Desipio Message Board

General Category => The Dead Pool => Topic started by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 12:14:06 PM

Title: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 12:14:06 PM
First Bonnie Franklin, now Pat Harrington (http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/entertainment/pat-harrington-obit-dead-feat/index.html) (aka Schneider.)

Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Bort on January 07, 2016, 01:31:24 PM
"That really made me stiff, by which I mean..."
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.

SEE, CT??
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: CT III on January 07, 2016, 01:43:20 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.

SEE, CT??

Here's the difference as I see it, most everyone else is either reacting after the thread is posted, or in Tonk's case reacting to thinking it was posted.  You are the only one who begins flooding the messageboard and the Shoutbox (RIP) with WHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOST at 12:01 on January 1st and whinges ceaselessly until Thrill finally posts the damn thing.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:44:29 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 01:43:20 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.

SEE, CT??

Here's the difference as I see it, most everyone else is either reacting after the thread is posted, or in Tonk's case reacting to thinking it was posted.  You are the only one who begins flooding the messageboard and the Shoutbox (RIP) with WHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOST at 12:01 on January 1st and whinges ceaselessly until Thrill finally posts the damn thing.

My ceaseless whinging is really the differentiator.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on January 07, 2016, 01:48:35 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:44:29 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 01:43:20 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.

SEE, CT??

Here's the difference as I see it, most everyone else is either reacting after the thread is posted, or in Tonk's case reacting to thinking it was posted.  You are the only one who begins flooding the messageboard and the Shoutbox (RIP) with WHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOSTWHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOST at 12:01 on January 1st and whinges ceaselessly until Thrill finally posts the damn thing.

My ceaseless whinging is really the differentiator.

None of it matters.  I've taken to tweeting at the fucker and he's still apparently busy crafting the figurines for his hippie community hummel collection to get off his ass and give us what we want.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on January 07, 2016, 02:36:50 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

Well, he was my #2, so ON DA BOARD!!!
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: R-V on January 07, 2016, 02:39:44 PM
I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that Huey doesn't like vegans, or hippies.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 07:34:35 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
I'm banking on her family to take her off life support

Quote from: PenPho on January 04, 2011, 10:26:12 AM
I had Gerry Rafferty on one of my earlier entries, but pulled him off after I read they took him off life support because his kidneys started responding again.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Saul Goodman on January 07, 2016, 07:38:08 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 07:34:35 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
I'm banking on her family to take her off life support

Quote from: PenPho on January 04, 2011, 10:26:12 AM
I had Gerry Rafferty on one of my earlier entries, but pulled him off after I read they took him off life support because his kidneys started responding again.

hey Pen, who ya crappin?
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: CT III on January 07, 2016, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

Look, I'm all for Wheezer and his esoteric quasi-celebrities, but I'd have known we could use stuff like this, I'd have just called the local cancer ward and gotten the names of the 10 sickest patients.

Stupid HIPAA.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 08:15:21 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

Look, I'm all for Wheezer and his esoteric quasi-celebrities, but I'd have known we could use stuff like this, I'd have just called the local cancer ward and gotten the names of the 10 sickest patients.

Stupid HIPAA.

Except then none of those people would die
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on January 07, 2016, 08:58:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 08:15:21 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

Look, I'm all for Wheezer and his esoteric quasi-celebrities, but I'd have known we could use stuff like this, I'd have just called the local cancer ward and gotten the names of the 10 sickest patients.

Stupid HIPAA.

Except then none of those people would die

Seems the least you could do, CT.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: CT III on January 07, 2016, 09:19:08 PM
Quote from: PANK! on January 07, 2016, 08:58:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 08:15:21 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

Look, I'm all for Wheezer and his esoteric quasi-celebrities, but I'd have known we could use stuff like this, I'd have just called the local cancer ward and gotten the names of the 10 sickest patients.

Stupid HIPAA.

Except then none of those people would die

Seems the least you could do, CT.

WHERE'S THE STUPID POST THRILL?
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Wheezer on January 07, 2016, 11:03:24 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 01:43:20 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 01:38:32 PM
Quote from: Tonker on January 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
Goddammit, Pen: a new thread in the Dead Pool?  For a moment, I got my hopes up.

SEE, CT??

