Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: Richard Chuggar on March 11, 2013, 03:58:55 PM

Title: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Richard Chuggar on March 11, 2013, 03:58:55 PM
This years early sleeper pick for the MVP:

Yang Yang
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on March 11, 2013, 04:14:45 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on March 11, 2013, 03:58:55 PM
This years early sleeper pick for the MVP:

Yang Yang

(http://www.defenders.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/panda-paiwei-wei-isp.jpg)?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 11, 2013, 06:06:57 PM
Quote from: Bort on March 11, 2013, 04:14:45 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on March 11, 2013, 03:58:55 PM
This years early sleeper pick for the MVP:

Yang Yang

(http://www.defenders.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/panda-paiwei-wei-isp.jpg)?

He plays for the Giants
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 13, 2013, 02:02:28 PM
APRIL FOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Yankees have asked first baseman Derrek Lee if he would come out of retirement and join the team as Mark Teixeira's replacement.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on March 14, 2013, 08:40:56 AM
Quote from: CBStew on March 13, 2013, 02:02:28 PM
APRIL FOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Yankees have asked first baseman Derrek Lee if he would come out of retirement and join the team as Mark Teixeira's replacement.

I didn't know Derek Lee had retired.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: thehawk on March 16, 2013, 05:35:01 PM
Javier Baez may not make the Chicago Cubstinks this year, but boy is he hitting them today in Arizona
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 17, 2013, 10:13:53 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 16, 2013, 05:35:01 PM
Javier Baez may not make the Chicago Cubstinks this year, but boy is he hitting them today in Arizona


My son in Japan only gets to see games that have a Japanese interest involved, so he watched the Cubs' split squad play a Japanese team.  On Skype yesterday he said that he had only two words for me,  "Javier Baez'.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: thehawk on March 17, 2013, 05:52:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 17, 2013, 10:13:53 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 16, 2013, 05:35:01 PM
Javier Baez may not make the Chicago Cubstinks this year, but boy is he hitting them today in Arizona


My son in Japan only gets to see games that have a Japanese interest involved, so he watched the Cubs' split squad play a Japanese team.  On Skype yesterday he said that he had only two words for me,  "Javier Baez'.

Probably because he hit a ball yesterday that may had ended up in your son's front yard.  That was his third home run in I believe 4ABs (and the first 3 HRs were on 3 consecutive pitches).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on March 18, 2013, 09:13:30 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 17, 2013, 05:52:02 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 17, 2013, 10:13:53 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 16, 2013, 05:35:01 PM
Javier Baez may not make the Chicago Cubstinks this year, but boy is he hitting them today in Arizona


My son in Japan only gets to see games that have a Japanese interest involved, so he watched the Cubs' split squad play a Japanese team.  On Skype yesterday he said that he had only two words for me,  "Javier Baez'.

Probably because he hit a ball yesterday that may had ended up in your son's front yard.  That was his third home run in I believe 4ABs (and the first 3 HRs were on 3 consecutive pitches).

There's a YouTube video of him using a live rattlesnake as a condom.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on March 18, 2013, 09:42:06 AM
Quote from: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*

Can you just tell us so we don't have to click?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CT III on March 18, 2013, 09:50:11 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 18, 2013, 09:42:06 AM
Quote from: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*

Can you just tell us so we don't have to click?

It's something like this...

CAN JAVIER BAEZ HIT IN THE MAJORS RIGHT NOW?!?

Then it's your classic Al stuff, Gary Scott mention, Michah Hoffpauir, Scott McClain.

Then a story about Rogers Hornsby, Billy Williams and Ron Santo.  Then some more Ron Santo.

Something something Corey Patterson.

In conclusion, the answer is "probably" but Al doesn't recommend it.  Or advocate it.  So don't yell at him, man.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on March 18, 2013, 10:09:43 AM
Quote from: CT III on March 18, 2013, 09:50:11 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 18, 2013, 09:42:06 AM
Quote from: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*

Can you just tell us so we don't have to click?

It's something like this...

CAN JAVIER BAEZ HIT IN THE MAJORS RIGHT NOW?!?

Then it's your classic Al stuff, Gary Scott mention, Michah Hoffpauir, Scott McClain.

Then a story about Rogers Hornsby, Billy Williams and Ron Santo.  Then some more Ron Santo.

Something something Corey Patterson.

In conclusion, the answer is "probably" but Al doesn't recommend it.  Or advocate it.  So don't yell at him, man.


I got distracted right away by the fact that there's some kid named Khristopher Davis with the Brewers.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on March 18, 2013, 10:15:20 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 18, 2013, 10:09:43 AM
Quote from: CT III on March 18, 2013, 09:50:11 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 18, 2013, 09:42:06 AM
Quote from: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*

Can you just tell us so we don't have to click?

It's something like this...

CAN JAVIER BAEZ HIT IN THE MAJORS RIGHT NOW?!?

Then it's your classic Al stuff, Gary Scott mention, Michah Hoffpauir, Scott McClain.

Then a story about Rogers Hornsby, Billy Williams and Ron Santo.  Then some more Ron Santo.

Something something Corey Patterson.

In conclusion, the answer is "probably" but Al doesn't recommend it.  Or advocate it.  So don't yell at him, man.


I got distracted right away by the fact that there's some kid named Khristopher Davis with the Brewers.

I got distracted by the bear trapped inside the cum drop:
(http://cdn2.sbnation.com/uploads/blog/sbnu_logo_minimal/8/small_bleedcubbieblue.com.minimal.png)

Fix'd.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Gilgamesh on March 18, 2013, 10:18:55 AM
Quote from: PANK! on March 18, 2013, 10:15:20 AM
Quote from: Yeti on March 18, 2013, 10:09:43 AM
Quote from: CT III on March 18, 2013, 09:50:11 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 18, 2013, 09:42:06 AM
Quote from: Slaky on March 18, 2013, 09:20:40 AM
http://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2013/3/17/4114166/javier-baez-cubs-prospect-major-leagues

YES AL YES HE CAN! *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*

Can you just tell us so we don't have to click?

It's something like this...

CAN JAVIER BAEZ HIT IN THE MAJORS RIGHT NOW?!?

Then it's your classic Al stuff, Gary Scott mention, Michah Hoffpauir, Scott McClain.

Then a story about Rogers Hornsby, Billy Williams and Ron Santo.  Then some more Ron Santo.

Something something Corey Patterson.

In conclusion, the answer is "probably" but Al doesn't recommend it.  Or advocate it.  So don't yell at him, man.


I got distracted right away by the fact that there's some kid named Khristopher Davis with the Brewers.

I got distracted by the bear trapped inside the seamen drop:
(http://cdn2.sbnation.com/uploads/blog/sbnu_logo_minimal/8/small_bleedcubbieblue.com.minimal.png)


You know, part of me wants to believe that you intentionally misspelled "semen," but with you, I just don't know anymore.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on March 19, 2013, 11:34:20 PM
Here's a hot rumor from MLBTR (http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/03/nl-central-links-profar-taveras-lohse-brewers-tabata.html):

QuoteFrom earlier today, the Cardinals released Ronny Cedeno and we heard the Cubs weren't interested in Carlos Marmol.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on March 20, 2013, 08:51:49 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on March 19, 2013, 11:34:20 PM
Here's a hot rumor from MLBTR (http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/03/nl-central-links-profar-taveras-lohse-brewers-tabata.html):

QuoteFrom earlier today, the Cardinals released Ronny Cedeno and we heard the Tigers weren't interested in Cubs reliever Carlos Marmol.

Correct'd on MLBTR
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on March 22, 2013, 08:58:35 AM
This (http://www.nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/51282651) is a great article about Epstink.

Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on March 22, 2013, 10:09:17 AM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2013, 08:58:35 AM
This (http://www.nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/51282651) is a great article about Epstink.

Quote"Welcome guys," Epstein remembers Samardzija saying on his first day with Sveum. "I just want you to know one thing about me. I will do whatever it takes to help this team. And I think the best way to help this team is by being a starting pitcher. I'm eliminating everything in my life that gets in the way. I'm dumping my girlfriend. I'm moving to Arizona. I just want the chance to show you that I'm a starting pitcher."
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on March 22, 2013, 11:01:56 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on March 22, 2013, 10:09:17 AM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2013, 08:58:35 AM
This (http://www.nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/51282651) is a great article about Epstink.

Quote"Welcome guys," Epstein remembers Samardzija saying on his first day with Sveum. "I just want you to know one thing about me. I will do whatever it takes to help this team. And I think the best way to help this team is by being a starting pitcher. I'm eliminating everything in my life that gets in the way. I'm dumping my girlfriend. I'm moving to Arizona. I just want the chance to show you that I'm a starting pitcher."

Posnanski now with two very nice Chicago themed pieces in the recent weeks. I'm ok with this.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: thehawk on March 25, 2013, 10:35:35 AM
Well at least the Cubs have an alum from the  hottest college in America  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Coleman_(baseball))
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on March 25, 2013, 10:46:28 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 25, 2013, 10:35:35 AM
Well at least the Cubs have an alum from the  hottest college in America  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Coleman_(baseball))

Wait--that fucking muppet's still on the roster?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on March 25, 2013, 11:20:17 AM
Quote from: PANK! on March 25, 2013, 10:46:28 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 25, 2013, 10:35:35 AM
Well at least the Cubs have an alum from the  hottest college in America  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Coleman_(baseball))

Wait--that fucking muppet's still on the roster?

Quite.  His father and his grandfather might have been Major League pitchers, but he's not, and never will be.  He'll never even be a useful trading chip.  He needs to do himself, and us, a favour - and get to fuck.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on March 25, 2013, 11:41:07 AM
Quote from: Tonker on March 25, 2013, 11:20:17 AM
Quote from: PANK! on March 25, 2013, 10:46:28 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 25, 2013, 10:35:35 AM
Well at least the Cubs have an alum from the  hottest college in America  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Coleman_(baseball))

Wait--that fucking muppet's still on the roster?

Quite.  His father and his grandfather might have been Major League pitchers, but he's not, and never will be.  He'll never even be a useful trading chip.  He needs to do himself, and us, a favour - and get to fuck.

I'm pretty sure Sullivan Tweeted that he got sent down the other day. Even if I dreamed that, I'm going to believe it's true.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 25, 2013, 11:58:02 AM
Quote from: PANK! on March 25, 2013, 10:46:28 AM
Quote from: thehawk on March 25, 2013, 10:35:35 AM
Well at least the Cubs have an alum from the  hottest college in America  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Coleman_(baseball))

Wait--that fucking muppet's still on the roster?

Of course.  The Cubs are probably planning to trade the interesting prospects for some other interesting prospects.  Something, something, meatball, meatball...something...something.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 29, 2013, 01:31:38 PM
Every day I come to this thread hoping to read that the Cubs persuaded Soriano to give up his aversion to becoming a Giant and that they traded him for half of the Giants' starting rotation.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Oleg on March 29, 2013, 02:02:35 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 29, 2013, 01:31:38 PM
Every day I come to this thread hoping to read that the Cubs persuaded Soriano to give up his aversion to becoming a Giant and that they traded him for half of the Giants' starting rotation.

In that case, next time, come to this thread after taking a hit of acid.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 04, 2013, 08:50:41 AM
Fuck, last night Lillibridge was just a few feet from becoming a fucking folk hero.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on April 04, 2013, 10:37:24 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 04, 2013, 08:50:41 AM
Fuck, last night Lillibridge Littlebitch was just a few feet from becoming a fucking folk hero.

But alas'd.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on April 04, 2013, 10:45:03 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 04, 2013, 08:50:41 AM
Fuck, last night Lillibridge was just a few feet from becoming a fucking folk hero.

When he took a pitch right down the middle to strike out looking with the bases loaded, you mean?  I'm starting to reconsider my previous opinion on this bloke.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 04, 2013, 12:50:31 PM
Quote from: Tonker on April 04, 2013, 10:45:03 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 04, 2013, 08:50:41 AM
Fuck, last night Lillibridge was just a few feet from becoming a fucking folk hero.

When he took a pitch right down the middle to strike out looking with the bases loaded, you mean?  I'm starting to reconsider my previous opinion on this bloke.

I was referring to his DESERVED HOME RUN that went foul, but that too.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 04, 2013, 12:54:41 PM
DPD.

Oh, for fuck's sake (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/04/04/wittenmyer-cubs-going-about-rebuilding-all-wrong/?utm_medium=VPH&utm_source=topvph_sports&utm_campaign=444259).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on April 04, 2013, 01:13:03 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 04, 2013, 12:54:41 PM
DPD.

Oh, for fuck's sake (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/04/04/wittenmyer-cubs-going-about-rebuilding-all-wrong/?utm_medium=VPH&utm_source=topvph_sports&utm_campaign=444259).

