Desipio Message Board

General Category => Boobtube => Topic started by: MikeC on February 11, 2005, 12:56:23 AM

Title: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on February 11, 2005, 12:56:23 AM
Anyone watched the new BSG series on the Sci-fi channel? I wish they would involve a little more action in the episodes, but overall it is a pretty well done series.

I do miss the old cyclons in their bright shiny armor and the red back and forth light in the visor. And their voices were cool. The new CGI ones are pretty lame.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck on February 11, 2005, 10:49:20 AM
Not enough Six.
(http://home.comcast.net/~ivychat/tricia_helfer.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on February 11, 2005, 11:02:17 AM
LoL
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Denny Crane on February 11, 2005, 01:49:05 PM
I've been curious about it..But isn't Starbuck a chick?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Mike D. on February 11, 2005, 03:31:59 PM
Sorry, but there's only ONE Battlestar Galactica, starring our favorite dog food pitchman.

(http://www.crazyabouttv.com/Images/battlestargalactica.jpg)

BTW, the guy who's third from the right is the original Dick Hatch.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Denny Crane on February 11, 2005, 03:37:12 PM
I thought that was Meathead?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MrSpeed on February 11, 2005, 03:47:14 PM
Quote from: Mike D. on February 11, 2005, 03:31:59 PM
Sorry, but there's only ONE Battlestar Galactica, starring our favorite dog food pitchman.

(http://www.crazyabouttv.com/Images/battlestargalactica.jpg)

BTW, the guy who's third from the right is the original Dick Hatch.



The guy on the end kind of looks like Brick Tamland,

(http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0357413/AM02.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on February 11, 2005, 03:51:44 PM
Yeah Starbuck is a chick, who kind of has a thing going on with Apollo.

But I like Grace Park, who plays Boomer...


(http://www.galactica2003.net//Images/park2.jpg)

(http://www.galactica2003.net/cgi-bin/view.cgi?/Images/ep0156.jpg) (http://www.galactica2003.net//Images/ep0156.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Rooster on February 11, 2005, 06:05:46 PM
Quote from: Mike D. on February 11, 2005, 03:31:59 PM
Sorry, but there's only ONE Battlestar Galactica, starring our favorite dog food pitchman.

(http://www.crazyabouttv.com/Images/battlestargalactica.jpg)

BTW, the guy who's third from the right is the original Dick Hatch.



was there a substitute Dick Hatch?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST on February 14, 2005, 04:46:55 PM
I must confess the new BG is one of my few must-see programs, but I've always been a sucker for good sci-fi. Olmos as Adama, the President and Gaius stand out. In terms of eye candy, Starbuck and Boomer don't do much for me. Starbuck, in particular, annoys me. I don't hate her because she's not man or because she's not Dirk Benedict. I hate her because she has a tenth of his charisma.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on April 01, 2005, 09:59:14 PM
OMG what a shocker for the season finale. He can't be dead can he?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST on April 08, 2005, 08:06:18 AM
That was a great season finale. I don't know that I've gasped out loud at a TV series in years. I think Adama could very well be dead, but it probably depends on real life stuff. I would think that the show might have revived Olmos' acting career a bit. Or Adama could just be laid up and out of the picture for the most part for a bunch of episodes like Swearingen on Deadwood so Olmos can do another project.

Anyway, check out a good interview with a couple BG writers with Tribune TV writer/blogger Maureen Ryan. You'll need to scroll down an item or two for the interview.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-tribtv,1,3096468.story?coll=chi-homepagenews2-utl

I keep forgetting that there are a lot of Deep Space Nine alums on BG. I caught a couple early DS9 episodes, but I've never been a Trekkie. They really beat Trek to death. Again. And again.

Anyway, here's the first couple questions, but it's an interesting and long interview.




Question: So, Commander Adama -- is he dead? Whatever updates you can give on his condition as Season 2 begins are much appreciated.

Weddle: I can't answer that. You saw where the bullets hit him. What do you think? Personally, I think it's going to be very touch and go. Let's hope he makes it.

Thompson: That would be kiss and tell, wouldn't it? As the second season begins, he's in exactly the same shape as he was after the bullets hit him. And we have to deal with that.

Question: Does Col. Tigh end up in charge of the military? If so, how much does his drinking increase as a result?

Weddle: Tigh's the XO. He would without question assume command of Galactica and therefore the military. How will he withstand the pressure? Will he be able to develop the diplomatic skills to deal with the civilian population? Will he be tempted to seek more solace from the bottle than usual or manage to control his addiction, and his ambitious wife? We will be exploring all of these questions in the new season.

Thompson: As XO, Tigh will have to step up while Adama's under the weather. It's a lot of pressure for someone who never aspired to command. He's spent a lot of his life medicating his problems away. Now he's going to be hit with a whole new level of problems: An incarcerated president, an unruly Quorum, and an overly ambitious wife. I'd say the sauce might seem pretty tempting, but who can say? Adama saw something in the man a long time ago, and perhaps that quality will come out.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Laura on June 08, 2005, 03:38:43 AM
Damn it, when does this start up again? 

I was the wrong age for the original series, which of course meant that I loved it.  Haven't watched it since.

I hear the new season starts off very ... darkly ... which rocks!  How could it not?  It's the most depressing potentially compelling storyline you could conjure up. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on July 14, 2005, 12:23:43 PM
Don't forget, Galactica starts back up this Friday.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: numbersman2 on August 02, 2005, 06:59:57 PM
Whats a Dick Hatch?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Clever_Username on August 07, 2005, 08:41:43 PM
Maren Jensen.

Yowza.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: James Westfall on December 13, 2006, 12:04:33 PM
Just finished the first season on dailymotion.com.  Fantastic season, fantastic series.  I've got to get through the 2nd season and catch up so I can start watching it on TV.

Six-Yummy.
Boomer-Tasty
Starbuck-Meh.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on December 14, 2006, 08:23:18 AM
I watch the show every Friday night. I think it is one of the best shows on TV.

I don't think many Desipio's watch it though, shame.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on December 14, 2006, 08:37:10 AM
Comcast has it in the On Demand section.  If you miss it Friday, it's available for weeks afterwards.

The show is about as good as TV gets.  Current without being preachy.

The boxing match episode was as good as TV gets.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: James Westfall on December 14, 2006, 08:59:54 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on December 14, 2006, 08:37:10 AM
Comcast has it in the On Demand section.  If you miss it Friday, it's available for weeks afterwards.

The show is about as good as TV gets.  Current without being preachy.

The boxing match episode was as good as TV gets.

I'll have to check the OD section.  Looks like they're wrapping season 3 up soon.  I'll have to get through season 2 and maybe get the season 3 DVD.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: forkserker on December 14, 2006, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: MikeC on December 14, 2006, 08:23:18 AM
I watch the show every Friday night. I think it is one of the best shows on TV.

I don't think many Desipio's watch it though, shame.

I believe the correct term is "Desipiots".
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: James Westfall on December 14, 2006, 12:55:59 PM
Quote from: forkserker on December 14, 2006, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: MikeC on December 14, 2006, 08:23:18 AM
I watch the show every Friday night. I think it is one of the best shows on TV.

I don't think many Desipio's watch it though, shame.

I believe the correct term is "Desipiots".

Desipiot: n. The preferred term to use when describing the nerds, dorks, tools, knobs and wankers who visit www.desipio.com.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: forkserker on December 14, 2006, 01:02:24 PM
Quote from: James Westfall on December 14, 2006, 12:55:59 PM
Quote from: forkserker on December 14, 2006, 11:44:33 AM
Quote from: MikeC on December 14, 2006, 08:23:18 AM
I watch the show every Friday night. I think it is one of the best shows on TV.

I don't think many Desipio's watch it though, shame.

I believe the correct term is "Desipiots".

Desipiot: n. The preferred term to use when describing the nerds, dorks, tools, knobs and wankers who visit www.desipio.com.

I call dibs on "tool".
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST on January 05, 2007, 01:40:50 PM
Quote from: James Westfall on December 14, 2006, 08:59:54 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on December 14, 2006, 08:37:10 AM
Comcast has it in the On Demand section.  If you miss it Friday, it's available for weeks afterwards.

The show is about as good as TV gets.  Current without being preachy.

The boxing match episode was as good as TV gets.

I'll have to check the OD section.  Looks like they're wrapping season 3 up soon.  I'll have to get through season 2 and maybe get the season 3 DVD.

Season 3 so far has outdone the second season as a whole. Maybe one truly mediocre episode so far whereas Season Two had a few clunkers. Season 3 starts back up in a few weeks and moves to Sundays at 9 p.m. CST, so you might not want to wait for that DVD.

Mo Ryan at the Trib is a big-time BSG geek and her blog is a good place to check for updates....

http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/battlestar_galactica/index.html

It hasn't been signed to a fourth season yet and the ratings have dropped, but SciFi may very well sign up for a new season, according to rumors on the Internets.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 19, 2007, 09:39:38 AM
First half of the season finale was damn good.  I'm looking forward to where this is going....

Now if only Comcast would get their shit together and pick up Universal HD (so I can watch this show in HD), this would be my favorite show on TV.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: DwightKurtz on March 19, 2007, 09:32:31 PM
We started watching this show about a week ago.  We've just finished the first season, and the first episode of season two.

It's an entertaining sci-fi show - better than a lot of Trek, and pretty enjoyable even if there aren't many laugh-out-loud moments.  However, I will have to say that it's no Firefly, even if they had a Firefly ship in the mini-series.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 20, 2007, 07:59:16 AM
Quote from: KurtEvans on March 19, 2007, 09:32:31 PM
We started watching this show about a week ago.  We've just finished the first season, and the first episode of season two.

It's an entertaining sci-fi show - better than a lot of Trek, and pretty enjoyable even if there aren't many laugh-out-loud moments.  However, I will have to say that it's no Firefly, even if they had a Firefly ship in the mini-series.

I think thay are different types of sci-fi shows.  Galactica is more drama where as Firefly was more drama/comedy.  There were a lot of funny throw away lines in Firefly.  Galactica is played off as if this were an actual event, and really, where's the funny in the destruction of mankind?  Both are extremely well written.  It's really a shame that major network tv doesn't pick up a sci-fi show.

Season two was hit or miss...some good, some not so good....  Season 3 has been great or good.  You have much to look forward to.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky! on March 20, 2007, 08:18:15 AM
If you guys met the one person who mentioned this show in my office, I bet you would never watch it again.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 20, 2007, 08:22:35 AM
Quote from: AC on March 20, 2007, 08:18:15 AM
If you guys met the one person who mentioned this show in my office, I bet you would never watch it again.

