News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread  ( 36,921 )

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #225 on: June 25, 2013, 09:33:21 AM »
Quote from: CT III on June 25, 2013, 09:24:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 09:02:25 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:51:39 AM
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 08:47:13 AM

Also, they'll be able to keep most of the guys this time around.

What is the cap situation exactly? Who am I most likely saying goodbye to?

Quickly (I'll do more detail on our site) - Bickell, Stalberg, Handzus, Mayers, Emery and Rozsival are all gone for sure.
Every team gets two buyouts that don't count against the Cap, so those will probably be Montador and Olesz. That will give the Hawks over $7 million in Cap space to take care of Leddy and Kruger.

Bolland and Oduya will probably be shopped around.

NOOO!  Now is the time to package Kane and Crawford for picks and grinders, then re-sign RONNIE PICKLE and RAY ARMORY.

Step 3: PROFIT MINIMAL LOSSES

Antti Raanta will be the goalie next season who will be immesaurably better than DAT BUM CRAWFORD.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #226 on: June 25, 2013, 09:56:52 AM »
Toews Face...

Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #227 on: June 25, 2013, 11:09:43 AM »
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 09:02:25 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:51:39 AM
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 08:47:13 AM

Also, they'll be able to keep most of the guys this time around.

What is the cap situation exactly? Who am I most likely saying goodbye to?

Quickly (I'll do more detail on our site) - Bickell, Stalberg, Handzus, Mayers, Emery and Rozsival are all gone for sure.
Every team gets two buyouts that don't count against the Cap, so those will probably be Montador and Olesz. That will give the Hawks over $7 million in Cap space to take care of Leddy and Kruger.

Bolland and Oduya will probably be shopped around.

Just so you're all aware Fork will be wrong about at least one of these names.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #228 on: June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM »
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #229 on: June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #230 on: June 25, 2013, 11:45:37 AM »
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

So would you call these the 2012 Hawks or the 2013 Hawks? Meaning, when discussing the year in Chicago sports would you lump them in with the disappointment that was the 2012 Bears, or the Superbowl Champion 2013 Bears?
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #231 on: June 25, 2013, 12:14:31 PM »
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

So would you call these the 2012 Hawks or the 2013 Hawks? Meaning, when discussing the year in Chicago sports would you lump them in with the disappointment that was the 2012 Bears, or the Superbowl Champion 2013 Bears?

Well, the lockout ... What?
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #232 on: June 25, 2013, 12:28:38 PM »
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

Have you ever zinged somebody without at least one typo or grammar mishap?

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #233 on: June 25, 2013, 12:42:59 PM »
Quote from: R-V on June 25, 2013, 12:28:38 PM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

Have you ever zinged somebody without at least one typo or grammar mishap?

Get brain pay the fuck attention.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #234 on: June 25, 2013, 12:50:46 PM »
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

So would you call these the 2012 Hawks or the 2013 Hawks? Meaning, when discussing the year in Chicago sports would you lump them in with the disappointment that was the 2012 Bears, or the Superbowl Champion 2013 Bears?

When it comes to banners, teams vary. The Blackhawks' banners are 1934, 1938, 1961 and 2010. 2013 will go up in October.

The Kings hung 2011-12 last year.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #235 on: June 25, 2013, 12:53:29 PM »
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 12:50:46 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

So would you call these the 2012 Hawks or the 2013 Hawks? Meaning, when discussing the year in Chicago sports would you lump them in with the disappointment that was the 2012 Bears, or the Superbowl Champion 2013 Bears?

When it comes to banners, teams vary. The Blackhawks' banners are 1934, 1938, 1961 and 2010. 2013 will go up in October.

The Kings hung 2011-12 last year.

EA Sports goes by championship year. I've just always referenced a team by Opening Day year.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #236 on: June 25, 2013, 12:59:11 PM »
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 12:53:29 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 25, 2013, 12:50:46 PM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 11:45:37 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 25, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:47:50 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 25, 2013, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: SKO on June 25, 2013, 08:18:01 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 25, 2013, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: Eli on June 24, 2013, 10:06:16 PM
I watched both of these last two games while basically not understanding what was happening, mostly just because of my Internet friends who love hockey so much. Sports are weird.

Enjoy it, guys.

Yeah, this.  I'm not going to lie, I got goosebumps at the end, there.

It started like that for me when they were playing Detroit in the Conference Finals in 089, and then I bandwagon'd the entirety of the playoffs the next year when they won the first, and since then hockey's pretty rapidly made the climb up to #2 on my list. Stick around. I guarantee they make it worth your while.

Intrepid Reader:  Meatball Savant:  GET YER FACKS STRATE!

08-09. I always refer to a team by the year the season started or I get too easily confused.

As opposed to when they actually played the series you were referencing? Sounds like a solid plan.

Seriously.  See if you can't get that brain of yours get it the right way.

So would you call these the 2012 Hawks or the 2013 Hawks? Meaning, when discussing the year in Chicago sports would you lump them in with the disappointment that was the 2012 Bears, or the Superbowl Champion 2013 Bears?

When it comes to banners, teams vary. The Blackhawks' banners are 1934, 1938, 1961 and 2010. 2013 will go up in October.

The Kings hung 2011-12 last year.

EA Sports goes by championship year. I've just always referenced a team by Opening Day year.

In the NFL most teams play 100% of their games in the Opening Weekend calendar year. In hockey and basketball, the games that take place before February are not nearly as important as those that come after. The leagues can claim they are but that's just not so. At least not in basketball. They will parade their teams around the continent drawing crowds and collecting gates but shit gets real after the all-star break.

Is this really a conversation we're having or have I been roped into some weird trolling due to lack of sleep?
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #237 on: June 25, 2013, 01:07:47 PM »
Just for the record, fuck Jim Belushi.  If the Cubs ever win another World Series I hope they refuse to let him on the field.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

Richard Chuggar

  • TJG is back!
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,493
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #238 on: June 25, 2013, 01:11:21 PM »
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 25, 2013, 01:07:47 PM
Just for the record, fuck Jim Belushi.  If the Cubs ever win another World Series I hope they refuse to let him on the field.

why?
Because when you're fighting for your man, experience is a mutha'.

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: 2012-13 Chicago Blackhawks/NHL/Stink Bowman should be FYERRED Thread
« Reply #239 on: June 25, 2013, 01:12:28 PM »
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on June 25, 2013, 01:11:21 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 25, 2013, 01:07:47 PM
Just for the record, fuck Jim Belushi.  If the Cubs ever win another World Series I hope they refuse to let him on the field.

why?

Why not?
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.