FACE
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on April 08, 2013, 09:39:19 AM
This team is already unwatchable garbage and yet I wish I was at Wrigley today. Of course that might be because I'm at work and would like to be anywhere else.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on April 08, 2013, 10:29:18 AM
Quote from: Slaky on April 08, 2013, 09:39:19 AM
This team is already unwatchable garbage and yet I wish I was at Wrigley today. Of course that might be because I'm at work and would like to be anywhere else.

I had to turn down a ticket this morning, and 67% of why I turned it down is done with.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on April 08, 2013, 02:14:07 PM
E-Jac with 49 pitches through two innings. A bit premature.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on April 08, 2013, 02:24:46 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on April 08, 2013, 02:14:07 PM
E-Jac with 49 pitches through two innings. A bit premature.

Only 100 pitches less than his no-hitter.

He's fine!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 09, 2013, 06:19:37 PM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

I just assumed Stew was the one who as joking.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on April 09, 2013, 11:16:23 PM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Fuck, I missed it!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: morpheus on April 10, 2013, 09:27:53 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?

Show a tiny bit of restraint?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on April 10, 2013, 09:53:52 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 10, 2013, 09:27:53 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?

Show a tiny bit of restraint?

Have a little compassion?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Richard Chuggar on April 10, 2013, 10:23:28 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 10, 2013, 09:53:52 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 10, 2013, 09:27:53 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?

Show a tiny bit of restraint?

Have a little compassion?

Stop being so short with Pen
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on April 10, 2013, 06:08:05 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 10, 2013, 10:23:28 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 10, 2013, 09:53:52 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 10, 2013, 09:27:53 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?

Show a tiny bit of restraint?

Have a little compassion?

Stop being so short with Pen

Be of at least average height?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on April 10, 2013, 06:12:10 PM
Quote from: Bort on April 10, 2013, 06:08:05 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on April 10, 2013, 10:23:28 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 10, 2013, 09:53:52 AM
Quote from: morpheus on April 10, 2013, 09:27:53 AM
Quote from: Fork on April 10, 2013, 09:24:33 AM
Quote from: Oleg on April 09, 2013, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on April 09, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 09, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 09, 2013, 03:16:52 PM
"Wrigley winds alter Cubs' fortunes" (http://m.mlb.com/chc/news/article/2013040844213612/)

Ok.
In my high school journalism class my teacher, Ben Franklin, taught us that when writing a sports article describing a home team loss one should never make up excuses.
"We would'a won but every time we batted the wind blew in and every time they batted the wind blew out"

Jesus, how old are you?

Nice work, Pen.  You went for the joke that was too obvious even for Fork and Morph.

Geez Oleg, can't you be the bigger man for once?

Show a tiny bit of restraint?

Have a little compassion?

Stop being so short with Pen

Be of at least average height?

I'd say this escalated quickly but that would be incorrect.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on April 15, 2013, 01:14:30 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


First comment on that article: "Joe Borowski just started doing pushups upon seeing this news."

Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on April 15, 2013, 06:49:47 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


That's fucking it!!!!!!!!!! I've goddamned had it up to my fucking eyeballs with the fucking Cubs!!!!!!!!!!! Kevin FUCKING Gregg???? Are you fucking serious???? Jesus fucking Christ Hoyer!!!!!!!!! What in the fucking goddamned hell are you doing? I don't give a goddamn that he's signed a minor league contract. That's a spot that could and should go to a more deserving prospect, not a motherfucking shitstain cocksucker like Kevin FUCKING Gregg!!!!!!!!. Don't you know the fucking difference between a decent relief pitcher and goddamned hack whose only purpose is to serve up fucking goddamned batting practice? If that cocksucker shows his retarded fucking goggles wearing face in Wrigley somebody better drop a goddmned a-bomb there. GOD-FUCKING-DAMMIT ALL TO FUCKING HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's one thing to admit that this team will suck dog shit for a few years while the front office tries to clean out the shit left behind by Moe Hendry. But JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!!!!!! Don't fucking repeat the same goddamned mistakes Hendry made!!!! SON-OF-A-FUCKING-BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on April 15, 2013, 07:01:34 AM
Quote from: Yeti on April 15, 2013, 06:49:47 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


That's fucking it!!!!!!!!!! I've goddamned had it up to my fucking eyeballs with the fucking Cubs!!!!!!!!!!! Kevin FUCKING Gregg???? Are you fucking serious???? Jesus fucking Christ Hoyer!!!!!!!!! What in the fucking goddamned hell are you doing? I don't give a goddamn that he's signed a minor league contract. That's a spot that could and should go to a more deserving prospect, not a motherfucking shitstain cocksucker like Kevin FUCKING Gregg!!!!!!!!. Don't you know the fucking difference between a decent relief pitcher and goddamned hack whose only purpose is to serve up fucking goddamned batting practice? If that cocksucker shows his retarded fucking goggles wearing face in Wrigley somebody better drop a goddmned a-bomb there. GOD-FUCKING-DAMMIT ALL TO FUCKING HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's one thing to admit that this team will suck dog shit for a few years while the front office tries to clean out the shit left behind by Moe Hendry. But JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!!!!!! Don't fucking repeat the same goddamned mistakes Hendry made!!!! SON-OF-A-FUCKING-BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chucky?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on April 15, 2013, 11:49:27 AM
Quote from: Yeti on April 15, 2013, 06:49:47 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


That's fucking it!!!!!!!!!! I've goddamned had it up to my fucking eyeballs with the fucking Cubs!!!!!!!!!!! Kevin FUCKING Gregg???? Are you fucking serious???? Jesus fucking Christ Hoyer!!!!!!!!! What in the fucking goddamned hell are you doing? I don't give a goddamn that he's signed a minor league contract. That's a spot that could and should go to a more deserving prospect, not a motherfucking shitstain cocksucker like Kevin FUCKING Gregg!!!!!!!!. Don't you know the fucking difference between a decent relief pitcher and goddamned hack whose only purpose is to serve up fucking goddamned batting practice? If that cocksucker shows his retarded fucking goggles wearing face in Wrigley somebody better drop a goddmned a-bomb there. GOD-FUCKING-DAMMIT ALL TO FUCKING HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's one thing to admit that this team will suck dog shit for a few years while the front office tries to clean out the shit left behind by Moe Hendry. But JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!!!!!! Don't fucking repeat the same goddamned mistakes Hendry made!!!! SON-OF-A-FUCKING-BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeti hides his feelings well.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Armchair_QB on April 15, 2013, 01:52:14 PM
Quote from: Yeti on April 15, 2013, 06:49:47 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


That's fucking it!!!!!!!!!! I've goddamned had it up to my fucking eyeballs with the fucking Cubs!!!!!!!!!!! Kevin FUCKING Gregg???? Are you fucking serious???? Jesus fucking Christ Hoyer!!!!!!!!! What in the fucking goddamned hell are you doing? I don't give a goddamn that he's signed a minor league contract. That's a spot that could and should go to a more deserving prospect, not a motherfucking shitstain cocksucker like Kevin FUCKING Gregg!!!!!!!!. Don't you know the fucking difference between a decent relief pitcher and goddamned hack whose only purpose is to serve up fucking goddamned batting practice? If that cocksucker shows his retarded fucking goggles wearing face in Wrigley somebody better drop a goddmned a-bomb there. GOD-FUCKING-DAMMIT ALL TO FUCKING HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's one thing to admit that this team will suck dog shit for a few years while the front office tries to clean out the shit left behind by Moe Hendry. But JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!!!!!! Don't fucking repeat the same goddamned mistakes Hendry made!!!! SON-OF-A-FUCKING-BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwkz7s3zYl1qad6z2.bmp)

Hallelujah! Holy shit! Where's the Tylenol?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 17, 2013, 08:54:07 AM
Quote from: Tonker on April 15, 2013, 01:14:30 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on April 14, 2013, 07:44:35 PM
Troll hard Theo, troll hard.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/04/cubs-sign-kevin-gregg.html


First comment on that article: "Joe Borowski just started doing pushups upon seeing this news."



Plural?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Andy on April 17, 2013, 12:47:31 PM
Quote from: Tonker on April 15, 2013, 01:14:30 AM

First comment on that article: "Joe Borowski just started doing pushups upon seeing this news."


"Started doing pushups" is accurate.  I doubt he's ever done one before.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 24, 2013, 02:22:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.

Some might even say he was handsome.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 24, 2013, 02:22:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.

Some might even say he was handsome.

They would be exaggerating.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on April 24, 2013, 02:57:42 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 24, 2013, 02:22:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.

Some might even say he was handsome.

They would be exaggerating.

Apropos of Stew's post, my 79 year dad had recently gotten an iPad and I used it to show him the wonders of baseball-reference.com.  To test his memory, we looked up Frank Ernaga, as my dad had claimed that the guy hit a homer and a triple off of Warren Spahn in his first two at-bats and then largely disappeared.  Turns out he was right.

Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on April 24, 2013, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 24, 2013, 02:22:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.

Some might even say he was handsome.

They would be exaggerating.

Probably the same people who thought he was better than Eddie Mathews.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Oleg on April 26, 2013, 11:47:28 AM
Quote from: PANK! on April 24, 2013, 02:57:42 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 24, 2013, 02:22:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on April 24, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 24, 2013, 08:33:42 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 24, 2013, 01:32:13 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on April 23, 2013, 03:04:38 PM
QuoteCINCINNATI -- Cody Ransom will make his Cubs' debut Tuesday night at Great American Ball Park, playing third and batting seventh against Reds rookie left-hander Tony Cingrani.

Tickets are still available.

That's a quality PAUL SULLIVAN burn.

And just like that, it's bonertime in his first Cubs AB.

FYPS?

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840416316030976

Quote from: Paul SullivanCody Ransom homers in first Cubs at-bat. Can't remember last time that happened either.

https://twitter.com/PWSullivan/status/326840661850587136

Quote from: Paul SullivanStarlin Castro is last Cubs player to homer in first at-bat, in Cincy in 2010.
I am no doubt the only Desipiot who can remember the last Ransom to play third base for the Cubs.  He wasn't bad.  Made the All Star game twice.

Some might even say he was handsome.

They would be exaggerating.

Apropos of Stew's post, my 79 year dad had recently gotten an iPad and I used it to show him the wonders of baseball-reference.com.  To test his memory, we looked up Frank Ernaga, as my dad had claimed that the guy hit a homer and a triple off of Warren Spahn in his first two at-bats and then largely disappeared.  Turns out he was right.



Apple meet tree?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on April 28, 2013, 01:37:59 PM
Is it too early to start the Carlos Villanueva Cy Young campaign?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on April 29, 2013, 09:17:27 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on April 28, 2013, 01:37:59 PM
Is it too early to start the Carlos Villanueva Cy Young campaign?

Too late actually.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 03, 2013, 01:50:52 PM
I assume the anonymous buyer (http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/9238925/cincinnati-reds-auction-jeff-samardzija-blood-stained-ball) was Bort, to strengthen his voodoo doll?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 07, 2013, 11:15:31 AM
DPD.

I'm not sure I quite follow this rambling about Ian Stewart (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/05/07/ian-stewart-decided-not-to-play-baseball-this-weekend/) not reporting to Iowa when he was already there, but I do know that I absolutely loathe this guy and anytime he's far away from the team is a good thing.

Also, apparently Nutsack went on quite the Twitter rant (http://www.justinjabs.com/blog/ian-stewart-is-pretty-upset-about-chris-nelsons-dfa/) a week or so back at 2am (always a great idea) and included this now deleted tweet:

Quote from: Ian Stewart
de Moines damn Iowa ,,,,,,plplace stinks

Top line summary: Fuck Ian Stewart.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Armchair_QB on May 07, 2013, 01:48:52 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 07, 2013, 11:15:31 AM
DPD.

I'm not sure I quite follow this rambling about Ian Stewart (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/05/07/ian-stewart-decided-not-to-play-baseball-this-weekend/) not reporting to Iowa when he was already there, but I do know that I absolutely loathe this guy and anytime he's far away from the team is a good thing.

Also, apparently Nutsack went on quite the Twitter rant (http://www.justinjabs.com/blog/ian-stewart-is-pretty-upset-about-chris-nelsons-dfa/) a week or so back at 2am (always a great idea) and included this now deleted tweet:

Quote from: Ian Stewart
de Moines damn Iowa ,,,,,,plplace stinks

Top line summary: Fuck Ian Stewart.

Clearly he hasn't had a chance to visit Big Earl's or he wouldn't feel that way.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 07, 2013, 02:03:15 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 07, 2013, 11:15:31 AM
DPD.

I'm not sure I quite follow this rambling about Ian Stewart (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/05/07/ian-stewart-decided-not-to-play-baseball-this-weekend/) not reporting to Iowa when he was already there, but I do know that I absolutely loathe this guy and anytime he's far away from the team is a good thing.