Are you so sure?  We deal with BC and have dealt with teh Paul and still I root for the Bears/Cubs.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky! on March 20, 2007, 08:49:40 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 20, 2007, 08:22:35 AM
Quote from: AC on March 20, 2007, 08:18:15 AM
If you guys met the one person who mentioned this show in my office, I bet you would never watch it again.

Are you so sure?  We deal with BC and have dealt with teh Paul and still I root for the Bears/Cubs.

Fair point. But you didn't have to deal with them in person.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST on March 20, 2007, 12:42:28 PM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 20, 2007, 07:59:16 AM
Quote from: KurtEvans on March 19, 2007, 09:32:31 PM
We started watching this show about a week ago.  We've just finished the first season, and the first episode of season two.

It's an entertaining sci-fi show - better than a lot of Trek, and pretty enjoyable even if there aren't many laugh-out-loud moments.  However, I will have to say that it's no Firefly, even if they had a Firefly ship in the mini-series.

I think thay are different types of sci-fi shows.  Galactica is more drama where as Firefly was more drama/comedy.  There were a lot of funny throw away lines in Firefly.  Galactica is played off as if this were an actual event, and really, where's the funny in the destruction of mankind?  Both are extremely well written.  It's really a shame that major network tv doesn't pick up a sci-fi show.

Season two was hit or miss...some good, some not so good....  Season 3 has been great or good.  You have much to look forward to.

It's not really fair to compare the two other than the fact that they're both set in a sci fi genre. Galactica is a pretty harsh drama with very little comic relief. Firefly is much more a quirky Western with a good deal of romantic comedy and straight comedy. I love both shows, but you're not really comparing apples to apples.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: DwightKurtz on March 20, 2007, 01:22:32 PM
I only compared them because some people have said that BSG is the greatest Sci Fi show ever, while I enjoyed Firefly a lot more.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 20, 2007, 01:31:29 PM
Quote from: KurtEvans on March 20, 2007, 01:22:32 PM
I only compared them because some people have said that BSG is the greatest Sci Fi show ever, while I enjoyed Firefly a lot more.

I think that BSG probably is.  If only because that title shouldn't rest upon the shoulders of a show that only aired 15 episodes.  I think Firefly could've had a broader appeal (due to it's sci-fi, western, comedy, written by the guy who did Buffy mix). 

BSG's closest competition is Farscape (IMO).
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Neifilicious on March 25, 2007, 10:00:08 PM
Absofuckinglutely crazy season finale. 

Baltar not guilty?
New cylon models (and shocking ones, even)?
The return of Starbuck?
Almost to Earth?

Holy shit, I love this show.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on March 25, 2007, 10:23:03 PM
I tell you one thing, BSG really knows how to do season finales. Another great one.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 26, 2007, 08:17:40 AM
Very nicely done.  A couple huge twists that didn't feel like they ripped you off.  I bet the series finale is going to induce an orgasm so big it'll blow your cock off.


I can't believe I have to wait ill 2008 to see the next season.  Motherfucker.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 08:25:49 AM
Quote from: MikeC on March 25, 2007, 10:23:03 PM
I tell you one thing, BSG really knows how to do season finales. Another great one.
The final scene with the approach of battle felt a little incongruous with the rest of the episode focused on the trial.

But I love the potential they've setup.  Hera needs to be protected beacuse she's the first Human-Cylon combination.  But the Chief has a kid, no?  The resistance was actually led by four of the final five.

And that last shot echoing the start of Contact was outstanding.

22 more eps, but not for 18 months?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 08:25:49 AM
Quote from: MikeC on March 25, 2007, 10:23:03 PM
I tell you one thing, BSG really knows how to do season finales. Another great one.
The final scene with the approach of battle felt a little incongruous with the rest of the episode focused on the trial.

But I love the potential they've setup.  Hera needs to be protected beacuse she's the first Human-Cylon combination.  But the Chief has a kid, no?  The resistance was actually led by four of the final five.

And that last shot echoing the start of Contact was outstanding.

22 more eps, but not for 18 months?


They were on the bubble for a renewal.  Had they gotten the ok earlier, we probably would've seen some eps during fall sweeps. 

They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 

SPOLIERS 

What caused the fleet wide power outage, did they jump into the middle of a cylon fleet or were they followed, what happened to Starbuck, have the new 4 been sabotaging the fleet subconsciously, what's the deal with Gaeta, who's the 5th , are they really cylons...  Correct me if I'm wrong but the cylons left for 40 years after they were defeated.  It's only been a year or two since they returned.  How is Tigh a cylon?  Weren't he and Adama old friends?  How would that be possible?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 10:12:32 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 
And, isn't it pretty obvious that Roslin is the final Cylon?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 26, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 10:12:32 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 
And, isn't it pretty obvious that Roslin is the final Cylon?

I don't think so.  She's been diagnosed by a few doctors as having cancer.  Why would they infect themselves with a disease?  Especially considering what happened when their scout ship found that contaminated beacon.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 03:05:42 PM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 10:12:32 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 
And, isn't it pretty obvious that Roslin is the final Cylon?

I don't think so.  She's been diagnosed by a few doctors as having cancer.  Why would they infect themselves with a disease?  Especially considering what happened when their scout ship found that contaminated beacon.
Well, that may be something unplanned.  But she sharred a dream with Boomer and Sex Six.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Neifilicious on March 26, 2007, 05:12:07 PM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 10:12:32 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 
And, isn't it pretty obvious that Roslin is the final Cylon?

I don't think so.  She's been diagnosed by a few doctors as having cancer.  Why would they infect themselves with a disease?  Especially considering what happened when their scout ship found that contaminated beacon.


I'm going to have to go with Starbuck as the final Cylon model.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Ghost of Desipio Past on March 26, 2007, 06:56:59 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 03:05:42 PM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on March 26, 2007, 10:12:32 AM
Quote from: The Ghost of Richard Jeni on March 26, 2007, 09:42:00 AM
They opened up a whole new book of arcs. 
And, isn't it pretty obvious that Roslin is the final Cylon?

I don't think so.  She's been diagnosed by a few doctors as having cancer.  Why would they infect themselves with a disease?  Especially considering what happened when their scout ship found that contaminated beacon.
Well, that may be something unplanned.  But she sharred a dream with Boomer and Sex Six.

Paging Dr. Freud.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 07:36:59 PM
"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic."

Suck it, old topic warning message.

Tomorrow night is the start of the final season.  Show of hands... who is enthused?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: DwightKurtz on April 03, 2008, 10:24:07 PM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 07:36:59 PM
"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic."

Suck it, old topic warning message.

Tomorrow night is the start of the final season.  Show of hands... who is enthused?

Shut up Paul, you're a douche? 

I'm desperate for this season to start ... and yet, I want to wait til it's over so I can watch it all in one or two shots.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 11:51:12 PM
Quote from: KurtEvans on April 03, 2008, 10:24:07 PM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 07:36:59 PM
"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic."

Suck it, old topic warning message.

Tomorrow night is the start of the final season.  Show of hands... who is enthused?

Shut up Paul, you're a douche? 

I'm desperate for this season to start ... and yet, I want to wait til it's over so I can watch it all in one or two shots.

Thanks Kurt.  Strangely enough, I have already been "Paul'd" twice, but each time got Ratto'd.  I appreciate it nonetheless. 

The last few days I have been watching the BSG marathons.  Yeah, it's great all in one hit, but I gotta admit that I'm enough of a dork that I watch my favorite shows more than once.  I'm even enough of a tool that I will get a Papa John's Pizza just because they are one of the sponsors.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on April 04, 2008, 06:45:43 AM
Can't wait until tonight?  You can be done with it before the Cubs game starts:

http://www.scifi.com/index.php

And you've gotta love the picture they use as a teaser.  Are they suggesting something by Lee's chalice instead of a water glass?

(http://www.scifi.com/takeover/bsgseason4/images/bg_main.jpg)
(http://www.scifi.com/takeover/bsgseason4/images/footer.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 04, 2008, 10:49:36 AM
Red dress.  Hot.

Guh.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: DwightKurtz on April 04, 2008, 11:20:52 AM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 11:51:12 PM
Quote from: KurtEvans on April 03, 2008, 10:24:07 PM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 07:36:59 PM
"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic."

Suck it, old topic warning message.

Tomorrow night is the start of the final season.  Show of hands... who is enthused?

Shut up Paul, you're a douche? 

I'm desperate for this season to start ... and yet, I want to wait til it's over so I can watch it all in one or two shots.

Thanks Kurt.  Strangely enough, I have already been "Paul'd" twice, but each time got Ratto'd.  I appreciate it nonetheless. 

The last few days I have been watching the BSG marathons.  Yeah, it's great all in one hit, but I gotta admit that I'm enough of a dork that I watch my favorite shows more than once.  I'm even enough of a tool that I will get a Papa John's Pizza just because they are one of the sponsors.

Yeah, I wasn't sure, hence the question mark at the end.  People change screen names so often that I'm honestly not sure who's who sometimes, anyway.  I can't keep up with every thread, and I guess that makes me a loser, if you're a loser because you don't read every post on a message board, even when it's as awesome as this one.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 04, 2008, 11:49:42 AM
It was a nice welcome back episode.  A bit too much recap in teh actual ep for my tasetes, but it seems like it's been off forever.  I suppose it was necessary.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 04, 2008, 12:54:10 PM
Quote from: KurtEvans on April 04, 2008, 11:20:52 AM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 11:51:12 PM
Quote from: KurtEvans on April 03, 2008, 10:24:07 PM
Quote from: powen01 on April 03, 2008, 07:36:59 PM
"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic."

Suck it, old topic warning message.

Tomorrow night is the start of the final season.  Show of hands... who is enthused?

Shut up Paul, you're a douche? 

I'm desperate for this season to start ... and yet, I want to wait til it's over so I can watch it all in one or two shots.

Thanks Kurt.  Strangely enough, I have already been "Paul'd" twice, but each time got Ratto'd.  I appreciate it nonetheless. 

The last few days I have been watching the BSG marathons.  Yeah, it's great all in one hit, but I gotta admit that I'm enough of a dork that I watch my favorite shows more than once.  I'm even enough of a tool that I will get a Papa John's Pizza just because they are one of the sponsors.

Yeah, I wasn't sure, hence the question mark at the end.  People change screen names so often that I'm honestly not sure who's who sometimes, anyway.  I can't keep up with every thread, and I guess that makes me a loser, if you're a loser because you don't read every post on a message board, even when it's as awesome as this one.

Agreed.  That's why I appreciate it nonetheless... what with the flood of newbs thread, Ratto post feedings, and overall smorgasbord of Desipio goodness, even a bum like myself can't keep up with the double entendres, multiple threads, and various personalities and handles around here.  I mostly just sit back and reserve my comments for t-ball jokes and topics I really know...

