Lenny gave me great advice one time. He said I should never use Skoal and take up Kodiak. It was great advice. Of course, I was 7 when he told me.
OK A-holes. It's fixed. Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them. I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: morpheus on April 14, 2009, 10:01:41 AMQuote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 14, 2009, 10:00:09 AMQuote from: morpheus on April 13, 2009, 08:46:55 AM
http://listas.20minutos.es/?do=show&id=66425&c=1233508233
Who knew there were so many reasonably attractive*** female politicians?
*** Note: this adjective can be used to describe almost all the ladies on this list.
Nice representation from Israel. Reason enough to know the Islamics are on the wrong end.
(GIANT PICTURES)
Really? A blonde Jew?
I can't quite make out their facial features, Chuck.
Quote from: Fork on April 08, 2009, 08:56:53 AMQuote from: RV on April 08, 2009, 08:42:26 AMQuote from: Weebs on April 07, 2009, 11:06:04 PMQuote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 02:36:28 PMQuote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 07, 2009, 02:27:50 PM
The only problem I have w/ Chuck is that the episodes are mostly the same. Chuck goes on a mission, flashes, gets caught up in spy games he shouldn't be in, saves the day humorously, insert wacky Buy More employees 3 times, 2 scenes w/ Ellie and Awesome... That's 80% of the episodes.
It's still fun to watch, but I can see whay people are turning it off. It's the same reason I gave up on My Name is Earl.
It's starting to stray a tad from that formula but it works for me. My Name Is Earl got awful when he went to jail. It was tolerable until then. I'd argue if they would have stayed with the formula, I might have kept watching.
It's certainly a lot better than it was for the first 6 or 7 episodes of the series, when they didn't really have a season-long arc to follow, or at least one that went through a few episodes. The problem is until they introduce new characters who know Chuck's secret (like his dad), the spy plots can really only include him, Sarah (needs more Yvonne), Casey, and whatever guests they have that week. I think Morgan or Awesome or somebody else needs to know what's going on and get involved in the spy plots. Also, they save the last 5 minutes of every episode to show Chuck once again confessing or renouncing his love for Sarah. It all is a little formulaic, but most of the cast is entertaining to watch, so I don't really have a problem with it.
I wonder if there will ever be a good TV show you don't ruin.
Weebs could ruin a show called "Naked Chicks And Shit Blowing Up".
Quote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 03:30:10 PMQuote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 07, 2009, 03:18:39 PMQuote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 02:38:16 PMQuote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 07, 2009, 02:31:03 PMQuote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 01:02:23 PM
So do you guys hate Mike Fontenot or just think he kinda sucks? I dig him. In a very gay way.
I've been ghey for Fontenot for awhile. He's like Theriot only good.
It still strikes me as very cool that the Cubs got him for Sosa.
Which means they REALLY got him for Jorge/George Bell.
Check out his page sponsor. http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/fontemi01.shtml
How lazy is this - I want to see it, but you didn't make it a hyperlink. So I'm not fucking going.
Quote from: Wheezer on April 07, 2009, 03:11:22 PMQuote from: Kermit, B. on April 07, 2009, 01:03:37 PM
Is it the DTs?
Don't mistake "rum fits" for delirium tremens.
Quote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 02:38:16 PMQuote from: Andre Dawson's Creek on April 07, 2009, 02:31:03 PMQuote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 01:02:23 PM
So do you guys hate Mike Fontenot or just think he kinda sucks? I dig him. In a very gay way.
I've been ghey for Fontenot for awhile. He's like Theriot only good.
It still strikes me as very cool that the Cubs got him for Sosa.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 07, 2009, 12:52:24 PMQuote from: PenFoe on April 07, 2009, 11:03:47 AMBlu-Ray burner is the way to go with the HF-10. Also takes great stills. Love the video but the shake stabilization software is pretty poor. I'm always looking for a place to brace my elbow so as to not give everyone motion sickness when we watch it.Quote from: Kermit, B. on April 07, 2009, 10:50:39 AM
Pen, did you ever decide on a camera? At some point, I think we're going to get one, and I love solicited advice.
I did indeed.
We ended up getting the Canon HF10.
I don't know why Amazon is listing it for $999, you can get it elsewhere for like half the price.
The good: It's very, very easy to use, compact (about the size of a can of soda/pop/Coke).
The one "bad" thing so far is that the files are really big. I took a 2 minute video of my daughter that I wanted to send to the grandparents. When I went to view the file on my computer (transferring from the camera is really easy on a PC running Vista or XP) the file was 150 MBs, shot in SP (which is the 2nd lowest of 4 quality options, though still HD).
The software that came with the camera let me convert it down to an MPEG but it was still about 16 MBs, too big to email.
So basically, if you want to share any videos more than about 30 seconds, you're going to need to upload them to youtube, which is fine, just not what I originally anticipated...though at least it spares me the hassle of having to explain to the over 60 crowd how to open Quicktime files.
And no, I don't have early onset Parkinsons.
Quote from: Slakee on April 07, 2009, 01:02:23 PM
So do you guys hate Mike Fontenot or just think he kinda sucks? I dig him. In a very gay way.
Quote from: PenFoe on April 07, 2009, 11:03:47 AMQuote from: Kermit, B. on April 07, 2009, 10:50:39 AM
Pen, did you ever decide on a camera? At some point, I think we're going to get one, and I love solicited advice.
I did indeed.
We ended up getting the Canon HF10.
I don't know why Amazon is listing it for $999, you can get it elsewhere for like half the price.
The good: It's very, very easy to use, compact (about the size of a can of soda/pop/Coke).
The one "bad" thing so far is that the files are really big. I took a 2 minute video of my daughter that I wanted to send to the grandparents. When I went to view the file on my computer (transferring from the camera is really easy on a PC running Vista or XP) the file was 150 MBs, shot in SP (which is the 2nd lowest of 4 quality options, though still HD).
The software that came with the camera let me convert it down to an MPEG but it was still about 16 MBs, too big to email.
So basically, if you want to share any videos more than about 30 seconds, you're going to need to upload them to youtube, which is fine, just not what I originally anticipated...though at least it spares me the hassle of having to explain to the over 60 crowd how to open Quicktime files.