Also, apparently Nutsack went on quite the Twitter rant (http://www.justinjabs.com/blog/ian-stewart-is-pretty-upset-about-chris-nelsons-dfa/) a week or so back at 2am (always a great idea) and included this now deleted tweet:

Quote from: Ian Stewart
de Moines damn Iowa ,,,,,,plplace stinks

Top line summary: Fuck Ian Stewart.

Why do we hate Ian Stewart again?  I'm barely aware he exists.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 07, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
DPD.  Interesting graphic (http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#white-sox:cubs) from the L.A. Times comparing each team's payroll, position by position.

And a very thoughtful commenter adds some precious insight:

(http://i39.tinypic.com/33d9zjd.png)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 07, 2013, 10:20:02 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
DPD.  Interesting graphic (http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#white-sox:cubs) from the L.A. Times comparing each team's payroll, position by position.

And a very thoughtful commenter adds some precious insight:

(http://i39.tinypic.com/33d9zjd.png)

Well, she's not wrong.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 07, 2013, 10:40:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 07, 2013, 10:20:02 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
DPD.  Interesting graphic (http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#white-sox:cubs) from the L.A. Times comparing each team's payroll, position by position.

And a very thoughtful commenter adds some precious insight:

(http://i39.tinypic.com/33d9zjd.png)

Well, she's not wrong.

She's a poet.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 08, 2013, 08:36:21 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 10:40:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 07, 2013, 10:20:02 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
DPD.  Interesting graphic (http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#white-sox:cubs) from the L.A. Times comparing each team's payroll, position by position.

And a very thoughtful commenter adds some precious insight:

(http://i39.tinypic.com/33d9zjd.png)

Well, she's not wrong.

She's a poet.

IT TAKES GREAT CONFIDENCE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL TO GIVE UP A SECURE SITUATION IN ORDER TO VENTURE OUT ONTO PATHS THEY'VE NOT TREADED.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 08, 2013, 08:38:25 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 10:40:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 07, 2013, 10:20:02 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 07, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
DPD.  Interesting graphic (http://graphics.latimes.com/mlb-salaries/#white-sox:cubs) from the L.A. Times comparing each team's payroll, position by position.

And a very thoughtful commenter adds some precious insight:

(http://i39.tinypic.com/33d9zjd.png)

Well, she's not wrong.

She's a poet.

She perhaps used to was a dude.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 12, 2013, 11:48:49 PM
DPD.  MLBTR commenter and Cardinals fan Kyle Noe, if only you frequented Desipio you wouldn't say such silly things (http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2013/05/cubs-to-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-seven-year-extension.html#comment-895528462):

QuoteFirst basemen who hit for power, steal bases, and field well don't grow on trees. Nicely done, Cubbies - Sincerely, Cards fan. Competitive balance is good for baseball. I may have been the only Cards fan who was ecstatic to see Theo take the reins in Chicago. We've always had an enjoyable and friendly rivalry, and now it looks like it will be more of a competitive one as well.

Get a brain, moran.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 13, 2013, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

http://mlbfinances.com/agencies/spor01
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 13, 2013, 10:55:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 13, 2013, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

http://mlbfinances.com/agencies/spor01

This is a great idea, in the abstract.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:14:39 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

Pretty good for Rizzo, too.  He loses 1 year of free agency, and gets guaranteed generational wealth level income after only 173 major league games played.

Not bad for a cancer survivor who has been traded twice.

Massive applause all around.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 13, 2013, 11:16:00 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:14:39 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

Pretty good for Rizzo, too.  He loses 1 year of free agency, and gets guaranteed generational wealth level income after only 173 major league games played.

Not bad for a cancer survivor who has been traded twice.

Massive applause all around.

Shit.  Chuck likes it?  Now I'm looking for the snag.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 13, 2013, 11:24:57 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

I'm already laughing at the Sox.  Cub fans had no expectations for 2013.  Sox fans, however, were hoping they would have the stamina to not fade like they did last year after a surprisingly strong start.  Instead it looks like the wheels are coming their turdwagon pretty early.  BWAHAHAHAHA.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 13, 2013, 11:35:39 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 13, 2013, 11:16:00 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:14:39 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

Pretty good for Rizzo, too.  He loses 1 year of free agency, and gets guaranteed generational wealth level income after only 173 major league games played.

Not bad for a cancer survivor who has been traded twice.

Massive applause all around.

Shit.  Chuck likes it?  Now I'm looking for the snag.

Proactive I-told-you-so'd.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:37:51 AM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 11:35:39 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 13, 2013, 11:16:00 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:14:39 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

Pretty good for Rizzo, too.  He loses 1 year of free agency, and gets guaranteed generational wealth level income after only 173 major league games played.

Not bad for a cancer survivor who has been traded twice.

Massive applause all around.

Shit.  Chuck likes it?  Now I'm looking for the snag.

Proactive I-told-you-so'd.

What, you think I think he's going to relapse and start making/selling meth?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 13, 2013, 11:53:31 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:37:51 AM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 11:35:39 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 13, 2013, 11:16:00 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 13, 2013, 11:14:39 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

Pretty good for Rizzo, too.  He loses 1 year of free agency, and gets guaranteed generational wealth level income after only 173 major league games played.

Not bad for a cancer survivor who has been traded twice.

Massive applause all around.

Shit.  Chuck likes it?  Now I'm looking for the snag.

Proactive I-told-you-so'd.

What, you think I think he's going to relapse and start making/selling meth?

You've thought worse.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on May 13, 2013, 12:23:04 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 13, 2013, 10:55:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 13, 2013, 10:10:26 AM
Quote from: BH on May 13, 2013, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 12, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
Rizzo signed through 2019 for $41MM (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-sign-anthony-rizzo-to-long-term-extension-jed-hoyer-theo-epstein-051213) (two club options and escalators could keep him signed through 2021 when he'd be 32 for $73MM)

Theo/Jed should start going after everyone Rizzo's agent represents. This is a great deal for the cubs.

http://mlbfinances.com/agencies/spor01

This is a great idea, in the abstract.

What a lineup of stars! John Buck, Jonathon Lucroy, the Brad Mills?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 02:25:44 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

Fine with me. But I won't not laugh if the above happens. 
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: morpheus on May 13, 2013, 02:44:32 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 02:25:44 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

Fine with me. But I won't not laugh if the above happens. 

I must say that I don't disagree with what Apex doesn't not say here.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on May 13, 2013, 03:18:23 PM
Quote from: morpheus on May 13, 2013, 02:44:32 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 02:25:44 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

Fine with me. But I won't not laugh if the above happens. 

I must say that I don't disagree with what Apex doesn't not say here.

Let's see how this plays out.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 13, 2013, 03:50:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on May 13, 2013, 03:18:23 PM
Quote from: morpheus on May 13, 2013, 02:44:32 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 02:25:44 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

Fine with me. But I won't not laugh if the above happens. 

I must say that I don't disagree with what Apex doesn't not say here.

Let's see how this plays out.

McStiff eats ass.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 13, 2013, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

No way.  That's what last year was about.  While I've not harbored any hope of them actually competing this year, I really don't care to see a repeat of the '12 shitshow.  I'd like to see some sort of incremental progress. 
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 13, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 13, 2013, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

No way.  That's what last year was about.  While I've not harbored any hope of them actually competing this year, I really don't care to see a repeat of the '12 shitshow.  I'd like to see some sort of incremental progress. 

For what? When the Cubs become good, there are two position players and a pitcher or two who will be a part of it. This is a long-term project, and it's still in the talent acquisition and development stage. I'd rather they nab another top 10 stud next year than some second-tier guy, since the stated goal is sustained success.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 14, 2013, 05:50:12 AM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 13, 2013, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 13, 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 13, 2013, 11:19:17 AM
I know it doesn't matter at all but the Cubs are only one game behind Milwaukee and the White Sox record-wise. If they were to finish ahead of either I'd laugh.

Since the Cubs are going to suck anyway, I'd rather they suck spectacularly and get better draft picks for next season. We'll have plenty of time for guffaws in a couple years.

No way.  That's what last year was about.  While I've not harbored any hope of them actually competing this year, I really don't care to see a repeat of the '12 shitshow.  I'd like to see some sort of incremental progress. 

For what? When the Cubs become good, there are two position players and a pitcher or two who will be a part of it. This is a long-term project, and it's still in the talent acquisition and development stage. I'd rather they nab another top 10 stud next year than some second-tier guy, since the stated goal is sustained success.

I don't think the difference between a Top 10 pick and, say, a #15 pick is going to make a difference; at least it shouldn't. If it does, then I'm concerned about the  Epstink regime (odds are, they'll still get a Top 10 pick this year even if they play as suckily as you hope).  Off the top of my head,  Patterson, Montanez and Harvey (L-R), were all Top 10 picks during the MacPhail era, if not Top 5.  They hired the current regime so they wouldn't have to rely on their suckiness backing lucking them into competitiveness.  They're already going to benefit this year; I don't think the absence of a Top 6 pick for next year is going to break this franchise.  They ought to be fine picking 10th or whatever.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 14, 2013, 07:38:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on May 14, 2013, 05:50:12 AM
I don't think the difference between a Top 10 pick and, say, a #15 pick is going to make a difference; at least it shouldn't. If it does, then I'm concerned about the  Epstink regime (odds are, they'll still get a Top 10 pick this year even if they play as suckily as you hope).  Off the top of my head,  Patterson, Montanez and Harvey (L-R), were all Top 10 picks during the MacPhail era, if not Top 5.  They hired the current regime so they wouldn't have to rely on their suckiness backing lucking them into competitiveness.  They're already going to benefit this year; I don't think the absence of a Top 6 pick for next year is going to break this franchise.  They ought to be fine picking 10th or whatever.

From a historical standpoint, you're sort of right. And Fork is also sort of right. Top-3 picks are far and away the most likely players to succeed and after that it gets a bit muddled. Like you said, I'd trust the front office to get a good player at No. 10 about as much as I'd trust them to get one at No. 6. But the talent level of the top 2-3 picks generally tends to be really high and scouting is getting more refined since the days of Patterson, Montanez, etc. So teams aren't missing quite as often as they did before. Of course, since baseball is so hard to scout, there will always be high-profile misses.

Whether that's all worth enduring another 100-loss season, I don't know. The number of losses doesn't bother me on its own, but another horrible season would probably mean the younger guys aren't developing like we hope and that would be more concerning.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 14, 2013, 08:05:30 AM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 07:38:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on May 14, 2013, 05:50:12 AM
I don't think the difference between a Top 10 pick and, say, a #15 pick is going to make a difference; at least it shouldn't. If it does, then I'm concerned about the  Epstink regime (odds are, they'll still get a Top 10 pick this year even if they play as suckily as you hope).  Off the top of my head,  Patterson, Montanez and Harvey (L-R), were all Top 10 picks during the MacPhail era, if not Top 5.  They hired the current regime so they wouldn't have to rely on their suckiness backing lucking them into competitiveness.  They're already going to benefit this year; I don't think the absence of a Top 6 pick for next year is going to break this franchise.  They ought to be fine picking 10th or whatever.

From a historical standpoint, you're sort of right. And Fork is also sort of right. Top-3 picks are far and away the most likely players to succeed and after that it gets a bit muddled. Like you said, I'd trust the front office to get a good player at No. 10 about as much as I'd trust them to get one at No. 6. But the talent level of the top 2-3 picks generally tends to be really high and scouting is getting more refined since the days of Patterson, Montanez, etc. So teams aren't missing quite as often as they did before. Of course, since baseball is so hard to scout, there will always be high-profile misses.

Whether that's all worth enduring another 100-loss season, I don't know. The number of losses doesn't bother me on its own, but another horrible season would probably mean the younger guys aren't developing like we hope and that would be more concerning.

I'd agree if there were more of the future core in Chicago. If Castro & Rizzo didn't buy into the EpHoyStink long-term vision, they wouldn't have sacrificed years of free agency.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:04:46 AM
Quote from: PANK! on May 14, 2013, 05:50:12 AM
I don't think the difference between a Top 10 pick and, say, a #15 pick is going to make a difference;

But there is a huge difference between the #1 to #9 picks vs. #10 and after.  If you have a top 9 pick, your pick is protected from being lost via a free agent signing.  If a team were to sign a top free agent, I believe defined as "Class A", and they have draft pick #10 or later, they lose the pick.  Not so if you are in the top 9.

