Desipio Message Board

Quote from: Cillit Bang on October 26, 2009, 10:32:31 AM

Quote from: Kermit, B. on October 26, 2009, 09:14:53 AM

Quote from: CBStew on October 25, 2009, 09:53:17 PM
Yes.  I am repeating myself.  You can't miss Ted Danson in this show.l

I was waiting for that scene with him and Zach G.  It did not disappoint.

Not even a little. That was the best episode yet. I'm glad to see it keeps getting better.

Every time I watch this show I think....holy shit, Mayday Malone is a good actor.

Quote from: Waco Kid on October 25, 2009, 08:10:35 PM

Quote from: air2300 on October 25, 2009, 07:44:29 PM
Wow.  That was well, disappointing.  I just hate the fact that the mouth breathers will be out in full force for the rest of the week about Orton and Benson.

Benson is at peace with himself. You have to be happy for him. He's so comfortable in his own skin. And how about that winning smile!

Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2009, 04:23:46 PM
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200309070sfo.htm

Yeah, but...

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/MIL/MIL200309070.shtml

I was at that game. My brother left the stadium chanting "First place Cubs!" and "Your quarterback is gay!". He's a classy guy, my brother.

Quote from: Eli on October 22, 2009, 09:04:09 PM
Also, Creed crying at the aria. 

Quote from: air2300 on October 23, 2009, 10:13:04 AM
I thought the chant scene was great because of Stanley's reaction in the background. 

Those.

Garret Wolfe looks like he is wearing the smallest shoulder pads they have, and they are still to big for him.

Does play action really need a good running game to work? If the defenders see a hand off, aren't they going to assume it is a run? All they need is a moment of hesitation or one step the wrong direction. Why does the success or lack of success on earlier running plays change the defense's approach to stopping what seems to be a running play?

Quote from: Andy on October 19, 2009, 11:57:30 PM
All day yesterday I thought I picked the Eagles to beat the Raiders and thought I was done.
Apparently I took the Steelers over Cleveland.

Who knew?

I thought I took the Steelers, but I took the Eagles. The only fair thing is to switch accounts so I can keep playing.

Quote from: Fork on October 13, 2009, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: Tony on October 13, 2009, 11:37:02 AM

Quote from: butthead on April 18, 2009, 03:11:01 PM
They need a Jim to mess with the Ansari and Poehler characters. The city planner, mustachioed boss, and Rashida Jones are worthless.

You're an idiot, Weebs.

You're a butthead, Tony.

I thought I was a Bananahands.

Quote from: butthead on April 18, 2009, 03:11:01 PM
They need a Jim to mess with the Ansari and Poehler characters. The city planner, mustachioed boss, and Rashida Jones are worthless.

You're an idiot, Weebs.

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:41:02 AM

Quote from: SKO on October 08, 2009, 10:38:39 AM
I would prefer Atlanta to win as they play the Bears next, but I'm otherwise opposed to giving advice in games where people are actually laying down some cake.   My advice?   Stop giving us a peephole into your degenerate habits.

What does Atlanta winning this game have to do with their game against the Beloved?

Ask Thrillho.

Just more of a comfort level thing.  I'd prefer the Bears play a decent team coming off a win than off a loss because they may not be playing as urgently, especially coming off a big divisional win on the road.
[/quote]

The 49ers and Falcons are in the same division now? God damn realignment. Sneaks up so fast.
[/quote]

Good gord I need to stop slamming Robitussin in the morning.
[/quote]

You handled that quote about as well as DeRo handles post season grounders.

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:32:44 AM

Quote from: Tony on October 08, 2009, 10:26:15 AM

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:23:54 AM

Quote from: Tony on October 08, 2009, 10:19:18 AM

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:11:50 AM

Quote from: Internet Apex on October 08, 2009, 10:06:59 AM
Atlanta @ San Francisco (-3). I think the Falcons look like a nice pick here. Would anyone like to argue otherwise? I'm thinking of putting some cheddar down since I don't have a Bears game to get the blood boiling on Sunday.

I would prefer Atlanta to win as they play the Bears next, but I'm otherwise opposed to giving advice in games where people are actually laying down some cake.   My advice?   Stop giving us a peephole into your degenerate habits.

What does Atlanta winning this game have to do with their game against the Beloved?

Ask Thrillho.

Just more of a comfort level thing.  I'd prefer the Bears play a decent team coming off a win than off a loss because they may not be playing as urgently, especially coming off a big divisional win on the road.

A win could mean they play with more confidence though. And don't forget the dreaded momentum!

But a loss could mean that they play with more zazz. 

See where I'm going with this highly-reasoned thinking?

How could I forget zazz? I use this line of thinking when making my confidence picks....I mean Tennesse lost last week, so they are sure to win this week right? It hasn't worked out so far.

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:23:54 AM

Quote from: Tony on October 08, 2009, 10:19:18 AM

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:11:50 AM

Quote from: Internet Apex on October 08, 2009, 10:06:59 AM
Atlanta @ San Francisco (-3). I think the Falcons look like a nice pick here. Would anyone like to argue otherwise? I'm thinking of putting some cheddar down since I don't have a Bears game to get the blood boiling on Sunday.

I would prefer Atlanta to win as they play the Bears next, but I'm otherwise opposed to giving advice in games where people are actually laying down some cake.   My advice?   Stop giving us a peephole into your degenerate habits.

What does Atlanta winning this game have to do with their game against the Beloved?

Ask Thrillho.

Just more of a comfort level thing.  I'd prefer the Bears play a decent team coming off a win than off a loss because they may not be playing as urgently, especially coming off a big divisional win on the road.

A win could mean they play with more confidence though. And don't forget the dreaded momentum!

Quote from: MAD on October 08, 2009, 10:11:50 AM

Quote from: Internet Apex on October 08, 2009, 10:06:59 AM
Atlanta @ San Francisco (-3). I think the Falcons look like a nice pick here. Would anyone like to argue otherwise? I'm thinking of putting some cheddar down since I don't have a Bears game to get the blood boiling on Sunday.

I would prefer Atlanta to win as they play the Bears next, but I'm otherwise opposed to giving advice in games where people are actually laying down some cake.   My advice?   Stop giving us a peephole into your degenerate habits.

What does Atlanta winning this game have to do with their game against the Beloved?

Much like Sparty and the Tigers did for Detroit, the Hawks need to win this game to lift the spirits of a beaten city. Show those snooty Euros who's boss!

Quote from: Indolent Reader on October 02, 2009, 11:34:35 AM
Nice episode last night, but was anyone else disturbed by the continual Dave & Buster's/Coors references?

I don't care. They are going to put the commercials somewhere if I am going to keep fast forwarding past the real ones.