Like obsessing over the chick in the red dress...  That, I am really good at doing.  Or wishing I was doing.  Or something...
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 04, 2008, 12:57:07 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 04, 2008, 11:49:42 AM
It was a nice welcome back episode.  A bit too much recap in teh actual ep for my tasetes, but it seems like it's been off forever.  I suppose it was necessary.

You're supposed to precede that with SPOILER ALERT!!! and flail your arms around.  Kidding. 

Wasn't all the recap covered by the "What the frak is going on" video?  Grrr.  Filler. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on April 18, 2008, 11:04:03 PM
Intense stuff with Caly.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 19, 2008, 12:18:32 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on April 18, 2008, 11:04:03 PM
Intense stuff with Caly.

Watching it right now.  It really is getting intense... especially with all the Cylon infighting.  Back to the show...
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on April 19, 2008, 12:28:23 AM
Oh.  Shit.  That was messed up. 

Seriously though, the Cylons turning on all the 6's... that was a real tragedy. 

All that beautiful bionic poon... gone.

It's insanity. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on April 20, 2008, 10:34:55 PM
Quote from: powen01 on April 19, 2008, 12:28:23 AM
It's insanity. 
They are also getting very, very close to Earth.  Check the constellation in teh background of this picture:

(http://media.battlestarwiki.org/images/6/6e/Orion_belt.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 21, 2008, 07:38:05 AM
Simply fantastic.  This shit is brilliant.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on June 02, 2008, 05:25:40 PM
I'm assuming some of you have seen the preview for next week's episode, "The Hub".  Tricky camera work and editing, but I'm going to call it now:  Laura Roslin is not revealed as a Cylon.  It's one of the others that is with her.  I think it's a red herring the way they have presented it.

Anyone noticed Admiral Adama referring to Athena's murdering of Six as the killing of a "woman"? 

I love this goddamn show. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on June 02, 2008, 10:32:50 PM
Yeah...that's become standard fare in TV these days.  I can't wait.  I don't think it's Roslin, it's been said it isn't Balthar, it's not going to be Adama (what's the point since he's already given command over to Tigh and that doesn't play into the prequel they're doing), it's not Apollo (since he's not there)...  Is it Starbuck?  Seems too easy.  I'm trying to think of another main character it could be. 


2nd best show on TV.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on June 08, 2008, 01:03:36 PM
DPD.

My favorite Cylon. (http://www.complex.com/GIRLS/Cover-Girls/GRACE-PARK/GRACE-PARK-GALLERY?page=2#gallery)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on June 13, 2008, 10:05:40 PM
I have many unresolved questions from this evening's episode.  Pretty good, but was Earth basically a jacked up planet?  Global warming?  What the hell?

I feel like tying on an Adama style binge, going three sheets to the wind, giving a hooker an Andy Dolan Special, etc, etc...   Argh.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on June 14, 2008, 12:11:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 13, 2008, 10:05:40 PM
I have many unresolved questions from this evening's episode.  Pretty good, but was Earth basically a jacked up planet?  Global warming?  What the hell?
Hardly.  That dirt Adama was holding didn't have any plants in it. It was black.

Nuked.

That was tremendous.  And how appropriate that a 9/11 In Space story ends up in in a bombed-out NYC.

2009 until more?  Shit.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on June 14, 2008, 01:15:30 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on June 14, 2008, 12:11:31 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 13, 2008, 10:05:40 PM
I have many unresolved questions from this evening's episode.  Pretty good, but was Earth basically a jacked up planet?  Global warming?  What the hell?
Hardly.  That dirt Adama was holding didn't have any plants in it. It was black.

Nuked.

That was tremendous.  And how appropriate that a 9/11 In Space story ends up in in a bombed-out NYC.

2009 until more?  Shit.

Don't worry, another whiskey and I'll have figured out the time machine.  I'm taking this whole fucking website to the future.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on June 14, 2008, 07:25:59 PM
All this has happened before and will happen again.  Makes me think this was another "happening".
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:27:41 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 

I think so.  I was just wondering if anyone knew if that's the only difference.  It looks like Razor came out in 2007, so I think the natural order would be Season 1, Season 2.0/2.5, Season 3, Razor, Season 4.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on June 16, 2008, 10:30:29 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 

2... 2.5... whatever it takes.

It really doens't matter.  You aren't going to lose anything you don't need to enjoy the show.

And Razor came out before this (current) season.  It was ok.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:37:38 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on June 16, 2008, 10:30:29 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 

2... 2.5... whatever it takes.

It really doens't matter.  You aren't going to lose anything you don't need to enjoy the show.

And Razor came out before this (current) season.  It was ok.

I continue to be in support of quoting Mr. Mom.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Big Cheese on June 19, 2008, 09:57:34 PM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:27:41 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 

I think so.  I was just wondering if anyone knew if that's the only difference.  It looks like Razor came out in 2007, so I think the natural order would be Season 1, Season 2.0/2.5, Season 3, Razor, Season 4.

Wait, if you're talking about the difference between the dvds for Season 2.0 and 2.5, you need to rent both to get the full season of episodes. 

Putting on the geek hat:

Sci Fi showed the first half of the season (episodes 2.1 - 2.10, 2.10 being Pegasus), then waited either 3 or 6 months to show the last half of the season (2.11 - 2.20).   They issued the Season 2.0 dvds before Season 2.5 was aired.  After Season 2.5 aired, as an incentive to buy the 2.5 dvd, they included the director's cut of Pegasus on the 2.5 DVD.

So you have to watch both or you'll be completely lost in Season 3. 

Unless you were just talking about which Pegasus to watch, in which case it doesn't really matter.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on July 07, 2008, 03:19:37 PM
Quote from: The Big Cheese on June 19, 2008, 09:57:34 PM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:27:41 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:15:32 AM
Quote from: powen01 on June 16, 2008, 10:11:24 AM
Quote from: Kerm on June 16, 2008, 10:08:50 AM
I can't read this thread yet, because I just started this series (I'm through the first two discs of season 1), but I wanted to add that it is absolutely fantastic.

Kerm, I don't want to ruin things for you so I'm not going to tell you that Six shows her titties in the last episode.  Enjoy the rest of the show. 

Also, if you get a chance, download Razor as well.  Helps fill in some blanks for this season... 

When should I watch that?  After Season 3 and before the current season?  That also reminds me of a question I wanted to ask you guys.  I think the only difference between Season 2.0 and Season 2.5 is a "director's cut" of one of the episodes.  If I rent 2.5, I won't miss anything from 2.0, right?

I think you would be fine seeing Razor before this season.  Won't spoil anything.

As for the 2.0 vs 2.5... no idea.  Don't director's cuts usually have everything and more? 

I think so.  I was just wondering if anyone knew if that's the only difference.  It looks like Razor came out in 2007, so I think the natural order would be Season 1, Season 2.0/2.5, Season 3, Razor, Season 4.

Wait, if you're talking about the difference between the dvds for Season 2.0 and 2.5, you need to rent both to get the full season of episodes. 

Putting on the geek hat:

Sci Fi showed the first half of the season (episodes 2.1 - 2.10, 2.10 being Pegasus), then waited either 3 or 6 months to show the last half of the season (2.11 - 2.20).   They issued the Season 2.0 dvds before Season 2.5 was aired.  After Season 2.5 aired, as an incentive to buy the 2.5 dvd, they included the director's cut of Pegasus on the 2.5 DVD.

So you have to watch both or you'll be completely lost in Season 3. 

Unless you were just talking about which Pegasus to watch, in which case it doesn't really matter.

Shit, now I'm confused.  I have to rent all of the Season 2.0 DVDs, and then rent all of the Season 2.5 DVDs?  I thought all of the episodes (except the Pegasus director's cut) overlapped.  Does 2.0 have the first 10 episodes plus the non-director's cut of Pegasus, and then 2.5 has the last 10 episodes plus the director's cut of Pegasus?

This show is so fantastic.  I just finished disc 4 of Season 1 (Starbuck just took off to find the spear or whatever on Caprica).  I can't wait to get the next disc.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: The Big Cheese on July 10, 2008, 12:57:07 PM
Quote from: Kerm on July 07, 2008, 03:19:37 PM
Does 2.0 have the first 10 episodes plus the non-director's cut of Pegasus, and then 2.5 has the last 10 episodes plus the director's cut of Pegasus?

Yes, this.  To watch all 20+ episodes, you need both the 2.0 & 2.5 sets.

QuoteThis show is so fantastic.  I just finished disc 4 of Season 1 (Starbuck just took off to find the spear or whatever on Caprica).  I can't wait to get the next disc.

Indeed.  I've developed bipolar feelings for the characters (Starbuck especially) depending on which season it is.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on July 10, 2008, 01:08:34 PM
Quote from: The Big Cheese on July 10, 2008, 12:57:07 PM
Quote from: Kerm on July 07, 2008, 03:19:37 PM
Does 2.0 have the first 10 episodes plus the non-director's cut of Pegasus, and then 2.5 has the last 10 episodes plus the director's cut of Pegasus?

Yes, this.  To watch all 20+ episodes, you need both the 2.0 & 2.5 sets.

QuoteThis show is so fantastic.  I just finished disc 4 of Season 1 (Starbuck just took off to find the spear or whatever on Caprica).  I can't wait to get the next disc.

Indeed.  I've developed bipolar feelings for the characters (Starbuck especially) depending on which season it is.

Perfect.  Thanks a lot for the tip.  I was trying to figure out what the hell was going on, and Netflix failed me.  Operating under that assumption, I moved 2.0 to the top of my queue, so now I have the last disc of Season 1 and the first disc of 2.0 waiting for me at home.  Sweet.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on July 11, 2008, 09:59:02 AM
I'm really pissed I'm several seasons behind, because I would like very much to discuss the Season 1 cliffhanger where

FOUR-YEAR-OLD SPOILER!












Adama gets shot by Boomer.

I did NOT see that coming at all.  This show rules.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on July 11, 2008, 10:02:36 AM
Actually, that was one of the few moments of that season that I did see coming.

Regardless, the opening montage of that episode, especially the boxing Adamas, was as good as filmmaking gets.

Remember that when you get to the next boxing episode.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on July 11, 2008, 10:10:18 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on July 11, 2008, 10:02:36 AM
Actually, that was one of the few moments of that season that I did see coming.

Regardless, the opening montage of that episode, especially the boxing Adamas, was as good as filmmaking gets.

Remember that when you get to the next boxing episode.

That wasn't the same episode, but, yes, that montage was great.  I guess I was surprised that the Boomer "reveal" happened so early in the series.

