Desipio Message Board

General Category => Boobtube => Topic started by: Quality Start Machine on April 28, 2011, 12:26:20 PM

Title: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 28, 2011, 12:26:20 PM

You fucking homo.*

*Doesn't apply to Tonk.#


#Yeah, it does.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Tonker on April 28, 2011, 01:41:42 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 28, 2011, 12:26:20 PM

You fucking homo.*

*Doesn't apply to Tonk.#


#Yeah, it does.

Yeah, it would, if I was paying attention, but I'm not.  I'm not anti-Monarchy, I just don't care.  When they held Diana's funeral, I went and washed the car - there was no queue at the car wash, fucking brillliant.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Slaky on April 28, 2011, 01:49:06 PM
Quote from: Tonker on April 28, 2011, 01:41:42 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 28, 2011, 12:26:20 PM

You fucking homo.*

*Doesn't apply to Tonk.#


#Yeah, it does.

Yeah, it would, if I was paying attention, but I'm not.  I'm not anti-Monarchy, I just don't care.  When they held Diana's funeral, I went and washed the car - there was no queue at the car wash, fucking brillliant.

That is brilliant.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: BH on April 28, 2011, 02:25:25 PM
There is nothing ghey about true love between a man and a woman. And presenting this love to God Almighty.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Internet Apex on April 28, 2011, 02:28:46 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

I hate weddings more than czars. Mike Fratello was the only czar I've ever seen and he was a decent sort. Every wedding ever sucks the life out of a Saturday that should have been spent watching bad baseball.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 02:36:38 PM
If they were to consumate the marriage on TV I would watch that.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Richard Chuggar on April 28, 2011, 02:36:49 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

Your Grandpa would probably say "Why in the holy fuck are you posting on a messageboard when you're 99 years old?"
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Gilgamesh on April 28, 2011, 02:39:34 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

Awesome.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 28, 2011, 02:55:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

"Kate Middleton? I fucked her."
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Tony on April 28, 2011, 07:52:01 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 28, 2011, 02:36:49 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

Your Grandpa would probably say "Why in the holy fuck are you posting on a messageboard when you're 99 years old?"

Forget the message board. He has a hard enough time explaining his haircut.

(http://i.imgur.com/PZG4u.jpg)
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Slaky on April 28, 2011, 08:26:56 PM
Quote from: Tony on April 28, 2011, 07:52:01 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 28, 2011, 02:36:49 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

Your Grandpa would probably say "Why in the holy fuck are you posting on a messageboard when you're 99 years old?"

Forget the message board. He has a hard enough time explaining his haircut.

(http://i.imgur.com/PZG4u.jpg)

That's actually the Paul Popovich Experience.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 05:12:32 AM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

To be fair, my Grandfather (and Father and brother) fought for King (or Queen) and country.  So, I think he'd be fine with it, God rest his soul.

Doesn't mean I'm going to do it, though.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Yeti on April 29, 2011, 09:02:38 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

Well, yea
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:41:48 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

Sorry, my summary was completely different that what you said, which was "And maybe I'll give them credit for 'Love Actually'."
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 11:11:33 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

2 Weeks Notice won an Oscar
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Internet Apex on April 29, 2011, 11:59:39 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

I remember seeing a trailer for it in a theater and wanting to throw up. TPex is such a good future wife because she understands my disdain for those types of flicks and watches them happily in private. I don't make her watch Asa Akira and she doesn't make me watch Hugh Grant. Win/win.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 29, 2011, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.

I could do every dance known to man, and it still wouldn't be as bad as your use of "weak sauce".
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: BH on April 29, 2011, 12:20:22 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.

I could do every dance known to man, and it still wouldn't be as bad as your use of "weak sauce".

It's all coming full circle. Tank was once Chad, then Thrill became Tank. Now Thrill becomes Chad.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: PenPho on April 29, 2011, 01:23:19 PM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 12:20:22 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.

I could do every dance known to man, and it still wouldn't be as bad as your use of "weak sauce".

It's all coming full circle. Tank was once Chad, then Thrill became Tank. Now Thrill becomes Chad.

My head just exploded.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Slaky on April 29, 2011, 01:29:19 PM
Quote from: PenPho on April 29, 2011, 01:23:19 PM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 12:20:22 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.

I could do every dance known to man, and it still wouldn't be as bad as your use of "weak sauce".

It's all coming full circle. Tank was once Chad, then Thrill became Tank. Now Thrill becomes Chad.

My head just exploded.

This thread has been triple-coated with suck.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Bort on April 29, 2011, 01:42:33 PM
Quote from: Slaky on April 29, 2011, 01:29:19 PM
Quote from: PenPho on April 29, 2011, 01:23:19 PM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 12:20:22 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 11:17:59 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 29, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 10:09:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 29, 2011, 09:42:13 AM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 29, 2011, 09:35:03 AM
Quote from: BH on April 29, 2011, 09:01:18 AM
This is too good to not post here, but on the facebooks, Chad actually wrote the only thing good the Brits gave America was the movie, "Love Actually".

That's actually not what I wrote.  Glad to see Brolumbus is treating you well, though.

He's right, to be fair.  What he actually wrote was, after listing the Beatles and the Spice Girls, "maybe I'll give them credit for "Love Actually"".  It's a small distinction, but obviously for Dubbs an important one.

But then, he also wrote "Nobody in American [sic] should give a shit about them".

The important part is simple - TDubbs loves himself a Hugh Grant rom-com. More so than the Rolling Stones.

Let the first among us who didn't mist up at "Music & Lyrics" cast the first stone.

Should I aim that stone at your glass house, Fork?

I'm married to a Drew Barrymore fan. What's your excuse?

My excuse for what?

For not misting up at a movie I've never even heard of before?

We're all bros here, you don't need to pretend around us.

That's the one where Grant plays the guy from the 80s pop band who has to write a song for a teen pop star...remember now?

That's some weak sauce there, soft shoe.

I could do every dance known to man, and it still wouldn't be as bad as your use of "weak sauce".

It's all coming full circle. Tank was once Chad, then Thrill became Tank. Now Thrill becomes Chad.

My head just exploded.

This thread has been triple-coated with suck.

It had nothing good to work with.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 29, 2011, 05:13:37 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/xuTTS.jpg)

Something something Mike Comrie.
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: SKO on April 29, 2011, 11:37:59 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

I think I know where this story goes. He had a hell of a time marrying off his three daughters, didn't he?
Title: Re: The Royal Wedding
Post by: Gilgamesh on April 29, 2011, 11:41:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on April 29, 2011, 11:37:59 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 28, 2011, 01:58:33 PM
Why do I not watch events such as this?  Because I picture myself as a 20 something, siitting in my grandfather's kitchen sharing a bottle of schnaps and cigars with him and telling him that I planned to spend an evening watching the wedding of persons born into privilege and who never have, nor ever will, work for or earn anything based upon their individual merit.  
My grandfather served in the Czar's army and after a 4 year stint returned to his shtetl to find that the Czar was not only tolerating but encouraging pograms, and now was sending out non coms to get grandpa back into uniform to go and fight the Japanese for him.  Grandpa got his fanny out of Russia and started a family in a country that didn't have hereditary royalty with God given rights to be supported in their lifestyles by socialists like him.   So if any of you are inclined to waste your time on that trash, just think...what would Grandpa say?

I think I know where this story goes. He had a hell of a time marrying off his three daughters, didn't he?

What does CT have to do with this story?