News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu
Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Pages: Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 63

Author Topic: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread  ( 112,366 )

Bort

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,605
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2011, 10:09:33 PM »
Quote from: ChuckD on October 18, 2011, 06:30:30 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 18, 2011, 06:24:48 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 18, 2011, 06:18:19 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 18, 2011, 03:51:10 PM
Quote from: CT III on October 18, 2011, 03:40:11 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 18, 2011, 03:32:35 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 18, 2011, 01:41:22 PM
Quote from: BH on October 18, 2011, 01:12:54 PM
From crazy rumor guy.

"Current Padres GM Jed Hoyer is being considered by the Cubs and Epstein, tweets SI's Jon Heyman.  In that scenario, Josh Byrnes would become the Padres' GM.  Heyman notes that the Cubs are also looking at Padres executives Byrnes and Jason McLeod for themselves, should Hoyer stay.  All the executives were once members of the Boston front office with Epstein."

They are going to hire TWO baseball guys?  Terrible, terrible idea.

Surprise!  I have no idea what's going on...I thought Epstein was going to be the GM.  What is this Hoyer guy going to do?


No, Epstein is going to have a swank new title like President, Grand Poobah or Supreme Leader.

"Defender of the Faith."

Lord Protector of the Baseball Realm.

Also known in 2013 as "Who?"

Just the Doctor.

NERD.
Logged
"Javier Baez is the stupidest player in Cubs history next to Michael Barrett." Internet Chuck

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM »
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.
Logged

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2011, 10:25:06 AM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Ah, it's time for another installment of Revisionist History with Chuck!

You see guys, Chuck didn't say that hiring one baseball guy would be a failure.

It was all of us fucking mindreaders who said that hiring two baseball guys was a bad idea.
Logged

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?
Logged

Brownie

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,279
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM »
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"
Logged

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2011, 10:35:34 AM »
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:25:06 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Ah, it's time for another installment of Revisionist History with Chuck!

You see guys, Chuck didn't say that hiring one baseball guy would be a failure.

It was all of us fucking mindreaders who said that hiring two baseball guys was a bad idea.

Link un-Morph'd
Logged
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM »
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.
Logged
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.
Logged

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM »
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.
Logged

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #24 on: October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM »
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?
Logged
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #25 on: October 20, 2011, 11:18:31 AM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?

Rimj.
Logged

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #26 on: October 20, 2011, 12:21:34 PM »
Quote from: Slaky on October 20, 2011, 11:18:31 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?

Rimj.

Rimj (no taintj).
Logged

Richard Chuggar

  • TJG is back!
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,493
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2011, 05:53:26 PM »
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 12:21:34 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 20, 2011, 11:18:31 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?

Rimj.

Rimj (no taintj).

If you have to ask you can't afford it
Logged
Because when you're fighting for your man, experience is a mutha'.

Shooter

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,624
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #28 on: October 20, 2011, 07:02:05 PM »
Quote from: Slaky on October 20, 2011, 11:18:31 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?

Rimj.

Couldn't get the taste out of his mouth.
Logged

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: Theo Epstein Sploosh Thread
« Reply #29 on: October 21, 2011, 08:36:40 AM »
Quote from: Shooter on October 20, 2011, 07:02:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 20, 2011, 11:18:31 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 11:06:03 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 20, 2011, 10:47:07 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:41:13 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 20, 2011, 10:38:36 AM
Quote from: Brownie on October 20, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 20, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on October 20, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Press conference tomorrow?

And he's bringing Jed Hoyer? Awful, awful that there will be two baseball guys instead of one.

Was anyone saying it would be an awful idea to have two smart baseball guys?

Intrepid Reader: Tom Ricketts

Of course not. What idiot would ever say that?

"I've never bought into the (idea) that I should have a baseball guy to watch my baseball guy and his baseball guys. Then what do you get — a baseball guy to watch the baseball guy who's watching your baseball guys?"

Saying the Cubs don't need two "baseball guys" at the top isn't the same thing as saying it would be an awful idea.

Exactly. I'm sure Ricketts wants to have as many smart "baseball guys" in the front office as possible. But naturally, Chuck chose to spin it as Ricketts saying he would prefer to NOT have it that way.

God damn, Chuck ruins EVERYTHING. I bet he complained about his first heej.

Hanj?

Rimj.

Couldn't get the taste out of his mouth.

Rimsh

I laughed.
Logged
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.
Print
Pages: Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 63
Previous topic - Next topic