Also, Mary McDonnell is one of the best-looking 50+-year-olds out there.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuckosan on July 11, 2008, 10:39:29 AM
Quote from: Kerm on July 11, 2008, 10:10:18 AM
Also, Mary McDonnell is one of the best-looking 50+-year-olds out there.
She's so damn good in this show I find myself forgetting about how good she looks and just enjoying her performance.  And if you think she's good in season 1, just wait.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on July 11, 2008, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: Chuckosan on July 11, 2008, 10:02:36 AM
Actually, that was one of the few moments of that season that I did see coming.

Regardless, the opening montage of that episode, especially the boxing Adamas, was as good as filmmaking gets.

Remember that when you get to the next boxing episode.

That was fucking outstanding.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on July 23, 2008, 09:19:30 AM
DPD.

Trailer for the new Caprica prequel is out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXT_-258Kso

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Al Yellon on July 23, 2008, 01:15:23 PM
I'm up to season three and just watched the boxing match episode. Very good stuff and I'm thoroughly addicted. I sort of understand why they didn't use the virus to eradicate the entire Cylon racebut I'm confused why they didn't in the very least pump the colonial fleet's ships full of the virus to expose any remaining Cylons.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on July 28, 2008, 04:18:33 PM
I'm still well behind you guys but Billy?  WHYYYYYYYY!!!!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on August 04, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Have you gotten to the boxing episode yet? The most opposite of awful, awful TV.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 02:36:27 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on August 04, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Have you gotten to the boxing episode yet? The most opposite of awful, awful TV.

I've seen a couple of boxing moments, but I strongly suspect that they are not of what you speak.  I will definitely let you know when I see it.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on August 04, 2008, 02:43:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf9wHz3SeOg&feature=related

That was high quality F/X.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on August 06, 2008, 10:58:11 PM
When it's over, they're gonna turn the clock back and tell us more.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2008/08/battlestar-gala.html
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on August 09, 2008, 05:53:11 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on August 04, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Have you gotten to the boxing episode yet? The most opposite of awful, awful TV.

Got to it last night.  Awesome.  Just awesome.  Rule 10.17(c) does not apply in this instance.  Poor Dee, though.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on August 09, 2008, 09:40:22 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 09, 2008, 05:53:11 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on August 04, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Have you gotten to the boxing episode yet? The most opposite of awful, awful TV.

Got to it last night.  Awesome.  Just awesome.  Rule 10.17(c) does not apply in this instance.  Poor Dee, though.
I don't think there's been a better episode since.

For perspective, that's like saying Pixar hasn't been as good since Nemo.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Al Yellon on August 10, 2008, 06:15:48 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on August 09, 2008, 09:40:22 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 09, 2008, 05:53:11 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on August 04, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Quote from: Kerm on August 04, 2008, 11:13:35 AM
I'm catching up (now on Season 3; they just got off New Caprica), but I have to mention that Apollo in a fat suit is completely hilarious.
Have you gotten to the boxing episode yet? The most opposite of awful, awful TV.

Got to it last night.  Awesome.  Just awesome.  Rule 10.17(c) does not apply in this instance.  Poor Dee, though.
I don't think there's been a better episode since.

For perspective, that's like saying Pixar hasn't been as good since Nemo.

Or that the Cubs haven't had a decent first baseman since Frank Chance.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kerm on September 04, 2008, 11:26:29 AM
I finally made it to the end of Season 3.  While I thought the writing and acting were pretty cheesy at the very end, I thought the Cylon "reveal" was pretty badass.  This show rules.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on January 05, 2009, 03:33:24 PM
I just finished Season 1 over the weekend.  It's a pretty good show, and I'll go onto Season 2, but i'd like that lady to get naked.  Which one?  All of them.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: 5laky on January 05, 2009, 03:40:19 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on January 05, 2009, 03:33:24 PM
I just finished Season 1 over the weekend.  It's a pretty good show, and I'll go onto Season 2, but i'd like that lady to get naked.  Which one?  All of them.

Let's clear something up - do chicks get naked on this show? Or is it on WGN at 4 pm on Sundays or something?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 05, 2009, 03:48:43 PM
Quote from: 5laky on January 05, 2009, 03:40:19 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on January 05, 2009, 03:33:24 PM
I just finished Season 1 over the weekend.  It's a pretty good show, and I'll go onto Season 2, but i'd like that lady to get naked.  Which one?  All of them.

Let's clear something up - do chicks get naked on this show? Or is it on WGN at 4 pm on Sundays or something?

They tease with sideboob, but sadly no.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on January 06, 2009, 07:30:40 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 05, 2009, 03:48:43 PM
Quote from: 5laky on January 05, 2009, 03:40:19 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on January 05, 2009, 03:33:24 PM
I just finished Season 1 over the weekend.  It's a pretty good show, and I'll go onto Season 2, but i'd like that lady to get naked.  Which one?  All of them.

Let's clear something up - do chicks get naked on this show? Or is it on WGN at 4 pm on Sundays or something?

They tease with sideboob, but sadly no.

Sometimes that's just the right amount.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 06, 2009, 10:33:51 AM
For anyone still catching up, Season 4 is out now.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 06, 2009, 10:45:42 AM
Season 4 is also running on Universal HD.  They had a 5 ep back-to-back thing a few nights ago
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on January 06, 2009, 11:58:24 AM
So what is the official watching order?  with this whole 2.5 and razor or whatever.  all this nerd talk hurts.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 06, 2009, 12:33:52 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on January 06, 2009, 11:58:24 AM
So what is the official watching order?  with this whole 2.5 and razor or whatever.  all this nerd talk hurts.

The Big Cheese explained it earlier in the thread, as I was similarly confused:

QuoteWait, if you're talking about the difference between the dvds for Season 2.0 and 2.5, you need to rent both to get the full season of episodes.

Putting on the geek hat:

Sci Fi showed the first half of the season (episodes 2.1 - 2.10, 2.10 being Pegasus), then waited either 3 or 6 months to show the last half of the season (2.11 - 2.20).   They issued the Season 2.0 dvds before Season 2.5 was aired.  After Season 2.5 aired, as an incentive to buy the 2.5 dvd, they included the director's cut of Pegasus on the 2.5 DVD.

So you have to watch both or you'll be completely lost in Season 3.

Unless you were just talking about which Pegasus to watch, in which case it doesn't really matter.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 17, 2009, 08:35:29 PM
Nice, fast start.  Boy, did 10.17(c) apply to the Fifth Cylon.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 20, 2009, 10:29:31 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 17, 2009, 08:35:29 PM
Nice, fast start.  Boy, did 10.17(c) apply to the Fifth Cylon.

Awesome, awesome episode, but BOOOOOOOO to the Final Cylon.

And, also, Dee?!  NOOOOOOOOO!!!  She was hotter than the sun.  I miss her already.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: ChuckD on January 20, 2009, 11:41:01 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 20, 2009, 10:29:31 PM
And, also, Dee?!  NOOOOOOOOO!!!  She was hotter than the sun.  I miss her already.

http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/19/the-ad-placement-from-hell/

Edit: Just in case you didn't get the hint, the link contains spoilers.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 21, 2009, 10:11:06 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on January 20, 2009, 11:41:01 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 20, 2009, 10:29:31 PM
And, also, Dee?!  NOOOOOOOOO!!!  She was hotter than the sun.  I miss her already.

http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/19/the-ad-placement-from-hell/

Edit: Just in case you didn't get the hint, the link contains spoilers.

Hmm.  I want to click it, but I don't want any spoilers.  I think I won't click it.

I want to talk more about how awesome that episode was.  The entire feel of the show completely changed in one hour.  Seeing "FRAK EARTH" scrawled on the wall was a great moment.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: 5laky on January 21, 2009, 10:16:45 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 21, 2009, 10:11:06 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on January 20, 2009, 11:41:01 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 20, 2009, 10:29:31 PM
And, also, Dee?!  NOOOOOOOOO!!!  She was hotter than the sun.  I miss her already.

http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/19/the-ad-placement-from-hell/

Edit: Just in case you didn't get the hint, the link contains spoilers.

Hmm.  I want to click it, but I don't want any spoilers.  I think I won't click it.

I want to talk more about how awesome that episode was.  The entire feel of the show completely changed in one hour.  Seeing "FRAK EARTH" scrawled on the wall was a great moment.

If you already saw that bitch shoot herself, you're fine.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 21, 2009, 10:22:17 AM
Quote from: 5laky on January 21, 2009, 10:16:45 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 21, 2009, 10:11:06 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on January 20, 2009, 11:41:01 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 20, 2009, 10:29:31 PM
And, also, Dee?!  NOOOOOOOOO!!!  She was hotter than the sun.  I miss her already.

http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/19/the-ad-placement-from-hell/

Edit: Just in case you didn't get the hint, the link contains spoilers.

Hmm.  I want to click it, but I don't want any spoilers.  I think I won't click it.

I want to talk more about how awesome that episode was.  The entire feel of the show completely changed in one hour.  Seeing "FRAK EARTH" scrawled on the wall was a great moment.

If you already saw that bitch shoot herself, you're fine.

Oh, thanks.  "I just want to celebrate another day of living."  Awesome.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on January 21, 2009, 11:24:30 PM
I haven't been watching this show nor following this thread.

Nevertheless, I'm fairly sure you all might could use a little dose of Dirk Benedict...

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dbenedict/2009/01/19/lt-starbuck--lost-in-castration/

QuoteOnce upon a time, in what used to be a far away land called Hollywood (but is now a state of mind and everywhere), a young actor was handed a script and asked to bring to life a character called Starbuck. I am that actor. The script was called "Battlestar Galactica."

Fortunately, I was young, my imagination fertile and adrenal glands strong, because bringing Starbuck to life was over the dead imaginations of a lot of Network Executives. Every character trait I struggled to give him was met with vigorous resistance. A charming womanizer? The "Suits" (Network Executives) hated it. A cigar (fumerello) smoker? The Suits hated it. A reluctant hero who found humor in the bleakest of situations? The Suits hated it. All this negative feedback convinced me I was on the right track.

Starbuck was meant to be a lovable rogue. It was best for the show, best for the character and the best that I could do. The Suits didn't think so. "One more cigar and he's fired," they told Glen Larson, the creator of the show. "We want Starbuck to appeal to the female audience for crying out loud." You see, the Suits knew women were turned off by men who smoked cigars, especially young men. How they "knew" this was never revealed. And they didn't stop there. "If Dirk doesn't quit playing every scene with a girl like he wants to get her in bed, he's fired." This was, well, it was blatant heterosexuality, treating women like "sex objects." I thought it was flirting. Never mind, they wouldn't have it. I wouldn't have it any other way, or rather Starbuck wouldn't. So we persevered, Starbuck and I. The show, as the saying goes, went on and the rest is history for, lo and behold, women from all over the world sent me boxes of cigars, phone numbers, dinner requests, and marriage proposals.

