Brace yourselves for the Jock Jones experience.The Cubs’ pitchers and catchers report to lovely Mesa, Arizona today, which is supposed to signal to those of us who don’t live in America’s catbox that winter’s over, spring is here and it’s time to get excited about another exciting season of Chicago Cubs baseball.

The Cubs this year project to be exciting. Absolutely. In much the same way it’s exciting to see how many paint chips you can eat before you throw up.

Cubs fever! Catch it! And die of lead poisoning!

But they’re back and that’s a good thing. It’s always more fun to bitch about what the Cubs are actually doing than it is to sit around all winter and bitch about what they are going to do.

Over at Cubs.com, the lovely and talented (hey zero out of two ain’t bad) Carrie Muskat opened up her mailbag, and weeded through all of the jailhouse proposals to answer real questions, from real readers.

One of them, apparently was our very own Brent E. who called her on her ludicrous statement that Neifi Perez “saved” the Cubs season. Neifi saved them for about three weeks, then, he reverted to form and sucked it up. Carrie is right to point out that Neifi batted .280 hitting in the second spot in the order. That’s tremendous. Great job, Neifi! Posting that whopping .300 on base average in that spot was grand, too.

In roughly the same number of at bats, Todd Walker hit .299 with an on base average of .351 batting second. So did Todd save the Cubs’ season, too? Gee, how many guys saved a team that won 79 games?

But this question was my favorite. I believe it was written in English, but I’m not sure.

When I look at the depth chart, it lists Glendon Rusch and Jerome Williams as the Nos. 4 and 5 starters. I hear a lot about the pitchers in the farm system and I’d be more comfortable if Rich Hill or Guzman were starting. Are the Cubs giving Hill and Guzman a chance to compete for those spots or just handing them to Rusch and Williams?
— Evans A., St. Louis, Mo.

First off, this was written by a guy who apparently has the first name of Evans. Secondly, did you ever think you’d read the words “I’d be more comfortable if Rich Hill or Guzman were starting?” Really?

You know what Evans, I hear a lot about the pitchers in the farm system, too. What I hear usually ends with “will have season-ending Tommy John surgery.”

You know what would make me more comfortable? (I mean other than slippers, a leather recliner and a Jessica Alba lap dance.) Angel Guzman pitching a big league inning–just one–before we hand him a spot in the rotation. I’d also feel more comfortable if the braintrust of Rothschild, Hill and Barrett would stop with the innings when Hill throws 20 of his movement-free 82 MPH fastballs compared to three of his knee buckling curve balls.

But that’s just me.

All in all, good stuff again from the Cubs.com Mailhag. I mean bag.

I’d like to warn you all that this is going to be the most repeated mantra from Cubs’ camp this year.

Cue Jim Hendry’s nonsense:

“St. Louis has been 10 to 12 games ahead of us by the middle to the end of May the last couple of years,” Hendry said Tuesday. “That’s something we have talked about all winter, trying to get out of the gate better and not let the gap get big early. We have to focus on trying to play better early, understand the severity of the wins and losses in the first one-third of the season.

Wait, you mean the Cubs are going to try to win games in April this year? What a novel idea! Shhhh! Don’t let this idea get out where your opponents can hear it. This kind of thing might catch on!

I like how Hendry says, “…and not let the gap get big early.” I like how on February 15 he’s already reserved to being behind somebody. He just doesn’t want to be behind by as much. Now that is confidence, people!

I also enjoyed this jibberish:

“We also have to figure a way to change our situation at home. We haven’t been a very good home team the last couple of years, while we have been an outstanding road club. That becomes a frustrating thing because we were over .500 against the Cardinals and Astros last year and deficient against some clubs in our division who were lower in the standings.”

Did he say “we have been an outstanding road club?” Is that what he said?

Last year, the Cubs were 41-40 on the road. That tied them for the third best road record in the National League with…wanna guess?

The Diamondbacks. Ooh, the 77 win D’backs!

The Cardinals were 51-30 on the road. The White Sox were 52-29 over in that other league. Those are “outstanding” road records.

Hendry’s point is valid though. If you play .500 on the road, you ought to be in good shape for a playoff spot. The 2004 Cubs were 44-36 on the road, that’s closer to outstanding. Closer. Not there.

So why are the Cubs so lousy at home lately?

It seems a mystery to Jim.

Could it be that our beloved GM has constructed a team that doesn’t fit well in his ballpark?

Ding, ding, ding!

You build a team with no speed and struggle to score runs on days when the wind isn’t howling out at 20 MPH, then you also build a team with no bullpen so that on days when the wind is howling out at 20 MPH and you are scoring runs, your pitching can’t hold the other team. Gee, why would you struggle at home?