News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers  ( 202,757 )

Yeti

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,248
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1215 on: December 30, 2009, 02:17:17 PM »
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:15:47 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on December 30, 2009, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:05:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2009, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 01:50:19 PM
Yes, the supporting casts are different, but as a statfelcher I thought this was interesting:

2009 Cutler:      6.5 yards per attempt
                       22.7 attempts per touchdown pass
                       19.2 attempts per turnover (INTs and fumbles)

Mystery QB:       6.7 yards per attempt
                        20.8 attempts per touchdown pass
                        19.2 attempts per turnover

Ten statpogs to the first moran to guess the Mystery QB without internets.

Ortman?

No, but it's a Bears QB from a past season.

Cade

Ah... I missed that. It's gotta be Sexy then

SABRYeti wins the statpogs! Mystery QB is Rex's Super Bowl season.

Any way you can send them p2p?

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1216 on: December 30, 2009, 02:18:51 PM »
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:17:17 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:15:47 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on December 30, 2009, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:05:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2009, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 01:50:19 PM
Yes, the supporting casts are different, but as a statfelcher I thought this was interesting:

2009 Cutler:      6.5 yards per attempt
                       22.7 attempts per touchdown pass
                       19.2 attempts per turnover (INTs and fumbles)

Mystery QB:       6.7 yards per attempt
                        20.8 attempts per touchdown pass
                        19.2 attempts per turnover

Ten statpogs to the first moran to guess the Mystery QB without internets.

Ortman?

No, but it's a Bears QB from a past season.

Cade

Ah... I missed that. It's gotta be Sexy then

SABRYeti wins the statpogs! Mystery QB is Rex's Super Bowl season.

Any way you can send them p2p?

Pud to pud?

I was starting to think Encyclopedia TJ or Huey Babbit was going to have to bail you guys out on this one.

Yeti

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,248
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1217 on: December 30, 2009, 02:26:48 PM »
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:17:17 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:15:47 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on December 30, 2009, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:05:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2009, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 01:50:19 PM
Yes, the supporting casts are different, but as a statfelcher I thought this was interesting:

2009 Cutler:      6.5 yards per attempt
                       22.7 attempts per touchdown pass
                       19.2 attempts per turnover (INTs and fumbles)

Mystery QB:       6.7 yards per attempt
                        20.8 attempts per touchdown pass
                        19.2 attempts per turnover

Ten statpogs to the first moran to guess the Mystery QB without internets.

Ortman?

No, but it's a Bears QB from a past season.

Cade

Ah... I missed that. It's gotta be Sexy then

SABRYeti wins the statpogs! Mystery QB is Rex's Super Bowl season.

Any way you can send them p2p?

Pud to pud?

I was starting to think Encyclopedia TJ or Huey Babbit was going to have to bail you guys out on this one.

Well, I never hated Rex Grossman so I'm ok with this.... kind of.

Richard Chuggar

  • TJG is back!
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,493
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1218 on: December 30, 2009, 02:32:11 PM »
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:26:48 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:17:17 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:15:47 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on December 30, 2009, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 02:05:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on December 30, 2009, 02:00:24 PM
Quote from: R-V on December 30, 2009, 01:50:19 PM
Yes, the supporting casts are different, but as a statfelcher I thought this was interesting:

2009 Cutler:      6.5 yards per attempt
                       22.7 attempts per touchdown pass
                       19.2 attempts per turnover (INTs and fumbles)

Mystery QB:       6.7 yards per attempt
                        20.8 attempts per touchdown pass
                        19.2 attempts per turnover

Ten statpogs to the first moran to guess the Mystery QB without internets.

Ortman?

No, but it's a Bears QB from a past season.

Cade

Ah... I missed that. It's gotta be Sexy then

SABRYeti wins the statpogs! Mystery QB is Rex's Super Bowl season.

Any way you can send them p2p?

Pud to pud?

I was starting to think Encyclopedia TJ or Huey Babbit was going to have to bail you guys out on this one.

Well, I never hated Rex Grossman so I'm ok with this.... kind of.

Just send something to his avatar and Yeti will be a happy fat boy.
Because when you're fighting for your man, experience is a mutha'.

Pre

  • Hank White Fan Club
  • Posts: 967
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1219 on: December 30, 2009, 02:44:18 PM »
Quote from: Yeti on December 30, 2009, 02:26:48 PM
Well, I never hated Rex Grossman so I'm ok with this.... kind of.