The Suits were not impressed. They would have their way, which is what Suits do best, and after one season of puffing and flirting and gambling, Starbuck, that loveable scoundrel, was indeed fired. Which is to say, "Battlestar Galactica" was cancelled. Starbuck, however, would not stay cancelled, but simply morphed into another flirting, cigar smoking, blatant heterosexual called Faceman. Another show, another set of Suits, and of course, if The "A-Team" movie rumors prove correct, another remake.

There was a time, I know I was there, when men were men, women were women and sometimes a cigar was just a good smoke. But 40 years of feminism have taken their toll. The war against masculinity has been won. Everything has turned into its opposite, so that what was once flirting and smoking is now sexual harassment and criminal. And everyone is more lonely and miserable as a result.

Witness the "re-imagined" "Battlestar Galactica," bleak, miserable, despairing, angry and confused. Which is to say, it reflects in microcosm the complete change in the politics and morality of today's world, as opposed to the world of yesterday. The world of Lorne Greene (Adama), Fred Astaire (Starbuck's Poppa) and Dirk Benedict (Starbuck). I would guess Lorne is glad he's in that Big Bonanza in the sky and well out of it. Starbuck, alas, has not been so lucky. He's not been left to pass quietly into that trivial world of cancelled TV characters.

"Re-imagining", they call it. "Un-imagining" is more accurate. To take what once was and twist it into what never was intended. So that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction. To better reflect the times of ambiguous morality in which we live, one would assume. A show in which the aliens (Cylons) are justified in their desire to destroy human civilization, one would assume. Indeed, let us not say who the good guys are and who the bad are. That is being "judgmental," taking sides, and that kind of (simplistic) thinking went out with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan and Kathryn Hepburn and John Wayne and, well, the original "Battlestar Galactica."

There's so much more.

I'm still searching for any point beyond: I'm a bitter, washed-up never-was who once starred in a Mormon-themed Star Wars knock-off that never make it past season one. Like all men, my balls have since been cut off by politically correct feminists and Harvard Business School Technocrats who won't allow artists to maintain their creative integrity by playing every role as a sex-crazed, cigar-smoking Lothario, forcing them instead to reflect a sense of moral complexity. Fuck... They went and gave my character tits! Hey, who wants to make me a baby?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on January 21, 2009, 11:26:54 PM
And we mustn't neglect this gem:

QuoteWomen are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Hamlet does not scan as Hamletta. Nor does Hans Solo as Hans Sally. Faceman is not the same as Facewoman. Nor does a Stardoe a Starbuck make. Men hand out cigars. Women "hand out" babies. And thus the world for thousands of years has gone' round.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on January 21, 2009, 11:46:09 PM
Turns out Dirk once played Hamlet on Broadway...

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE5D9173CF931A1575AC0A961948260

QuoteTHE first casualty of the Musical Theater Works production of ''Hamlet'' at the Abbey Theater is language.

Only Claudius (Douglass Watson) seemed able to let the audience know he was at times speaking in verse. As for this Hamlet (played by Dirk Benedict, who may be well known to television audiences as Face in ''The A-Team''), he could not seem to get the stresses right. Given that disability, it seems cruel not to have simply cut out the Latin phrase hic et ubique from the ghost scene. At least someone might have told him the phrase is not French and that the last word is pronounced oo-bee-KWAY, not oo-BEEK.

...

The play is gutted of introspection, doubt and perplexity. Here Hamlet's question about being or not is a cynical joke, avenging Laertes is a mindless puppet, Ophelia's death is as impersonal as a car crash. Inevitably, the performance leaves one cold. All the action may be, as Horatio says, ''carnal, bloody and unnatural,'' and some of it is even spectacular, but it is as distant from one's own passions and thoughts as any ordinary prime-time thriller.

No word on Hamlet's inspired use of a gran corona in place of Yorick's skull.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on January 22, 2009, 01:04:31 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.

Did I miss something?  I thought it was Dick Hatch that was on the new one, not Face.

Sounds like it's time to get off the macrobiotic diet.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 01:40:11 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on January 22, 2009, 01:04:31 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.

Did I miss something?  I thought it was Dick Hatch that was on the new one, not Face.

Sounds like it's time to get off the macrobiotic diet.

Nope.  I missed something.  Missed something BIG TIME.  Okay, I hate him less now.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST Redux on January 26, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.


Sorry, Dirk Benedict sounds like a right-wing douchebag in his little rant, but he has more charisma in one of his fingernails than Sackhoff.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 27, 2009, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 26, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.


Sorry, Dirk Benedict sounds like a right-wing douchebag in his little rant, but he has more charisma in one of his fingernails than Sackhoff.

I thought the dude who plays Tom Zarek was the original Starbuck.  (has never seen the original BSG)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST Redux on January 27, 2009, 10:41:32 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 27, 2009, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 26, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.


Sorry, Dirk Benedict sounds like a right-wing douchebag in his little rant, but he has more charisma in one of his fingernails than Sackhoff.

I thought the dude who plays Tom Zarek was the original Starbuck.  (has never seen the original BSG)

No, Zarek (Richard Hatch) was Apollo. For years, he tried to get the series remade without owning the rights. Ron Moore and Co., who managed to acquire the rights and sell the series to SciFi, sort of threw Hatch a bone by writing him in the script as Zarek. (Unlike Dirk Benedict, Hatch never really went on to do anything big like A-Team. And Benedict's character in A Team is basically how he played Starbuck.)

The original series was OK for its time. Unlike the current series, Starbuck and Apollo were basically action hero/fighter pilots and the main stars of the show. Lorne Greene as Adama was there to pretend that it was a weighty show - not just a cheesy Star Wars knockoff. There were some other semi-important characters and a couple cute gals but Starbuck and Apollo carried the show.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 27, 2009, 10:59:02 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 27, 2009, 10:41:32 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 27, 2009, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 26, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.


Sorry, Dirk Benedict sounds like a right-wing douchebag in his little rant, but he has more charisma in one of his fingernails than Sackhoff.

I thought the dude who plays Tom Zarek was the original Starbuck.  (has never seen the original BSG)

No, Zarek (Richard Hatch) was Apollo. For years, he tried to get the series remade without owning the rights. Ron Moore and Co., who managed to acquire the rights and sell the series to SciFi, sort of threw Hatch a bone by writing him in the script as Zarek. (Unlike Dirk Benedict, Hatch never really went on to do anything big like A-Team. And Benedict's character in A Team is basically how he played Starbuck.)

The original series was OK for its time. Unlike the current series, Starbuck and Apollo were basically action hero/fighter pilots and the main stars of the show. Lorne Greene as Adama was there to pretend that it was a weighty show - not just a cheesy Star Wars knockoff. There were some other semi-important characters and a couple cute gals but Starbuck and Apollo carried the show.

Yeah, I realized my stupidity earlier in the thread.  At least, my stupidity on THIS point.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on January 27, 2009, 11:28:39 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 27, 2009, 10:41:32 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 27, 2009, 10:09:40 AM
Quote from: HST Redux on January 26, 2009, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on January 22, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
If he doesn't like it, maybe he should stop appearing on the "inferior" remake, since his character is probably the worst thing to happen to the new series.  This was rich:

QuoteSo that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith and family is un-imagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.

The entire new series has been a struggle to keep hope and spiritual faith in the face of overwhelming odds.  They do it by relying on their literal and figurative families aboard the Galactica.  And where exactly is all the "sexual violence" in BSG?

What a cockface.  Katee Sackhoff is 100 times the Starbuck he ever was.


Sorry, Dirk Benedict sounds like a right-wing douchebag in his little rant, but he has more charisma in one of his fingernails than Sackhoff.

I thought the dude who plays Tom Zarek was the original Starbuck.  (has never seen the original BSG)

No, Zarek (Richard Hatch) was Apollo. For years, he tried to get the series remade without owning the rights. Ron Moore and Co., who managed to acquire the rights and sell the series to SciFi, sort of threw Hatch a bone by writing him in the script as Zarek. (Unlike Dirk Benedict, Hatch never really went on to do anything big like A-Team. And Benedict's character in A Team is basically how he played Starbuck.)

The original series was OK for its time. Unlike the current series, Starbuck and Apollo were basically action hero/fighter pilots and the main stars of the show. Lorne Greene as Adama was there to pretend that it was a weighty show - not just a cheesy Star Wars knockoff. There were some other semi-important characters and a couple cute gals but Starbuck and Apollo carried the show.

The original was good because I was 7.  The Cylons and the robot dog were cool.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on January 27, 2009, 11:59:52 AM
When I mentioned above that the original Battlestar Galactica was Mormon-themed, by the way, I wasn't bullshitting...

http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html
http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm
http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html
http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 27, 2009, 12:19:11 PM
Quote from: Tank on January 27, 2009, 11:59:52 AM
When I mentioned above that the original Battlestar Galactica was Mormon-themed, by the way, I wasn't bullshitting...

http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html
http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm
http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html
http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html
Glen A. Larson, the original producer, is a Mormon.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on January 27, 2009, 12:49:39 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 27, 2009, 12:19:11 PM
Quote from: Tank on January 27, 2009, 11:59:52 AM
When I mentioned above that the original Battlestar Galactica was Mormon-themed, by the way, I wasn't bullshitting...

http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html
http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm
http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html
http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html
Glen A. Larson, the original producer, is a Mormon.

Thanks for the info, Chuck.

Also, did you know (http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html)...

QuoteThe creator of Battlestar Galactica is television writer and producer Glen Larson. According to the 42nd edition of Who's Who in America, Larson has an impressive array of credits as a writer, editor, or producer of a long list of television shows including McCloud, The Virginian, Six Million Dollar Man, Buck Rogers in the 25th Century, and Magnum P.I. Also according to Who's Who in America, Glen Larson is a member of the Mormon Church. This makes the appearance of Mormon theology in Battlestar Galactica as a coincidence highly unlikely.

Also (http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm)...

QuoteAccording to these articles, Glen A. Larson is member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and evidently chose Galactica (which was originally envisioned as Adam's Ark in the late 60's, around the time of Star Trek) to serve as a vehicle for expressing some Mormon beliefs.

And (http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html)...

QuoteGlen Larson (creator and producer of Galactica) is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and many parallels between his church's and the show's mythologies can be found.

Not to mention (http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html)...