What you want is what Theo said before the season started (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-26/sports/ct-spt-0227-haugh-cubs-chicago--20130227_1_theo-epstein-cubs-fans-rooftop-owners):

"What I want to avoid is the middle ground. It'd be nice to make the playoffs or get a protected draft pick (awarded the bottom nine teams). We're not hiding that. There's no glory in 78 wins instead of 73. Who cares?"
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on May 14, 2013, 10:24:46 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

The feelings this team gives me are weird. They're 16-22 and on pace to be very bad, record wise, which is all that matters. Still, they're only five runs from having an even run differential. What the hell? They lead the NL in extra base hits. What the hell? Their starting pitching, again, has been actually above average. What the hell?

I mean honestly if people can't see that this team when augmented over the course of another season and a half is going to be not only good but sustainably good then they're just trying to be dipshits.

That's all there is to it. This is a very bad team that I don't think has gotten their asses handed to them on a baseball field more than one or two times this season.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread?

OK.  Fill in the Roster:

SP Jeff Samardzija
SP
SP
SP
SP
SU
CL
RP
RP
RP
RP

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?)
RF Jorge Soler
CF
LF Albert Almora
C

C Wellington Castillo
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 10:40:57 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive?

Along with Dave Sappelt (dang!).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on May 14, 2013, 10:46:26 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 10:40:57 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive?

Along with Dave Sappelt (dang!).

Sappelt is destined for the Greatest Thread but apparently young Ronald TorreYES is really showing some good signs in the minors. Could be a role player down the line or something.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on May 14, 2013, 11:13:13 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
OK.  Fill in the Roster:

SP Jeff Samardzija
SP Travis Wood
SP Jeff Pico
SP Dennis Lamp
SP Micah Bowie
SU Drew Hall
CL Terry Adams
RP  Lester Lancaster
RP  Rich Bordi
RP  Hoyt Wilhelm
RP  Steve Wilson

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B Bobby Hill
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?)
RF Jorge Soler
CF Felix Pie
LF Albert Almora
C  Pat Cline

C Wellington Castillo
UT Kevin Orie
UT  Dan Rohn
UT Domingo Ramos
UT Thad Bosley
UT Paul Popovich

Keepers? All of them.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 11:53:04 AM
I love Lamp.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 14, 2013, 11:58:45 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 11:53:04 AM
I love Lamp.

Threw a 1-hitter for both Chicago teams.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 12:20:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

I want one with Dioner Navarro's number on it. Don't ask me why.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:22:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Lousy Smarch internet.

(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Travis+Wood+Chicago+Cubs+v+Houston+Astros+-Z2IgPHI9nrl.jpg)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/777353/thumbs/r-WOOD-CUBS-LOSE-large570.jpg)

(http://www.trbimg.com/img-5012b114/turbine/chi-cubs-lineup-has-same-look-for-cardinals-op-001/600/600x400)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 12:27:46 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:22:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Lousy Smarch internet.

(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Travis+Wood+Chicago+Cubs+v+Houston+Astros+-Z2IgPHI9nrl.jpg)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/777353/thumbs/r-WOOD-CUBS-LOSE-large570.jpg)

(http://www.trbimg.com/img-5012b114/turbine/chi-cubs-lineup-has-same-look-for-cardinals-op-001/600/600x400)

I don't understand these PenPho Foetoshops at all.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:30:20 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 12:27:46 PM

I don't understand these PenPho Foetoshops at all.

You are vastly overrating my Photoshop skills.

I think the crux is that Travis Wood changed his number.

Personally, I'm keeping the #30 throwback. 
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 12:31:41 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:30:20 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 12:27:46 PM

I don't understand these PenPho Foetoshops at all.

You are vastly overrating my Photoshop skills.

I think the crux is that Travis Wood changed his number.

Personally, I'm keeping the #30 throwback. 

I'm keeping my Kevin Foster #31.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 12:35:54 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:30:20 PM
Personally, I'm keeping the #30 throwback. 

#GroundFloor
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 14, 2013, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:22:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Lousy Smarch internet.

(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Travis+Wood+Chicago+Cubs+v+Houston+Astros+-Z2IgPHI9nrl.jpg)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/777353/thumbs/r-WOOD-CUBS-LOSE-large570.jpg)

(http://www.trbimg.com/img-5012b114/turbine/chi-cubs-lineup-has-same-look-for-cardinals-op-001/600/600x400)

Damn you, internet!  If only there was some kind of page with all the players' numbers on it so I wouldn't be forced to do all my research in Google Image Search!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 14, 2013, 12:42:21 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:22:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Lousy Smarch internet.

(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Travis+Wood+Chicago+Cubs+v+Houston+Astros+-Z2IgPHI9nrl.jpg)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/777353/thumbs/r-WOOD-CUBS-LOSE-large570.jpg)

(http://www.trbimg.com/img-5012b114/turbine/chi-cubs-lineup-has-same-look-for-cardinals-op-001/600/600x400)

Damn you, internet!  If only there was some kind of page with all the players' numbers on it so I wouldn't be forced to do all my research in Google Image Search!

Burn (?).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 14, 2013, 12:42:42 PM
Also, it'd be nice if Pen watched a game or two in the past 6 weeks.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 14, 2013, 12:43:20 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 12:42:21 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:38:32 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:22:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Lousy Smarch internet.

(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Travis+Wood+Chicago+Cubs+v+Houston+Astros+-Z2IgPHI9nrl.jpg)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/777353/thumbs/r-WOOD-CUBS-LOSE-large570.jpg)

(http://www.trbimg.com/img-5012b114/turbine/chi-cubs-lineup-has-same-look-for-cardinals-op-001/600/600x400)

Damn you, internet!  If only there was some kind of page with all the players' numbers on it so I wouldn't be forced to do all my research in Google Image Search!

Burn (?).

I guess I can't fault Pen for not knowing when the great Dioner Navarro wants #30, you give it to him.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 12:51:03 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 14, 2013, 12:42:42 PM
Also, it'd be nice if Pen watched a game or two in the past 6 weeks.

And while I was watching paid close attention to the number of the back of his jersey?

I could probably tell you the number of 10-15 guys since 1994, Potatohead.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Armchair_QB on May 14, 2013, 12:58:40 PM
Quote from: Brownie on May 14, 2013, 11:13:13 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
OK.  Fill in the Roster:

SP Jeff Samardzija
SP Travis Wood
SP Jeff Pico
SP Dennis Lamp
SP Micah Bowie
SU Drew Hall
CL Terry Adams
RP  Lester Lancaster
RP  Rich Bordi
RP  Hoyt Wilhelm
RP  Steve Wilson

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B Bobby Hill
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?)
RF Jorge Soler
CF Felix Pie
LF Albert Almora
C  Pat Cline

C Wellington Castillo
UT Kevin Orie
UT  Dan Rohn
UT Domingo Ramos
UT Thad Bosley
UT Paul Popovich

Keepers? All of them.

No Gary Woods? This list is bullshit!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on May 14, 2013, 01:04:39 PM
Good talk fellas.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 14, 2013, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Intrepid Reader: Dante Hicks

I'M 37?????
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 01:57:21 PM
Quote from: Fork on May 14, 2013, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 14, 2013, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 

I'd say it's okay to go buy a Wood shirsey.

Or just turn your old 34 into a 30. 

Or a 37, if you want his number on it.

Intrepid Reader: Dante Hicks

I'M 37?????

Intrepid Reader: Michael Palin

I'm 37! I'm not old!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 02:26:58 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 14, 2013, 12:42:42 PM
Also, it'd be nice if Pen watched a game or two in the past 6 weeks.

Nice for whom?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 14, 2013, 02:56:10 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 14, 2013, 01:04:39 PM
Good talk fellas.

Hey, we had an actual discussion going there for about 4 posts.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 03:33:46 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 02:56:10 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 14, 2013, 01:04:39 PM
Good talk fellas.

Hey, we had an actual discussion going there for about 4 posts.

I'm happy to accept both my participation in the good conversation and the subsequent derailment.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 14, 2013, 04:10:16 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 14, 2013, 10:12:19 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread? Like what of Travis Wood, the inspiration of the original "EPSTINK" missive? He's a part of the new tradition right? Or is he trade fodder? Yes AND yes?


26 years old, making just over $500K this year.
Under team control (arbitration eligible) through the 2016 season. 


And he's a lefthander who doesn't completely suck. Worst case, he's a LOOGY, best case, he's a 3-5 starter once this team is a contender.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 14, 2013, 04:53:30 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread?

OK.  Fill in the Roster:

SP David Price/Matt Moore
SP Jeff Samardzija
SP
SP
SP
SU
CL
RP
RP
RP
RP

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?) Kris Bryant
RF Jorge Soler
CF
LF Albert Almora
C

C Wellington Castillo
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT

Back to this, conventional wisdom would be to slot in Appel or Gray after Samardzija in that second SP slot. But if Kris Bryant keeps hitting like 8 home runs per week, it wouldn't be a total shock to see the Cubs take him if Houston doesn't. That'd leave them free to use Baez as a trade piece for one of the Tampa pitchers.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on May 14, 2013, 05:01:54 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 04:53:30 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 14, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
Can we start turning this thread into a keeper thread?

OK.  Fill in the Roster:

SP David Price/Matt Moore
SP Jeff Samardzija
SP
SP
SP
SU
CL
RP
RP
RP
RP

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?) Kris Bryant
RF Jorge Soler
CF
LF Albert Almora
C

C Wellington Castillo
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT

Back to this, conventional wisdom would be to slot in Appel or Gray after Samardzija in that second SP slot. But if Kris Bryant keeps hitting like 8 home runs per week, it wouldn't be a total shock to see the Cubs take him if Houston doesn't. That'd leave them free to use Baez as a trade piece for one of the Tampa pitchers.

Or put Baez at second and hope Almora or Soler would get Moore or Price.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 05:45:51 PM
SP David Price
SP Jeff Samardzija
SP Max Scherzer
SP
SP
SU
CL
RP
RP
RP
RP

1B Anthony Rizzo
2B Robinson Cano
SS Starlin Castro (increasingly likely)
3B Javier Baez (or SS?) Kris Bryant
RF Jorge Soler
CF
LF Albert Almora
C Brian McCann

C Wellington Castillo
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 06:21:24 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

I'm starting to wonder if Not Robinson Cano is our leading candidate for post-2014 FYC.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on May 14, 2013, 08:54:21 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

DAT EPSTINK SHUD TRADE MARMOL AND STEVEN STUART FOR CANO OR HE SHOULD OF BEEN G
FIRED ALREADY MY FRENT.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:44:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

So, you're on board with Price and Scherzer?  Cool.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 01:38:36 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 06:21:24 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

I'm starting to wonder if Not Robinson Cano is our leading candidate for post-2014 FYC.

I like it, but what are we FYCing for?  When Robinson Cano hits one out for Not the Cubs?  When Robinson Cano goes 0-fer?  Or when Not Robinson Cano (e.g. Barney) has a good game?

Also, Chuck: Eli is right.  It's not going to happen.

1. He's already (ahem, Dominican) 30, so his best years are probably behind him already.
2. He's looking for a HUGE payday at the end of this year.
3. His agent is Boras, so you can forget paying anything other than top dollar.
4. Barney's not bad anyway, and the money could be far better spent somewhere else.
5. No, Chuck.

Give it up, man, seriously.  Jim Hendry might have tried to sign Cano.  Epstink and Hoystink won't - points 1 and 2 above in particular are pure Krypsteinite.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 15, 2013, 01:49:51 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 01:38:36 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 06:21:24 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

I'm starting to wonder if Not Robinson Cano is our leading candidate for post-2014 FYC.

I like it, but what are we FYCing for?  When Robinson Cano hits one out for Not the Cubs?  When Robinson Cano goes 0-fer?  Or when Not Robinson Cano (e.g. Barney) has a good game?

Also, Chuck: Eli is right.  It's not going to happen.

1. He's already (ahem, Dominican) 30, so his best years are probably behind him already.
2. He's looking for a HUGE payday at the end of this year.
3. His agent is Boras "Roc Nation", so you can forget paying anything other than top dollar.
4. Barney's not bad anyway, and the money could be far better spent somewhere else.
5. No, Chuck.

Give it up, man, seriously.  Jim Hendry might have tried to sign Cano.  Epstink and Hoystink won't - points 1 and 2 above in particular are pure Krypsteinite.

Aside from Cano leaving Boras to run this town with Jay Z, I'm with Tonk.  Just can't see them shelling out for a second baseman on the wrong side of 30 (especially with big contracts like Hamilton and Pujols already looking like huge mistakes, Hamilton especially) when they have Barney already.  Cano plays almost 162 games every season; there's no way he keeps that up over the length of his next contract.  He has to break down sometime, and he's due.  And this team obviously has bigger problems than 2B right now.  Even if Barney doesn't hit enough to avoid a net loss despite his glove, there's still a decent chance he'll figure things out early in the hypothetical Cano contract.  Then what?  The nice thing about Barney is he's never going to be a guy who makes a ton of money.  If he can approach league-average production at the plate, maybe a little under, his glove will add the rest and they can use those savings elsewhere.

