News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: Inglorious Basterds  ( 17,438 )

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #30 on: August 28, 2009, 02:11:31 PM »
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on August 28, 2009, 01:08:08 PM
Samuel L. Jackson's voiceovers seemed tacked on. Maybe there were other quibbles, but I can't immediately recall them.

Holy shit, that was Samuel L. Jackson?  I should probably watch this again.
Hire Jim Essian!

flannj

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,369
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #31 on: August 28, 2009, 02:16:35 PM »
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 01:54:01 PM
I hate this movie because everyone else here likes it.
I hate everyone here because they've seen the movie and I haven't.
"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." -- Al Swearengen

TDubbs

  • TJG's 5th best writer
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,894
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #32 on: August 28, 2009, 02:17:42 PM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on August 28, 2009, 02:11:31 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on August 28, 2009, 01:08:08 PM
Samuel L. Jackson's voiceovers seemed tacked on. Maybe there were other quibbles, but I can't immediately recall them.

Holy shit, that was Samuel L. Jackson?  I should probably watch this again.

Or at least hear it again.
THERE ARE TOO MANY MEN ON THE FIELD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dr. Nguyen Van Falk

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,887
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #33 on: August 28, 2009, 02:30:01 PM »
Quote from: Kermit, B. on August 28, 2009, 02:11:31 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on August 28, 2009, 01:08:08 PM
Samuel L. Jackson's voiceovers seemed tacked on. Maybe there were other quibbles, but I can't immediately recall them.

Holy shit, that was Samuel L. Jackson?  I should probably watch this again.

And the voice on the other end of the two-way radio was Harvey Keitel.
WHAT THESE FANCY DANS IN CHICAGO THINK THEY DO?

Kermit, B.

  • Missing Daryle Ward since 10/04/08
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,978
  • Location: The nucleus of a uranium atom
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #34 on: August 28, 2009, 02:30:26 PM »
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on August 28, 2009, 02:30:01 PM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on August 28, 2009, 02:11:31 PM
Quote from: Dr. Nguyen Van Falk on August 28, 2009, 01:08:08 PM
Samuel L. Jackson's voiceovers seemed tacked on. Maybe there were other quibbles, but I can't immediately recall them.

Holy shit, that was Samuel L. Jackson?  I should probably watch this again.

And the voice on the other end of the two-way radio was Harvey Keitel.

Yeah, that one I definitely noticed.
Hire Jim Essian!

Dr. Nguyen Van Falk

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,887
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #35 on: August 28, 2009, 03:01:57 PM »
Also: Jon is right... This movie is the closest thing to the spirit of Hitler Getting Punched we've yet seen on celluloid.

And that includes that "Punching Hitler" short.
WHAT THESE FANCY DANS IN CHICAGO THINK THEY DO?

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,828
  • Location: NonDescript
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #36 on: August 28, 2009, 04:33:35 PM »
Quote from: Slak on August 28, 2009, 02:10:04 PM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 01:54:01 PM
I hate this movie because everyone else here likes it.

And I like you because everyone else hates you.

You like me, you really like me!

HST Redux

  • When teh going gets weird....
  • Pollyellon Fan Club
  • Posts: 236
  • Location: Wayne's World
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #37 on: August 28, 2009, 05:56:33 PM »
Quote from: Jon on August 27, 2009, 11:44:43 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on August 27, 2009, 11:39:40 AM
Quote from: Jon on August 27, 2009, 11:30:46 AM
Quote from: Oleg on August 27, 2009, 11:19:36 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on August 27, 2009, 10:54:18 AM
I saw it last Friday.  Tarantino needs an editor with the balls to stand up to Tarantino.  I enjoyed it, but I disagree with "full of action and tension."  There were some VERY slow parts.  I thought it was worth seeing, though.  Pitt is terrific.

I thought the parts that weren't just a bunch of shooting at least advanced the plot, and were therefore effective.  I guess I do see what you're saying; the scene with the "Bear Jew" was a bit drawn out, waiting for his entrance (I didn't give up any plot, don't worry).  Maybe I just chose to remember the awesome parts.

It's no Pulp Fiction, but that would be like comparing the American version of The Office to the British one.

The tension and suspense was evident from the first scene, and there were few scenes where I could relax before something else was happening or going wrong or whatever.  Could just be me though; I am known to be somewhat uptight.