QuoteNote: Glen A. Larson was a member of the Mormon Church and certainly was
more than aware that he was creating a parallel between the show and the church.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 27, 2009, 01:54:40 PM
Quote from: Tank on January 27, 2009, 12:49:39 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 27, 2009, 12:19:11 PM
Quote from: Tank on January 27, 2009, 11:59:52 AM
When I mentioned above that the original Battlestar Galactica was Mormon-themed, by the way, I wasn't bullshitting...

http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html
http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm
http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html
http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html
Glen A. Larson, the original producer, is a Mormon.

Thanks for the info, Chuck.

Also, did you know (http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.html)...

QuoteThe creator of Battlestar Galactica is television writer and producer Glen Larson. According to the 42nd edition of Who's Who in America, Larson has an impressive array of credits as a writer, editor, or producer of a long list of television shows including McCloud, The Virginian, Six Million Dollar Man, Buck Rogers in the 25th Century, and Magnum P.I. Also according to Who's Who in America, Glen Larson is a member of the Mormon Church. This makes the appearance of Mormon theology in Battlestar Galactica as a coincidence highly unlikely.

Also (http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/battlestar-mormonica.htm)...

QuoteAccording to these articles, Glen A. Larson is member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and evidently chose Galactica (which was originally envisioned as Adam's Ark in the late 60's, around the time of Star Trek) to serve as a vehicle for expressing some Mormon beliefs.

And (http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/bgmormon.html)...

QuoteGlen Larson (creator and producer of Galactica) is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and many parallels between his church's and the show's mythologies can be found.

Not to mention (http://home.comcast.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.html)...

QuoteNote: Glen A. Larson was a member of the Mormon Church and certainly was
more than aware that he was creating a parallel between the show and the church.
So, your multi-link festivus of info was more or less succinct tham my 9 word response?  OK, 8 words if you don't consider middle initials a word.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on January 31, 2009, 04:07:42 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...

Continue THIS!  ::gestures at balls::

That episode was incredible.  Watching this show on DVD was so much easier, as now I can't wait until next week.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: MikeC on February 04, 2009, 12:26:21 PM
"I'm coming for all of you!!!"

What a great final season so far, can't wait till this weeks episode.

Literally everthing is hitting the fan.

I would like to talk about the most recent episode, because there was so much stuff going on, but it looks like a few people are still catching up.



Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Eli on February 04, 2009, 03:33:51 PM
Quote from: MikeC on February 04, 2009, 12:26:21 PM
Literally everthing is hitting the fan.

I have never watched an episode of Battlestar Galactica in my entire life, but I'm almost certain that this statement is false.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on February 04, 2009, 05:21:47 PM
Quote from: Eli on February 04, 2009, 03:33:51 PM
Quote from: MikeC on February 04, 2009, 12:26:21 PM
Literally everthing is hitting the fan.

I have never watched an episode of Battlestar Galactica in my entire life, but I'm almost certain that this statement is false.


Bah.

The "literally" modifies "everything" rather than "hitting the fan."

This could mean that literally everything that could figuratively hit the fan is doing so.

If you're willing allow a bit of license for exaggeration, I'd say that this is just fine.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Eli on February 04, 2009, 05:34:41 PM
Quote from: Tank on February 04, 2009, 05:21:47 PM
Quote from: Eli on February 04, 2009, 03:33:51 PM
Quote from: MikeC on February 04, 2009, 12:26:21 PM
Literally everthing is hitting the fan.

I have never watched an episode of Battlestar Galactica in my entire life, but I'm almost certain that this statement is false.


Bah.

The "literally" modifies "everything" rather than "hitting the fan."

This could mean that literally everything that could figuratively hit the fan is doing so.

If you're willing allow a bit of license for exaggeration, I'd say that this is just fine.

Oh, look.  There's Tankho, siding with MikeC yet again. 

Some things never change.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on February 06, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.

I got chills during Roslin's speech.  This show is unbelievable.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:38:39 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 06, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.

I got chills during Roslin's speech.  This show is unbelievable.
Chills and laughs. I can't remember the last time I watched a TV show and felt my heart beating all the way through.  Then, Lampkin retrieves his shades.  Chief goes by the crappers. Tigh and the "cut your leg off" line.

Fucking.

Brilliant.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on February 07, 2009, 03:10:40 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:38:39 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 06, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.

I got chills during Roslin's speech.  This show is unbelievable.
Chills and laughs. I can't remember the last time I watched a TV show and felt my heart beating all the way through.  Then, Lampkin retrieves his shades.  Chief goes by the crappers. Tigh and the "cut your leg off" line.

Fucking.

Brilliant.

I missed Lampkin retrieving his shades.  Damnit!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: HST Redux on February 07, 2009, 12:47:56 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 07, 2009, 03:10:40 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:38:39 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 06, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.

I got chills during Roslin's speech.  This show is unbelievable.
Chills and laughs. I can't remember the last time I watched a TV show and felt my heart beating all the way through.  Then, Lampkin retrieves his shades.  Chief goes by the crappers. Tigh and the "cut your leg off" line.

Fucking.

Brilliant.

I missed Lampkin retrieving his shades.  Damnit!

Pulled them off the dead guy. Yeah, these last two episodes were pretty great.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on February 07, 2009, 04:39:03 PM
Quote from: HST Redux on February 07, 2009, 12:47:56 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 07, 2009, 03:10:40 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:38:39 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on February 06, 2009, 10:24:04 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 06, 2009, 10:06:26 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on January 30, 2009, 11:22:58 PM
Holy shit...
Agained.

I got chills during Roslin's speech.  This show is unbelievable.
Chills and laughs. I can't remember the last time I watched a TV show and felt my heart beating all the way through.  Then, Lampkin retrieves his shades.  Chief goes by the crappers. Tigh and the "cut your leg off" line.

Fucking.

Brilliant.

I missed Lampkin retrieving his shades.  Damnit!

Pulled them off the dead guy. Yeah, these last two episodes were pretty great.

I just watched the episode.  I think my computer was getting the wrong video stream from the website because all it showed was a great big pair of steakballs. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on February 14, 2009, 12:19:11 AM
I guess that Dirk Benedict can back off now knowing that Starbuck was a guy before she was a girl.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on February 18, 2009, 07:32:26 AM
Have they said who the last cylon is? 
Do you guys want to know if they haven't?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky on February 18, 2009, 09:09:59 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on February 18, 2009, 07:32:26 AM
Have they said who the last cylon is? 
Do you guys want to know if they haven't?

I want to know. Please tell me.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on February 18, 2009, 11:22:09 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on February 18, 2009, 07:32:26 AM
Have they said who the last cylon is? 
Do you guys want to know if they haven't?

They have.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on February 18, 2009, 03:16:46 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on February 18, 2009, 11:22:09 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on February 18, 2009, 07:32:26 AM
Have they said who the last cylon is? 
Do you guys want to know if they haven't?

They have.

Well since I'm only halfway thru Season 3, I gotta say that it's pretty crazy that it's her.  Xena just saw all their faces at the Eye Of Jupiter.  I think I know who the other two are, though. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.

When they come out with the whole-series-in-one-box set in HD, that's when I go buy a blu-ray.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.

When they come out with the whole-series-in-one-box set in HD, that's when I go buy a blu-ray.

I was thinking the same thing.  I'm going to wait to get the DVDs until they're all out, and I'd be a fool not to get them on Blu-Ray, right?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 11:14:09 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.

When they come out with the whole-series-in-one-box set in HD, that's when I go buy a blu-ray.

I was thinking the same thing.  I'm going to wait to get the DVDs until they're all out, and I'd be a fool not to get them on Blu-Ray, right?
Seems kind of silly to buy ANY DVD that isn't blu-ray anymore.  SD DVD is the equivalent of vinyl circa 1992.  Get Netflix to rent the SD of what you want to see only once, but buy what you want to keep on Blu-Ray.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 12:19:48 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 11:14:09 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.

When they come out with the whole-series-in-one-box set in HD, that's when I go buy a blu-ray.

I was thinking the same thing.  I'm going to wait to get the DVDs until they're all out, and I'd be a fool not to get them on Blu-Ray, right?
Seems kind of silly to buy ANY DVD that isn't blu-ray anymore.  SD DVD is the equivalent of vinyl circa 1992.  Get Netflix to rent the SD of what you want to see only once, but buy what you want to keep on Blu-Ray.

True.  I think the only DVDs I've bought in the past year are the Futurama movies.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 16, 2009, 12:40:46 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 11:14:09 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 16, 2009, 10:14:14 AM
I'm going to miss this show.
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.

When they come out with the whole-series-in-one-box set in HD, that's when I go buy a blu-ray.

I was thinking the same thing.  I'm going to wait to get the DVDs until they're all out, and I'd be a fool not to get them on Blu-Ray, right?
Seems kind of silly to buy ANY DVD that isn't blu-ray anymore.  SD DVD is the equivalent of vinyl circa 1992.  Get Netflix to rent the SD of what you want to see only once, but buy what you want to keep on Blu-Ray.

Or just Netflix BluRay movies and rip them.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.
Rekha Sharma does a hilarious take on her father.  She's good looking, too.
(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/images/2008/07/02/rekhaheadshot.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.
Rekha Sharma does a hilarious take on her father.  She's good looking, too.
(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/images/2008/07/02/rekhaheadshot.jpg)

Yeah, she's hot as hell.  Lucky Gaius.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 10:11:04 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 09:03:13 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 16, 2009, 10:21:50 AM
Retrospective / behind the scenes show tonight.
Rekha Sharma does a hilarious take on her father.  She's good looking, too.
(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/images/2008/07/02/rekhaheadshot.jpg)

Much better looking in that special than that picture implies (or on the show, for that matter).

Does it make it not racist if she mocks the Indian accent.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 10:27:03 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 10:11:04 AM
Much better looking in that special than that picture implies (or on the show, for that matter).
So, where do we rank Grace Park, Tricia Helfer, Rekha Sharma, Lucy Lawless, Katee Sackhoff, and Kandyse McClure?  Separate bracket for Kate Vernon, Michelle Forbes and Mary McDonnell?

It's pretty obvious that Six is one.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 11:03:10 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 10:27:03 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 10:11:04 AM
Much better looking in that special than that picture implies (or on the show, for that matter).
So, where do we rank Grace Park, Tricia Helfer, Rekha Sharma, Lucy Lawless, Katee Sackhoff, and Kandyse McClure?  Separate bracket for Kate Vernon, Michelle Forbes and Mary McDonnell?

It's pretty obvious that Six is one.

I don't know.  I might put Tricia and Kandyse as #1 and #1a.  Kandyse is smoking hot.  Also, Lucy Lawless is old, and you are forgetting the DSL 2000, Stephanie Jacobsen.  Not to mention the great-looking Racetrack, Leah Cairns.

