News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11  ( 157,727 )

Ivy6

  • Hank White Fan Club
  • Posts: 686
  • Location: Buffalo Grove
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #300 on: October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM »
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #301 on: October 08, 2009, 10:06:14 PM »
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

And he's dreamy.
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.

Dr. Nguyen Van Falk

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,887
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #302 on: October 08, 2009, 10:06:58 PM »
Quote from: JD on October 08, 2009, 10:06:14 PM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

And he's dreamy.

Hi again.
WHAT THESE FANCY DANS IN CHICAGO THINK THEY DO?

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #303 on: October 08, 2009, 10:08:54 PM »
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on October 08, 2009, 10:06:58 PM
Quote from: JD on October 08, 2009, 10:06:14 PM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

And he's dreamy.

Hi again.

Stop rubbing my left knee.  It's not going to work. 
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #304 on: October 09, 2009, 08:18:10 AM »
Quote from: JD on October 08, 2009, 10:08:54 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on October 08, 2009, 10:06:58 PM
Quote from: JD on October 08, 2009, 10:06:14 PM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

And he's dreamy.

Hi again.

Stop rubbing my left knee.  It's not going to work. 

Lefty no likey?
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Powdered Toast Man

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,921
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #305 on: October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM »
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.
IAN/YETI 2012!  "IT MEANS WHAT WE SAY IT MEANS!"


Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #306 on: October 09, 2009, 08:38:28 AM »
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

77 what?

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #307 on: October 09, 2009, 08:40:37 AM »
Quote from: Oleg on October 09, 2009, 08:38:28 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

77 what?

77 sweaty grunts per daily workout.


Philberto

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,884
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #308 on: October 09, 2009, 08:41:22 AM »
Quote from: Oleg on October 09, 2009, 08:38:28 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

77 what?

Probably OPS+

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #309 on: October 09, 2009, 08:42:03 AM »
Quote from: IrishYeti on October 09, 2009, 08:41:22 AM
Quote from: Oleg on October 09, 2009, 08:38:28 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

77 what?

Probably OPS+

Gotcha.

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #310 on: October 09, 2009, 11:32:47 AM »
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

Considering the 05-08 Burrell played healthy in the NL and 09 Burrell played oft-injured in the AL, this isn't that bad a return, all things considered.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

Powdered Toast Man

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,921
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #311 on: October 09, 2009, 11:55:30 AM »
Quote from: PenFoe on October 09, 2009, 11:32:47 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

Considering the 05-08 Burrell played healthy in the NL and 09 Burrell played oft-injured in the AL, this isn't that bad a return, all things considered.

I keep thinking about this and my initial reaction is to disagree with everything you say,  but I keep coming to the conclusion that getting rid of Bradley is priority one and the return is icing on the cake.  Plus, Pat Burrell is white.
IAN/YETI 2012!  "IT MEANS WHAT WE SAY IT MEANS!"


R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #312 on: October 09, 2009, 12:07:10 PM »
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 11:55:30 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on October 09, 2009, 11:32:47 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

Considering the 05-08 Burrell played healthy in the NL and 09 Burrell played oft-injured in the AL, this isn't that bad a return, all things considered.

I keep thinking about this and my initial reaction is to disagree with everything you say,  but I keep coming to the conclusion that getting rid of Bradley is priority one and the return is icing on the cake.  Plus, Pat Burrell is white.

So, Burrell in left center and Soriano in left. Our Cubbiez still need a center or right fielder.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #313 on: October 09, 2009, 12:10:46 PM »

Yeah, but racist Cub fans at least had a catchy nickname for the Soriano/Fukudome/Bradley outfield.

What can you do with "Pat the Bat"?
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: The 2010 Cubs Free Agent and Roster Moves Thread: SAVEENG OUR KUBBEEZ!!11
« Reply #314 on: October 09, 2009, 12:11:02 PM »
Quote from: R-V on October 09, 2009, 12:07:10 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 11:55:30 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on October 09, 2009, 11:32:47 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 09, 2009, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: Ivy6 on October 08, 2009, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 08, 2009, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: BH on October 08, 2009, 03:59:36 PM
"Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times believes the Cubs are pushing the Rays to make a deal for Milton Bradley quickly.
Chicago would certainly like to avoid the Bradley saga dragging out all offseason, impacting their free agency plans and are likely to be aggressive as a result. The Rays were one of Bradley's top suitors last winter and would theoretically still be interested. Tampa opted for Pat Burrell instead at a cheaper price (two years, $16 million as opposed to 3/$30), who had a rough year. A Bradley/Burrell deal makes a lot of sense, but the Cubbies would have to toss in money to make it happen.
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Related: Pat Burrell"

32 years old and a million different kinds of awful last year.  This will end well.

He's a free swinger. Donuts likes guys like this.

Pat Burrell?  One of the most disciplined hitters in the league back before he passed away? The guy who walked 103 times a year from 05-08?  Or do you mean he's free swinging in that he strikes out a lot?  I hate those guys, especially when they get on base at a .363 clip over their careers.

05-08 Burrell, sure.  Dead 09 Burrell, no thanks:  .221 .315 .367 .682 77 in 122 games.

Considering the 05-08 Burrell played healthy in the NL and 09 Burrell played oft-injured in the AL, this isn't that bad a return, all things considered.

I keep thinking about this and my initial reaction is to disagree with everything you say,  but I keep coming to the conclusion that getting rid of Bradley is priority one and the return is icing on the cake.  Plus, Pat Burrell is white.

So, Burrell in left center and Soriano in left. Our Cubbiez still need a center or right fielder.

I assume Burrell will figure out how to play RF, given enough time to do so.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.