Here's the difference as I see it, most everyone else is either reacting after the thread is posted, or in Tonk's case reacting to thinking it was posted.  You are the only one who begins flooding the messageboard and the Shoutbox (RIP) with WHERESTHEDEADPOOLPOST ... at 12:01 on January 1st and whinges ceaselessly until Thrill finally posts the damn thing.

Were you people able to read the subject line or not? The only reaction I had was "Mackenzie Phillips outlasts another one."

[Edit.—On further recollection, I perceived a brief mental seize-up in which which the "Bonnie Franklin" circuit was triggered and received separate replies. First was "finally dead?" Then "wait, already dead?" The resolution of course was "read post." However, interpreted as a Gedankenexperiment, it occurs to me that it might have represented a nontrivially interesting way of connecting object-oriented AI models to experiment back in the day, with the remaining question being whether there was a realizable fMRI/PET instantiation: What replies can a BonnieFranklin object return? Why the delay? Were there two messages? Etc.]
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Wheezer on January 08, 2016, 12:00:04 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

This has proved to be a poor criterion for me in the past, although I did at least take care in choosing the particular inmates.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Wheezer on January 08, 2016, 01:03:04 AM
Finally,

Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

I suspect that what you're betting on is ill defined (http://ia601508.us.archive.org/6/items/gov.uscourts.cand.294144/gov.uscourts.cand.294144.docket.html). Then again, "questionable" is not a well-defined Dead Pool term of art, either, although it has an attestation in the superlative form "highly questionable."

And I spent a good half of my free PACER allotment for the quarter bringing the docket current and downloading the exhibits (N.D. Cal. helpfully pads them with a blank page) to the complaint, so you're welcome.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Tonker on January 08, 2016, 01:14:37 AM
This is certainly the first time that one of my picks died before Thrill posted...
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: PenFoe on January 08, 2016, 09:33:11 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 08, 2016, 01:14:37 AM
This is certainly the first time that one of my picks died before Thrill posted...

Are we sure that Thrill hasn't died?
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on January 08, 2016, 09:36:12 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 08, 2016, 09:33:11 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 08, 2016, 01:14:37 AM
This is certainly the first time that one of my picks died before Thrill posted...

Are we sure that Thrill hasn't died?

Well yeah.   He keeps trolling here, peppering us with reminders that HE HASN'T FINISHED HIS FUCKING JOB.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Bort on January 08, 2016, 09:41:40 AM
Quote from: PANK! on January 08, 2016, 09:36:12 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 08, 2016, 09:33:11 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 08, 2016, 01:14:37 AM
This is certainly the first time that one of my picks died before Thrill posted...

Are we sure that Thrill hasn't died?

Well yeah.   He keeps trolling here, peppering us with reminders that HE HASN'T FINISHED HIS FUCKING JOB.

Take your time, Thrill. This is gold.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Quality Start Machine on January 08, 2016, 09:48:29 AM
Quote from: Bort on January 08, 2016, 09:41:40 AM
Quote from: PANK! on January 08, 2016, 09:36:12 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 08, 2016, 09:33:11 AM
Quote from: Tonker on January 08, 2016, 01:14:37 AM
This is certainly the first time that one of my picks died before Thrill posted...

Are we sure that Thrill hasn't died?

Well yeah.   He keeps trolling here, peppering us with reminders that HE HASN'T FINISHED HIS FUCKING JOB.

Take your time, Thrill. This is gold.

Christmas works for me.
Title: Re: One Dead At a Time
Post by: Wheezer on January 10, 2016, 01:05:12 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 05:22:56 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 07, 2016, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 03:36:59 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on January 07, 2016, 02:24:49 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM
To be fair, Pen's probably just really itching to get some points that he may not actually ever get.

They're my points until they're not.

As a matter of fact, you've got two picks that could be problematic.

I don't even know if you're referring to Schumacher or McMath, but I stand by both of those picks.

If this is the McMath you're referring to then I call bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahi_McMath_case)

She's more legit than anyone on Death Row with a scheduled execution date.

I'm banking on her family to take her off life support (or her heart to stop beating)in 2016 which is pretty damn unlikely based on any history here.

Look, I'm all for Wheezer and his esoteric quasi-celebrities, but I'd have known we could use stuff like this, I'd have just called the local cancer ward and gotten the names of the 10 sickest patients.

Stupid HIPAA.

Dammit, now I hear about Darren Steven Miller (https://www.facebook.com/darren.s.miller.9/posts/10207674039996328?fref=nf).