News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread  ( 365,679 )

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2955 on: February 01, 2016, 10:30:43 AM »
Quote from: Tonker on February 01, 2016, 10:22:53 AM
Quote from: SKO on February 01, 2016, 09:29:57 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 01, 2016, 09:19:13 AM
Quote from: Oleg on February 01, 2016, 08:56:30 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

With the exception of Eddy Martinez replacing Underwood, the same players appear on BP's Top 101.  I don't think any of them are high ceiling guys like the last group but very impressive.

Not to mention, with the Cubs going hard after international players, they will continue improving their organizational depth. For all we know, if they sign Lazarito then Gleybar gets bumped down to the Cubs' #2 prospect.

He's 16 years old. He might be their most talented prospect if he signs but he'd not be ranked as their #1 prospect without playing any professional games in the US. You don't see many guys ranked as a top 25 prospect at signing or without being fairly close to the majors. I don't care how impressive of a 16 year old he is he's probably at least a 3-4 year minor league project.

You statnerds and your statnerdery.  Fork is a born scout and you'll never be able to compete with his natural feel for the game.

Now I'm off to live out my days with a porkpie hat, cheap cigar and clipboard.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2956 on: February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM »
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2957 on: February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM »
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2958 on: February 11, 2016, 04:12:33 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.

That's where Law has them ranked.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2959 on: February 11, 2016, 04:52:50 PM »
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 11, 2016, 04:12:33 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.

That's where Law has them ranked.

Yes, that's exactly what I just said.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2960 on: February 11, 2016, 05:08:31 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 04:52:50 PM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 11, 2016, 04:12:33 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.

That's where Law has them ranked.

Yes, that's exactly what I just said.

Okay, but what about Keith Law's ranking?
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2961 on: February 11, 2016, 07:47:24 PM »
Quote from: Saul Goodman on February 11, 2016, 05:08:31 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 04:52:50 PM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 11, 2016, 04:12:33 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.

That's where Law has them ranked.

Yes, that's exactly what I just said.

Okay, but what about Keith Law's ranking?

Keith Law has a decent ranking but his schedule is soft.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2962 on: February 11, 2016, 08:40:45 PM »
Quote from: Saul Goodman on February 11, 2016, 05:08:31 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 04:52:50 PM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 11, 2016, 04:12:33 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 11, 2016, 02:06:01 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 11, 2016, 07:22:47 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 30, 2016, 04:55:02 AM
The top 100 prospects as per mlb.com.  I was going to make SOME JOKE ABOUT DA CUBS NOT HAVIN ANY PROPSECTS SINCE DAT EPSTINK GUY GOT RIDDA DEM INTO DA BIG LEAGUES MY FRENTS but it turns out, they still have six in the list:

28 Gleyber Torres
50 Willson Contreras
76 Ian Happ
77 Duane Underwood
86 Albert Almora
88 Billy McKinney

so, you know... fuck Matt Trueblood.

To save you the bother of counting for yourselves, the Deadbirds have two, Milwaukee, Pissburgh and the Reds have five each, and the Sox have two and are going to be awful for quite some time.  And honestly, at the moment it's hard to see a) how the rest of the National League is going to keep up with the Cubs in the next few years and b) how long it's going to be before my erection subsides.

Keith Law's Top 100 also has six Cubs:

15 Gleyber
27 Contreras
47 Ian Happ
69 Billy McKinney (Nice)
88 Almora
91 Dylan Cease.

Kinda cool to see Cease that high.

Thought I saw somewhere that he has the Cubs as (still) the 4th best farm system.

Pretty dope.

That's where Law has them ranked.

Yes, that's exactly what I just said.

Okay, but what about Keith Law's ranking?

No way to know.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2963 on: February 12, 2016, 08:48:43 AM »
Sahadev said on teh Twits that Lazarito probably won't be a Cub.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2964 on: February 12, 2016, 10:09:18 AM »
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on February 12, 2016, 08:48:43 AM
Sahadev said on teh Twits that Lazarito probably won't be a Cub.

Barely any of this makes sense.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2965 on: March 14, 2016, 10:37:18 AM »
So, Jeimer Candelario looks good?
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2966 on: March 14, 2016, 10:46:13 AM »
Quote from: SKO on March 14, 2016, 10:37:18 AM
So, Jeimer Candelario looks good?

With Villanueva hurt, does he make the jump to Iowa? He and Almora have been in the Cubs' organization for what seems like long that it's easy to forget they'll both be only 22 this entire season.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2967 on: March 14, 2016, 10:50:15 AM »
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 14, 2016, 10:46:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 14, 2016, 10:37:18 AM
So, Jeimer Candelario looks good?

With Villanueva hurt, does he make the jump to Iowa? He and Almora have been in the Cubs' organization for what seems like long that it's easy to forget they'll both be only 22 this entire season.

There's no question about it.  The dude seems legit.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2968 on: March 14, 2016, 11:00:37 AM »
Quote from: PANK! on March 14, 2016, 10:50:15 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 14, 2016, 10:46:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 14, 2016, 10:37:18 AM
So, Jeimer Candelario looks good?

With Villanueva hurt, does he make the jump to Iowa? He and Almora have been in the Cubs' organization for what seems like long that it's easy to forget they'll both be only 22 this entire season.

There's no question about it.  The dude seems legit.

He's always had really good tools, but whatever it is it's all seemed to click for him since the middle of last year. Hopefully he can keep it up at Iowa because he should make a very attractive trade chip if he does. He's young, he's a switch-hitter, he's got power, and he's also the rare Cub prospect that doesn't K a lot. He's K'd just 16% of the time in the minors.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Cubs' Prospects FUTUREBONER thread
« Reply #2969 on: March 14, 2016, 11:11:10 AM »
Quote from: SKO on March 14, 2016, 11:00:37 AM
Quote from: PANK! on March 14, 2016, 10:50:15 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 14, 2016, 10:46:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 14, 2016, 10:37:18 AM
So, Jeimer Candelario looks good?

With Villanueva hurt, does he make the jump to Iowa? He and Almora have been in the Cubs' organization for what seems like long that it's easy to forget they'll both be only 22 this entire season.

There's no question about it.  The dude seems legit.

He's always had really good tools, but whatever it is it's all seemed to click for him since the middle of last year. Hopefully he can keep it up at Iowa because he should make a very attractive trade chip if he does. He's young, he's a switch-hitter, he's got power, and he's also the rare Cub prospect that doesn't K a lot. He's K'd just 16% of the time in the minors.

He's always been on the low end of age for whichever league he's been in. He's finally achieving grown-ass man status.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16