I think there might be a place for Barney on a winning Cubs team.  I'm sure they'll eventually upgrade if they get a chance, but until then let him save runs in the field, save some money at the same time, and prioritize offense at other positions.  They'd rather spend the Cano money on extending Samardzija or setting some cash aside for Baez, Almora, Appel/Bryant/Gray, and other big needs.  Then, once the overall young talent level has been addressed, if second base is still a problem they'll have the flexibility to sign someone or make a trade.  Based on everything Epstink have said, signing a guy like Cano at this stage in his career doesn't seem to fit into the Cubs' plans.  I think Cano is ticketed for L.A. or New York anyway.

Since Vitters is far from a sure thing, if the Cubs did decide to spend money on the infield, a run at Chase Headley would be more likely.  Not saying it's all that likely, just more likely than Cano.  Headley's contract would come with its own problems -- he just turned 29 and he doesn't match Cano's consistency or durability.  Then there's the question whether Baez will end up at third, but that could be fixed by moving Headley back to LF.  I guess I'm trying to say it would make more sense than signing Cano, but I'm not gonna buy a Headley shirsey just yet.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 02:00:31 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 15, 2013, 01:49:51 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 01:38:36 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on May 14, 2013, 06:21:24 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

I'm starting to wonder if Not Robinson Cano is our leading candidate for post-2014 FYC.

I like it, but what are we FYCing for?  When Robinson Cano hits one out for Not the Cubs?  When Robinson Cano goes 0-fer?  Or when Not Robinson Cano (e.g. Barney) has a good game?

Also, Chuck: Eli is right.  It's not going to happen.

1. He's already (ahem, Dominican) 30, so his best years are probably behind him already.
2. He's looking for a HUGE payday at the end of this year.
3. His agent is Boras "Roc Nation", so you can forget paying anything other than top dollar.
4. Barney's not bad anyway, and the money could be far better spent somewhere else.
5. No, Chuck.

Give it up, man, seriously.  Jim Hendry might have tried to sign Cano.  Epstink and Hoystink won't - points 1 and 2 above in particular are pure Kr

How the fuck did I forget that so soon?  Anyway, the point stands.  You can bet ROC NATION will be looking to make a splash.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 15, 2013, 08:06:51 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:44:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

So, you're on board with Price and Scherzer?  Cool.

Pretty unlikely the Cubs would get both, but they'd at least make sense from an age/talent/positional standpoint.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 15, 2013, 08:19:09 AM
Spending a fuckload of money on a guy like Caano for a team that is at least two years from contention is like putting Cragars on a car that is leaking transsmission fluid.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on May 15, 2013, 08:52:40 AM
Quote from: Fork on May 15, 2013, 08:19:09 AM
Spending a fuckload of money on a guy like Caano for a team that is at least two years from contention is like putting Cragars on a car that is leaking transsmission fluid.

Time to post.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CT III on May 15, 2013, 09:05:33 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 01:38:36 AM

I like it, but what are we FYCing for?  When Robinson Cano hits one out for Not the Cubs?  When Robinson Cano goes 0-fer?  Or when Not Robinson Cano (e.g. Barney) has a good game?

Also, Chuck: Eli is right.  It's not going to happen.

1. He's already (ahem, Dominican) 30, so his best years are probably behind him already.
2. He's looking for a HUGE payday at the end of this year.
3. His agent is Boras, so you can forget paying anything other than top dollar.
4. Barney's not bad anyway, and the money could be far better spent somewhere else.
5. No, Chuck.

Give it up, man, seriously.  Jim Hendry might have tried to sign Cano.  Epstink and Hoystink won't - points 1 and 2 above in particular are pure Krypsteinite.

I agree with your ultimate point Tonk, but Darwin Barney is bad.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 09:17:01 AM
Quote from: CT III on May 15, 2013, 09:05:33 AM
Quote from: Tonker on May 15, 2013, 01:38:36 AM

I like it, but what are we FYCing for?  When Robinson Cano hits one out for Not the Cubs?  When Robinson Cano goes 0-fer?  Or when Not Robinson Cano (e.g. Barney) has a good game?

Also, Chuck: Eli is right.  It's not going to happen.

1. He's already (ahem, Dominican) 30, so his best years are probably behind him already.
2. He's looking for a HUGE payday at the end of this year.
3. His agent is Boras, so you can forget paying anything other than top dollar.
4. Barney's not bad anyway, and the money could be far better spent somewhere else.
5. No, Chuck.

Give it up, man, seriously.  Jim Hendry might have tried to sign Cano.  Epstink and Hoystink won't - points 1 and 2 above in particular are pure Krypsteinite.

I agree with your ultimate point Tonk, but Darwin Barney is bad.

Yeah, okay.  He's not good.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: R-V on May 15, 2013, 01:44:45 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 15, 2013, 08:06:51 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:44:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

So, you're on board with Price and Scherzer?  Cool.

Pretty unlikely the Cubs would get both, but they'd at least make sense from an age/talent/positional standpoint.

First of all I am very much enjoying this Cubes baseball discussion. I had not heard until reading this thread that Scherzer was even a trade possibility, and was a little surprised that he'd be mentioned in the same sentence as Price. Price is a year younger, but Scherzer's numbers are slightly better:

Price:      839 IP, 3.52 FIP, 8.3 K/9, 15 WAR
Scherzer: 852 IP, 3.62 FIP, 9.4 K/9, 16.9 WAR

And what's this about Matt Moore? Why would the Rays trade him this offseason when he'll only be 24?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 15, 2013, 01:52:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on May 15, 2013, 01:44:45 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 15, 2013, 08:06:51 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:44:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

So, you're on board with Price and Scherzer?  Cool.

Pretty unlikely the Cubs would get both, but they'd at least make sense from an age/talent/positional standpoint.

First of all I am very much enjoying this Cubes baseball discussion. I had not heard until reading this thread that Scherzer was even a trade possibility, and was a little surprised that he'd be mentioned in the same sentence as Price. Price is a year younger, but Scherzer's numbers are slightly better:

Price:      839 IP, 3.52 FIP, 8.3 K/9, 15 WAR
Scherzer: 852 IP, 3.62 FIP, 9.4 K/9, 16.9 WAR

And what's this about Matt Moore? Why would the Rays trade him this offseason when he'll only be 24?

I saw it somewhere on Twitter but can't seem to find it now. I guess the thinking was that the Rays could get a better package for Moore than Price since he's under control for longer. Not sure I buy it because that's exactly the reason the Rays should want him around. He'll be cheap for another 3-4 years.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 15, 2013, 01:56:20 PM
Quote from: R-V on May 15, 2013, 01:44:45 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 15, 2013, 08:06:51 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 14, 2013, 10:44:31 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 14, 2013, 06:02:35 PM
god damn it the robinson cano thing is not happening chuck

So, you're on board with Price and Scherzer?  Cool.

Pretty unlikely the Cubs would get both, but they'd at least make sense from an age/talent/positional standpoint.

First of all I am very much enjoying this Cubes baseball discussion. I had not heard until reading this thread that Scherzer was even a trade possibility, and was a little surprised that he'd be mentioned in the same sentence as Price. Price is a year younger, but Scherzer's numbers are slightly better:

Price:      839 IP, 3.52 FIP, 8.3 K/9, 15 WAR
Scherzer: 852 IP, 3.62 FIP, 9.4 K/9, 16.9 WAR

And what's this about Matt Moore? Why would the Rays trade him this offseason when he'll only be 24?

There's some speculation that the Verlander's deal means the Tigers would need to trade Scherzer to stay under or closer to luxury tax levels.  That's also part of the speculation with Robins...  never mind.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on May 16, 2013, 09:23:21 AM
How does last place smell, Milwaukee? Alt title: How Epstink's ass taste?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on May 21, 2013, 06:09:57 PM
Did I miss something?  Is there a rule that the Cubs can't beat Wandy Rodriguez?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 21, 2013, 06:12:17 PM
Quote from: CBStew on May 21, 2013, 06:09:57 PM
Did I miss something?  Is there a rule that the Cubs can't beat Wandy Rodriguez?

Sometimes you just have to tip your cap.

Pitchers with career ERAs of 4.00 don't grow on trees, you know.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 21, 2013, 08:18:03 PM
Shawn Camp sucks.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on May 24, 2013, 05:35:17 PM
"Sometimes, you just think too much," Soriano continued. "I get frustrated when you see that happen, because I'm tired of losing. I don't want to be on a losing team and have a bad record."

Gee, Alfonso, I can think of a quick fix for that.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on May 24, 2013, 06:21:11 PM
Quote from: CBStew on May 24, 2013, 05:35:17 PM
Gee, Alfonso, I can think of a quick fix for that.

Have the team stop sucking at baseball?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
Quote from: CBStew on May 24, 2013, 05:35:17 PM
"Sometimes, you just think too much," Soriano continued. "I get frustrated when you see that happen, because I'm tired of losing. I don't want to be on a losing team and have a bad record."

What does he want? To be on a losing team without a bad record?  A winning team with a bad record?  Or a winning team with a good record?

Sometimes, you just think too much.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.

Yes.  We are running out of time. After that, what overpriced old guy free agent acquisition who does nothing in the playoffs do I have to pick on? Hossa?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: ChuckD on May 24, 2013, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.

Yes.  We are running out of time. After that, what overpriced old guy free agent acquisition who does nothing in the playoffs do I have to pick on? Hossa?

God dammit, Chuck (http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ukaz1/).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 25, 2013, 09:18:31 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on May 24, 2013, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.

Yes.  We are running out of time. After that, what overpriced old guy free agent acquisition who does nothing in the playoffs do I have to pick on? Hossa?

God dammit, Chuck (http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ukaz1/).

+1
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on May 25, 2013, 10:41:00 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on May 24, 2013, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.

Yes.  We are running out of time. After that, what overpriced old guy free agent acquisition who does nothing in the playoffs do I have to pick on? Hossa?

God dammit, Chuck (http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ukaz1/).

[Polite applause]
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on May 25, 2013, 08:26:26 PM
Quote from: Bort on May 25, 2013, 10:41:00 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on May 24, 2013, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 10:17:15 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 24, 2013, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on May 24, 2013, 07:42:16 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 24, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
What does he want?

Probably for people to not nitpick comments made in his second language.

Would you please keep your rational and sane analysis to yourself please; we're trying to attack Soriano on all fronts, damnit.

Yes.  We are running out of time. After that, what overpriced old guy free agent acquisition who does nothing in the playoffs do I have to pick on? Hossa?

God dammit, Chuck (http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ukaz1/).

[Polite applause]

Who's the guy with the brown hair in that picture?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on May 29, 2013, 10:08:08 AM
Kyuji Fujikawa: (https://twitter.com/CSNMooney/status/339757681122361344) Japanese for Tommy John Disease.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 29, 2013, 10:39:30 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 29, 2013, 10:08:08 AM
Kyuji Fujikawa: (https://twitter.com/CSNMooney/status/339757681122361344) Japanese for Tommy John Disease.

*lurches forward in chair*
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 29, 2013, 11:57:56 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on May 29, 2013, 10:08:08 AM
Kyuji Fujikawa: (https://twitter.com/CSNMooney/status/339757681122361344) Japanese for Tommy John Disease.

He'll be fine.  Lewis Yocum will have him pitching better than ever in no time.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 29, 2013, 04:05:52 PM
Dioner Navarro sure hates him some White Sox.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on May 29, 2013, 04:06:51 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 29, 2013, 04:05:52 PM
Dioner Navarro sure hates him some White Sox.

When did Melky Cabrera get traded to the Cubs?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 31, 2013, 04:43:19 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.

Aside from the guy they gave a fuckload of money for 4 years to, the starting pitching isn't terrible.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tinker to Evers to Chance on May 31, 2013, 04:50:31 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.

They're shitty.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on May 31, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on May 31, 2013, 04:50:31 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.

They're shitty.

They swing between shitty and great.  But you know what?  Like the 2007 Cubs, they're getting it together and above all, they're fun to watch.  I kind of like these Cubs.  And I really like James Russell and his 2ER in 20.2 IP.

By the way, at this stage, the 2007 Cubs were 22-31.  Your 2013 Cubs are 23-30.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 31, 2013, 09:15:15 PM
Quote from: Tonker on May 31, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on May 31, 2013, 04:50:31 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.

They're shitty.

They swing between shitty and great.  But you know what?  Like the 2007 Cubs, they're getting it together and above all, they're fun to watch.  I kind of like these Cubs.  And I really like James Russell and his 2ER in 20.2 IP.

By the way, at this stage, the 2007 Cubs were 22-31.  Your 2013 Cubs are 23-30.

