Fuck New England in their ass.
I was going to go with Massholes at Meatheads. PAGING PEX
The Lions lead the Packers 7-3 with 7:55 left.
Lions win 7-3. If there was any way this game could become even more enjoyable, now the Bears have a chance to get 2 and a half games up on the Packers.
I hate to go full meathead here, but that looks awesome.
Quote from: CT III on December 12, 2010, 03:14:31 PM
I hate to go full meathead here, but that looks awesome.
THIS
The BEAR WEATHER can't stop Brady to Welker.
A little odd to not be discouraged down 7-0, but I think the Bears can win this game if they can get a couple plays out of the passing game.
Forget that. Good grief the Patriots offense is running on all cylinders right now.
That fucker was down. Fucking fuck. Fuck the fucking fuck fuck.
See Orton would've game managed that situation by throwing a terrible incompletion instead of actually completing a pass to Knox there.
This is supposed to be Bear weather.
Really hard to be pissed off when the other team is giving an A+++++ performance.
Who wants to play some Call of Duty with me
What was the safety doing on that play? Oh well, this was over a long time ago.
So that's what a Super Bowl team and an elite quarterback looks like? Good to know.
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
This really is the 2005 season isn't it? The fourth loss is a nightmare curbstomping in the snow to an AFC powerhouse in which everything falls apart. 11-5 and the two seed? It's looking like it.
Today, the Bears got pwned in all four phases. I do not apologize for my part in the collapse of the 4th Phase. I won't watch a team that doesn't stop the run. I won't. Fuck you. Not in the snow especially. I left at halftime and recovered at Giordano's over some coffee and Bailey's and a deep dish. I'll live to fight another day as will our Beloved Bears. Bring on Jake Delhomme and/or the Panthers.
Well, that answered a few questions. Not least of which : are the Bears really any good?
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 04:36:38 PM
What was the safety doing on that play? Oh well, this was over a long time ago.
They weren't playing 11-on-11, I'll tell you that.
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 12, 2010, 09:43:00 PM
This really is the 2005 season isn't it? The fourth loss is a nightmare curbstomping in the snow to an AFC powerhouse in which everything falls apart. 11-5 and the two seed? It's looking like it.
Today, the Bears got pwned in all four phases. I do not apologize for my part in the collapse of the 4th Phase. I won't watch a team that doesn't stop the run. I won't. Fuck you. Not in the snow especially. I left at halftime and recovered at Giordano's over some coffee and Bailey's and a deep dish. I'll live to fight another day as will our Beloved Bears. Bring on Jake Delhomme and/or the Panthers.
Missed this first time round. Ghey.
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
If only Bud Selig could get Miller Park retrofitted for football...
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
So you think that Green Bay will win in New England or the Bears will lose to Minnesota? Fuck, you are some kind of queer Wisconsin Favre dong chuggar aren't you? I will agree with you that a first round bye may be in play for the Bears in Week 17 and Green Bay will be trying to lock up a Wild Card. So it won't be moot. But Jesus H. Koresh, Huard.
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
I see what you did there. I'm pretty sure that there is no need to make Carlos (oh that's right..lits all Carlos's now.. Carlos Z) the back-up QB. If the dome isn't ready by next week, they can set up the U of Minnesota outdoor field, as they will have time to get it shoveled out, set up the beer stands and put some cameras in there. Still an advantage to have the bears play outside against a dome team, I would think.
Hey did anyone mention that Brian Hoyer did indeed make an appearance?
Quote from: thehawk on December 13, 2010, 09:35:52 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
I see what you did there. I'm pretty sure that there is no need to make Carlos (oh that's right..lits all Carlos's now.. Carlos Z) the back-up QB. If the dome isn't ready by next week, they can set up the U of Minnesota outdoor field, as they will have time to get it shoveled out, set up the beer stands and put some cameras in there. Still an advantage to have the bears play outside against a dome team, I would think.
BEAR WHETHER!!!!
Quote from: thehawk on December 13, 2010, 09:35:52 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
I see what you did there. I'm pretty sure that there is no need to make Carlos (oh that's right..lits all Carlos's now.. Carlos Z) the back-up QB. If the dome isn't ready by next week, they can set up the U of Minnesota outdoor field, as they will have time to get it shoveled out, set up the beer stands and put some cameras in there. Still an advantage to have the bears play outside against a dome team, I would think.
The Bears-Vikings game has as much chance being played in a TCF Bank at your local Jewel as it does being played in TCF Stadium. Zygi Wilf has just lost millions in gate receipts with the Ford Field home game (they're giving tickets away). Will he surrender another 14,000 ticket payers (Metrodome holds 64K to TCF's 50) just so he can play in Minnesota?
Look for the game to be played in Ford Field, the Superdome, Edward R. Jones Stadium, Lucas Oil Stadium, Nile Kinnick Stadium or Camp Randall Stadium. After the Vikings lose today, cash money will be all for Zygi Wilf to salvage.