I'm going to go:

1.  Tricia  (http://www.popoholic.com/bigimages/tricia-helfer-fhm2-01.jpg)
1a.  Kandyse  (http://cdn.chickipedia.com/www/images/f/fb/002_studioshot_std_150.jpg)
2.  Katee  (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/2451153556_db5b54b675_b.jpg)
3.  Leah (http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff114/luckybear101_krm/88%20Minutes/LeahCairns1.jpg?t=1237305737)
4.  Stephanie  (http://www.meissnermanagement.com.au/Stephanie%20Jacobsen.jpg)
5.  Rekha  (http://www.buddytv.com/articles/Image/Battlestar-Galactica/rekha(2).jpg)
6.  Grace  (http://www.digital-geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/grace-park-battlestar.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 11:53:47 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 11:03:10 AM
I don't know.  I might put Tricia and Kandyse as #1 and #1a.  Kandyse is smoking hot.  Also, Lucy Lawless is old, and you are forgetting the DSL 2000, Stephanie Jacobsen.  Not to mention the great-looking Racetrack, Leah Cairns.
Kandyse is better looking off the show than on.  Never had a great opportunity to show her off given her role.  Racetrack is also always helmeted.

Hell, you could also do a whole side thing on just Baltar's harem.

Best.  Looking.  Cast.  EVER!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 12:04:50 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 11:53:47 AM
Racetrack is also always helmeted.

As long as they don't invent a helmet for her ass.  Hey-o!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 01:10:32 PM
I think the real question is Grace Park or Ming Na....

Anyway, I'm too lazy to look up all their real names....

Six
Boomer
Athena

Racetrack
Starbuck
Callie
Ellen
Hardball
Tory
D'Anna
Roslin


Obviously, I think they're twins.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 01:13:31 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 01:10:32 PM
I think the real question is Grace Park or Ming Na....

Anyway, I'm too lazy to look up all their real names....

Six
Boomer
Athena

Racetrack
Starbuck
Callie
Ellen
Hardball
Tory
D'Anna
Roslin


Obviously, I think they're twins.


I'm pretty sure Hardball is a dude.

(http://shop.sfbevents.com/images/autographs/halley%20jen%202.jpg)

A dude with two hard balls between his legs.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 01:37:13 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 01:13:31 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 01:10:32 PM
I think the real question is Grace Park or Ming Na....

Anyway, I'm too lazy to look up all their real names....

Six
Boomer
Athena

Racetrack
Starbuck
Callie
Ellen
Hardball
Tory
D'Anna
Roslin


Obviously, I think they're twins.


I'm pretty sure Hardball is a dude.

(http://shop.sfbevents.com/images/autographs/halley%20jen%202.jpg)

A dude with two hard balls between his legs.

Me too.  But that speaks more to the others than Hardball.  Not a fan.  I was going to go with Apollo, but thought it was too obvious.  I used to like what used to be Mary McDonnel.  Whatever is wearing her skin now is just creepy.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 17, 2009, 01:43:32 PM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 17, 2009, 01:37:13 PM
Me too.  But that speaks more to the others than Hardball.  Not a fan.  I was going to go with Apollo, but thought it was too obvious.  I used to like what used to be Mary McDonnel.  Whatever is wearing her skin now is just creepy.

Agreed.  Her bald head gives ME cancer.  Cancer of the eyes.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 20, 2009, 11:44:14 AM
WARNING: Tonight's episode will run over by 11 minutes or so.  Double park your TIVO.

Link to a series retrospective.  Spoiler free on tonight's episode.
http://sepinwall.blogspot.com/2009/03/battlestar-galactica-my-favorite.html
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 20, 2009, 02:30:39 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 20, 2009, 11:44:14 AM
WARNING: Tonight's episode will run over by 11 minutes or so.  Double park your TIVO.

Link to a series retrospective.  Spoiler free on tonight's episode.
http://sepinwall.blogspot.com/2009/03/battlestar-galactica-my-favorite.html

Thanks for the tip, Chuck.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Wheezer on March 20, 2009, 06:56:36 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 17, 2009, 11:53:47 AM
Best.  Looking.  Cast.  EVER!

That Stephanie Jacobsen never fails to remind me of tortellini.  I'm fervently hoping she's killed off on T:SCC tonight.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 25, 2009, 10:39:56 AM
Pretty good wrap up (although the DVR cut off the last 5 minutes).  I loved the Boomer flashback.  I wish the Baltar/6 visions were explained more (angels?) and the Starbuck thing really just seemed like they couldn't think of a way to tie off her arc, so they just made her go away.  Apollo should've at least looked around like "WTF?"  Loved the look on Tyrol's face when he saw the truth.

Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 25, 2009, 10:42:49 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 25, 2009, 10:39:56 AM
Pretty good wrap up (although the DVR cut off the last 5 minutes).  I loved the Boomer flashback.  I wish the Baltar/6 visions were explained more (angels?) and the Starbuck thing really just seemed like they couldn't think of a way to tie off her arc, so they just made her go away.  Apollo should've at least looked around like "WTF?"  Loved the look on Tyrol's face when he saw the truth.



I liked it, too.  I thought it was pretty awesome that Tyrol single-handedly kept the Cylon War going.  Like that guy on the Star Destroyer that said, "Hold your fire.  There are no life forms aboard."  I thought it was a tad unnecessarily preachy at the very end, but I don't know how else they could have ended it.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 25, 2009, 10:55:43 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 25, 2009, 10:42:49 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 25, 2009, 10:39:56 AM
Pretty good wrap up (although the DVR cut off the last 5 minutes).  I loved the Boomer flashback.  I wish the Baltar/6 visions were explained more (angels?) and the Starbuck thing really just seemed like they couldn't think of a way to tie off her arc, so they just made her go away.  Apollo should've at least looked around like "WTF?"  Loved the look on Tyrol's face when he saw the truth.

I liked it, too.  I thought it was pretty awesome that Tyrol single-handedly kept the Cylon War going.  Like that guy on the Star Destroyer that said, "Hold your fire.  There are no life forms aboard."  I thought it was a tad unnecessarily preachy at the very end, but I don't know how else they could have ended it.
Not a big fan of the "Angels" ending.  And couldn't they have landed somewhere, like on Ionia where their religion could have become the Greek gods and also the place where modern science really began?  150,000 years?  Also, something just wrong about all of the main characters going off on their own.  What happens to Lee?  Does he ever see his dad's cabin?

Those nits aside, the bulk of the episode was terrific.  How great was that to see BSG original centurions shooting it out with modern ones.  How great was the Opera House vision leading to CIC?  How great was Chief, a cylon, simply snapping Tory's neck, another cylon, because Tory had airlocked Callie?

And how great was Mary McDonnell and Edward Olmos' last scene together in the raptor?

I think the final few eps were a let down since Zarek and Gaeta were executed.  But this show was so good, even the not so good stuff was miles better than the best of anything else.

Bring on the Blu-Ray boxed set.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on March 25, 2009, 11:07:03 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 25, 2009, 10:55:43 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on March 25, 2009, 10:42:49 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 25, 2009, 10:39:56 AM
Pretty good wrap up (although the DVR cut off the last 5 minutes).  I loved the Boomer flashback.  I wish the Baltar/6 visions were explained more (angels?) and the Starbuck thing really just seemed like they couldn't think of a way to tie off her arc, so they just made her go away.  Apollo should've at least looked around like "WTF?"  Loved the look on Tyrol's face when he saw the truth.

I liked it, too.  I thought it was pretty awesome that Tyrol single-handedly kept the Cylon War going.  Like that guy on the Star Destroyer that said, "Hold your fire.  There are no life forms aboard."  I thought it was a tad unnecessarily preachy at the very end, but I don't know how else they could have ended it.
Not a big fan of the "Angels" ending.  And couldn't they have landed somewhere, like on Ionia where their religion could have become the Greek gods and also the place where modern science really began?  150,000 years?  Also, something just wrong about all of the main characters going off on their own.  What happens to Lee?  Does he ever see his dad's cabin?

Those nits aside, the bulk of the episode was terrific.  How great was that to see BSG original centurions shooting it out with modern ones.  How great was the Opera House vision leading to CIC?  How great was Chief, a cylon, simply snapping Tory's neck, another cylon, because Tory had airlocked Callie?

And how great was Mary McDonnell and Edward Olmos' last scene together in the raptor?

I think the final few eps were a let down since Zarek and Gaeta were executed.  But this show was so good, even the not so good stuff was miles better than the best of anything else.

Bring on the Blu-Ray boxed set.

You are violating Rule 10.17(c) in every way possible.  I agree with pretty much all of that.  What a fantastic show.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 25, 2009, 09:09:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 25, 2009, 10:55:43 AM
Bring on the Blu-Ray boxed set.
July 28th
http://galacticasitrep.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-about-bsg-blu-ray-dvd-set.html
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 26, 2009, 09:20:03 AM
And if Starbuck knew her mission was over and she was going bye-bye, why was she so sad to see Adama go?  I mean, regardless of what he did, she was going to go poof anyway. 
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 26, 2009, 09:43:02 AM
Quote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on March 26, 2009, 09:20:03 AM
And if Starbuck knew her mission was over and she was going bye-bye, why was she so sad to see Adama go?  I mean, regardless of what he did, she was going to go poof anyway. 
The Starbuck resolution was the weakest link. How did she get from the maelstrom to Earth 1?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Tank on April 01, 2009, 04:35:03 PM
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/obama_depressed_distant_since
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on April 01, 2009, 04:53:29 PM
Quote from: Tank on April 01, 2009, 04:35:03 PM
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/obama_depressed_distant_since

QuoteSources said he emerged exhilarated and told several aides that the show's writers "wrapped things up the best they could, though the very end was a little much."

I'm as smart as the President (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=634.msg172601#msg172601)!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on April 02, 2009, 08:15:00 AM
I just finished Season 4, when they finally get to Earth and it looks like shit.  Now I get to wait however long for Season 5 to come out on DVD.  Great.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 02, 2009, 10:17:12 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on April 02, 2009, 08:15:00 AM
I just finished Season 4, when they finally get to Earth and it looks like shit.  Now I get to wait however long for Season 5 to come out on DVD.  Great.

Hulu
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on April 02, 2009, 08:15:00 AM
I just finished Season 4, when they finally get to Earth and it looks like shit.  Now I get to wait however long for Season 5 to come out on DVD.  Great.

This show is SO March, 2009.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.

I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 03, 2009, 08:45:20 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM


I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.


How are you on Brian Campbell?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:08:56 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.