2006 was the best year of Sexy's career and 2009 has been Cutler's worse.  Considering
the lack of an offensive line and running game, it's pretty impressive that Cutler has
managed the same QB rating as Sexy's 2006.

If the Bears had the 2009 offense w/ 2006's defense and special teams we'd all
be excited for the playoffs.  I also believe that Cutler's numbers would be a lot better
(to use to the classic Favre-defense) if he was playing from behind less.

BC

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,576
    • bricrozier@hotmail.com
  • Location: Central Illinois
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1220 on: December 30, 2009, 07:23:01 PM »
Quote from: Pre on December 30, 2009, 02:44:18 PM
 I also believe that Cutler's numbers would be a lot better (to use to the classic Favre-defense) if he was playing from behind less.

It seemed like the Bears were down 7-0 by the time the offense got the ball for a second time in almost every game this year...
Desipio is a free-flowing website that occasionally touches on the immaturity, foolishness and outright stupidity of its readership.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1221 on: January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM »
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1222 on: January 03, 2010, 07:20:08 PM »
Quote from: Eli on January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

He was with two other teams before the Bears picked him up off the scrap heap. He's somebody else's Mark Bradley apparently.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Ivy6

  • Hank White Fan Club
  • Posts: 686
  • Location: Buffalo Grove
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1223 on: January 03, 2010, 07:53:19 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 03, 2010, 07:20:08 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

He was with two other teams before the Bears picked him up off the scrap heap. He's somebody else's Mark Bradley apparently.

Haha, no one would ever make Aromashadu the 38th pick in the draft.

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,828
  • Location: NonDescript
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1224 on: January 03, 2010, 08:01:30 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 03, 2010, 07:20:08 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

He was with two other teams before the Bears picked him up off the scrap heap. He's somebody else's Mark Bradley apparently.

Also, Aromashadu got hurt in camp.  That's the only reason Johnny Knox made it as the number 3.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1225 on: January 03, 2010, 11:09:26 PM »
Quote from: CT III on January 03, 2010, 08:01:30 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 03, 2010, 07:20:08 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

He was with two other teams before the Bears picked him up off the scrap heap. He's somebody else's Mark Bradley apparently.

Also, Aromashadu got hurt in camp.  That's the only reason Johnny Knox made it as the number 3.

When in Rome, do as Aromashadu.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,828
  • Location: NonDescript
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1226 on: January 04, 2010, 06:29:03 AM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 03, 2010, 11:09:26 PM
Quote from: CT III on January 03, 2010, 08:01:30 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on January 03, 2010, 07:20:08 PM
Quote from: Eli on January 03, 2010, 03:31:01 PM
So, Devin Aromashadu might be good.  Too bad it took so long for him to get on the field.

He was with two other teams before the Bears picked him up off the scrap heap. He's somebody else's Mark Bradley apparently.

Also, Aromashadu got hurt in camp.  That's the only reason Johnny Knox made it as the number 3.

When in Rome, do as Aromashadu.

Louis Lipps sinks ships.

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1227 on: January 04, 2010, 06:40:15 AM »
So a 10, an 18, an 84, and an Ortman for Utler and Knox. Works for me.

Also, Josh McDaniels is a pudwhack. In a sea of sports suck the Broncos nosedive was fun to watch.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1228 on: January 04, 2010, 07:40:04 AM »
For what it's worth-
Cutler's 2009-
-27 tds (3rd best in Bears history after Kramer (29 in 1995) and Luckman (28 in 1943))
-3,666 yards (2nd best in Bears history after Kramer (3,838 in 1995))
-229.1 ypg (2nd after Kramer (239.9 in 1995))
-60.5 % comp. (3rd after Harbaugh (61.5% in 1993) and Walsh (60.6 in 1994)), minimum 10 games.
-1st in completions (336) and attempts (555)
-26 interceptions (2nd after Luckman (31 in 1947, but dammit, he made the Pro Bowl.)
-76.8 career rating as a Bear (4th behind Kramer (80.7), McMahon (80.4), and Walsh (77.9)), minimum 10 games.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Waco Kid

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,809
Re: 2009-10 Bears Season: Utler, 'Uther 'Uckers
« Reply #1229 on: January 04, 2010, 07:57:06 AM »
Quote from: R-V on January 04, 2010, 06:40:15 AM
So a 10, an 18, an 84, and an Ortman for Utler and Knox. Works for me.

Also, Josh McDaniels is a pudwhack. In a sea of sports suck the Broncos nosedive was fun to watch.

In the end, Ortman, the future hall of famer early in the year, was who we thought he was.