I didn't mind the build on the Bear Jew part. I thought there could have been a lot less plot and a lot more Nazi killing, though.

THI.

I agree, Oleg, that there weren't any pointless scenes.  I just felt that some of the scenes could have been a lot tighter.  I wouldn't have changed a single thing about the scene in the underground bar, though.  That was terrific.

THA.

I loved the opening scene (even though it was long as hell), and the bar scene. They were perfect for me. Pretty much every other scene in the movie could have been tightened, especially the ones between Shoshanna and her would be beau.

The opening scene/chapter is about as close to perfection as movie-making gets. I never see movies in the theatre twice, but I may go see this one again. It's not the masterpiece some critics called it, but it's a pretty darn great movie.
"In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: Not necessarily to Win, but mainly to keep from Losing Completely." - Hunter S. Thompson

Jon

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,880
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #38 on: August 29, 2009, 11:40:44 AM »
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 04:33:35 PM
Quote from: Slak on August 28, 2009, 02:10:04 PM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 01:54:01 PM
I hate this movie because everyone else here likes it.

And I like you because everyone else hates you.

You like me, you really like me!

I liked your first couple of albums, but you sold out when you signed to a major label.
Take that, Adolf Eyechart.

"I'm just saying, penis aside, that broad had a tight fuckable body in that movie. Sans penis of course.." - A peek into *IAN's psyche

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #39 on: September 01, 2009, 04:03:28 AM »
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 04:33:35 PM
Quote from: Slak on August 28, 2009, 02:10:04 PM
Quote from: CT III on August 28, 2009, 01:54:01 PM
I hate this movie because everyone else here likes it.

And I like you because everyone else hates you.

You like me, you really like me!

No, he's just saying that.
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #40 on: September 06, 2009, 10:58:03 AM »
I am reluctant to admit this, but I didn't like this movie.  I agree that chapter one was engrossing.  Everything else was bizarre. 
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #41 on: September 06, 2009, 11:53:36 AM »
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2009, 10:58:03 AM
I am reluctant to admit this, but I didn't like this movie.  I agree that chapter one was engrossing.  Everything else was bizarre. 

I was just about to start rooting for Cal, too.

cubbiebluestew

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,915
  • Location: Berkeley, Caifornia
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #42 on: September 06, 2009, 04:36:03 PM »
Quote from: Oleg on September 06, 2009, 11:53:36 AM
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2009, 10:58:03 AM
I am reluctant to admit this, but I didn't like this movie.  I agree that chapter one was engrossing.  Everything else was bizarre. 

I was just about to start rooting for Cal, too.

I read a review that described this movie as a "Jewish wet dream" about killing Nazis.  During World War II Hollywood routinely made movies creating fictitious battles and victories.  But after the war movies were fictionalized versions of actual events.  Audiences were not prepared for stories that changed the way things played out.  That's why this movie put me off.  It was like seeing Custer win the battle at the Little Big Horn.
Life is too short to be a Cub fan

*In a Nutsack

  • TJG's 6th best writer.
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,882
  • Location: Damn commies.
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #43 on: September 06, 2009, 10:33:26 PM »
Well, I liked this movie because it rocked fucking ass.  The opening scene was outstanding.  The actor who played Colenel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz) deserves recognition.

Brad Pitt's character (Aldo) in the white tux doing his best Godfather made me happy.
Abraham Lincoln once said, "If you are a racist, I will attack you with the North."  And, these are the priciples I carry with me in the workplace.

Dr. Nguyen Van Falk

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,887
Re: Inglorious Basterds
« Reply #44 on: September 07, 2009, 03:17:45 AM »
Quote from: CBStew on September 06, 2009, 10:58:03 AM
I am reluctant to admit this, but I didn't like this movie.  I agree that chapter one was engrossing.  Everything else was bizarre. 

Quote from: cubbiebluestew on September 06, 2009, 04:36:03 PM
I read a review that described this movie as a "Jewish wet dream" about killing Nazis.  During World War II Hollywood routinely made movies creating fictitious battles and victories.  But after the war movies were fictionalized versions of actual events.  Audiences were not prepared for stories that changed the way things played out.  That's why this movie put me off.  It was like seeing Custer win the battle at the Little Big Horn.

Two votes against, then?
WHAT THESE FANCY DANS IN CHICAGO THINK THEY DO?