Damnit, you're going to make me care.

I blame Nate Schierholtz.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on June 01, 2013, 08:39:17 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on May 31, 2013, 09:15:15 PM
Quote from: Tonker on May 31, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on May 31, 2013, 04:50:31 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on May 31, 2013, 04:09:47 PM
These guys aint so fuckin' bad.

They're shitty.

They swing between shitty and great.  But you know what?  Like the 2007 Cubs, they're getting it together and above all, they're fun to watch.  I kind of like these Cubs.  And I really like James Russell and his 2ER in 20.2 IP.

By the way, at this stage, the 2007 Cubs were 22-31.  Your 2013 Cubs are 23-30.

Damnit, you're going to make me care.

I blame Nate SchierholtzJimmy Butthole.

No?'d
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 02, 2013, 12:47:00 AM
Three walks and then a Granny?  Nice one, Marmol.  If you had any pride, you'd tear up your contract and walk away.

Also, what is a Putnam?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Shooter on June 02, 2013, 01:20:51 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 02, 2013, 12:47:00 AM
Three walks and then a Granny?  Nice one, Marmol.  If you had any pride, you'd tear up your contract and walk away.

Also, what is a Putnam?
He also walked the batter after the granny. If acting manager Jay Mequirk had a sense of humor, he would have left Marmol in to see if he could double down.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 02, 2013, 03:53:01 PM
Quote from: Shooter on June 02, 2013, 01:20:51 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 02, 2013, 12:47:00 AM
Three walks and then a Granny?  Nice one, Marmol.  If you had any pride, you'd tear up your contract and walk away.

Also, what is a Putnam?
He also walked the batter after the granny. If acting manager Jay Mequirk had a sense of humor, he would have left Marmol in to see if he could double down.

Final score: 49-4
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 03, 2013, 01:46:11 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on June 02, 2013, 03:53:01 PM
Quote from: Shooter on June 02, 2013, 01:20:51 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 02, 2013, 12:47:00 AM
Three walks and then a Granny?  Nice one, Marmol.  If you had any pride, you'd tear up your contract and walk away.

Also, what is a Putnam?
He also walked the batter after the granny. If acting manager Jay Mequirk had a sense of humor, he would have left Marmol in to see if he could double down.

Final score: 49-4

Another three walks in an inning yesterday.  He really needs to go away and think about what he's done.  Seriously - this is all in his head, now.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on June 04, 2013, 11:29:55 PM
I'm getting a robust semi-chub for this Feldman kid.  His WHIP and BAA are much more in line with his solid rookie season two years ago than his numbers last season.

And he has the build of an imposing starting pitcher.  Cause you know.  That matters.  Or something.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Gilgamesh on June 04, 2013, 11:48:43 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on June 04, 2013, 11:29:55 PM
I'm getting a robust semi-chub for this Feldman kid.  His WHIP and BAA are much more in line with his solid rookie season two years ago than his numbers last season.

And he has the build of an imposing starting pitcher.  Cause you know.  That matters.  Or something.

Kid?

He's 30.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on June 04, 2013, 11:50:20 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on June 04, 2013, 11:48:43 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on June 04, 2013, 11:29:55 PM
I'm getting a robust semi-chub for this Feldman kid.  His WHIP and BAA are much more in line with his solid rookie season two years ago than his numbers last season.

And he has the build of an imposing starting pitcher.  Cause you know.  That matters.  Or something.

Kid?

He's 30.

And was not a rookie two years ago.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 05, 2013, 12:34:39 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on June 04, 2013, 11:50:20 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on June 04, 2013, 11:48:43 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on June 04, 2013, 11:29:55 PM
I'm getting a robust semi-chub for this Feldman kid.  His WHIP and BAA are much more in line with his solid rookie season two years ago than his numbers last season.

And he has the build of an imposing starting pitcher.  Cause you know.  That matters.  Or something.

Kid?

He's 30.

And was not a rookie two years ago.

Can't a guy enjoy a perfectly good semi-chub anymore without haters throwing cold water on his pants?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on June 05, 2013, 07:05:42 AM
So, who was he actually talking about?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on June 05, 2013, 07:10:18 AM
Perhaps he was thinking of Travis Wood? Rookie year was 2010. He's 26. And the "kid's" WHIP from 2010 is close to 2013s
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on June 05, 2013, 07:46:10 AM
The important thing is to have a semi-chub for someone.  Somewhere. Who may or may not be 30, could possibly be a couple of years into an MLB career, and has some sort of stats.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: ChuckD on June 05, 2013, 08:50:23 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 05, 2013, 07:10:18 AM
Perhaps he was thinking of Travis Wood? Rookie year was 2010. He's 26. And the "kid's" WHIP from 2010 is close to 2013s


I wouldn't say Wood has "the build of an imposing starting pitcher" though. He's 5' 11" and 175 pounds. Maybe CFiHP is talking Junior League ball.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on June 05, 2013, 09:10:51 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on June 05, 2013, 08:50:23 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 05, 2013, 07:10:18 AM
Perhaps he was thinking of Travis Wood? Rookie year was 2010. He's 26. And the "kid's" WHIP from 2010 is close to 2013s


I wouldn't say Wood has "the build of an imposing starting pitcher" though. He's 5' 11" and 175 pounds. Maybe CFiHP is talking Junior League ball.

But Wood has his own personal sploogey fest. So it must be Feldman. From across the hall.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 05, 2013, 09:34:18 AM
He was talking about Appel.

Or Gray.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on June 05, 2013, 09:37:16 AM
Quote from: Slaky on June 05, 2013, 09:10:51 AM
So it must be Feldman. From across the hall.

(http://i.imgur.com/N8rRIGv.jpg)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on June 15, 2013, 11:47:35 AM
On June 15, 2012 the Cubs were 21 and 42.  June 15, 2013 they are 27 and 38.  Discuss.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on June 15, 2013, 12:32:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on June 15, 2013, 11:47:35 AM
On June 15, 2012 the Cubs were 21 and 42.  June 15, 2013 they are 27 and 38.  Discuss.

They're gaining 6 wins per year. So it's 33-32 in 2014 and 39-26 in 2015. Sounds about right.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 15, 2013, 01:06:22 PM
Quote from: CBStew on June 15, 2013, 11:47:35 AM
On June 15, 2012 the Cubs were 21 and 42.  June 15, 2013 they are 27 and 38.  Discuss.

(buys Valbuena shirsey)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 16, 2013, 03:06:17 PM
Sweet Jesus, the Mets are terrible.  What a shame that Marmol is even worse.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 16, 2013, 04:15:02 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 16, 2013, 03:06:17 PM
Sweet Jesus, the Mets are terrible.  What a shame that Marmol is even worse.

Holy shit what a meltdown.  If Marmol is found dead in the next 24 hours, Garza will be the prime suspect.  No judge or jury would convict him.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 19, 2013, 01:45:58 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

More Cody Ransoms, fewer Javier Baezs.  Cody Ransom: No Tears Here, Theo!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on June 19, 2013, 03:10:09 PM
Quote from: BH on June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.

OH, sure. Trade the CLOSURE. HOW THE HELL ARE THEY GONNA CLIMB BACK TO 9-under-.500 without Greg?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 19, 2013, 03:20:34 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on June 19, 2013, 03:10:09 PM
Quote from: BH on June 19, 2013, 03:01:42 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

Did you not read Al's article? It doesn't matter who we get back, all prospects suck.

OH, sure. Trade the CLOSURE. HOW THE HELL ARE THEY GONNA CLIMB BACK TO 9-under-.500 without Greg?

6/16/13 NEVER FORGET

(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2013/0616/mlb_a_marmol_gb1_400.jpg)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 19, 2013, 05:31:28 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.

S'weenie's doing 90 'cause he's got nowhere to go.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on June 21, 2013, 01:46:37 PM
I read on the Cubs' official site that Concepcion, the Cubs' 23 year old Cuban pitcher, has been sidelined with a sore back.  A 23 year old with a sore back?  That is obviously 23 years in Cuban time.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 21, 2013, 02:51:47 PM
Quote from: Fork on June 19, 2013, 05:31:28 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 19, 2013, 05:23:40 PM
Quote from: R-V on June 19, 2013, 02:46:55 PM
Quote from: Slaky on June 19, 2013, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 19, 2013, 01:29:23 AM
Has anybody else noticed that Cody Ransom is now batting .286/.386/.662/1.030 for the Cubs, with 5 2B and a Sosa-esque 8HR in just 77AB?

DIS KID IS ONE FOR DA FUTURE MY FRENTS.

Edit: he's actually pretty terrible against righties (except Adam Wainwright, yay) but his line against lefties is .327/.407/.827.  Against southpaws, Cody Ransom is *literally* Barry Bonds.

Also, he's not even the best lefty-killer on the Cubs.  Navarro is batting a chuckle-inducing .556/.652/1.056/1.708 (!) with 10 hits, 5 BB and 3HR in just 18AB.

I have. It's very weird.

It's also funny that he's 78 years old.

If the Cubs get anything close to worthwhile at the deadline for Gregg, Ransom or S'weenie, Theo and Jed deserve a big old sloppy buttkiss.

What?

No.

No, no, no.

S'weenie's doing 90 'cause he's got nowhere to go.

Heh.  I'll give you that one, Fork.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on June 28, 2013, 11:39:45 PM
We might get another Al screed after some pretty poor outfield play tonight -- Sweeney and Schierholtz were too busy avoiding a stupid, unnecessary collision to actually catch the ball, and Bogusevic going for a very ill-advised falling/diving attempt that he whiffed on and of course the ball then rolled all the way to the wall and let the tying run score. Robbing the great Travis Wood of a deserved win. Basically, minor leaguers playing like the minor leaguers they are (except Schierholtz).

Good thing I'm rooting for a high draft pick or I might actually be upset.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?

Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on July 01, 2013, 08:53:32 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?

If I recall correctly, they've also played one of the tougher schedules in baseball. It'll probably make next year's March to .500 (subtitle: I'ts Gonna Hai) all the more surprising to a bunch of people who aren't really paying attention.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Brownie on July 01, 2013, 11:25:27 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 01, 2013, 02:35:36 AM
Quote from: PANK! on June 30, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
Quote from: Tonker on June 30, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
The Cubs are now 34-45.  Their X_WL, though, is 38-41, and their record in one-run games is 9-17.  In a parallel Universe, this team is around one marmol (the standard unit of suck) away from playing .500 ball.  Which is... something, but I'm not quite sure what.

Light years ahead of the confused pig fucking on the south side, I know that.

Outside the NL Central, the Cubs (X_WL now 39-41) currently have a better run differential (just -10) than everybody except Atlanta, Arizona and Colorado.  Pissburgh are less than half a run per game better than the Cubs, and yet currently stand 15.5 games ahead of your Chicago National League Ballclub, and a full five games ahead of their X_WL.  It's a funny old game, eh?



If Marmol hadn't blown that lead at Shiti Field, we'd be BUYERS!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 01, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
There have to be better ways to raise money for charity than lame T-shirts (Al) and sleep deprivation (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/01/force-me-to-blog-for-24-no-30-no-36-straight-hours-at-the-trade-deadline/) (Bleacher Brett), right?  "Donate lots of money and 'force' me to stay up for 30 hours" seems like a really weird sales pitch.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 01, 2013, 09:53:34 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
There have to be better ways to raise money for charity than lame T-shirts (Al) and sleep deprivation (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/01/force-me-to-blog-for-24-no-30-no-36-straight-hours-at-the-trade-deadline/) (Bleacher Brett), right?  "Donate lots of money and 'force' me to stay up for 30 hours" seems like a really weird sales pitch.

He should just go walk somewhere for a while or something.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 01, 2013, 11:13:18 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 01, 2013, 09:53:34 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
There have to be better ways to raise money for charity than lame T-shirts (Al) and sleep deprivation (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/01/force-me-to-blog-for-24-no-30-no-36-straight-hours-at-the-trade-deadline/) (Bleacher Brett), right?  "Donate lots of money and 'force' me to stay up for 30 hours" seems like a really weird sales pitch.

He should just go walk somewhere for a while or something.

Or he should ask himself, "Can the Cubs mend my broken heart?"
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on July 02, 2013, 06:29:42 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 11:13:18 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 01, 2013, 09:53:34 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
There have to be better ways to raise money for charity than lame T-shirts (Al) and sleep deprivation (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/01/force-me-to-blog-for-24-no-30-no-36-straight-hours-at-the-trade-deadline/) (Bleacher Brett), right?  "Donate lots of money and 'force' me to stay up for 30 hours" seems like a really weird sales pitch.

He should just go walk somewhere for a while or something.

Or he should ask himself, "Can the Cubs mend my broken heart?"