EDIT: Don't forget Soldier Field as another obvious alternative.
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 13, 2010, 09:32:17 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
So you think that Green Bay will win in New England or the Bears will lose to Minnesota? Fuck, you are some kind of queer Wisconsin Favre dong chuggar aren't you? I will agree with you that a first round bye may be in play for the Bears in Week 17 and Green Bay will be trying to lock up a Wild Card. So it won't be moot. But Jesus H. Koresh, Huard.
I said that thinking Green Bay would be at home, but I since have noticed that they'll be in New England. I still call it a tossup, though. New England can lose to the Packers and, so long as they beat Boofalo and Miami, they've got homefield in the AFC. That game will be much bigger for Green Bay than it was for the Bears and not as big for New England as the Bears game was--particularly in light of the Jets also losing yesterday. And where did I say I think the Bears wil lose to Minnesota? Go eat a dick, spazz.
Quote from: thehawk on December 13, 2010, 09:35:52 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
I see what you did there.
Pun not intended, actually.
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:52:17 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 13, 2010, 09:32:17 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
So you think that Green Bay will win in New England or the Bears will lose to Minnesota? Fuck, you are some kind of queer Wisconsin Favre dong chuggar aren't you? I will agree with you that a first round bye may be in play for the Bears in Week 17 and Green Bay will be trying to lock up a Wild Card. So it won't be moot. But Jesus H. Koresh, Huard.
I said that thinking Green Bay would be at home, but I since have noticed that they'll be in New England. I still call it a tossup, though. New England can lose to the Packers and, so long as they beat Boofalo and Miami, they've got homefield in the AFC. That game will be much bigger for Green Bay than it was for the Bears and not as big for New England as the Bears game was--particularly in light of the Jets also losing yesterday. And where did I say I think the Bears wil lose to Minnesota? Go eat a dick, spazz.
I think the Bears have a better chance of losing at Minnesnowta than Green Bay has of winning at New England and so does everybody else. But neither one is going to happen because... fuck you!
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:52:17 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 13, 2010, 09:32:17 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 13, 2010, 09:23:31 AM
Quote from: BC on December 12, 2010, 06:56:13 PM
If I'm reading the tiebreakers right, if Green Bay loses to New England next week and the Bears beat Minnesota, then the Bears would clinch the division. The Bears would hold the divisional record tie-breaker over GB in that scenario even if both teams ended up 10-6.
So, there's that.
Wow. BC actually provided good information.
We stayed until 6:56 left in the game, after Cutler got picked off again in the endzone. We were assuming that the Minnesota game is huge and could possibly render the Green Bay game moot. Sadly, I think it's still going to come down to that Green Bay game and this New England ass-whupping won't be the game we'll be cursing then but the Deadskins game instead.
Also, what could work to the Bears' advantage is if the Humpdome still ain't ready by next week. A deflated team being forced to play a "home" game that is closer to Chicago than their home stadium...hmmm where have we seen that before?
So you think that Green Bay will win in New England or the Bears will lose to Minnesota? Fuck, you are some kind of queer Wisconsin Favre dong chuggar aren't you? I will agree with you that a first round bye may be in play for the Bears in Week 17 and Green Bay will be trying to lock up a Wild Card. So it won't be moot. But Jesus H. Koresh, Huard.
I said that thinking Green Bay would be at home, but I since have noticed that they'll be in New England. I still call it a tossup, though. New England can lose to the Packers and, so long as they beat Boofalo and Miami, they've got homefield in the AFC. That game will be much bigger for Green Bay than it was for the Bears and not as big for New England as the Bears game was--particularly in light of the Jets also losing yesterday. And where did I say I think the Bears wil lose to Minnesota? Go eat a dick, spazz.
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 13, 2010, 09:32:17 AMSo you think that Green Bay will win in New England or the Bears will lose to Minnesota?
As BC noted, at least one of those two things would have to happen for the season to "come down to" the Green Bay game in January.
Nixon say relax. (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=6928.msg232604#msg232604)
New scenario: Packers lose to the Pats in Foxborough and beat the Giants at home, the Bears lose to the Vikings at the Target Center and beat the Jets in Chicago, taking us to Jan 2 with the Bears at 10-5 and the Packers at 9-6.
A Bears win gives them a straight-up division win at 11-5.
If the Packers win, the Bears and Packers would be tied for the division lead at 10-6 overall, tied vs. the NFC North at 4-2 and tied vs. common opponents at 8-4. The Packers, however, would have the edge against Conference opponents, 8-4 vs. 7-5.
Quote from: Slaky on December 13, 2010, 09:37:56 AM
Hey did anyone mention that Brian Hoyer did indeed make an appearance?
I noticed. It was not when I was hoping him to come in. I was slightly kinda sorta hoping the bears would concuss Justin Bieber yesterday.