200287)
I assume it's an MOT thing.

Quote
The cubs are catching the reds at the right time. Jason marquis continues to pay dividends for the cubs. He hit scott rolen in the head ...

Thank God the Cubs won't have to face Scott Rolen tonight.


Honestly, how could he miss?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 03, 2009, 07:01:46 PM
Quote from: CT III on August 03, 2009, 04:30:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
Stoney loves him some Jason Marquis. (http://twitter.com/BaseballStone/status/3108200287)
I assume it's an MOT thing.

Quote
The cubs are catching the reds at the right time. Jason marquis continues to pay dividends for the cubs. He hit scott rolen in the head ...

Thank God the Cubs won't have to face Scott Rolen tonight.


Honestly, how could he miss?

Throw wide of the gravitational pull?
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Internet Apex on August 03, 2009, 10:12:20 PM
Quote from: Fork on August 03, 2009, 07:01:46 PM
Quote from: CT III on August 03, 2009, 04:30:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on August 03, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
Stoney loves him some Jason Marquis. (http://twitter.com/BaseballStone/status/3108200287)
I assume it's an MOT thing.

Quote
The cubs are catching the reds at the right time. Jason marquis continues to pay dividends for the cubs. He hit scott rolen in the head ...

Thank God the Cubs won't have to face Scott Rolen tonight.


Honestly, how could he miss?

Throw wide of the gravitational pull?

I'm sure Marmol could pull it off if he aimed right for it.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: BH on December 21, 2009, 02:08:53 PM
Bump.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/nationals-to-sign-jason-marquis.html

"The Nationals will sign Jason Marquis, according to MASN.  It's a two-year deal, according to MLB Network's Hazel Mae.  The Phillies and Mets were other clubs reportedly in the mix for the 31-year-old righty.  Back on December 15th, Marquis explained to MLB.com's Bill Ladson that he found the ability to mentor the Nats' young pitching staff appealing.

Marquis racked up 216 innings for the Rockies this year with a 4.04 ERA, 4.8 K/9, 3.3 BB/9, and 55.6% groundball rate."
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: Saul Goodman on December 21, 2009, 04:43:16 PM
Quote from: BH on December 21, 2009, 02:08:53 PM
Bump.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/nationals-to-sign-jason-marquis.html

"The Nationals will sign Jason Marquis, according to MASN.  It's a two-year deal, according to MLB Network's Hazel Mae.  The Phillies and Mets were other clubs reportedly in the mix for the 31-year-old righty.  Back on December 15th, Marquis explained to MLB.com's Bill Ladson that he found the ability to mentor the Nats' young pitching staff appealing.

Marquis racked up 216 innings for the Rockies this year with a 4.04 ERA, 4.8 K/9, 3.3 BB/9, and 55.6% groundball rate."

He will touch a lot of people.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: JD on December 23, 2009, 01:39:39 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on December 21, 2009, 04:43:16 PM
Quote from: BH on December 21, 2009, 02:08:53 PM
Bump.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/nationals-to-sign-jason-marquis.html

"The Nationals will sign Jason Marquis, according to MASN.  It's a two-year deal, according to MLB Network's Hazel Mae.  The Phillies and Mets were other clubs reportedly in the mix for the 31-year-old righty.  Back on December 15th, Marquis explained to MLB.com's Bill Ladson that he found the ability to mentor the Nats' young pitching staff appealing.

Marquis racked up 216 innings for the Rockies this year with a 4.04 ERA, 4.8 K/9, 3.3 BB/9, and 55.6% groundball rate."

He will touch a lot of people.

Future headline:

Nationals Pitching Staff Hit Hard...

by the Herpes Simplex Virus.



Their pretty lips will never be the same.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: CT III on December 23, 2009, 01:46:54 PM
Quote from: JD on December 23, 2009, 01:39:39 PM
Quote from: C-C-Cats on December 21, 2009, 04:43:16 PM
Quote from: BH on December 21, 2009, 02:08:53 PM
Bump.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/nationals-to-sign-jason-marquis.html

"The Nationals will sign Jason Marquis, according to MASN.  It's a two-year deal, according to MLB Network's Hazel Mae.  The Phillies and Mets were other clubs reportedly in the mix for the 31-year-old righty.  Back on December 15th, Marquis explained to MLB.com's Bill Ladson that he found the ability to mentor the Nats' young pitching staff appealing.

Marquis racked up 216 innings for the Rockies this year with a 4.04 ERA, 4.8 K/9, 3.3 BB/9, and 55.6% groundball rate."

He will touch a lot of people.

Future headline:

Nationals Pitching Staff Hit Hard...

by the Herpes Simplex Virus.



Their pretty lips will never be the same.

Looks like somebody's got the day off today.
Title: Re: Marquis de suc defenestration thread
Post by: fiveouts on April 18, 2010, 02:56:13 PM
Bump for old times' sake.   (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=5109612)