That line is what got me in trouble in the first place
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 02, 2013, 10:00:54 PM
Quote from: Yeti on July 02, 2013, 06:29:42 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 11:13:18 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 01, 2013, 09:53:34 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 01, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
There have to be better ways to raise money for charity than lame T-shirts (Al) and sleep deprivation (http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/01/force-me-to-blog-for-24-no-30-no-36-straight-hours-at-the-trade-deadline/) (Bleacher Brett), right?  "Donate lots of money and 'force' me to stay up for 30 hours" seems like a really weird sales pitch.

He should just go walk somewhere for a while or something.

Or he should ask himself, "Can the Cubs mend my broken heart?"

That line is what got me in trouble in the first place

I thought the line that got you in trouble was "Grass on the field? Play ball!"
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 03, 2013, 11:50:53 AM
Read these quotes from Sveum and tell me these aren't the words of a broken man.

"It's almost comical to see this happen every single night," Sveum said. "We have the lead and get beat by guys who sometimes hardly even hit home runs. [Norris] had one at-bat off a left-hander in 15 days and beats us with a three-run homer."

"I'm not concerned about [losing players due to trades]," Sveum said. "We're still viable and able to fill those roles now. If you start getting more thin, then things change. I'm not worried. They're professional players and they have to go out and perform."

"You're trying to stay out of a double play and make something happen, and once again, we didn't perform and swung right through a fastball," Sveum said.

That doesn't sound like a man with the passion and the fire.  He had to know what he was signing up for but it seems like it's been worse than he even thought.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 08, 2013, 09:54:27 PM
DPD. That was hilariously inept.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Armchair_QB on July 12, 2013, 04:18:09 PM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

It was heartening to see that Mike Matheny can be as big of assclown as his predecessor as well. Eat a bag of dicks, Mike.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on July 12, 2013, 06:15:20 PM
YES.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on July 13, 2013, 04:21:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

bAeutiflu.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 13, 2013, 07:58:44 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 13, 2013, 04:21:25 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

bAeutiflu.
ha!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on July 16, 2013, 08:56:21 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

Good god that's glorious.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 16, 2013, 10:50:18 AM
Quote from: PANK! on July 16, 2013, 08:56:21 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

Good god that's glorious.

I am still laughing at this.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: SKO on July 16, 2013, 10:55:58 AM
Quote from: Bort on July 16, 2013, 10:50:18 AM
Quote from: PANK! on July 16, 2013, 08:56:21 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

Good god that's glorious.

I am still laughing at this.

You're not the only one.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on July 16, 2013, 11:04:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on July 16, 2013, 10:55:58 AM
Quote from: Bort on July 16, 2013, 10:50:18 AM
Quote from: PANK! on July 16, 2013, 08:56:21 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

Good god that's glorious.

I am still laughing at this.

You're not the only one.

Who else is?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2013, 12:09:20 PM
http://blogs.providencejournal.com/sports/red-sox/2013/07/all-star-rosters-reveal-changing-landscape-of-team-construction.html

QuoteThe blueprint for team success in the majors has started slowly to change. More attention is paid to the draft each year, and building a team through free agency is becoming riskier and riskier.

A look at this year's All-Star rosters shows why.

Both the American and National league All-Star teams this season are testaments to the significance of prospect evaluation. Of the 78 players who earned All-Star recognition, more than half were acquired by their current team through the draft (35), an international singing (four) or a trade while still in the minor leagues (eight).

The draft has taken on additional significance in recent years, and for good reason. Thirty-five All-Stars were taken by their current team in the draft. That includes 20 first-round picks, with two top overall picks (Joe Mauer and Bryce Harper), three No. 2 picks, a No. 3, a No. 5 and three sevens. (The No. 7 pick, which the Red Sox used last month on pitcher Trey Ball, boasts the most alums at the All-Star Game, if we count Prince Fielder alongside Matt Harvey, Clayton Kershaw and Troy Tulowitzki.)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: BH on July 16, 2013, 12:10:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 16, 2013, 12:09:20 PM
http://blogs.providencejournal.com/sports/red-sox/2013/07/all-star-rosters-reveal-changing-landscape-of-team-construction.html

QuoteThe blueprint for team success in the majors has started slowly to change. More attention is paid to the draft each year, and building a team through free agency is becoming riskier and riskier.

A look at this year's All-Star rosters shows why.

Both the American and National league All-Star teams this season are testaments to the significance of prospect evaluation. Of the 78 players who earned All-Star recognition, more than half were acquired by their current team through the draft (35), an international singing (four) or a trade while still in the minor leagues (eight).

The draft has taken on additional significance in recent years, and for good reason. Thirty-five All-Stars were taken by their current team in the draft. That includes 20 first-round picks, with two top overall picks (Joe Mauer and Bryce Harper), three No. 2 picks, a No. 3, a No. 5 and three sevens. (The No. 7 pick, which the Red Sox used last month on pitcher Trey Ball, boasts the most alums at the All-Star Game, if we count Prince Fielder alongside Matt Harvey, Clayton Kershaw and Troy Tulowitzki.)

Prospects don't turn out man, give it a rest.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: Yeti on July 16, 2013, 11:04:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on July 16, 2013, 10:55:58 AM
Quote from: Bort on July 16, 2013, 10:50:18 AM
Quote from: PANK! on July 16, 2013, 08:56:21 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on July 12, 2013, 05:33:45 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 03:07:23 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 12, 2013, 12:47:36 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 12, 2013, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Bort on July 12, 2013, 11:25:40 AM
Quote from: Eli on July 12, 2013, 11:07:21 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on July 12, 2013, 10:53:15 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on July 12, 2013, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: Tonker on July 12, 2013, 02:29:38 AM
The Cubs may not be going anywhere this season (although with a 370/377 RS/RA ratio, they're one hammering by the Angels away from being a de facto .500 team), but beating (and blanking) the Tards never, ever gets old.

Also, I was very sorry to see noted gentleman Matt Holliday pull up with a sore hamstring.  I do hope he gets better soon.

THI.

But I don't have the blood in the mouth laugh over it that I used to have. It sucks. I want that feeling again.

Submitted into evidence as Exhibit B in Pex's transition towards full-blown Cardinal fandom.

It's only getting worse.

(http://i39.tinypic.com/2v3jyvl.jpg)

+1

LSA

No Packer love?

You leave Huey out if this.

(http://i.imgur.com/eLaQ0Uo.jpg)

Good god that's glorious.

I am still laughing at this.

You're not the only one.

Who else is?

I am. And Optoat is my new favorite made up word.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:23:51 PM
DPD. Optoat has officially replaced Jub Jub as the nickname for my cat.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:03:22 PM
Quote from: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:23:51 PM
DPD. Optoat has officially replaced Jub Jub as the nickname for my cat.

It's a cat. Just call it whatever you want.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on July 16, 2013, 01:03:53 PM
Quote from: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:03:22 PM
Quote from: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:23:51 PM
DPD. Optoat has officially replaced Jub Jub as the nickname for my cat.

It's a cat. Just call it whatever you want.

I think he is
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:13:26 PM
Quote from: Yeti on July 16, 2013, 01:03:53 PM
Quote from: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:03:22 PM
Quote from: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:23:51 PM
DPD. Optoat has officially replaced Jub Jub as the nickname for my cat.

It's a cat. Just call it whatever you want.

I think he is

Fair point.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on July 16, 2013, 05:13:53 PM
Quote from: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:13:26 PM
Quote from: Yeti on July 16, 2013, 01:03:53 PM
Quote from: Eli on July 16, 2013, 01:03:22 PM
Quote from: Tony on July 16, 2013, 12:23:51 PM
DPD. Optoat has officially replaced Jub Jub as the nickname for my cat.

It's a cat. Just call it whatever you want.

I think he is

Fair point.

It's a cat.  It doesn't matter what you call him.  He couldn't care less.  He's not going to come anyway.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on July 23, 2013, 01:44:46 PM
The Cubs are in the top half of the NL in OPS (http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/team/_/stat/batting/league/nl/sort/OPS/order/true). Yay?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on July 23, 2013, 02:32:10 PM
Quote from: Fork on July 23, 2013, 01:44:46 PM
The Cubs are in the top half of the NL in OPS (http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/team/_/stat/batting/league/nl/sort/OPS/order/true). Yay?

Third in slugging. The on base still kind of stinks.

Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: ChuckD on July 26, 2013, 09:11:54 AM
By my count, there are now only 5 players (Samardzija, Castro, Barney, Russell, and Castillo) who remain from the 25-man roster that Jepstink inherited in 2011. That's a lot of goddamn gutless fucking assholes to unload in <2 years.

Snorknado is now the longest tenured Cub -- 5 years as of yesterday.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on July 26, 2013, 09:25:02 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on July 26, 2013, 09:11:54 AM
By my count, there are now only 5 players (Samardzija, Castro, Barney, Russell, and Castillo) who remain from the 25-man roster that Jepstink inherited in 2011. That's a lot of goddamn gutless fucking assholes to unload in <2 years.

Snorknado is now the longest tenured Cub -- 5 years as of yesterday.

*polite clap*
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: ChuckD on July 26, 2013, 09:27:39 AM
Actually, make that 6 -- Rafael Dolis. However, even if you use the 40-man rosters from 2011 and 2013, you'll only find those same 6 names common to both.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on July 26, 2013, 09:36:19 AM
Quote from: Bort on July 26, 2013, 09:25:02 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on July 26, 2013, 09:11:54 AM
By my count, there are now only 5 players (Samardzija, Castro, Barney, Russell, and Castillo) who remain from the 25-man roster that Jepstink inherited in 2011. That's a lot of goddamn gutless fucking assholes to unload in <2 years.

Snorknado is now the longest tenured Cub -- 5 years as of yesterday.

*polite clap*

+1
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: flannj on July 26, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?

He smells... like really bad.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on July 26, 2013, 07:35:13 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?

Pretty sure I have a picture of this guy with my (at the time) 2.5-year old daughter before a late September game in 2008 an--HOLY SHIT HE WASN'T OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED?!?!  THIS RUINS EVERYTHING!  *burns picture*
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on July 26, 2013, 07:57:11 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 26, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?

He smells... like really bad.


He didn't do himself any favors on B&B. I'm not sure he's all there.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Shooter on July 27, 2013, 12:18:32 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 07:57:11 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 26, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?

He smells... like really bad.


He didn't do himself any favors on B&B. I'm not sure he's all there.

North side version of Andy the Clown? I'm pretty sure the Sox invited him to Old Comiskey just in time for the demolition.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Slaky on July 29, 2013, 09:08:13 AM
Sweeping the Giants (however shitty they are) means the Cubs are now seven games under .500 and 9.5 games out of the wild card.

I think it's time for the annual TJ Explains How The Cubs Win It All post.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on July 29, 2013, 09:22:16 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 07:57:11 PM
Quote from: flannj on July 26, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on July 26, 2013, 04:48:12 PM
So I'd never heard of or seen this Billy Cub guy (http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=9181458) before this week. Anyone have any run-ins?

He smells... like really bad.


He didn't do himself any favors on B&B. I'm not sure he's all there.


Still better than Jerry Pritikin.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 07, 2013, 09:23:20 PM
WHERE WAS DONNIE MURPHY WHEN THIS TEAM NEEDED HIM, BACK BEFORE LAZY STARLIN AND HIS BUDS GAVE UP ON THE SEASON? YOU SUCK, EPSTINK!
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 08, 2013, 01:01:11 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on August 07, 2013, 09:23:20 PM
WHERE WAS DONNIE MURPHY WHEN THIS TEAM NEEDED HIM, BACK BEFORE LAZY STARLIN AND HIS BUDS GAVE UP ON THE SEASON? YOU SUCK, EPSTINK!

Donnie is obviously out of his element.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on August 08, 2013, 09:35:53 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 08, 2013, 01:01:11 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on August 07, 2013, 09:23:20 PM
WHERE WAS DONNIE MURPHY WHEN THIS TEAM NEEDED HIM, BACK BEFORE LAZY STARLIN AND HIS BUDS GAVE UP ON THE SEASON? YOU SUCK, EPSTINK!

Donnie is obviously out of his element.

In two days Donnie has hit one seventh of the homeruns of his career
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on August 08, 2013, 12:35:27 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 08, 2013, 09:35:53 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 08, 2013, 01:01:11 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on August 07, 2013, 09:23:20 PM
WHERE WAS DONNIE MURPHY WHEN THIS TEAM NEEDED HIM, BACK BEFORE LAZY STARLIN AND HIS BUDS GAVE UP ON THE SEASON? YOU SUCK, EPSTINK!

Donnie is obviously out of his element.

