I'm in. You can call me 'Crazy Aunt Martha' or 'Pittsburgh Diving Champion' or whatever you want...
As long as you're calling me 'winner' at the end.
As long as you're calling me 'winner' at the end.
OK A-holes. It's fixed. Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them. I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Corn-fed on September 27, 2007, 12:49:46 PMQuote from: TJ on September 27, 2007, 12:46:44 PMQuote from: CT II on September 27, 2007, 09:59:45 AMQuote from: DPappy on September 27, 2007, 09:56:53 AMQuote from: Andy on September 27, 2007, 09:13:50 AM
I couldn't believe Ned brought in McLung to hit Pujols. He had McLung and Turdthrow both warming up at the same time. You knew what he was going to do. Somebody on baseball primer pointed out that as bad as Turdthrow has been he's tragically terrible when entering a game with runners on (something like 6.23 ERA for the entire season...even with his "good" start to the season included). So you guarantee that Pujols will be on first when that mouthbreathin' dope comes in. Ned might as well have pulled the stock on the floodgates on his way to the clubhouse after that move.
Now it's down to this. If the Cubs lose the rest of their games they'll probably have to play a one-gamer at Wrigley. If they win one, they'll win the division.
Not exactly the most graceful way to win it, but who gives a shit?
The Brewers recap says that in Turdthrow's August/September outings, he's allowed 12 of 14 inherited runners to score. Wow.
And yet Yost keeps marching him out there. This must have been what it was like for Astros when Baker was managing the team in 2004.
Hey not even the Farns was that bad.
What of LaTrojan?
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on September 08, 2007, 01:38:17 AMQuote from: CT II on September 07, 2007, 11:41:36 PM
Bump.
All three "contending" teams lose again tonight. I feel no anxiety about this divisional race. It's fucking hilarious that none of these teams can get out of their own way.
I'm proud to note that I predicted a month ago the Cubs would back into this thing and win the Central.....with a .500 record. Prescient, I am, or something.
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PMQuote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PMQuote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AMQuote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it. After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry. I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.
I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four. I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?
If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.
Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion. I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...
What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game? To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings. I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either. Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench. It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League.
I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision. Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.
Gary Roberts
Excited for hockey, are ya?
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AMQuote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it. After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry. I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.
I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four. I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?
If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.
Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion. I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...
What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game? To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings. I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either. Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench. It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League.
I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision. Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.
Quote from: LoneStarCubFan on August 11, 2007, 09:59:08 PM
Fuck Brad Lidge. Fuck him right in the fucking ear.
Quote from: ~Apex on August 08, 2007, 05:16:52 PM
19-4, F
Milwaukee
IP H R ER BB K HR Season ERA
Y. Gallardo (L, 4-2) 2.2 12 11 11 3 1 2 4.20
C. Villanueva 0.2 3 4 3 0 1 1 4.46
M. Wise 0.2 2 1 1 1 1 0 3.55
M. Parra 2.0 1 1 1 1 3 0 3.06
B. Shouse 1.0 5 2 2 0 2 0 2.60
D. Turnbow 1.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3.88
Quote from: Andy on August 04, 2007, 11:35:14 PMQuote from: BC on July 30, 2007, 01:28:18 PM
Let's say that...
This week:
Cubs go 2-5
Brewers go 2-4
Cardinals go 4-2
Standings would be:
MIL 59-53 --
CHC 57-53 1 GB
STL 53-55 4 GB
Next week:
Cubs go 2-5
Brewers go 1-5
Cardinals go 5-2
MIL 60-58 --
CHC 59-58 .5 GB
STL 58-57 .5 GB
Week after (Remember that STL plays both MIL and CHC):
Say the Cardinals sweep the Brewers at MIL while the Cubs can only win 1 of 3 from the Reds, then the Cardinals go to CHC and win 2 of 3 while the Brewers can win 2 of 3 from the Reds...
Cubs go 2-4
Brewers go 2-4
Cardinals go 5-1
STL 63-58 --
MIL 62-62 2.5 GB
CHC 61-62 3 GB
-----
That scenario is realistic, and doesn't even take into account worst-case scenarios that could see the Brewers and Cubs even farther behind than the 2.5 and 3 games back they are in this scenario.
I'm still trying to follow this. Where do the 15-1 and 12-1 losses the Cardinals have posted on their way to a 1-5 road trip through Pissburgh and DC fit in?
Quote from: DPappy on July 28, 2007, 10:41:01 PMQuote from: ~Apex on July 28, 2007, 10:06:55 PM
Yeah, no shit. The Tards are finished. But the Astros! Oh, buddy, the Astros give me fits when I sleep. I'm also scared of the boogie man, the Detroit Lions, Peter King and Al Gore.
Heh heh heh...
They traded Dan Wheeler to Tampa Bay for Ty Wigginton. It's funny to think that a team that's 10.5 games back is buying instead of selling, but this IS the Astros we're talking about here....
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2952871
Quote from: ~Apex on June 19, 2007, 10:47:10 PM
But hell, the last two years we couldn't even play with ourselves. So there's that.
Quote from: hammerman on May 19, 2007, 05:49:43 PM
My man-love for Derrek has never been stronger.