I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.
Then he'll be exactly what you expect.  Not sure if this show will be able to maintain. The pilot was good, but slow.  There's a hint of the old BG style of writing from a cop talking about monotheism and Bear McCreary's music is very good and hints at several old BG themes.  Fork will enjoy the DVD version with multiple gratuitous nubile hogan shots that one expects would be pixelated out when broadcast.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on May 11, 2009, 09:55:04 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:08:56 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.

I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.
Then he'll be exactly what you expect.  Not sure if this show will be able to maintain. The pilot was good, but slow.  There's a hint of the old BG style of writing from a cop talking about monotheism and Bear McCreary's music is very good and hints at several old BG themes.  Fork will enjoy the DVD version with multiple gratuitous nubile hogan shots that one expects would be pixelated out when broadcast.

I was wondering if anyone had watched it.  It's next on my Netflix queue, but it's going to sit there for as long as I keep falling asleep during the last 20 minutes of this one Deadwood episode.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:56:34 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on May 11, 2009, 09:55:04 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:08:56 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.

I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.
Then he'll be exactly what you expect.  Not sure if this show will be able to maintain. The pilot was good, but slow.  There's a hint of the old BG style of writing from a cop talking about monotheism and Bear McCreary's music is very good and hints at several old BG themes.  Fork will enjoy the DVD version with multiple gratuitous nubile hogan shots that one expects would be pixelated out when broadcast.

I was wondering if anyone had watched it.  It's next on my Netflix queue, but it's going to sit there for as long as I keep falling asleep during the last 20 minutes of this one Deadwood episode.
As Netflix only has probably one copy of it, you won't get it until I return it.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on May 11, 2009, 09:59:15 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:56:34 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on May 11, 2009, 09:55:04 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 11, 2009, 09:08:56 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 04:19:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 02, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 02, 2009, 11:27:08 AM
This show is SO March, 2009.
Caprica starts in less than 3 weeks.

I'm not excited about that show at all.  I have an irrational hatred for Eric Stoltz.  He creeps me out.
Then he'll be exactly what you expect.  Not sure if this show will be able to maintain. The pilot was good, but slow.  There's a hint of the old BG style of writing from a cop talking about monotheism and Bear McCreary's music is very good and hints at several old BG themes.  Fork will enjoy the DVD version with multiple gratuitous nubile hogan shots that one expects would be pixelated out when broadcast.

I was wondering if anyone had watched it.  It's next on my Netflix queue, but it's going to sit there for as long as I keep falling asleep during the last 20 minutes of this one Deadwood episode.
As Netflix only has probably one copy of it, you won't get it until I return it.

Or you could just send it to me.  I promise I'll return it when I'm done.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on May 20, 2009, 02:30:19 PM
I kept falling asleep for the last 15 minutes or so, but I got through most of Caprica last night.  At least enough to say that the acting is as horrible as I thought it would be.  I have no idea how Stoltz has maintained any semblance of a career.  The guy is terrible.  So was Trixie, Swearengen's whore.  So was Zoe.  Pretty much everyone sucked except for Esai Morales, who played Adama.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 20, 2009, 02:51:57 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on May 20, 2009, 02:30:19 PM
I kept falling asleep for the last 15 minutes or so, but I got through most of Caprica last night.  At least enough to say that the acting is as horrible as I thought it would be.  I have no idea how Stoltz has maintained any semblance of a career.  The guy is terrible.  So was Trixie, Swearengen's whore.  So was Zoe.  Pretty much everyone sucked except for Esai Morales, who played Adama.
I'll bet you got my copy.  I sent it back on Monday.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 07:53:11 AM
So Jimmy Hendrix is God, but he hates to be called God?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 03, 2009, 08:15:08 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 07:53:11 AM
So Jimmy Hendrix is God, but he hates to be called God?

No, Clapton is God.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky on September 03, 2009, 08:38:41 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 07:53:11 AM
So Jimmy Hendrix is God, but he hates to be called God?

Huh?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 03, 2009, 08:47:39 AM
Quote from: Slak on September 03, 2009, 08:38:41 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 07:53:11 AM
So Jimmy Hendrix is God, but he hates to be called God?

Huh?

Jimmy Hendricks is Gord.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 08:48:18 AM
Quote from: Slak on September 03, 2009, 08:38:41 AM
Quote from: TDubbs on September 03, 2009, 07:53:11 AM
So Jimmy Hendrix is God, but he hates to be called God?

Huh?

Sorry.  It was early and I am hung over. 
Jimi. 
And I guess it'd be Bobby Dylan, anyway.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on October 22, 2009, 09:18:52 AM
The Plan comes out on an unrated DVD and Blu-Ray (I finally get to see this stuff in HD) next week.  Could that mean full frontal Tricia Helfer and Grace Park?

Regardless, should be good to see these characters again.  Not sure what to think of Olmos directing.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:31:33 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.

God fucking dammit, Weebs.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Weebs on December 04, 2009, 09:45:06 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:31:33 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.

God fucking dammit, Weebs.

I was just saying it wasn't perfect, but no show is.  In hindsight, I realize I should have omitted that sentence from the post.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Richard Chuggar on December 04, 2009, 09:54:45 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 04, 2009, 09:45:06 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:31:33 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.

God fucking dammit, Weebs.

I was just saying it wasn't perfect, but no show is.  In hindsight, I realize I should have omitted that sentence from the post.

The truth'd
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:55:39 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 04, 2009, 09:45:06 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:31:33 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.

God fucking dammit, Weebs.

I was just saying it wasn't perfect, but no show is.  In hindsight, I realize I should have omitted that sentence from the post.

The biggest flaw is that THEY'RE IN FUCKING SPACE, AND THEY CREATED ROBOTS SMART ENOUGH TO CREATE ROBOTS SIMILAR ENOUGH TO HUMANS TO MAKE HUMAN-ROBOT BABIES.  Other than that, though, there were some parts where the lighting was totally unrealistic.

I don't know whose acting you're calling "B-rate," but I'm just going to attribute that comment to you sucking.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky on December 04, 2009, 10:43:42 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:55:39 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 04, 2009, 09:45:06 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on December 04, 2009, 09:31:33 AM
Quote from: Weebs on December 03, 2009, 10:34:03 PM
I watched this entire series in just over a week.  Sad as that may be, this show was pretty incredible.  I think it has a very large number of flaws that were sometimes hard to get past (the B-rate acting, Baltar's rapid-fire character changes, making Tori one of the Final Five when she had been on the show for about 5 minutes, etc.), but it was still one of the greatest shows on TV.  Something about it just feels important.

Also, Tricia Helfer is hot as shit.

God fucking dammit, Weebs.

I was just saying it wasn't perfect, but no show is.  In hindsight, I realize I should have omitted that sentence from the post.

The biggest flaw is that THEY'RE IN FUCKING SPACE, AND THEY CREATED ROBOTS SMART ENOUGH TO CREATE ROBOTS SIMILAR ENOUGH TO HUMANS TO MAKE HUMAN-ROBOT BABIES.  Other than that, though, there were some parts where the lighting was totally unrealistic.

I don't know whose acting you're calling "B-rate," but I'm just going to attribute that comment to you sucking.

That's so unrealistic. Who thought this show was a good idea?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit IV on February 12, 2010, 02:51:59 PM
Is anyone watching Caprica?  Can I delete these episodes from my DVR, or are they worth watching?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on February 12, 2010, 03:02:15 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on February 12, 2010, 02:51:59 PM
Is anyone watching Caprica?  Can I delete these episodes from my DVR, or are they worth watching?

I haven't watched it.  But Sepinwall seems to like it.  He's a pretty good gauge in my book.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Canadouche on February 12, 2010, 03:02:26 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on February 12, 2010, 02:51:59 PM
Is anyone watching Caprica?  Can I delete these episodes from my DVR, or are they worth watching?

Dunno about the rest of the episodes yet, but the pilot episode had bewbs.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: powen01 on February 12, 2010, 04:58:09 PM
Quote from: Canadouche on February 12, 2010, 03:02:26 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on February 12, 2010, 02:51:59 PM
Is anyone watching Caprica?  Can I delete these episodes from my DVR, or are they worth watching?

Dunno about the rest of the episodes yet, but the pilot episode had bewbs.

I've liked it so far.  Hoping the pace picks up a bit though...
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Slaky on March 02, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
So anyone watching Caprica? It sounds good. Of course I haven't seen BSG yet - do I need to if I wanted to watch Caprica or is there no continuity there?

Also, Polly Walker should be naked often.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 02, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 02, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
So anyone watching Caprica? It sounds good. Of course I haven't seen BSG yet - do I need to if I wanted to watch Caprica or is there no continuity there?

Also, Polly Walker should be naked often.

It's OK. No BSG background needed, but it doesn't hurt.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit IV on March 03, 2010, 12:28:40 PM
Quote from: Slack-E on March 02, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
So anyone watching Caprica? It sounds good. Of course I haven't seen BSG yet - do I need to if I wanted to watch Caprica or is there no continuity there?

Also, Polly Walker should be naked often.

Eh.  I'm sticking with it still, just because I want to see how the Cylons turned evil, but I honestly don't think it's very good.  Eric Stoltz and Trixie are absolutely terrible at acting.  So terrible that they're actually distracting.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit IV on March 16, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
Caprica is borderline terrible, and I think it's mainly due to casting.  What a colossal disappointment.  The only interesting character is Adama's gay brother, and he's disappeared from the show in the last few episodes.  I hope the entire Graystone family gets Cylon cancer.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: PenFoe on March 16, 2010, 03:01:41 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on March 16, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
Caprica is borderline terrible, and I think it's mainly due to casting.  What a colossal disappointment.  The only interesting character is Adama's gay brother, and he's disappeared from the show in the last few episodes.  I hope the entire Graystone family gets Cylon cancer.

There goes BK again...always with the cancer.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on October 28, 2010, 01:32:41 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on March 16, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
Caprica is borderline terrible, and I think it's mainly due to casting.  What a colossal disappointment.  The only interesting character is Adama's gay brother, and he's disappeared from the show in the last few episodes.  I hope the entire Graystone family gets Cylon cancer.

Now it's dead (http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-alan-watching/posts/the-caprica-cancellation-what-went-wrong).  Happy?

I am.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica series
Post by: Kermit IV on October 29, 2010, 02:01:35 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 28, 2010, 01:32:41 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on March 16, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
Caprica is borderline terrible, and I think it's mainly due to casting.  What a colossal disappointment.  The only interesting character is Adama's gay brother, and he's disappeared from the show in the last few episodes.  I hope the entire Graystone family gets Cylon cancer.

Now it's dead (http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-alan-watching/posts/the-caprica-cancellation-what-went-wrong).  Happy?

I am.

Me too.  That show was terrible.