In two days Donnie has hit one seventh of the homeruns of his career

Perhaps
Excellence
Develops
Slowly?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2013, 01:10:36 AM
Right that wrong, Theo! (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20130908_Moyer_still_trying_to_defy_the_ages.html)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Tonker on September 08, 2013, 11:36:27 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2013, 01:10:36 AM
Right that wrong, Theo! (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20130908_Moyer_still_trying_to_defy_the_ages.html)

That is some fucking terrible writing.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 09, 2013, 08:54:56 AM
Quote from: Tonker on September 08, 2013, 11:36:27 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 08, 2013, 01:10:36 AM
Right that wrong, Theo! (http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/phillies/20130908_Moyer_still_trying_to_defy_the_ages.html)

That is some fucking terrible writing.

Fuck it, it's already been done (http://www.amazon.com/The-Greatest-Summer-Remarkable-Comeback/dp/013364927X).
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on September 10, 2013, 09:26:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I'd be interested to know if a team coming off 100 losses has ever had a farm team lock up a league title with 4 innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian before.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 10, 2013, 09:34:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 10, 2013, 09:26:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I'd be interested to know if a team coming off 100 losses has ever had a farm team lock up a league title with 4 innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian before.

  The previous record included three innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 10, 2013, 09:37:18 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 10, 2013, 09:26:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I'd be interested to know if a team coming off 100 losses has ever had a farm team lock up a league title with 4 innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian before.

Edwards and Searle also combined for a 2-hit shutout in the first round of the playoffs - Searle gave up the hits in that one. So there's that.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on September 10, 2013, 10:15:16 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 10, 2013, 09:34:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 10, 2013, 09:26:42 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I'd be interested to know if a team coming off 100 losses has ever had a farm team lock up a league title with 4 innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian before.

  The previous record included three innings of no-hit pitching by an Australian.

Ah, ol' one'eyed Mick McGillicacken, the erstwhile Cleveland Spiders farmhand. Totes forgot about him.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 10, 2013, 10:36:34 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

This numbering convention is Peter King-approved.  Although he'd like to see more mixing of numbers and letters.  Name three better ways to make lists than that.  You can't.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on September 11, 2013, 12:31:10 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I don't remember any of these guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_players_from_Australia) playing for the Cubs.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Quality Start Machine on September 11, 2013, 12:36:25 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on September 11, 2013, 12:31:10 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I don't remember any of these guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_players_from_Australia) playing for the Cubs.

Once Searle makes the big club, Tonk needs to go jersey shopping.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 11, 2013, 12:39:53 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on September 11, 2013, 12:31:10 PM
Quote from: Fork on September 10, 2013, 09:04:24 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 09, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 09, 2013, 09:05:57 PM
Two significant events tonight.  !.  Cubs tied their win total for 1961 (ho hum) 2.  They beat Bronson Arroyo (!)

#> Daytona Cubs win the Florida State League championship on 5 innings of 1-hit pitching from C.J. Edwards plus 4 innings of no-hit pitching from something called Ryan Searle.

Ryan Searle is Australian. I don't think the Cubs have ever had one of those.

I don't remember any of these guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_players_from_Australia) playing for the Cubs.

Elaine: "Would you like something to read?
Passenger: "Do you have anything light?"
Elaine: "How about this leaflet, List of Major League Baseball players from Australia?"
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on September 19, 2013, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

why
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 19, 2013, 02:07:09 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.

And, if there's anyone around here who should be totally cool with waiting on a "long term plan" to play out, it's the guy born in the 1930s.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 02:09:02 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 19, 2013, 02:07:09 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.

And, if there's anyone around here who should be totally cool with waiting on a "long term plan" to play out, it's the guy born in the 1930s.

yep.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Bort on September 19, 2013, 02:16:09 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 02:09:02 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 19, 2013, 02:07:09 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.

And, if there's anyone around here who should be totally cool with waiting on a "long term plan" to play out, it's the guy born in the 1930s.

yep.
To be fair, you probably should have given up on this team before any of us were born.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 04:28:38 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 02:16:09 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 02:09:02 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 19, 2013, 02:07:09 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.

And, if there's anyone around here who should be totally cool with waiting on a "long term plan" to play out, it's the guy born in the 1930s.

yep.
To be fair, you probably should have given up on this team before any of us were born.
It was stubbornness.  The family moved to San Francisco ten years before the Giants came to town.  It was natural that I would continue to follow the Cubs since there was no major league baseball west of St. Louis, (you should forgive the expression).  The Cubs were in the World Series four years before I left town.  Who knew what the future held?  When the Giants arrived I was in too deep to switch allegiance.  Anyway, being a fan is not something I can turn off, although the Ricketts are insisting that I do so.  In the summer of 1984 I threw a party for transplanted Chicagoans living in Berkeley.  There were dozens of them.  We served deep dish pizza (from Zachary's, look it up), Chicago hot dogs and Old Style beer.  The TVs were showing a Cub game.  During the party every single one of my guests confessed that they no longer cared about the Cubs. Even in 1984?   My own brother told me that he couldn't tell me the name of a single Cub player.   I was dumbfounded.   My wife, a California girl, was and is a trouper.  She went to Chicago with me to go to the league championship games in 1984 and even attended the playoffs in San Francisco in 1989, when we played hookey from afternoon Yom Kippur services.  Even in this rotten year she attended all of the Cubs games in Oakland and San Francisco with me.  If that isn't true love, what is?
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Internet Apex on September 19, 2013, 06:09:37 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 04:28:38 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 02:16:09 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 02:09:02 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 19, 2013, 02:07:09 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 19, 2013, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 19, 2013, 12:21:29 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 19, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
I read earlier this week, I think that it was in the TRIB, that Epstein/Hoyer hadn't made any decisions about Sveum for the third year of his contract.  They weren't holding the loss totals of the last two years against Sveum, and that they recognized that they were responsible for those.  That being the case, is it conceivable that they would fire themselves?  Or at least give back some of their salaries?

They pretty much told people to expect the team to lose, so ... no?

For the first time in any of our lives, the Cubs actually seem to have a long term plan that they have every intention of sticking to, and are making material progress towards attaining goals. Now would be a perfect time to throw in the towel.

And, if there's anyone around here who should be totally cool with waiting on a "long term plan" to play out, it's the guy born in the 1930s.

yep.
To be fair, you probably should have given up on this team before any of us were born.
It was stubbornness.  The family moved to San Francisco ten years before the Giants came to town.  It was natural that I would continue to follow the Cubs since there was no major league baseball west of St. Louis, (you should forgive the expression).  The Cubs were in the World Series four years before I left town.  Who knew what the future held?  When the Giants arrived I was in too deep to switch allegiance.  Anyway, being a fan is not something I can turn off, although the Ricketts are insisting that I do so.  In the summer of 1984 I threw a party for transplanted Chicagoans living in Berkeley.  There were dozens of them.  We served deep dish pizza (from Zachary's, look it up), Chicago hot dogs and Old Style beer.  The TVs were showing a Cub game.  During the party every single one of my guests confessed that they no longer cared about the Cubs. Even in 1984?   My own brother told me that he couldn't tell me the name of a single Cub player.   I was dumbfounded.   My wife, a California girl, was and is a trouper.  She went to Chicago with me to go to the league championship games in 1984 and even attended the playoffs in San Francisco in 1989, when we played hookey from afternoon Yom Kippur services.  Even in this rotten year she attended all of the Cubs games in Oakland and San Francisco with me.  If that isn't true love, what is?

All of that is fascinating. I doubt if anyone will care to hear my own story when 900 years old I reach. I can tell them how I moved from Buttpuddle to the very doorsteps of Wrigley Field and then stopped watching games for three years while they renovated the stadium and the roster. I'll tell them about the little old man from Berkeley who shook his fist at the baseball Gods for inventing Moneyball and making him sweat out the rebuild while the sands of time dwindled down.

This will all be worth it, you know. You'll see.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 23, 2013, 11:40:48 PM
Two days in a row.  Two different visiting teams clinch the playoffs at Wrigley.  That has got to be a record. 
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 24, 2013, 01:22:42 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 23, 2013, 11:40:48 PM
Two days in a row.  Two different visiting teams clinch the playoffs at Wrigley.  That has got to be a record. 

Only thing that could make it better is both pitchers also winning their 300th games.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Yeti on September 24, 2013, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 24, 2013, 01:22:42 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 23, 2013, 11:40:48 PM
Two days in a row.  Two different visiting teams clinch the playoffs at Wrigley.  That has got to be a record. 

Only thing that could make it better is both pitchers also winning their 300th games.

via No-Hitters
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 24, 2013, 08:41:28 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 24, 2013, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 24, 2013, 01:22:42 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 23, 2013, 11:40:48 PM
Two days in a row.  Two different visiting teams clinch the playoffs at Wrigley.  That has got to be a record. 

Only thing that could make it better is both pitchers also winning their 300th games.

via No-Hitters
On the other hand, it is good for tourism.  "Come to Chicago.  See your team fatten up.  Visiting teams are guaranteed to win or your fourth day is free."
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Saul Goodman on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on September 30, 2013, 04:07:55 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.

The problem is that they haven't explained how or why letting Sveum finish out his contract would be inconsistent with "the Plan."
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: flannj on September 30, 2013, 04:20:35 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.

Transpose the first two words of the sentence made bold and you have your answer.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: PenFoe on September 30, 2013, 04:22:36 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 30, 2013, 04:07:55 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.

The problem is that they haven't explained how or why letting Sveum finish out his contract would be inconsistent with "the Plan."

I think it's because the plan is to develop young players and they don't think Sveum is good at that, now having seen him for two years.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 04:31:08 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 30, 2013, 04:07:55 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.

The problem is that they haven't explained how or why letting Sveum finish out his contract would be inconsistent with "the Plan."

Listen, I get that someone getting dismissed from the Cubs organization without the club totally torching said someone's reputation via the media both before and after the dismissal is kind of a novel thing. But I think it's quite possible that, from their vantage points in the front office, Theo and Jed are privy to a number of details about Sveum's strengths and weaknesses as a major league field manager and developer of young talent that maybe we, the general public, can't see. And that perhaps they'd prefer not to go around airing out Sveum's shortcomings just for sake of looking a little bit better themselves.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CT III on September 30, 2013, 07:29:40 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 04:31:08 PM
Quote from: CBStew on September 30, 2013, 04:07:55 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on September 30, 2013, 03:33:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 30, 2013, 02:37:10 PM
You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.

(http://i.imgur.com/1vPGSL8.jpg)

Bonus points for the prescient CTA train illustration in the nameplate.

Theo has a lot to answer for?  What?  Only if the people who keep asking questions weren't listening to the answers they've been given for two-plus years.  It continues to astound that people still demand accountability for Theo and Jed when they couldn't have been more clear since the beginning about what they're doing.  No, they're not perfect, but I'm getting pretty much what I expected to get since they took over.  Is it just easier for hacks to stir shit up and be "provocative" than to actually try reporting on how the plan is going, whether it needs to be modified, what's working and what isn't?  Someone help me out here.

The problem is that they haven't explained how or why letting Sveum finish out his contract would be inconsistent with "the Plan."

Listen, I get that someone getting dismissed from the Cubs organization without the club totally torching said someone's reputation via the media both before and after the dismissal is kind of a novel thing. But I think it's quite possible that, from their vantage points in the front office, Theo and Jed are privy to a number of details about Sveum's strengths and weaknesses as a major league field manager and developer of young talent that maybe we, the general public, can't see. And that perhaps they'd prefer not to go around airing out Sveum's shortcomings just for sake of looking a little bit better themselves.

You are forgetting sir, that we "the general public" pay these people's celeries.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: R-V on March 07, 2014, 11:53:15 AM
Sveumstink was terrible *

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2014/3/5/5471442/estimating-number-of-runs-saved-by-infield-shifts

* Or maybe this is just statistical noise/bad luck
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: Eli on March 07, 2014, 12:21:27 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 07, 2014, 11:53:15 AM
Sveumstink was terrible *

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2014/3/5/5471442/estimating-number-of-runs-saved-by-infield-shifts

* Or maybe this is just statistical noise/bad luck

There also seems to be a very rough correlation between runs saved and the quality of the team (not always, since good teams like the Tigers ranked low). It could just be that the Cubs were pretty bad at everything and the numbers reflected that.

Like you said, too much noise here to really be that useful.
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 07, 2014, 01:35:50 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 07, 2014, 12:21:27 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 07, 2014, 11:53:15 AM
Sveumstink was terrible *

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2014/3/5/5471442/estimating-number-of-runs-saved-by-infield-shifts

* Or maybe this is just statistical noise/bad luck

...It could just be that the Cubs were pretty bad at everything...



Captain Obvious
Title: Re: 2013 Epstink's Chicago Cubstinks
Post by: CBStew on March 16, 2014, 09:04:03 PM
Que lastima!

The Cubs have fired their team psychologist